UGA blog finds new home
Morning all. As I’ve said a couple of times this week, we’re converting this blog over to a WordPress platform and it will be a permanent move the first of next week.
Those of you who are regulars probably know that I’m not what you’d call techno-wizard when it comes to these things. But from what I understand the technology offered in this new format should make the blogging and commenting experience better for all. Of course, I’ll be learning as we go along, too. But I’m hoping to provide more pictures and video and things like that which should bring the blog more to life.
Of course, this blog is nothing without all you guys so I want to heartily invite (read: beg) you to come over to the new site by CLICKING HERE ON THE NEW ADDRESS and save it in your browsers. As of Monday, Feb. 23rd, this will be the permanent home of the UGA blog you so love or, in the case of some of you, love to loathe. If you’d prefer to copy and paste or just memorize, the new address is: http://blogs.ajc.com/uga-sports-blog/.
See at the new place!
AJC > Sports > UGA > Blog > Archives > 2006 > November > 14 > Entry
Does Tech-UGA matter?
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Just wondering where the Georgia-Georgia Tech rivalry ranks with you in terms of national significance. I wouldn’t consider it up there with the Michigan-Ohio State game or Texas-Oklahoma or Southern Cal-Notre Dame or even Georgia-Florida or Georgia-Auburn. All of those games — in the past 10 years, at least — have held national significance.
While Georgia-Georgia Tech has had national implications in the past, year in and year out it lacks the punch on both sides of the ball that the more serious games across the country always seem to have. Quite frankly, even within each respective team’s conferences there are more intriguing and important games to be played and won.
There should be more intrigue this year just because of the year each team is having. Those who follow the Bulldogs have now had their hopes raised. And Tech’s hopes have been sky-high all season. Plus, there is the extra added bonus for Tech that it knows it can knock Georgia to Nashville and the Music City Bowl.




DEL.ICIO.US


Comments
By tim
November 14, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this
That’s because Auburn and FLA are UGA’s true rivals. Tech is just that annoying little brother that keeps saying, come on, let’s play again until you finally let him win one so you can go to bed.
By Josh GT2005
November 14, 2006 04:15 PM | Link to this
I think it means a lot in that, unlike a lot of those other rivalries, we have to see each other almost every day of the year. The rivalry splits offices, and often families, into factions. I think the Tech program is back to where it was in the late 90’s (hopefully even better). The UGA program is definitely strong—even with this down year. I think you’ll start to see this game matter tremendously in years to come.
By Michael Scharff
November 14, 2006 04:21 PM | Link to this
Wow, Carter, if you are a UGA grad as I have read elsewhere, then the mindset must really have changed with younger grads in the past ten years or so. Now me, I’m class of 1981. To me and those around my age, as well as alumni older than myself, this still ranks as one of the all-time classic rivalries. Bill Cromartie didn’t call it “Clean, Old Fashioned Hate” for nothing. Ask Furman Bisher about this. It may not mean much on the national scene any more, but it still counts for bragging rights, and that means a heck of a lot. Yeah, we say “to hell with (fill in the blank)” now for most of our rivals when we sing “Glory, Glory,” but it’s still so much sweeter to sing the original “AND TO HELL WITH GEORGIA TECH!” GO DAWGS!
By Josh GT2005
November 14, 2006 04:22 PM | Link to this
tim,
Trust me, if y’all lose to us, you’ll realize how big the rivalry is. You will hear about it ALL YEAR LONG.
By BirdDawg
November 14, 2006 04:24 PM | Link to this
Carter, you are a smelly piece of crap, and this is yet another steaming pile.
Do us a favor and just go away.
Y’all don’t post on this piece of crap’s board.
Go post on Bill’s board. He usually has something interesting to say.
By BirdDawg
November 14, 2006 04:26 PM | Link to this
Carter, you are a smelly piece of crap, and this is yet another steaming pile.
Do us a favor and just go away.
Y’all don’t post on this piece of crap’s board.
Go post on Bill’s board. He usually has something interesting to say.
By GREG
November 14, 2006 04:27 PM | Link to this
LOL!!!!!! @ TIM!!!!
By Let'sdiscusssomethingelse
November 14, 2006 04:31 PM | Link to this
Once again, I don’t think the the topic of this blog was well thought out. Of course it doesn’t register nationally—does Tennessee/Vandy mean anything to anyone outside of the state of Tennessee? Tech is not and has not been a consistent winner in football and therefore, from a national perspective, there is no rivalry. We have already discussed what it means to the fans and players of both teams.
Here’s a topic Carter: Does Mark Richt’s religious beliefs hinder or help him as a coach? How do recruits respond? How do players past and present feel about him being an Evangelical? How do Alumni feel about that? I would love to hear from Musa Smith now that he is out of Richt’s system what it was like for him being a part of the 2002 team. Would he have come to Georgia if Richt was the head coach when he was recruited?
Perhaps, it doesn’t effect his coaching style at all. I think maybe it does. I watched the game on t.v. Saturday and heard Coach Richt say that while the win against Auburn was great, because of his faith, he was okay with the losing too. How do y’all feel about that? Just wondering….
By durham dawg
November 14, 2006 04:34 PM | Link to this
kind of a silly premise for an article, don’t you think?
National significance for a rivalry game is always defined by the rankings of one or both teams going into the game. Texas-Oklahoma, Georgia-Auburn, etc….those games typically mean more in terms of the national spotlight, because most of the teams involved have been ranked pretty high in the past several years.
But that doesn’t mean that this isn’t an important game for UGA or Tech. Bragging rights within your home state are no minor thing. Ask FSU or Miami whether this year’s win meant less to them than in years past. Or tell me that FSU isn’t going to be just as excited this year to try to beat UF as they’ve been in most every other year. Bragging rights are HUGE for college football, especially with in-state rivals.
Come on, Carter. I know you have deadlines for these blogs, but you should know better than to come at us with this waste.
By GREG
November 14, 2006 04:34 PM | Link to this
WHAT HAPPEND TO ALL THE TENN FANS TALKING ABOUT THEM BEING BACK!!!!!!I MISS THOSE COMMENTS!!!!HEY TENN YOU LAUGHED AT US LOSING TO VANDY AND KENTUCKY!!!!!YOU BETTER CHECK YOUR 2 REMAINING GAMES!!!!YOU BETTER HOPE THE THUGS HAVE SOME FIRE LEFT IN THEM!!!!!WE BEAT TECH AND YALL LOSE ONE,WE GET THE BETTER BOWL!!!!!LOL!!!!!!!FAT PHIL IS BACK!!!LOL!!!!!!
By WPD's boyfriend
November 14, 2006 04:35 PM | Link to this
No it doesn’t matter. Let’s just cancel the game. Clemson and Miami are more important to Tech and FLA AUB are more important to UGA. After we all hold hands at half field and sing Kumbaya we can all just go home because nobody on either side cares.
