Ice Man

By Pucks n Snot

April 14, 2007 6:56 PM | Link to this

A HA HA HA HA HA! Nice defense of your home ice - SOUTHLEAST DIVISION CHUMPS!! And Kovalchuk getting baited by Avery to take him off his game….how typical of the prototype for immature “superstars” in the NHL!! Instead of using his skating prowess to launch one final rush to the net he goes after Avery instead and makes a complete fool of himself!! Memo to Ilya Kovalchuk - if you ever do end up learning how to play hockey the right way you’ll know that players like Avery exist solely to distract players like you - thanks for making it so easy for him! A HA HA HA HA!!!! You guys should have traded this bozo like I said - then you wouldn’t have to sit and suffer through watching guys like Sutton and deVries - you could have picked up some real defensemen! Now the crazy Ranger fans are waiting at MSG to devour you once and for all. One game and the coach pulls the goalie who played the entire season - A HA HA HA!!!! I knew this team was a freggin joke! Excuse me now while I go prepare to watch Detroit continue to kill all in their path on the way to another Cup. Welcome - to UNGLUEDLAND!!! A HA HA HA!!!

By ryanloral

April 14, 2007 6:56 PM | Link to this

you think they played good? have you ever seen a hockey game before? this teams sucks and is the dirtiest team i have seen this year, in this the sixth game i have seen between these teams. they tried the same b/s from the first game, running over everyone on the rangers until they decided, ok, this isn’t working. let’s try something else. they had no sustained pressure except for a few shifts, as they did in game one. every time we came into your end we had either a scoring chance or just dominated anyone you put out on the ice to defend the real blueshirts. when your team relies on two ranger rejects as you do, you know you’re in trouble. enjoy the summer.

By ryanloral

April 14, 2007 6:57 PM | Link to this

you think they played good? have you ever seen a hockey game before? this teams sucks and is the dirtiest team i have seen this year, in this the sixth game i have seen between these teams. they tried the same b/s from the first game, running over everyone on the rangers until they decided, ok, this isn’t working. let’s try something else. they had no sustained pressure except for a few shifts, as they did in game one. every time we came into your end we had either a scoring chance or just dominated anyone you put out on the ice to defend the real blueshirts. when your team relies on two ranger rejects as you do, you know you’re in trouble. enjoy the summer.

By stendec

April 14, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

I usually hold your views in high regard, Ice Man, but not this time. The team is heartless, gutless and clueless. Change the blue scheme to yellow. Losing twice at home to a team like the tutu-wearing Rangers is totally and completely UNACCEPTABLE! No matter how you attempt to justify it. This bunch has proven to be Falcons on ice! Sad but true. They will not shoot! They will not defend. Rival goals get in whether inpired from above or below. Losers always use excuses as a crutch! Keep them coming. The bottom line is that a division so-called champion lost twice (TWICE) at home to a totally inferior group of punks from the Big Apple. Defend them all ya want! Truth will be seen when Rangers get swept in next round. Blue guys may not lose in four although they deserve to. Pitiful performance. Fans deserve MUCH better!

By tiger7_88

April 14, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

I love the Thrash. They played hard. Moose was a monster.

But in the end, like all Atlanta sports clubs…. same as it ever was ($1 to David Byrne).

By ryanloral

April 14, 2007 6:59 PM | Link to this

sorry for the double post :(

By B. Thenet

April 14, 2007 7:01 PM | Link to this

Other than some checks, how on earth can you even say the Thrashers dominated the Rangers in this game?

We gave up over 35 shots for the 2nd game in a row, and had less than 30 ourselves.

Rangers 0 Giveaways Thrashers 12 Giveaways

The Thrashers picked a great time to fall into one of their mini-slumps. The grinders are playing great….the top dogs are playing poorly.

Ilya woke up after his first goal, he was MIA like Hossa before that.

Hedberg deserved better, the team got what they deserved…another loss after another poorly played game at home.

By jeff k

April 14, 2007 7:06 PM | Link to this

The Thrashers hit very well but you win by scoring goals. If they were less concerned about making the Rangers black and blue, and more concerned with setting up goals, they might have won one of these games.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 7:07 PM | Link to this

I’ll give you that ‘dominated’ is a bit strong (remember, I’m writing off the top of my head, which is different than writing a column for print) …. What I mean to say is that the Thrashers were flying the whole game, dictating most of the contact and establishing a physical dominance of sorts. … yes, they gave up a lot of shots, but that’s because about 5 of our 6 defensemen are clueless. I did not feel threatened by a bulk of the Rangers shots, and they were threatening, Hedberg thwarted them away.

But, in essence, I did overspeak on ‘dominate,’ not quite what I meant. Let’s say, ‘went toe to toe with’

By Matthew at the SLC

April 14, 2007 7:07 PM | Link to this

What a sorry bunch of losers! This team does not even deserve to play in the postseason. For the past two games all I have seen was sloppy passing and few shots on goal. You cannot win if you do not score.

What do you expect from an Atlanta team in the postseason.

I am sorry I bought into the playoff hype. Unleash the fury my A@@!

By B. Thenet

April 14, 2007 7:13 PM | Link to this

Hedberg was forced to make the better saves.

Have the Thrashers even had a breakaway in the series? The Rags are getting around 1 per period.

By Wreckin' & Thrashin'

April 14, 2007 7:20 PM | Link to this

Gotta disagree with you on this Ice Man… we didn’t deserve to win. Sure, we played with a lot of energy and passion and we played an awesome physical game. Unfortunately, we didn’t bother to try to put the puck on the goal most of the time. I don’t if the guys are afraid to shoot or what, but something is horribly wrong in our offensive strategy right now. Most of the shots we put on goal were cheap shots that were easy stops for Lundquivst. We didn’t put funnel the puck to the net and put pressure on him. And no team that gets a total of 1 shot through 4 power play attempts deserves to win a playoff game. Just all around extremely frustrating. This is a terrible way to end a season after so much progress.

By Brian

April 14, 2007 7:25 PM | Link to this

They deserved to lose and did not go toe to toe with the NY Rangers the whole game.

I blame Hartley. As soon as Kovvy tied up that game, they stopped playing to win and instead started playing not to lose. You know where that gets you. How do you have the ice tilted towards them and then just completely shut down after the next faceoff? It was utter BS the way they stopped after getting that goal.