By JugHead
November 14, 2006 04:35 PM | Link to this
Carter
Please come back and run the Archie Blog again… These UGA people just don’t appreciate you.
By tim
November 14, 2006 04:37 PM | Link to this
I know it is a rivalry and that it will be a good, tough game. It typically is, year in and year out. But, that’s what these games are for (the jokes and whatnot). But, Ga Tech doesn’t have a win against UGA in, what 16 years, right? I mean, since the NCAA took all Ga Tech’s wins away for cheating. Other than that, it still has been 5. Thus, a rather lopsided recent history.
By Always A Dawg
November 14, 2006 04:39 PM | Link to this
This one always matters, not just because my brother and my brother in law graduated from the North Avenue Trade School. Its icing on the cake to cap off a season by slapping a yellow jacket silly. Go Dawgs, squash the bees.
By JTL
November 14, 2006 04:40 PM | Link to this
nationally: insignificant regionally: insignificant state of georgia: sooner jump in front of a bus then to see their respective team lose.
go dawgs.
By godawg
November 14, 2006 04:46 PM | Link to this
Carter you managed to post another idiotic topic. We’re GEORGIA fans. We DON’T CARE about national significance. To us EVERY game is significant. Tech is special to us. They are such nerds, geeks, whiners and losers that it is embarassing and humiliating to lose to them although, thankfully, it rarely happens.
Take this picture of Ramble ON! for instance. How would you like to go a WHOLE YEAR listening to his crap if Tech won the game. Please CMR. Give us a break. Beat these bugs. Beat them bad.
Here is a NERD TEST you can take online just to make sure you’re not infected with the Jacket Virus. You wouldn’t want to end up looking like Ramble ON! I took it and was relieved to see I only scored 15. Whew!!!!!!
By Ben
November 14, 2006 04:50 PM | Link to this
In reponse to “letsdiscuss”, I believe you may have taken coach Richt’s statement out of context Saturday. He actually said that win or lose he would praise the Lord. That means more to more to me than the score or what stats are reported in the paper the next morning. Georgia, we have a real man of character leading our football team and I believe it can only help us in recruiting.
By Carlton Powell
November 14, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this
Since Tech left the SEC after the ‘64 season, this game has gradually gone from REALLY important to only somewhat important. Prior to ‘64, the game could decide the SEC champion. No more. Therefore, the TECH-GA game is not viewed by most GA fans as significant as GA-FL, AU, or TENN. Those games DO determine the kind of season the ‘Dogs will ultimately have. I do think both sets of fans consider it important, but for different reasons. Plus, it’s never desireable to end a season on a losing note. I only wish TECH was still in the SEC where they belong. Why doesn’t someone do a story on why TECH decided to get out of the SEC?? No question in my mind Coach Dodd lived to rue the day he promoted the idea of leaving the SEC. No matter, it will be a wild game.
By Bryan G.
November 14, 2006 04:54 PM | Link to this
Check out the difference in UGA students and Tech
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 04:56 PM | Link to this
Born in Savannah, grew up in J’ville so the Reptile game has always meant more. Today, if Tech was in the SEC and another Division, the game would have a lot more meaning. As things are today, Georgia has nothing to gain and everything to lose. Tech’s not considered a football power so most people think we should win anyway. We never have a big jump in the polls when we win and that’s more important than ever and if we lose it could knock ue right out of a possible chance to play for the NC.
By JTL
November 14, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this
Bryan G.
A picture says a thousand words.
amen brother.
By bobbybowden
November 14, 2006 04:58 PM | Link to this
i’d trade any of your seasons for ours…WE SUC_!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By JB
November 14, 2006 04:59 PM | Link to this
I think for folks under the age of 35 or so, the game has moved on, SEC vs. ACC. But for us say 45-65, HELL yes it’s a big game. The history is what makes the game. Not Mark or Chan or certainly not Reggie vs. Stafford. It’s the great games of the past, on both sides, and family splits, office fodder etc. Hell, it’s Tech/Georgia !
By francoisedawg
November 14, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this
no matter how you play the season this one is the taste you end up with in your mouth…go 11-0 and lose this one and not considered a successful one….bring it on…DOGS EKE BY 24-22…NO AWFULBARN LIKE BLOWOUT!!!
By Brian
November 14, 2006 05:00 PM | Link to this
Tech really has a lot to play for in “Clean, Old Fashioned Hate” since there’s not a player on that team that’s beaten Georgia. Regardless of the season Georgia’s having the Dawgs will be up for this game. It will be a good one.
By Carlton Powell
November 14, 2006 05:01 PM | Link to this
Good God Almighty, Bryan G!! I looked the link you just referenced. EVEYONE ought to do the same. As the saying goes, “a picture is worth a thousand words.” Good work, Bryan G!!
By wildthing
November 14, 2006 05:02 PM | Link to this
this means more this year becuz tech thinks they are the better team…for once the dawgs will not be only defending home stadium pride but the pride of the SEC…win and techs boastful division crown will be laughable!!!!
By AD
November 14, 2006 05:03 PM | Link to this
Losing to Tech is like getting beat up by a girl. Just humiliating.
By kentucky kade
November 14, 2006 05:03 PM | Link to this
i think this is the year we get the vols finally…should go in 7-4/whadya think?…vandy got ‘em last year and us this year…parity is a coming!!!
By jeff bowden
November 14, 2006 05:05 PM | Link to this
maybe if i could not follow in mark’s footsteps i could coach under him over there and learn a little about winning…seem to have forgotten!!
By Atilla
November 14, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this
If the Georgia team that played Auburn shows up, Tech gets crushed. Last Saturday was a sneak peak at the future. Sorry Tech. Not this year nor any other year. Calvin goes to the league and Tech goes back to the cellar.
By godawg
November 14, 2006 05:09 PM | Link to this
Bryan G,
Perfect. Nothing could convey the contrast more succintly.
By let'sdiscusssomethingelse
November 14, 2006 05:11 PM | Link to this
Ben, That’s great that Coach Richt’s statement of faith means more to you than stats and winning records do. I am just wondering how the players and possible players feel about it and how “non-believers” feel about it. I am not saying it isn’t great that he is a man of character, I am just wondering how most people feel about the fact that he appears to put his faith above everything else. Is that a good coaching strategy? How does that play outside of the South? Surely there is talent outside of the South that would be welcome at Georgia regardless of what religion (if any) they practice. Do recruits feel that they would be welcome? That’s what I am wondering. Does Coach Richt have a killer instinct? Just asking…
By godawg
November 14, 2006 05:13 PM | Link to this
Nobody cares about you and the Vols or Vandy kade. Please go away. You bring up too many bad memories.
I mean it….Go….Now.
By toemeetsleather
November 14, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this
this and playoff means BCC stuff for us…you with your one big win season will be trying to get another home game at peach bowl…REGGIE RULES AND YELLOW FEVER HAS DEFINITELY SWEPT THE STATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By James
November 14, 2006 05:14 PM | Link to this
Kentucky, please beat Tennessee because that would lift a huge weight off of our shoulders. As much as they dished it out to us over the past month for the embarassing losses, how ridiculous would it be if it happened to them. That is a dream ending for our season. Beat Tech and Tennessee comes apart. Oh yeah, this rivalry means a lot because I mean its TECH…the nerds…so we never want to lose to them.
By Uga889
November 14, 2006 05:15 PM | Link to this
Bryan G. that is funny! A bit harsh perhaps, but very funny.
By jimrome
November 14, 2006 05:33 PM | Link to this
fsu and penn state to play in the OLE COACHES BOWL…come on guys / time for you to hang it up!!!
By L. Hull
November 14, 2006 05:37 PM | Link to this
That has to be the dumbest question/lead that you, or anyone else at the AJC has ever used. Does beating Tech matter? You must be s—-ing me!
By rockytopmel
November 14, 2006 05:50 PM | Link to this
don’t get too excited over your auburn blowout,,,we felt the same way after playing you and have not looked the same since!!!!!!!!!!GO VOLS!!!”STILL RATED”…something you won’t be until next year’s again preseason ANNUAL OVERRATING!!!!!!!!
By honest_abe
November 14, 2006 05:57 PM | Link to this
buck and durham dawg summarized it best… uga vs tech has lost national significance because of the ineptitude of the tech program. bottom line… if tech had any kind of relative success over the past few years… the game would definitely garner more national interest…
By auburnal
November 14, 2006 05:58 PM | Link to this
you guys still want muschamp..TAKE HIM…PLEASE…NEW SCHEMES EVERY GAME??what was that saturday?????
By Ramble ON!
November 14, 2006 06:13 PM | Link to this
OK one of you moron’s on here went under cover as ramblerambleramble who at 3:22 said he was going to play a round of golf, after he called me an idiot. Now, I’m sure he wants us to believe he has a house at County Club of the South, and is going to stroll out to his back yard and start hacking away with his GT caddie right behind him. Common sense tells me, (if I were to scratch my head about this) can anyone play a round of Golf in 2 hours? (benefit of the doubt, because right now its 5:36 and it’s completely black outside). This is assuming of course, your GT caddie was waiting at the tea box with club in hand. I would have thought this may have been Odell, after smoking one to many hits, but he said some things that lead me to believe he has the equivalent of a high school education.
Now godawg wants some, NO WAIT, you are godawg!!!! Ahhh makes sense now.
Where’s Ole Buck for the NW or Honest_abe, at least they don’t live vicariously through others because they still live at home with mommy (which explains you’re fascination with mine).
For all you other Mutt Nation believers, who haven’t a clue to what I’m talking about, just know this.
GT 48 UGAy 3, I have to prepare for Duke, they gave Vanderbilt a tough game, and we know how good Vandy is, don’t we?
See you mutts later. I think some Star Trek reruns are on. The good ones with Dr. Spock, man those were than days!
By Najeh Davenpoop
November 14, 2006 06:33 PM | Link to this
Well that’s convenient, let’s downplay the rivalry in the year that GT is clearly superior to UGA. Pretty clever of you, Carter.
By JMar
November 14, 2006 06:44 PM | Link to this
The thing is, no matter how good either team is, UGA always downplays the rivalry. For UGA fans, it’s more important that we beat Florida, Tennessee, and Auburn. Most of us don’t even talk trash to Georgia Tech fans because, well, they’re Georgia Tech. You don’t see us talking smack to Georgia Southern or Vandy or whomever when we beat them either. The only reason this win is important is because the GT fans, who for years have kept to themselves, are going to be annoying as real yellow jackets if they did win. One person likened it to an older-younger brother relationship. I see it as the cool kids against the nerds - the cool kids mock the nerds, but have their own lives and the constant struggle to be cooler than the other cool kids taking priority. The nerds, however, have nothing better to do than envy and hate the cool kids.
By Crosby
November 14, 2006 06:45 PM | Link to this
I believe Tech got back all of those wins on an appeal to the NCAA. I might be wrong. I do however think it’s funny that some UGA fans will say this game does not matter or isn’t a rivalry simply because UGA has held a definate advantage in wins over the last few years. However, in the exact same breath they will say that UGA and FLA is a big rivalry. I wonder if Fla fans will begin saying that game isn’t a rivalry anymore since they seem to dominate the series in the last ten or fifteen years.
By suwaneegeorgia
November 14, 2006 06:46 PM | Link to this
it’s not necessarily a national rivalry like osu and meechigan because rarely are both uga and yech ranked in the top ten simultaneously. in fact, i can’t remember the last time yech was even ranked.
anywho……….consistently high rankings from year to year increase the intensity of the game.
also, the big ten is the media darling of espn, and they drive this rivalry and hype it to make it bigger than it really is.
By TheTruth
November 14, 2006 06:49 PM | Link to this
To the guy that said he was class of “81” and this game is more important than others seems to be a little confused. For all the long time Dawg fans, and for certain those in his time. They will say that this game ranks behind Auburn, Florida, Tennessee, and Clemson. We don’t even play Clemson every year, but consider it a bigger rival game than Tech.
By TheTruth
November 14, 2006 06:52 PM | Link to this
Davis Love played the final round of the Tour Championship in 2 hours and 4 minutes. I have played several rounds under two hours when the course is clear. Let all the Tech Fans run their mouth just like Auburn.
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 07:02 PM | Link to this
Ramble On when she was alive she was beautiful and you would’da been out side howling! Outside because she didn’t like “Bugs”
By The peoples champ
November 14, 2006 07:04 PM | Link to this
what a dumb question of course it matters..What is the guys name who paints his head and goes to ever uga game btw???
By HelluvaJacketFan
November 14, 2006 08:27 PM | Link to this
I come from three generations of Tech ball players - beginning with my great-grandfather who played under Heisman. This became a rivalry early on in the two school’s meetings because of their close proximity to each other. Later, when both were in the SEC, it was as bitter a rivalry as you could imagine. When Bobby Dodd pulled Tech from the SEC because he refused to lower the academic standards of his athletes - a very public withdrawl I might add - his stinging comments added more fuel to the fire. Now, it’s more or less about pride for both - unfortunately for me, my UGA neighbors have gotten the better end of that deal here lately. Yet, we still see the legacy of Dodd in the academic accomplishments of our athletes. It’s a trade off that many Tech alum - and I’m talking about former players here - feel was the right thing to do. It’s a tradition that we see again in again and will witness once more this year when Calvin Johnson elects to stay on for his senior year to finish his degree - that’s how much our academics mean to our athletes. We’re not an open admissions sports program. Things are especially sweet when our “nerdy” players beat the hell out of those damned dawgs from Athens …
and yes, I drink my whiskey clear! Go Jackets!