Heard on The Fan on the way home that Sutton might be suspended for the late hit “after” the game (pure sportstalk speculation). Wouldn’t that be nice…

By Thrashy Thrashy

April 14, 2007 7:54 PM | Link to this

The Thrashers played much better defensively tonight, but that doesn’t matter. They still can’t get it done when it matters the most. The power play has been nonexistent for weeks, so no surprise on that one. It’s just sad to see a team with the offensive talent that the Thrashers have not pressuring the opponent and carrying the play to them. If you want to win in the playoffs, you have to be aggressive in everything you do, not just hitting guys. The Thrashers have been way too passive and will be very fortunate if they can make this a series. Remember: A change in net doesn’t matter if the guys in front don’t take care of business. Shanahan was left wide open and plunged a dagger into the Blueland faithful. It’s so typical of this team, so I’m not surprised. I’m just disappointed that the boys let the home folks down. The fans deserve better.

By Scott

April 14, 2007 7:58 PM | Link to this

The series is far from over. The Thrashers did out play the Rags this game and they should have won. That fluke goal cost us the game.

But one thing no one is talking about. Where the hell is Marian Hossa at? He’s been MIA big time so far.

By Barry

April 14, 2007 8:03 PM | Link to this

All you guys who are trashing Atlanta saying they don’t deserve to be in the playoffs are a bunch of stupid losers. They didn’t win the past two games, but they won enough to get in the playoffs. If such a lousy team like the Thrashers can win their division (beating the Rangers 3 games to 1 in the regular season, by the way) then they deserve to be there more so than the Rangers and the ones who couldn’t see to win enough.

Every team can get hot and every team can go cold. The Rangers have had the puck rolling their way. They’ve played hard and deserved to win. It is good sportsmanship to admit that.

Losers who denigrate a team because of their geographic region or their city’s sports history are showing their stupidity. The Thrashers are loaded with Canadians, Russians, and “northerners” who have played hockey all their lives. They are not from the south…yet some of our players have played in Stanley Cup finals. The Southeast Division has Stanley Cup champions playing here too.

So, why don’t you so called “hockey fans” go get drunk again at your local bar. That is obviously your condition as you watch hockey games.

By TK

April 14, 2007 8:10 PM | Link to this

i’m a ranger fan, and admit avery goal was nothing more than huge luck for us, but fact is that the thrashers “showed up” in the first ever playoff and on HOME ICE by being outshot 77-52!??!!?

past ranger teams took much heavier physical beatings from philly teams (especially in 80’s with herb brooks smurfs). tkachuk a career loser who will never be remembered for anything more than disgracing Team USA…holik cups were pure coat-tail rides of brodeur and stevens-led defense…end of game predictable from hartley…”tough guy” sutton jumps cullen who is giving 50 pounds…let’s see if he runs orr at garden. nice game for hedberg, but i think that’s as good as it gets for your goaltending as you head into garden where i guarantee you all will not outshoot us 77-52…should be over soon, but look on bright side….flat-leaver flames won’t be dancing any longer

By five_hole

April 14, 2007 8:10 PM | Link to this

I agree with the Ice Man’s assessment. We dominated physical play in this game; we dominated in terms of hustle. We got burned by a fluke goal. Yes, the Rangers outshot us. But I thought that most of their shots were from the perimiter. That’s not the same as close in, which is where most goals get scored.

If not for that fluke goal, we might still be playing at 8PM tonight. You have to give props to Lundqvist; he not only stood on his head; he did backflips too. We had several good chances in close, inside their d-men, and Lundqvist stoned everyone except Kovy.

Was there bad play? Absolutely. And I wouldn’t just call out the d-men. I thought Slava had the worst game I’ve ever seen him play (which might be the only bad game I’ve seen him play). Does anyone know where Hossa is? I was at the game, but really didn’t see him on the ice. Tkachuk didn’t have a great game (although he looked really good with Kovy on his goal).

Who shined for us? Holik was a MONSTER. Same for DuPuis. Mellenby for an old guy was a warrior for us. Of course Moose. Kovy had a good game, up until the end. Larsen get’s the most out of his limited skills.

I think Kovalchuk will be a marked man in game 3 at MSG for his flagrant cheap shot of Avery at the end of the game.

So, the question should be, who does Heartley start for game 3? I suggest the Moose deserves it. Plus, being back-to-back games, let Lehtonen start game 4.

By Barry

April 14, 2007 8:11 PM | Link to this

The Thrashers have too many intensity lapses during the game. The defensemen are often lazy in going after the puck in the Thrashers zone. And how many times do we see Kovy or Hossa sprinting down ice with no one trailing? How often do they shoot with rebounds being gobbled up by defensemen with no other Thrashers in sight?

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:11 PM | Link to this

Tutu wearing …. umm ok? I was watching for the Ranger thug line and saw them only twice - once matched against Hossa (20 seconds) and once when Orr took a penalty. Is toughness measured in hits - or is it measured in willingness to take a hit to make a play? I saw at least 3 times when a big hit attempt was slammming against air - and the boards - this occurred in front of my eyes so those who chooses to debate this -Whateva in the NY tongue. You may have heard me chanting Thank- you-Hartley after that ridiculous 1st goal. Now what do you do - Hope Moose stands on his head twice in a row if not for the rest of the playoffs? - He is a backup for a reason so good luck with that. An incredible game for sure - one of the best Playoff games I have ever been at. I know this is not possible but the thuggery with 4.8 left was all for the home team - nothing like getting suspended for an unbelievably crucial game 3 - which will be forthcoming. As for all of you sloganeering “unleash the fury” types - you know unless we lose. - You Suck. Heartless? Gutless? Did the Trash fold the tents at any point? If so when? This is why ATL remains a great sports town for those of us with ancient allegiances, Waaahhh if the home team loses. I will - as so many of “you” wished “go home” for game 3. I assure you having sat in the depths of despair with those people for many years, I would take them on my side vs. this crap I am reading on this post any time.

By Tom

April 14, 2007 8:13 PM | Link to this

If anyone needs to be suspended it is Shanahan for his hit on Kozlov, but the NHL will never do that, it is NY you know and they do need ratings.

Instead you have NBC and that little panger dude kissing Shanahans buttocks.

What would be nice is to remember back in 1996 when the Braves rolled into NY all cocky that they would win the series they were up 2-0… Maybe history will reverse itself.

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:14 PM | Link to this

Barry - get with the present buddy - your 0-2 going to NYC for game 3. Your ridiculous opinions are better served not being in print.

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:15 PM | Link to this

Last Call … If I had the shot Kovy buried at 1-1 I would have played D1 not ride the pine D3

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:18 PM | Link to this

Sorry - Tom, who won the ‘96 world series? Get your facts right. NBC needs the ratings? What for 1 game? Rangers are done after we finish business here - Sloganeering is for fools.

By Rangers fan!!!!!!

April 14, 2007 8:19 PM | Link to this

The Rangers OUTPLAYED the Thrashers yet again on their home ice. I was disappointed to only be one of a handful of Rangers fans in the building but I wore my Graves jersey with pride. It was a great game and the Thrashers looked like goons at the end, taking all those cheap shots in the last 30 seconds. Get over it, you lost. Take it like men.

2-0…..we’ll see how you like it on OUR ice.

By BG33Brown

April 14, 2007 8:22 PM | Link to this

This is so typical of this blog. WE LOST. There is no way we deserved that loss. But we have to rebound. The sky isn’t falling. We played a great game but didn’t get it done. PERIOD.

Moose was incredible. Absolutely ZERO rebounds of consequence. Just a fluke bounce.

To quote Mr. Blutarski “was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor.”

True I am sick to my stomach about the loss but to all you fairweather fans-F YOU!

GO Thrashers!!!

By TK

April 14, 2007 8:25 PM | Link to this

that boom you just heard was the germans bombing pearl harbor, or was it hossa banging his own head into the boards…his only memorable moment of the series

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 8:28 PM | Link to this

I’ve just been told that there’s no such thing as a ‘PVR’ … I guess you kids call it a “DVR” … hell, I still call the fridge the ‘ice box.’

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 8:31 PM | Link to this

Brian - Excellent point concerning the style of play. The first thing I noticed a few minutes after the tying goal was a lack of pressure on the Ranger’s end of the ice. The puck was spending too much time in the Thrasher’s zone and with our defense, or lack thereof, that would soon equate to a Ranger’s goal.

If Sutton is suspended, Shanahan should be suspended as well for his hit on Kozlov. This hitting players from behind while facing the boards is gutless hockey. One of the Preds players did that crap the other night and has been suspended for one game.

Next issue, Rangers fans should not be talking about cheap shot hockey. The Rangers have two of the worst cheap shot artists in the league with Hollweg and Avery. For those new hockey fans, playoff hockey is more physical than regular season hockey. However, there is a difference between more physical hockey and cheap shots.

By Barry

April 14, 2007 8:32 PM | Link to this

wh- you need to get a life. You see, I know that I won’t be on the ice and I won’t have my life ruined if my team loses a playoff series. It is losers like you who ruin sport for everyone else. You show no real sportsmanship and your opinions are totally without sense or reason.

By the way, if you have problems with my opinions…then my point is proven.

By Alex

April 14, 2007 8:34 PM | Link to this

amazing when a team wins…it’s “we”…when they lose…it’s “they”.

You Trashers fans are so fickle to give up now, down 2-0. Most of the bloggers here are acting like the Trashers got blown out and outplayed in every category during the game. Stop your crying and support the team. You gotta believe, as long as there is a chance.

Rangers fans, I wouldn’t come here and gloat, show some class! Remember, what comes around, goes around…a series can “turn” in a blink of a moment.

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:35 PM | Link to this

yeah that’s me a big “sports ruining j*******” Your opinions are nonsense. You are a front running fool. The networks controlled the outcome? When you want to be fully outlandish - get some new material.

By 1st and 6

April 14, 2007 8:35 PM | Link to this

I like the trashers and there is a tiny chance of a come back…but is there and I don’t care what the fake fans are blogging here. Did you said blueland? I can’t hear you hahahaha

By Bob

April 14, 2007 8:37 PM | Link to this

Well, crap.

‘Canes went down 2-0 to the Habs last year and skated the Cup. Believe.

That said, our PP is atrocious. AbsoltutelyfreakinBAD.

So how hard is it to know that we lost b/c the Hawks played last night and the night crew couldn’t put the boards together properly last night?

Is there an Amber Alert out yet for Hossa and Tkachuk?

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:40 PM | Link to this

Sorry Barry - had you confused with NBC controlling the outcome mutant. Your statement of “don’t deserve to be there” is a bit odd particularly in light of 0-2.

By TK

April 14, 2007 8:43 PM | Link to this

hawks playing last night makes sense…the ice must have sucked…both teams looked slow as sh*t out there…thought i was watching isles - canucks from ‘83 finals…now that was when plodders won cups

By Andy

April 14, 2007 8:44 PM | Link to this

The Rangers are an organization of scum and we will come back in NY, where—don’t forget—we won both games this season.

By stendec

April 14, 2007 8:47 PM | Link to this

I would LOVE to blame the Hawks too. But Moose, you were playing on HOME ice. Be within the same zip code when the puck goes in. At least Letemin usually is!

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 8:47 PM | Link to this

wh - I don’t think you understood Tom’s point. Tom was stating that the Braves, who were up 2-0 against the Yankees, went into New York too confident and as a result blew the series. His analogy is that if the Rangers go into the next two games too confident, they may procure the same result. Tom knows the Braves lost the series, he is from New York.

By Barry

April 14, 2007 8:48 PM | Link to this

wh- I don’t know what you are talking about. I never said the Rangers “don’t deserve to be there” either. If you are going to type my name at least be sure you respond to what I said.

By JEidson

April 14, 2007 8:48 PM | Link to this

My first hockey game todsy-I do not claim to know much about the game but without a great great game from the Hedberg it would have ben 5 Or 6 goals—He keep the Thrashers in the game—Power play should have been put on life support—worthless today—You will not win a NHL playoff game playing like that-Please learn to shot at least as shown by the Rangers 1st goal something good could happen—I fully expect a Ranger sweep—I have now been to most all major sporting events—Nice crowd but very poor showing from a must more talented Thrasher team—As someone said early after we got it tied we them play not to lose rather than to win—Atlanta does not deserve unleash the fury title —-They are far from a good playoff hockey team—-I willl not be back—Ranger will sweep—Atlanta is average at best —I do know enough about hockey to know you don;t get points for knocking people down—the little puck must go in the goal—we were out shot 77-52 and it seemed 3 times as much—

By TK

April 14, 2007 8:49 PM | Link to this

yes you did andy…problem is it was november and january.

defense and goaltending usually wins in playoffs….well ‘nuff said

By stendec

April 14, 2007 8:58 PM | Link to this

What the Rangers are truly surfaced when one of the punks yelled FU at the fans as he skated off the ice. Not as historic as the Mike Vick flip-off. Oh yeah, that was to HOME fans. Rangers may laugh now but next foe will knock them through boards into zamboni. At least the Boston Red Sox KNOW how to treat Big Apple refuse!

By wh

April 14, 2007 8:59 PM | Link to this

I won’t argue semantics - see your last line of text

April 14, 2007 8:03 PM | Link to this

All you guys who are trashing Atlanta saying they don’t deserve to be in the playoffs are a bunch of stupid losers. They didn’t win the past two games, but they won enough to get in the playoffs. If such a lousy team like the Thrashers can win their division (beating the Rangers 3 games to 1 in the regular season, by the way) then they deserve to be there more so than the Rangers and the ones who couldn’t see to win enough

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:04 PM | Link to this

wh, what about Turco last night? chump.

Hedberg goes again on Tuesday, right?