By nobull
November 14, 2006 08:34 PM | Link to this
JMar is cool….just ask him!lol A real dog pr!ck…
By ramblerambleramble
November 14, 2006 08:42 PM | Link to this
Oh Mr. RAMBLE ON! I’m Baaaa ck!! Yes, my yellow nerdy friend, I left to play a round at 3:22 YOURTIME. Why do you assume I live on the east coast? Oh yes because you assume all UGA grads live in Georiga. No sir, I, like Buck in the NW, live way out west in a state whos fans are even more ignorant than the average tech fan. A fanbase that spouts off even more crap than techies.. I live in Boise where the average bronco fan makes you ramble on look like some kind of actual scholar. So you see, while my GT caddy comment was an embellishment for your enjoyment, my round of golf started at 1:30 local time, and before you go spouting off that I didnt have a enough time to get to a course, relax I live on the course and I play in my red and black golf cart. So now thats out of the way let me tell you, despite living far from home, I’m a loyal Dawg fan and have made it back to every homegame this year, along with the Auburn and Ole Miss games as well. I will be home again next weekend to watch you and the nerd troup get sent home with another loss to the dawgs. by the way Im not godawg and yes I called you out as an idiot, a strong word, one I dont use often, but you make yourself such an easy target. Say, while we’re on the subject of alias’s gt4ever seems to have your number their pal.. The two of you sound like peas in pod. You both embrace the stereotype of a TechFan so completely. later idiot.
By Brian Jones TECH FAN
November 14, 2006 09:20 PM | Link to this
UGA 1 national championship GA TECH 4 national championships enough said UGA sucks
By BlogPolice
November 14, 2006 09:30 PM | Link to this
It’s amazing how whenever Carter or Bill or Bradley puts something out, a certain number or rednecks can’t help but ignore the topic and be critical of the blogger. In this instance it’s BirdDawg, “durham dawg” and godawg. And in the meantime, plenty of people engage the topic, judging by the responses. Kind of dilutes the other blogs these people make, don’t ya think ?
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 09:31 PM | Link to this
this is a test…dsl problem
By BlogPolice
November 14, 2006 09:42 PM | Link to this
I neglected to mention Cuz, the original Country Bumpkin, who tries to make his living off of disparaging Carter. I guess the only reason he hasn’t chimed in on this topic is that he hasn’t seen it yet.
By wlightnin27
November 14, 2006 09:47 PM | Link to this
well im only 23, and i consider anyone who plays UGA to be a rival, at least for one week, but when i think about rivals, i consider who I want to see lose week in and week out, and that would be Tech. and Notre Dame, don’t know why but i hate them. However, i would like to see Staff beat Tebow for the next three years. God Bless ya’ll!!!
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 09:50 PM | Link to this
Back from some tests and load so Ramble On come on!!!! It’s really sad but the Dawgs gain nothing from beating the “Bugs”. Some Dawgs remember when the game meant something and for them there’s a personal feeling; otherwise. we gain nothing. We win, we’re supposed to so not much poll jump there, lose? hugh upset and big poll drop and in today’s world the polls mean something to Ga. We’ll be fighting for a NC soon whereas you “bugs”, as long as you’re in the ACC won’t be.
By BlogPolice
November 14, 2006 09:54 PM | Link to this
Wlightnin27, you’re “only 23”? Congratulations. That makes you about 10 years wiser than the rednecks I referenced earlier.
By AltamahaDawg
November 14, 2006 10:13 PM | Link to this
JB, what about the 36-44 yr olds?
By AltamahaDawg
November 14, 2006 10:18 PM | Link to this
Why would you assume CMR lets his faith interfere with his football strategies? He is a football coach who is a professed christian. Why is that an issue?
By Gen Neyland
November 14, 2006 10:25 PM | Link to this
kentucky kade—you heard godawg…go away or just read… This ain’t your week to dance on these pages…Look, don’t touch…FOO
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 10:38 PM | Link to this
Carter, what or who is your source about Joe T playing? Richt just told your buddy Josh Kendall that it’s not true. ……Carter, where did the story come from?
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 10:58 PM | Link to this
I hope this cut and paste from scout.com works. Carter you brought it up so what’s going on?……….. NFL Draft and Free Agency Team Directory MLB MLB Team Directory MiLB Front Page MiLB Player Rankings COLLEGE CollegeFootballNews.com Team Directory FB RECRUITING BB RECRUITING MORE… AFL CFL High School JC Football NASCAR NBA NBA Draft NHL WNBA Women’s Hoops Women’s Recruiting
FROM THE NETWORKDawgs suffer first loss of season Record Books for Alabama Running Back Exclusive: Richt says all assistants staying MORE STORIES…
Search:WebScout.com
Welcome: price_cochran@yahoo.com (pcochran) My Account | Logout | Contact Us
Front Page Message Boards Forum List Chat Room Top Stories All Stories Football FB Recruiting Men’s Basketball BB Recruiting Alumni Football Stories Roster Schedule Team Stats FB Recruiting Hot News Prospects Combines Visits Commits Team Rankings Basketball Stories Roster Schedule Team Stats Women’s Stats BB Recruiting Hot News Prospects Commits Team Rankings Alumni NFL NFL Draft NFL Free Agency NFL Fantasy CFL AFL MLB MiLB NBA NBA Draft WNBA All Stories My HotList™ Site Tour
A A A A A
Exclusive: Richt says all assistants staying
Mark Richt By Josh Kendall Dawg Post Reporter Posted Nov 14, 2006
ATHENS – Georgia coach Mark Richt will not fire any of his assistant coaches, he told Dawg Post Reporter Josh Kendall in an exclusive interview Tuesday.
“I want everybody to stay,” Richt said. He also contradicted an AJC.com report that said senior quarterback Joe Tereshinski might start on Nov. 25 against Georgia Tech because that game is the Bulldogs’ senior day.
Tereshinski will not start, and there is no plan to play him any differently than in any other game, Richt said.
“Senior Day means a lot around here, but so does winning,” he said. “I hadn’t really thought about that dynamic, getting so-and-so in the game.”
Although the Bulldogs turned around the tone of their season on Saturday by upsetting Auburn 37-15, the question of staff changes was broached after a span of four losses in five games. Defensive coordinator Willie Martinez was the most notable target of fans’ ire despite the fact that his defense is ranked second in the Southeastern Conference this season.
However, when asked if all nine of his on-field assistants will be staying another year unless one of them leaves on his own, he replied, “Yes.”
In fact, Richt credits the makeup of his staff with helping the Bulldogs (7-4, 4-4 SEC) survive their rough patch and rebound with the victory at Auburn.
“If you’re letting guys go every year, then it’s tough for those guys to stay unified if they’re thinking, ‘Well, coach may cut me loose, I better get out of here before the ax falls,’” he said. “It’s hard to stay loyal if you don’t feel like there’s loyalty from the top.”
Richt himself wonders why so much heat has fallen on his assistants.
“You’re probab ly looking at the second-best run in Georgia football (in the last four years)and a great majority of these coaches have been here through the whole thing,” he said. “If something as simple as keeping from turning the ball over means we win two or three more games, does that mean every guy here has done a horrible job or this guy here has done a horrible job? I just don’t see it that way.”
The only assistant coach fired by Richt was Tony Pierce who was let go in the middle of the 2002 season for off-field reasons, but Richt isn’t afraid to make a move, he said.
“Everybody has to be accountable,” he said. “Everybody has a job to do, we can’t become complacent. I’m not going to say I will never let an assistant go, but I’m not going to do it to relieve pressure from me. If I believed it was the best thing to do for the program, I would do it, but I’m not going to do it to relieve pressure or to satisfy somebody’s appetite. I won’t do that.”
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 11:17 PM | Link to this
Now, who’s on 1st base?
By 91Wreck
November 14, 2006 11:21 PM | Link to this
Buck Cochran,
Quickly shut down your yahoo email account that you posted by mistake @10:58. Open up a new account with yahoo and share your new address with your friends/contacts. Can you imagine the damage that can be done if ALL CAPS GREG has your email address?
Just trying to help!
Oh, BTW I am afraid I will have to give up my GT diploma. I took the nerd test and scored a 20. The UGA grad that linked the website for the test almost scored higher than me!
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 11:32 PM | Link to this
OK 91wreck, I use to be a repporter and I like to get to the bottom of conflicting reports. Hope it an educational read for everyone.
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 14, 2006 11:43 PM | Link to this
91Wreck, but it’s quiet the rest of the night
By 91Wreck
November 14, 2006 11:50 PM | Link to this
Hey,
Is the Scout.com premium service worth the monthly fee? I have thought about signing up for it, but I am not sure if the juice is worth the squeeze.
Hopefully you won’t get any idiots sending you trash emails. There are some unstable folks that post on both the Tech and UGA blogs.
By TheTruth
November 15, 2006 12:29 AM | Link to this
Tech’s academic standard didn’t seem to matter in the recruitment of AT Barnes from Cartersville. He will be a freshman next year in football, but graduated (or was supposed to) in 05. At UGA they send partial qualifiers to Hargrave. At Tech they let them in school.
By Dawg85
November 15, 2006 12:44 AM | Link to this
Of course it matters. The Dawgs don’t lose to the Yellow Jackets much but when they do you get to hear about it all year long. I don’t know about anyone else but I haven’t forgotten the three year losing streak — hasn’t been that long ago. Before Mark Richt came along the pundits were talking about how Tech had passed Georgia in football and were the dominant team in the state. UGA’s a rivalry rich program but you got to beat Tech!
By luda
November 15, 2006 02:25 AM | Link to this
The game rarely matters becasue Tech is rarely good. Simple. We beat Tech so often that it is hard to rank the game as a big rivalry. It’s like beating up your little brother. You know you can. You go through the motions and it gets done. Even if Tech wins this year (HA!) it will only be the 4th time since 1991. If the Dawgs play up to their ability like they did vs. Auburn then they have no chance. Dawgs 27, dorks 10. Better luck next year geeks.
By Jim
November 15, 2006 02:50 AM | Link to this
Carter- Way to fulfill your obligation to posting something on the blogs, I mean how hard to you really put into your article. Its seems like you do that everytime. Quit wasting our time, of course Tech/ UGA is not a huge national rival, but a big one here! Keep contributing nothing and I’ll keep wondering why they pay you money. Thanks.
Jim
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 15, 2006 06:30 AM | Link to this
Carter, maybe no else is interested but I am so again, my question is: You and the ajc say MR is mulling over the idea of playing Joe T some, MR says it an’t so and never has been a thought……..what’s the truth?
By MC
November 15, 2006 07:59 AM | Link to this
I hope Richt does not Totally lose his mind and start playing someone just for the hell of it———-Tech means everything, go ask Jim Donnan. When they fired him he was a good coach. But, he could not beat Tech. But he had Quincy Carter(choke boy) too. But make no mistake, Tech is Georgia’s biggest rival. Here is a hint for the Tech game—stay after Reggie and you win the game. He has not been able to handle the blitz in any Georgia game. Later ya’ll.
By godawg
November 15, 2006 08:30 AM | Link to this
BlogPolice, when Carter posts insightful topics, I compliment him on them. But when he makes inane statements like, “…where the Georgia-Georgia Tech rivalry ranks…in terms of national significance.”, he’ll get called on it. I mean really, Tech is ranked just inside the top twenty and Georgia is not ranked at all. Why would he think any of us would consider that the game has “national significance”? Oh yeah, I forgot, he considers us all a bunch of uneducated rednecks from a podunk school in a podunk state. Where IS CUZ?
Ramble ON!, as ramblerambleramble stated, we are not the same person, although I too, live in a state that is not Georgia. I have been on these boards for a couple of years now and have never used another handle. When you come on an opponents boards and make asnine comments you’ve got to expect more than on person will take shots at you.
BTW, I am proud to be a Founding Member of FANS OF CHAN. WOOF!
By mark
November 15, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this
Ramble ON- 48-3? You can’t be serious! Assuming that every blogger on here lives in the metro Atlanta area? You have to go prepare for Duke? Commments like this certainly support accusations of your lack of intelligence. Maybe you were driving the car that Odell had one too many hits in.
By whocares?
November 15, 2006 08:40 AM | Link to this
only conference opponents matter. who cares if you beat tech and lose to vandy and ky? personally, i’ll take any sec opponent over anyone else. all you old school folks need to wake up. today’s college football is ONLY about winning conferences and national titles. nothing else should matter. treat the matchup for what it is — last-game-of-the-year-to-appease-old-alumni..
By dawgfacedboy
November 15, 2006 08:49 AM | Link to this
It sure is appealing to join in the sarcastic comments towards Carter and Tech fans I think my fellow dawg bloggers have done enough. In regards to the game though here are a couple of my own opinions: This is always a pretty emotional game with a few too many stupid penalties and a lot of trash talking. I think the team that can limit these stupid penalties will have the greatest chance. Keep your emotions in check. Momentum, momentum, momentum; same as Auburn. I think saying we need to shut down C.J should go unsaid. Hopefully we’ll watch a lot of the Clemson game. I missed the UNC game but judging by the score C.J. either didn’t play or was shut down. Lastly, make plays and limit turnovers. A lot of this sounds elemtary but we havn’t really done a lot of this other than the Auburn game. I believe the biggest will be stupid penalties (personal fouls, pass interference).