By captmess

April 14, 2007 9:05 PM | Link to this

Hey Blueland … here are a few thoughts from a Rangers fan of 42 years. First, the Rangers did play “okay” … for a road game. They kept it SIMPLE at all times … a tribute to Mr. Renney. Second, the Rangers only have one power play unit that really SHOOTS. (Hint: Jagr is NOT on it.) At MSG, I can promise you that the Rangers WILL feed off the energy of their fans and play EVEN MORE of an “up-tempo” game. Third, their young players (a.k.a. virtual playoff rookies) such as Girardi, Tutin, Callahan and Ortmeyer … are still FIGURING THIS STUFF OUT. They will only get better. Finally, it is HIGHLY UNLIKELY that the Rangers will “regress{” in Games 3 and 4. Not impossible (as long-suffering Ranger fans know better than ANY fans in all of sport — including Cubs fans) … but unlikely. Over-and-out.

By wh

April 14, 2007 9:05 PM | Link to this

NY sucks - Thugs from Boston are cooler and tougher they KNOW how to treat those #$#$#$ New Yorkers.

Yet only in NY can you find a DB ….

By Lew39

April 14, 2007 9:06 PM | Link to this

I guess with being two games down we’ll see if our team has heart and character. We played well enough to win, but we need to start scoring. WE ARE BETTER THAN WE ARE SHOWING.

Has anyone seen Koslov, Hossa, Tkachuk? When a 40 year old seems more offensive than the three mentioned above, you have to wonder?

Power Play? Some good passing, it’s still a non-event.

Offense? In the locker room and never came out

Our Forecheck: Throw the puck in and let’s all meet in the corner (anyone want to be in front of the net). Our offense looks like a 5 year’s old soccer match..

Take nothing away from the Rangers defense, they back checked us like white on rice.

People sitting around me say look at that we had more hits; my response,so what, they had more goals.

The dumbest question being asked during any between period interview. WShat do we have to do to win SCORE MORE GOALS THAN THE OTHER TEAM!!

WE CAN BEAT THIS TEAM….THE QUESTION IS DO WE HAVE THE HEART, WE HAVE THE SKILL. OUR FIRST LINE NEEDS TO WAKE UP..THEY MUST BE A MINUS 3 OR 4 FOR THE TWO GAMES. Maybe Coach Hartley will change the line match ups.

By Barry

April 14, 2007 9:09 PM | Link to this

wh- LOL…when did I say the Rangers “don’t deserve to be there”? I certainly didn’t say it in the quote you provided.

I didn’t say the Rangers “don’t deserve to be there.” I said the Thrashers deserve it more based on the season series and the fact that they did win their division.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 9:11 PM | Link to this

Before anyone else says something to the effect of: Without Hedberg, we would have lost by 5 or 6 …. can I just remind you: That’s hockey. That’s what a good goaltender does. He makes sure you don’t lose by 5 or 6 goals. It doesn’t necessarily impugn the rest of the team. With a bad goalie, ANY team would lose by 5 or 6 goals to ANY OTHER team. Part of a goalie’s job is to make great saves that prevent you from losing by 5 or 6 goals. Even when Marty Brodeur was making 20 saves a night for the Devils, 4 or 5 of them would still be ‘goal-saving’ saves.

Now … that said … I think a lot of you guys are letting your newness to NHL playoffs get the better of you. Your team lost two ONE-GOAL games, and despite what some of you are saying, the Thrashers never quit in either game. I’ve seen teams quit in the playoffs before and it’s pretty damn pathetic. You should be lauding the Thrashers for their effort the past two games. They may not have played perfectly, in fact, as we’ve pointed out, far from it, but to diss their ‘effort’ is ridiculous. If they’re going down, they’re going down fighting (at least so far).

Some of you are saying this is an embarrassment and that the Thrashers are losers. You ought to get a whiff of an 8-0 playoff game sometime.

And remind me never to jump into your foxhole.

By gobucks2006

April 14, 2007 9:20 PM | Link to this

I was watching the Atl-NYR game on one tv while watching the Ottowa-Pitt game on the NHL Center Ice. Good games all. The Thrashers remind me of those Flyer teams in the mid to late 90’s that would always blow it in the playoffs with all that talent.

It was interesting to note how the local newscasts treated the Thrashers first playoff appearance versus how they treated the Braves first playoff appearance in 1991. Needless to say no comparison. I thought on Thursday night the local news might say something about the hockey game at the top of their newscats but they said nothing. That tells us something about how far hockey needs to go.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:22 PM | Link to this

I think a lot of you guys are letting your newness to NHL playoffs get the better of you.

Save that bullcrap, Ice Princess. I’m in the foxhole, what I’m wonderin is when the State Patrol tracks down poor Hoss, Tkachuk, and Kozlov …

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 9:25 PM | Link to this

Bob, you’re not mad at me, you’re mad at the team, so I forgive you for the weak cheap shot that’s clearly beneath a fan of your high standing.

Again, I think what I said was, let’s draw the distinction between not playing well and not playing with effort. I’m watching those guys struggle mightily, but struggle nonetheless. I don’t doubt their desire, just their performance.

By wh

April 14, 2007 9:28 PM | Link to this

damn - forgot my email and lost my scathing remarks - Your right Luongo sucks - Both were terrible goals. You should watch hockey instead of pretending you know what you are talking about.

By Rawhide

April 14, 2007 9:40 PM | Link to this

Of course, then I remember Job. And I think, perhaps this is a test. Perhaps this team just needs to keep playing hard, keep persevering and keep laying those rat bastards on their asses and keep putting the biscuit in the basket. (I don’t think the Bible put it quite like that, but it’s close enough.) Dave, I think your quoting from 1st Thrasherlonians 4:12!

OK, let me take the trash out here first,….PUCKS N SNOT - You classless little shred-of-human-debris,…how typical it si you you, being as dickless as you are, to STAY AWAY from this site while the Thrashers were WINNING, and doing the things you so “aptly” predicted we would not,..make the playoffs and win the division. You are a typical no-nuts coward who only jumps in here to say HAHA when the team slumps. Go to hell you idiot. Oh, I forgt,..you already live in Detroit!

What a truely frustrating game,…that bounce,…AUUuuuugh!! But THAT should not have beaten us,..he had almost a full game to deal with it.

The Ice???? Come on guys,…I saw BOTH teams out there having to deal with it.

NBC?? Rating??? That is TOO mindless to even address. Even as much as I DESPISE the big NY Networks,…let’s keep thi withing the confines of reality, shall we.

Lundquivst,….was the reason NY won. Escpecially that sequence just prior to Avery’s crap-goal.

NY is just playing THAT much better,…unfortunately THAT much is good enough for a 2-0 series lead. It is what it is.