By Luke
November 15, 2006 09:05 AM | Link to this
Of course it means something. We wouldn’t be talking about fumbles and non-fumbles if it didn’t mean something.
By Dirty Dawg
November 15, 2006 09:08 AM | Link to this
So, I guess this ‘Carter’ person is just another one of them carpet-baggin’, so-in-so, writers that seem to delight in throwing a bone out in the yard and watch the dawgs - and jackets, and tigers, and gators, and blue-tick hounds - fight over it.
No, the game seldom has national significance because seldom are both teams ranked - and since Georgia isn’t this year, maybe that means we won’t have to give ‘em points (Techie’s, unlike Dawgs, are never too embarrassed to ask for ‘em). Whatever the game has lost over the years started with Tech’s getting greedy all those years back when they pulled out of the SEC…and later when they limped back in through the ACC - primarily because of basketball - it hasn’t given the football game much gravitas.
At the same time, ask any Georgia fan, which one of our ‘rivals’ do you hate to lose to worse…you’ll get the same answer. It’s Tech…and not because of any rankings, or championships, or bowl implications…it’s because of all the ‘other guys’ we have to deal with on a day-to-day basis, Techies are the ones that love to rub our noses in a loss more than any others. Just lose to ‘em once in a blue-moon and they won’t let you forget it, until you smack ‘em down the next year. They seem to delight in rubbing your nose in it more than any of the others - well, Florida’s arrogant fans may be right there with ‘em.
So, does this game matter, you’re damn right it matters, and always will. My daddy and granddaddy would spin is their graves at the thought of my deminishing Bill Cromartie’s ‘Clean Old Fashioned Hate’ in any way. They always would say that they weren’t prejudiced…they didn’t care who beat Tech…and I think that’s a pretty good way to look at it.
By Ben
November 15, 2006 09:21 AM | Link to this
Of course it matters. It’s one of the great rivalries of the South. The only reason it doesn’t get the pub that the ones you mentioned do is because there has’t been a whole lot riding on this game in years past. There is nothing better than a UGA/Tech game where both teams are in the top 20. Electric.
By gtforever
November 15, 2006 09:57 AM | Link to this
Chan.
Please sit Reggie this saturday. If you can’t beat Duke with Bennett at QB, then this team surely is not good enough to win any ACC Championship!
Save Reggie for UGA! I don’t care what anyone says about this rivalry, this team needs to beat the Dawgs.
Go Jackets!
By Buck Cochran in the NW
November 15, 2006 09:59 AM | Link to this
Carter, I’m listening……….Ben , you’re right. Tech just doesn’t have a ranked team year in & out…….What I would love to hear this year is a radio transcript of the “Trash Talking” on the field! That would be a stitch!!!
By Brooks
November 15, 2006 10:05 AM | Link to this
If your a Dawg fan and you say that beating Tech doesen’t matter then you’re not a real fan. Your blood doesen’t run red and black. I hear people say that Florida is our top rival and they would rather beat them than anybody else. That is a bunch of bull@%$#. Tech is and always will be our biggest rival. If you don’t beat Tech then the season was a failure. You hang your hat on it. For all the Tech “fans” that keep talking about the 3 game win streak. Look at the record books. Those 3 games never happened. It doesen’t matter about national attention or exposure. It’s about 2 teams that hate each other. GO DAWGS!
By gdawginkalamazoo
November 15, 2006 10:11 AM | Link to this
Bryan G, that link was worthy of a “godawg hilarious link” award. Too funny dude.
By Scott
November 15, 2006 10:13 AM | Link to this
The UGA-Tech rivalry doesn’t really matter to me. Being from South Ga, its Florida and Auburn that I hate. I really don’t care about Tech.
By gdawginkalamazoo
November 15, 2006 10:20 AM | Link to this
gtforever, something we can agree upon. Save Reggie for the UGA game, please.
Doesn’t bother me since I live in Michigan now, but the bragging rights for the state are important.
By godawg
November 15, 2006 10:21 AM | Link to this
You’re right ‘zoo. I thought my two links in this post were pretty good but Bryan beat me hands down, no doubt. (btw, I’m honored to have an award named after me)
By crs
November 15, 2006 10:27 AM | Link to this
To be a great rivalry, you need parity and competiveness and over the last few years UGA has been pretty dominating. I say the same about UGA and FL, it is in my mind not a great rivalry as FL has won 15/17 and many games have not really been great games. Right now, UGA/AUB is the best rivalry UGA has going. Games are usually competitive with something on the line and both teams win their fair share and play well in the others stadium. I would also rank UGA/SC pretty high because it is always a crucial early season game for UGA. On a national scale, I love Michigan/Ohio St., maybe the best rivalry all time.
By georgiadome
November 15, 2006 10:31 AM | Link to this
gator fans…you can go to MAPQUEST and get directions…been so long since ya been up here..tractor routes are also available with a little additional research…for those of you do not have a lab top..go to the nearest village and look for a starbucks/someone there might let you borrow theirs…have a nice trip!!!
By TennDawg
November 15, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
godawg - I aced the nerd test - a 7! I’m either definitely not a nerd or a complete moron. Either way, I enjoyed the amusement. Thanks for the link.
So many Tech folks here these days. Same thing every year: “UGA sucks”, “we’re going to kick your a**”, etc., etc. After the game and another loss though, they all disappear until “next year”. Here’s an idea - WIN a game against our boys, then come talk smack. One would think with such superior intelligence, Tech fans surely would be familiar with “if you’re going to talk-the-talk, you’ve got to walk-the-walk”?
Finally, an off-week. Should do a lot of good. GO DAWGS!!!
By TennDawg
November 15, 2006 10:42 AM | Link to this
Amen on the Bryan G. link! That was hilarious! GO DAWGS!!!
By kelly
November 15, 2006 10:44 AM | Link to this
What? Tech matter?
By hotdawg
November 15, 2006 10:45 AM | Link to this
Difference between UGA and Tech students. Best all around vs Nerd. See link http://www.suwaneebusinessalliance.org/news.asp
By RedcoatDawg
November 15, 2006 10:59 AM | Link to this
Here’s the deal from a Redcoat Band Alum… Even though Tech is ranked and the Dawgs lost to the bottom-feeders in the SEC, everyone assumes UGA will beat Tech. Even those die-hard North Ave. fans know, in the back of their minds, that everyone thinks UGA will win. If UGA beats Tech this year, there won’t be a big huge deal made. Even though the Dawgs have had a pretty poor season, they just literally destroyed Auburn, so the expectation is set.
If Tech wins, it’ll be bigger Atlanta news than the Dems winning Congress, even if they blow the ACC Championship and somehow end up in Boise again.
And, as always… “Glory, Glory, to Ole Georgia… AND TO HELL WITH GEORGIA TECH!” GO DAWGS!!!
By mark
November 15, 2006 11:22 AM | Link to this
All I have to say is…..
http://www.suwaneebusinessalliance.org/news.asp
By mcdwag
November 15, 2006 11:29 AM | Link to this
KUDOS hotdawg-a picture is worth a thousand words
By mark
November 15, 2006 11:36 AM | Link to this
Sorry dude, I didn’t see that you had already posted that link!
By David
November 15, 2006 12:04 PM | Link to this
Regarding an earlier post, Mark Richt didn’t say he was OK with losing. The sideline TV guy asked a question about Richt’s faith in a flippant way that trivialized Richt’s faith, and Richt wouldn’t let the question pass without stating that his faith is more serious than just rejoicing in good times. He said that win or lose, his faith remains the same, that it doesn’t hinge on good things happening. That’s a far cry from how you’re interpreting his response.
By godawg
November 15, 2006 12:05 PM | Link to this
mark, hotdawg great link, rarely have I ever seen a more poignant comparison between the two schools.
Thanks for posting but know that Bryan G pulled the trigger on that side-buster yesterday at 4:54 on this blog.
By MarkP
November 15, 2006 12:06 PM | Link to this
First/Last time “blogger” here. To even suggest that Tech is not a rival is ridiculous. Granted, since Tech’s move to Indy>ACC, the significance of the game (conference-wise) has obviously diminished. Nevertheless, this is one of the most-storied rivalries in the South. I am young and was brought up in the age of Tennessee and South Carolina (what?) actually being considered a “rival.” What a joke. Those are conference opponents, but not “rivals” as defined by Websters or a real Georgia fan. We have three true rivals. Do I really have to write who they are? Florida, Auburn and Tech. Depending on your location in the state, you probably consider one of the three the biggest. I am from South Georgia, now living in Atlanta. For me, I hate each one with equal passion. It merely depends on the week in which you ask me. This week I hate Tech. GO YOU HAIRY, HAIRY DAWGS!!
By mark
November 15, 2006 12:21 PM | Link to this
My apologies to Bryan G. the obvious originator of that link. With so many entries I just missed. Funny nonetheless!
By Go Vols
November 15, 2006 12:34 PM | Link to this
Hey Greg:
Get over it.
You just made the point about Tennessee being back since this blog was supposed to be about GT-UGA and you wrote mostly about Tennessee. Still upset about giving up 51 points at HOME to the Vols?
If Tennessee loses one, as you wrote about, they will have the same record at Georgia, plus UT has the head to head, so why would UGA get the better bowl? Good to see you are using your powers of addition and subtraction.
By the way, where is UGA ranked? Oh, that’s right, you haven’t been in the rankings for a while now.
I hear Shreveport is nice in December so enjoy it…
By TennDawg
November 15, 2006 12:57 PM | Link to this
Go Vols - 5 and 6 ring a bell? At least our “down” year is respectable (currently 7 and 4). As for Shreveport, don’t know but y’all do. Do tell, how is it in December? We’ll be in the warm and friendly confines of our home-away-from-home, the Georgia Dome. You boy’s at UT remember where that is don’t you? Tell us the truth, two losses in a row got your feathers wrinkled? Don’t slip up (again) to Vandy on Saturday. GO DAWGS!!!
By Wozzo the Wonder Dog
November 15, 2006 01:19 PM | Link to this
I see O.J. Simpson is in the news again. Why doesn’t UGA hire him as a Defensive Coordinator. He would bring a killer attitude, and help UGA gut other teams. O.J. could carve up opponents, and slice through offensive lines to the other quarterback. O.J. won a Heisman Trophy, and while he was a tailack his cut-to-the-bone style would really help UGA — unless he is still too busy looking for his wife’s killer.
By brett30033
November 15, 2006 01:46 PM | Link to this
This article sums it all up…
http://www.suwaneebusinessalliance.org/news.asp
By logic
November 15, 2006 02:00 PM | Link to this
It’s Tech. How can you take them seriously?
By logic
November 15, 2006 02:03 PM | Link to this
Saw where spurrier is out blaming the refs again. That man is all class. A good coach - Yes. A crying egotistical moron - Yes again.
By gdawginkalamazoo
November 15, 2006 02:39 PM | Link to this
godawg, yeah might as well be the “godawg hilarious link award”. I thought I gave props to your first post but I might have gotten busy. But 10 out of 10 times I can count on your links providing humor. BTW, I took the nerd test. Thankfully I am not a nerd, but evidently I retain knowledge that I should have forgotten, or at least drowned with alcohol while it was fresh in my mind.
By godawg
November 15, 2006 02:53 PM | Link to this
Thanks ‘zoodawg. I got another one but am waiting for Carter’s “new” topic that I imagine he will start thinking about in an hour or so.
Glad to hear you’re OK. That nerd stuff is tricky, you got to watch out for it or you’ll find yourself shopping for pocket protectors and going to sci fi conventions to look at women.
By JB
November 15, 2006 03:01 PM | Link to this
If UGA catches the ball and turnovers are even. Sorry tech, UGA rolls.
By gator the dog catcher
November 15, 2006 03:12 PM | Link to this
Kalamazoo - whats the buzz like up in Michigan with the big game coming up?
By BIGNCDAWG
November 15, 2006 03:29 PM | Link to this
I am with you Markp. All 3 are equally dispised. To “letsdiscuss”, do you remember Tom Osbourn of Nebraska. He was an evangelical as is Bowen of FSU. They seem to have done alright at recruiting.
By gdawginkalamazoo
November 15, 2006 03:40 PM | Link to this
gtdc, I was actually worried more about Western playing FSU myself. Back to that other game, the Maize and Blue really came out of the closet this year. You can tell the fair weather fans, they smell like moth balls. Also all those damn car flags too. Usually posted opposite window of the Pizza Hut flags.
Seriously, big buzz as usual. I guess if you look at ESPN website it looks like that times 10. I will be watching without any pressure on me this weekend though, first time in weeks.
By gdawginkalamazoo
November 15, 2006 03:47 PM | Link to this
godawg, Thanks. But I might give those sci-fi conventions a try. Have you seen some of those hot alien chicks lately? You know put a space helment over their heads and shift a tenacle here and there and ….
By DawgByte
November 15, 2006 04:00 PM | Link to this
I agree with Carter’s assertion. UGA vs GT does not have the same cache as the rivalry games he mentions above, particularly when you look at it from a national perspective.
Having said that, from a state perspective it does have significant importance regarding bragging rights. It also has some significance on local recruiting.
Tech is more of an annoyance than a rival.