I would be depressed more if we were getting our butts kicked 5-1 or something,…but we are not. So, I have not given up hope.

But we cannot kid ourselves. He HAVE to take both in the GAH-den next week. HAVE to. Period.

CM - If your in here,…I think n aspirin and tuck-in isn’t enough for ya tonight. A few drinks down you might be needed first. What’s your poison???

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:41 PM | Link to this

wh, I’ll type slowly this time … Turco outplays Luongo.

IceMan, save the newness. We played like s** in both games, flashes of what we can do at times but you must bring the effort 60 minutes, every shift, in the playoffs. They did not do that, the “effort” you espouse was nonexistant in the first period and a 1/2 of this game and they deserve to be down 2-0. I can’t believe how pitiful our PP is, and I can’t fathom how you could say they brought a playoff worthy effort for 60 minutes tonight.

The effort they gave after the midpoint of the 2nd period was good. But you have to bring that 60 minutes, not 30, that’s been this club’s problem all year, great in spurts, crap for lengths of time, that will not cut it in the playoffs.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 9:55 PM | Link to this

Bob, c’mon, the first 12 minutes of this game were phenomenal. I honestly don’t even know what you’re referring to. The Thrashers were flying out there and it looked like they were going to knock the snot out of the Rangers … Then that goal …. Let’s not forget it came right after Lundqvist absolutely denied Tkachuk and Kovalchuk with two of the best saves I’ve ever seen. It was demoralizing … and even then the Thrashers still played with a lot of emotion.

Honestly, dude, I think you’re letting the end result tarnish the rest of the game for you. The team was trying. Honestly. They were trying.

The problem is (he said whispering) is that this team just may be as flawed as we suspected it was throughout the season. But if they weren’t trying, they would be getting blown out.

Positive thoughts here. Let’s not go to pieces. I’m watching Games 3 and 4 fully expecting to win.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:59 PM | Link to this

IceMan, sorry pal, I was rinkside all afternoon and the effort the 1st half of the game was unacceptable. 1/2 way through the first, it finally started clicking and the effort was there, but it must be there from the drop of the puck in the 1st period, 1/2 game efforts don’t cut it?

Let me guess, you were listening to Darren Eliot call the game?

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:01 PM | Link to this

1/2 way through the 2nd it started clicking, damn this blogging tool!@@$$%$&@!

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:02 PM | Link to this

Bob, I think you can help me. As you know I’m heading up to games 3 and 4 at the Garden and hate traveling without everything I need. I ask because you seem the the shopping type. I just came back from Kroger and they seem to be all out. I was wondering where I could get a Red White and Blue broom? Ahh nevermind, I’ll just pick one up at the Garden Weds night.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 10:04 PM | Link to this

OK, man, clearly we’ll have to disagree. You have high standards, and I respect that. I saw my team get bloody today, and I respect them for that.

(But you might want to consider switching allegiances to New Jersey or Detroit or Minnesota if you want textbook hockey, cuz it ain’t gonna happen with these guys.)

Can we agree that tomorrow’s another day?

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 10:07 PM | Link to this

wh - You shouldn’t use up all of your trust money to watch the Rangers lose at the Garden.

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:09 PM | Link to this

R Stroz - “Here all week” - I wish you would have waited 5 minutes longer. LOL

By Brian

April 14, 2007 10:10 PM | Link to this

David Vescey - I don’t think someone who is new to hockey should be telling a bunch of die hard hockey fans about their “newness to the NHL playoffs”

Let’s remind everyone that even though you make the occasional nostalgic reference to the NY Islanders, you are not a hockey fan, you didn’t watch the Thrashers for most of the season and the only reason you do this blog is because it was “assigned” to you as you are an AJC employee. You have said yourself that you don’t know the game and you just get the banter going between the TRUE FANS.

I would ask you which game you were watching that you think the Thrashers put pressure on after they scored their goal but then again, you don’t watch most of the games. Don’t ever tell real hockey fans again that they are new to the game. You are new to blogging and had a horrible time. Lest I remind you of your “which star will get injured first” blog. Oh wait, that had to be removed from the ajc.com website…

P.S. a game is 60 minutes long so don’t tell us stories about the first 12 minutes.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:10 PM | Link to this

wh, you’re gonna see the BlueShirts close us out in Game 4 unless we bring 60 minutes of effort. We’re all talent and no effort, your boys will school us all night if we bring the same effort the next 2 games.

Ice Man, we got schooled. Watch the tape, if you want to subject yourself to it again. We stunk the 1st 1/2 of that game.

I could give 2 s** about text book hockey. I expect 60 minutes +++ of effort, Melrose was right, the Thrashers have the talent, and they’ll win, if they have the effort and want it more than the Rangers. Scoreboard says 0-2, easily 2-0 if our boys brought the effort 60 minutes, not text book, just effort. But the Ranjerks outworked out boys, plain and simple.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:15 PM | Link to this

Jeepers, I agree with Brian! How can IceMan be this clueless? The only reason we’re down 2-0 in this series is because the Ranjerks outworked us for all 60 minutes, yet he thinks it’s an injustice that we lost? Get a grip, that’s how it works in the NHL playoffs, he who wants it most, generally wins.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 10:23 PM | Link to this

Let it go, Brian.

Again, you’re not mad at me, you’re mad at the team. I’m disappointed, too, dude. But it’s OK to have differing opinions. You’ve been so civil the past few weeks and all of a sudden you’re flying off the handle like a child. I could almost see the little flecks of spittle on your monitor as you posted your blog.

Bob and I can at least have a heated disagreement. He saw it one way, I saw it another. End of story. You’re just having a little tantrum about me, for whatever reason.

We’re on the same team here, guy. Let’s go Thrashers.

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:24 PM | Link to this

“objectively speaking” - and I have been to or watched a majority of Thrash game this year, The D is awful - I will leave it to Brian and R Stroz to rehash this if they choose. Thrashers as constructed will win 6-5 games. I was pretty stunned they held on as well as they did in a 1-0 game today with the “quality” of the D. Season ticket holder next to me told me Sutton wants “At least 4M per season” Capitalism is wonderful I am sure you will all wish him well.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:26 PM | Link to this

Iceman, sorry dude, you are just way off on this one. We got outworked for 2 straight games. Thems the facts, you don’t believe me, watch the tapes. But that it’s, plain and simple.

That not injustice, that’s hockey.

By Brian

April 14, 2007 10:29 PM | Link to this

Bob - I sat behind the NYR net tonight and other than the final minute of 6 on 4 the only exciting play I saw down there in that end after our goal was the “icing” call that someone referred to above with the alligator arms.

What are your thoughts on them just turning it off? You can’t tell me that this talent just quite like that. I have to think BH told them to pull back and play for OT maybe or just not to give the game away?

Too much pressure to just go away on the next faceoff, something had to be said and they lost the game.

By Ray

April 14, 2007 10:32 PM | Link to this

I’m a Thrashers fan, and was at game 1 on Thursday….but sad to say, it’s over. I don’t know what game you watched Ice Man, but the Thrashers did not dominate the Rangers…oh, they hit more and ran players over more, but that was it. For the second game in a row, I saw a team with a disorganized power play, weak penalty kills (the Rangers just stay in zone at will), and a team that is just outmatched at each position (except perhaps goalie, where Hedberg looked great). The Thrashers will be lucky to win a game in NY and get the series back here. Looks like Rangers sweep to me.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 10:32 PM | Link to this

I hear you. Like I said, you have high standards. I like what I saw, end result notwithstanding.

Your critiques are perfectly valid. I felt like I watched an exciting hockey game today. You didn’t. No problema.

The thing that bothers me is that I’m the one being overly optimistic and trying to muster up some positives to say about the team, but then I’m also being lambasted for not being a “real fan” by Bri Guy. It makes no sense.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:32 PM | Link to this

I don’t think they were told to shut it down, I think the simple facts are they only showed up to play for 30 minutes, and the Rangers played 60, they got the extra bounces to go there way, that’s playoff hockey.

Not injustice. It’s actually pure justice.

By Pucks n Snot

April 14, 2007 10:33 PM | Link to this

A HA HA HA HA! Dissention in the UNGLUEDLAND ranks! Look at all you people ripping eachother apart! You are all limp wristed hockey wannabes! Especially you, Rawhide! Did you take your name from the condition of your buttocks after your boyfriend finishes pounding away? A HA HA HA HA - DETROIT=GREATEST SPORTS CITY ON EARTH ATLANTA=CROTCH GROPING BANDWAGONERS RED WINGS STANLEY CUP CHAMPS 2007

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:38 PM | Link to this

This douche should really just be ignored, but please drink a glass of shut the f*** up will ya, Snots and F***?

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:40 PM | Link to this

The Lions are great - Matt Millen is God

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:47 PM | Link to this

Anyone been to the airport in Detroit? Its Grade 1 Greyhound. Now I’M pandering so will shut the F* up. Detroit? Thank god for sports. Tell us about the time the Pistons won and burned the town down. That was so cool. Oh and Hell night before Halloween where … they burn the town down. Detroit is cool - I love projects.

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:51 PM | Link to this

Isn’t it weird about inner turmoil gay folk? Always want everyone else to be gay. Dude - In the new millennium it’s cool to be gay. Don’t feel ashamed. Plow some rear and grab your nuts - You’ll feel better about yourself once you end this needless self conflict.

By wh

April 14, 2007 10:55 PM | Link to this

The caps made me go back to a study My girl was reading in her research. Oddly enough, people who use caps on internet chat have 23% lower IQ’s and are more likely - 36% - to have sever internal discourse. 15% of those who suffer from “internal discourse” were moleted, generally by a family member. So take it easy on PnS, he likely has suffered more than any of you.

By Brian

April 14, 2007 10:55 PM | Link to this

Vecsey - I am not having a tantrum, I am just stating facts. And if you want to know the “for whatever reason” that I said what I said it’s because you think we unjustly lost this game, we played for 60 minutes, and you telling other people on this blog that they have “newness to the NHL playoffs” is just out of whack. So now it is your job to “muster up positives”? Great job, post a blog that we were robbed so you can rally the locals…

wh - the Zhitnik trade fixed a lot of our D problems. He came in and has played the 25+ mins/game to be a true #1, and that bumped Sutton down (who many here are not happy with) to a #5/#6. Having McCarthy in rather than Sutton is another common theme here. Devo hasn’t been that bad lately either, Havelid missed some time during the season, injuries (at one point we were on our #8 or #9 D-man). Yeah, other parts of the season D sucked. But in the end it was getting where it had to be minus some dumb scratches.

Sutton getting $4m/year is ludicrous. He took stupid penalties today, I looked up at the clock and it wasn’t until the 11:20 mark that he let someone skate right around him and go to the net.

By Rawhide

April 14, 2007 10:59 PM | Link to this

PS,…you worthless sack of Sh#t,….

I wish you mom would hurry up and get home from the strip club and take away your computer.

At least WH and other NYR fans that live here have the guts to show their faces at Philips,….aggrivating as they are,…at least they are HERE.

where are you chicken Sh#t???? Got the nads to show your face around here…..no,…you don’t even have the means to get here unless you steal some of mommie street-walkin’ money before her pimp beats it out of her.

Detroit???? Check your census data….in 10 years, cities like your won’t have the population nor the economic viability to hold multiple sports teams.

Everyone that has any brains and/or jobs skills is moving away from dog Sh#t piles like Detroit.

Soon the only people left their will be in-bred, momma-boys with no viable means to be employed and left in a run-down rust heap of a has-been town.

You not even smart enough or good enough Wings fan to hang with your own crowd,…that’s why you come into this blog to vent you bile. Your rejected even by Detroiters. Otherwise, you would be content enough to enjoy your wings with your crowd and not need to feel the need to jump in here to “compensate” for your small prick by acting like you have anything worthwhile to add to the discussion.

How pitiful is that you butt-F#cker?

By Rawhide

April 14, 2007 11:03 PM | Link to this

Sutton looking for $4 million a year is ALMOST as rediculous as Snot-Boy asking the manager of the video rental store he works for to give him more then minimum wage.

Not-gonna-happen.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 11:10 PM | Link to this

Brian, How many times have I had to remind you to turn on the and fonts on your computer?

It’s unjust on a higher level, not a literal level.

It’s unjust because we (or, I, I guess) wanted the team to win so badly.

It’s unjust because this team has worked so hard to get to this point and overcome so many obstacles along the way that they deserve to win a playoff game, especially one decided on a f-in goal from center ice. THAT’S my point. If you think it’s fair to lose on a goal like that, fine. I don’t. I hate it. It’s unfair. Each team scored one legitimate goal today.

Don’t you think it’s weird that you’re accusing me of both liking the team too much and not being a big enough fan? Which is it?

By Brian

April 14, 2007 11:17 PM | Link to this

Vecsey - I’m not accusing you of “both liking the team too much and not being a big enough fan*”. I am accusing you of never watching the sport while you make statements about those who do.

Rawhide - thanks, I’ve been depressed since the game ended but I got a good chuckle out of that one.

I can understand Rangers fans coming here, it’s all part of the playoffs, not to mention there’s some good hatred/rivalry between the Braves & Mets/Yankees. But did we even play the Red Wings this year? Or did I miss something with the Falcons/Lions feud of ‘06 that spilled over into the NHL fan base?