By DawgByte
November 15, 2006 04:11 PM | Link to this
Dawg & Tech fans - whoever said generalities and stereotypes are meaningless obviously hasn’t seen this link. This is hilarious!!!
http://www.suwaneebusinessalliance.org/news.asp
By Gen Neyland
November 15, 2006 04:53 PM | Link to this
As the true southern gentleman that I am, my wish is to remain respectful of the UGA-GTnats ongoing debate on these pages and only read the blather, but when somebody cracks a door and opens up UT, especially these next two weeks, I have to wonder:- You ain’t over it yet..?
TennDawg— You reference 5-6. How about 51-33 ? OUCH… 19-15-2 ? OUCH…Must I go on ?
GREG— You have my sympathy. But I know you are a Dawg fan, so good. I’m glad you’re on their side…
As Cuz said, To the victor go the spoils…This year, the spoils of the UT-UGA contest are on the Top of MT. Rocky…We all are from a different unit, but we all belong to U.S SEC, so go forward now and whip those nerds from North Ave…
By TennDawg
November 15, 2006 05:08 PM | Link to this
Gen Neyland - true, it would be nice to keep to the UGA/GT game and blogs;however, I believe it was Go Vol who “cracked a door” and “opened up” on UGA here on our teams blog. Truth be known, I was “over” the loss as I left the stadium that night in Athens. I actually stayed late partaking in tailgating celebration with friends and family (all UT grads) into the early morning hours.
GO DAWGS!!!
By FiftyonetoSeven
November 15, 2006 06:00 PM | Link to this
The Difference between UGA and Tech [http://www.suwaneebusinessalliance.org/news.asp]
By FiftyonetoSeven
November 15, 2006 06:06 PM | Link to this
The Difference between UGA and Tech [http://www.suwaneebusinessalliance.org/news.asp]
By BlogPolice
November 15, 2006 07:53 PM | Link to this
DawgByte, who R u ? Someone posing as an intelligent poster ? Surely not a UGA student or grad ? (Just kidding.) Let’s hear more from people who can tell the difference between “your” and “you’re”, etc.
By Cuz
November 16, 2006 12:06 AM | Link to this
Carter you ignorant slut. No one in this state(Georgia you lame brain) cares about what you think period, much less the “great rivalries”. If I were you I would take some of your paycheck and buy a clue. In the state of Georgia, this is the rivalry game. The Dawgs have whupped them hard for years and now like the great white in Jaws, they smell blood in the water. The Techies are salivating like Pavlovs Dawg at the sound of a bell. What they don’t know is Pavlov’s Dawg is a Bulldawg and the bell ringing is the Chapel bell ringing untill dawn after a Dawg victory in Athens over the Bugs.
Everybody say it one time, GO DAWGS!!!*
By Please Don't Make Me Post this Again
November 16, 2006 09:22 AM | Link to this
It frightens me that my tax dollars are supporting GIT grads who can’t grasp basic math.
Georgia has 2 Consensus National Championships. Tech has NEVER won a Consensus National Championship. If you’re going to continue to claim partial MNC’s, then UGA has 5 of those to Tech’s 4.
57-36-5 The Record which UGA leads 12-6 Conference Championships (UGA leads, Tech has 5 SEC, 1 ACC) Georgia has won more games Georgia has a higher winning percentage Georgia has more Heisman Winners Georgia has had more All Americans Georgia has been invited to more bowls Georgia has won more bowls Georgia has finished in the top 10 more frequently Georgia has sent more players to the NFL
Tech has a fine football tradition and has had the better football team this year. But if you’re going to recite history, at least get it close.
By Gen Neyland
November 16, 2006 09:35 AM | Link to this
TennDawg— We cool. You are right. Some overly hyper Vol fans can’t let it go. My apologies. Now, go get the beeboys. Maybe Duke will serve up a surprise…
By GTinVA
November 18, 2006 10:32 AM | Link to this
Please Don’t Make Me Post this Again
Where are you getting your facts? Out of your home computer? Take a look here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NCAADivisionI-Anationalfootball_championship (Tech 4, UGA 1) or go to www.ncaa.org for more details (This one shows all the polls and has Tech 6, UGA 5). I would love to see you prove your numbers?
By tim
November 18, 2006 02:31 PM | Link to this
So three shared titles and one while the rest of the country was playing football due to WWI? Way to go Tech. I envy your football program’s success…
By Mike T.
November 18, 2006 06:38 PM | Link to this
Hey go back to 1616, when Tech beat some soccer team 222-0.
By helluvaJacketFan
November 19, 2006 08:53 AM | Link to this
tim - Actually, Heisman turned down an invitation to the Rose Bowl in 1917 so that hs boys could enlist - every one of them, my great-grandfather included, signed up for duty. You’re just another ignorant Dawg fan. TO HELL WITH GEORGIA!
By tim
November 19, 2006 06:13 PM | Link to this
I was referring to the 1918 “title,” when UGA, amongst others did not field a team.
By Mikegadawg
November 19, 2006 06:24 PM | Link to this
damn u techies……talk about bring a blog down……u guys truly are bores. anyway…….so, “WHEN” UGA beats Tech this weekend……And if Tech does by chance win the ACC, would that make UGA the ACC CHAMPS by default!? LOL TAlk amongst urselves! LOL U techies are pathetic.
GO DAWGS!
By Sting'em
November 20, 2006 08:31 AM | Link to this
I would like to respond to the following comment from AD: “Losing to Tech is like getting beat up by a girl. Just humiliating”
Hey AD, we will keep that in mind as Michael Johnsons (93) knocks Matt Stafford’s #$# into next week. Don’t come crying to me when he gets hurt and has to go looking for his helmet and mouthpiece.
You have alot more to lose at QB than we do….and we will be hunting for him. We are coming to totally rip your program to shreds and expose all the holes your program. We will hand you your helmet at the end of the day.
By Sting'em
November 20, 2006 08:48 AM | Link to this
Hey Mikegadawg, back to your single-wide in Clark County. Your mama is looking for some action from you, along with your sister.
By bulldawgincarolina
November 20, 2006 06:56 PM | Link to this
georgia will win this game because hey its tech-georgia…….say 27-24/jackets will also lose in acc jokeinship[i mean championship] and some texas tech or UTAH TYPE..will take them in bowl game…final record 9-5/Uga 9-4
By alan
November 20, 2006 08:21 PM | Link to this
In an attempt to get back to the original theme of the blog….Ga. / Ga. Tech is as important a rivalry as any other inter-state rivalry because it is for “PRIDE”, not “MONEY.” Sure money is a part of any college game at this level. However, my Jackets are playing for more than one major accomplishment this weekend and, as smart as most of us are,we couldn’t give a rat’s a* where we fit in at the national level. The game has a life of it’s own and nothing ESPN says or doesn’t say makes any difference. To simplify it, having braggin’ rights is “FUN!” Remember fun?