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 11:18 PM | Link to this

WH, that’s a great point. Funning thing is that I actually wasn’t making a ‘gay’ joke about PnS, I was making a ‘you must be a woman’ joke … but, you know, that’s not cool either, as I respect women. Bob called me a woman earlier on this blog, and I didn’t like it, either.

So, seriously, thanks for playing the voice of social conscience on that one, and I’m gonna delete that comment based on your input.

By Brian

April 14, 2007 11:27 PM | Link to this

It’s unjust because we (or, I, I guess) wanted the team to win so badly.

So now Vecsey is implying that even though he doesn’t watch the games that often, he was the only one that wanted the Thrashers to win while the rest of us who were actually at Philips Arena for games 1 & 2 didn’t want them to win…

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 11:35 PM | Link to this

Brian,

Your anger is wasted on me, dude. I’m a nice guy. I like hockey. I watch hockey as much as a possible for a guy who works nights and weekends, takes college courses on the side, has a wife who also works full-time and is working on a Masters and who has two small kids, two cats and a dog. If I can’t watch as much hockey as you would like me to, I apologize for that, too, I guess.

If I offended you with the word ‘newness,’ I sincerely apologize. Obviously, I didn’t mean anybody and everybody who could possibly read this blog. You obviously have many years experience enjoying this fine sport, as do many of our readers.

Let me see if I can rephrase it so you understand me better: Perhaps our excitement over finally getting into the playoffs has been somewhat dampened by two bitter defeats on home ice, and perhaps we’re forgeting that two one-goal losses are a far cry from behind embarrassed. Though the team has yet to play to its full potential, I feel it is trying hard and deserves a little pat on the back. You and some others think the team is playing like horsepucks, and that’s certainly a valid opinion as well.

Does that work better for you?

I just want you to get over the whole “Ice Man is the anti-christ” thing. It’s getting old and it makes you sound petty.

I’ve told it to you straight, like friends should.

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 11:40 PM | Link to this

Pucks n Snot is proof as to why morons shouldn’t procreate. He should really get back to sitting on his cucumber.

By Ice Man

April 14, 2007 11:44 PM | Link to this

P.S. My wife would fall over laughing if she ever heard somebody accuse me of not watching enough hockey! Maybe you could do me a favor and e-mail her to tell her you don’t think I watch nearly enough hockey.

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 12:22 AM | Link to this

Well, pucks finally came out of the closet!

By Ice Man

April 15, 2007 12:29 AM | Link to this

Had to remove latest PnS comment on grounds of lewd language. There are few others in here, from not just him, that I should do the same. Let’s keep it cleaner from here on in, guys. Tonight was definitely a feisty night with emotions running high, but we need to remember that kids can access these things, as can mothers, grandmothers, sisters, etc …. so let’s not be degenerates.

Heading out for the night pretty soon, so just wanted to say great conversations tonight, always appreciate the feedback. And I appreciate everybody reading the blog. Let’s channel some positive energy into the boys and get them playing to potential on Tuesday.

Don’t give up on ‘em, Bob. They need you.

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 12:34 AM | Link to this

Ice Man - Please put P&S back up. He finally revealed who he is and where he lives. We have been trying to draw him out for a long time. At least clean up the language and put it back. We finally suckered him into coming out of the closet!

By Alex

April 15, 2007 12:41 AM | Link to this

*Pucks n Snot *

Back to your parent’s basement it is!

The only fraking way your arrogant and overpayed Red Wings win championships is…by virtue of the all mighty dollar. They want to be the NYY of hockey by buying their championships…well how many have you won recently? Yeah, I forgot, first round loses in the playoffs the last two times, how did you enjoy that for your hockeytown arrogant bunch?

Ice Man, I’m optimistic about the Trashers chances, but they have to win game 3. Just have to. Can’t go down 3-0.

By Ice Man

April 15, 2007 12:42 AM | Link to this

Can’t do it. I think we paid way too much attention to him tonight, and now we need to go back to ignoring him. Everybody was a bit chippy tonight, rightfully so. But this is a place for people with a common interest to kibbitz about hockey, not a place to trade low-grade insults. I even let a few things go further than they should have tonight, so I think it’s just high time for happy thoughts.

Well get the conversation back on track about hockey tomorrow. Hopefully without the personal insults.

Thanks again.

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 12:47 AM | Link to this

Ice Man - It would be an injustice of biblical proportions if you don’t put P&S’s post back up. Everyone would be happy know that, yes, he does live in Lavonia, Michigan, wastes his money gambling, and all of the other stupid things he revealed. Please reveal the truth on P&S.

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 1:17 AM | Link to this

Since the Ice Man is censuring the blog as it pertains to P&S’s coming out of the closet party, I’ll try to relay the propaganda. One, P&S alleges to work in the healthcare industry making 60k/year. The truth is that he is probably a janitor at public health care facility making 20k. He alleges that he lives in Lavonia, one of the wealthiest suburbs of Detroit. The truth is he lives on the wrong side of the tracks in a cardboard box and uses the public health facility’s computer. He alleges that he gambles when he just panhandles outside of the casinos. Last, he thinks everyting in Detroit is great thus displaying his ignorance once again. Furthermore, in an attempt to show his business and economics knowledge, P&S stated that he is not effected by the automotive industry difficulties. Hey, P&S, if the manufacturing base leaves, so do most of the other jobs, that’s why you have casinos stupid, your tax base is depleted. Lastly, P&S hasn’t left Detroit because he loves the snow. The truth is his tricycle has three flat wheels.

By NYR

April 15, 2007 1:18 AM | Link to this

Funny to watch everyone jumping off the bridge being down 2-0. Although as a Rangers’ fan I can definitely relate.

I’ve seen us blow too many 2-0 leads to get excited yet.

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 1:29 AM | Link to this

Rawhide - Great job, it seems you annoyed P&S the most. Even though I don’t drink, I owe you a cold one.

By doug

April 15, 2007 1:57 AM | Link to this

let’s see, when was the last time detroit won the stanley cup ? how often have the red wings won the cup lately, two out of ten ?

By doug

April 15, 2007 2:09 AM | Link to this

not to defend the obnoxious detroit fan, but they can’t buy championships anymore. we all have a salary cap now.

By Sharon

April 15, 2007 3:45 AM | Link to this

Lavonia? Did PnS type that? It’s actually Livonia. There are much wealthier suburbs just outside of Detroit. I believe Livonia is the whitest, but definately not the wealthiest nor the nicest. 60k doesn’t cut it in the ritzy burbs.

I’m originally from Detroit and I know the area and the people very well. I really hope y’all don’t start hating on the Red Wings because of that freak. He’s not a true hockey fan, he’s just a loner with a computer. Really, that’s a “special” existence. Pity the fool.

Also, the Wings are far more than the NYY of the NHL. Check out their roster and the solid prospects in the system. Yes, they spent money in the pre-cap days, but the their drafting record is hella good!

In a nutshell (too late, haha), this series is damn frustrating. I still have an ounce of hope. If all else fails, I have 12 ounces of medication in the fridge. Lotsa doses.

Just so you know, there are several Wings fans up in Detroit rooting for our Thrashers. Now that’s some love!

By Tom

April 15, 2007 3:49 AM | Link to this

NYR

That is exactly my point. Much earlier before this blogpost melted down I said that we should remember how the Yankees came back from being down 2-0 against the Braves. Series can turn, not saying it will, but history has shown they can.

If you look back at the history of the NHL a 2-0 deficit is not something that is impossible to overcome.

I have said since day 1 that the Rangers and the Thrashers match up almost identically and both of these games could have just as easily gone to overtime as ended in 1 point wins for the Rangers.

We lose 6-2 twice, I would give the Rangers the credit for owning us. Instead there were 2 hard fought games that we were in a position to win or tie in the last 5 minutes.

So we go to NY and get the bounces, we could be coming home tied 2-2. We don’t, the Rangers may sweep. Irregardless it has been frustrating to be a Thrasher fan and not get the win, but the games have been tight and we were in both until the end.

By greg

April 15, 2007 4:35 AM | Link to this

so i know i’m a ranger fan and that few of you will actually listen to me, but i don’t think you should be writing your team off so easily.

as so many other people have said, they were both hard fought games. they were both close games. and yes, we got a very lucky bounce tonight, but you didn’t play badly. hedberg was amazing. you guys had some great chances.

also, sometimes one team’s bad play is because of the opponent’s good play. both teams have played well at points, even though the rangers are up 2-0. i personally was not happy with how the rangers played in game 1.

i think that, as fans, you should stand by your team. rangers fans (true blue faithful, not most people that come on boards like these just to gloat or curse or something), know that just as well as anyone.

i’ve actually been impressed with the crowds at phillips arena. i wasn’t expecting much, but it was a loud, packed house both games. it’s been a fun, up-tempo series, and while i understand your frustration, i don’t think you should be burning your jerseys just yet.

By greg

April 15, 2007 4:37 AM | Link to this

plus i don’t think calling the opposition “rat bastards” belongs on a newspaper site. come on… be mature and talk about hockey, don’t resort to name calling.

By the colonel

April 15, 2007 5:49 AM | Link to this

The Rangers are playing smart hockey. The Thrashers are probably as good as Blueshirts when they are playing without fear and anxiety. Holik’s line plays that way, but none of the other come close for Atlanta. Andy Sutton’s icing play late in the 3rd helped set up NY’s winner. And when he iced the puck there wasn’t a Ranger within 10 feet of him. He has been terrible and I’d welcome McCarthy back in a heartbeat. Not that it would change a lot—where is my man JP Vigs? Sim is doing absolutely nothing out there. Zhitnik and Havlid have seemed overmatched at times. And man on man what is up with Atlanta’s power play?

By CM

April 15, 2007 7:16 AM | Link to this

Seems to me like there aren’t that many regualars on here anyway, (atleast not trashing our team) so for those accusing us of jumping off the bridge, er bandwagon, forget it, that’s not happening. And for all you yankee @ss holes who are here just to be well, yankee @ss holes, I think the rats are looking for you, c-ya. Get a life, seriously.

RH had I been at that game, unfortunately I was not, aspirin, a pat on the head and a little sleep wouldn’t have done the trick. I was too sick to even get on here last night. Awful, just awful. That goal, that Sutton, that piece of crap Avery, that killer pass to Shannahan..ughghghgh! It was a killer pass though and did you see the one to Sid the kid in the Pit game? Why can’t we do that stuff?! Okay so we have the talent to, then why don’t we?! Are we a team of individuals, it sure seems that way sometimes.

Despite the fact that I wasn’t at Phillips I literally felt sick when it was over, as if I had lost the game myself, I guess THAT’S what being a fan is all about. I wonder if ANY of us would be on some $hit hole Rangers website talking the same crap their ratty, worthless @sses are talking here? I think not. Instead we’d spend our time praising and cheering on OUR team, on OUR blog.

No quetion about it, we must win in NY and it will be a raunchy crowd (to say the very least). I wonder if any of those ‘Bluelanders’ from the NYNY video on Thursday night will be at the game :)

GO THRASHERS!!

By K

April 15, 2007 7:36 AM | Link to this

WE NEED SOME DEFENSMEN THAT KNOW WHAT THE HELL THEY ARE DOING!!!!! Lehtonen is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay over rated, and the scoring talent is very streaky. none of that translates to post season success. No crisp passing, nearly no shots. it was painful to watch

By jerry

April 15, 2007 8:49 AM | Link to this

I will take an ugly shot on goal over a beautiful pass any day of the week. The Rangers don’t f—k around. They shoot the puck at the goal.

By Scott

April 15, 2007 9:06 AM | Link to this

I think you forgot there is another team on the ice. The Thrashers have given up almost 80 shots in two games!!! 80 SHOTS!!! They better stop running out of position to make unnecessary hits or this seris will be over SOON. The game is won on goals, generated by scoring chances, not hits. Now ask yourself which team is more dedicated to playing positional defensive hockey and that is the team that will win the series. Un fortunately we know that answer.

By BG33Brown

April 15, 2007 9:10 AM | Link to this

Greg-thanks for your post. You are absolutely right about everything you said. Hockey is a streaky game. So far the Rangers have gotten the bounces. It pains me to agree with a man from a city I loathe.

As a life long Wings fan (until I got my season tickets to the Thrashers 3 years ago) I can think of a bunch of series that teams have blown a 2-0 lead. 1 early Thrashers goal in NYC and this is a whole new series.

While some of you may be ready to give up I AM NOT.

STENDEC Make up your mind-does Moose suck or Kari suck. Maybe we should put you in between the pipes b/c a BRILLIANT performance and a bad bounce aren’t good enough for you.

By brugie5

April 15, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

I root for the blueshirts boys and enjoy the rants on both sides of the fence…I’ve seen series come and go and in just about every Playoff series you need three things to win

—-Strong special teams —-Top Flight Goaltending —-A little luck

For the first two games the Rangers have gotten all three—none of that is disputable—-can it all change in the blink of an eye?…oh you bet ya! Pressure is always on the home team to get in done so the pressure shifts to the back of the NY jerseys regardless of the series outcome to date. Atlanta has a very talented team and I expect nothing less than 2 wars Tuesday and Wednesday night. Keep your heads up Peach staters..this series is far from over!

By Krust

April 15, 2007 9:20 AM | Link to this

I do believe last year the Hurricanes lost their first two games at home. I also heard on 680 thursday before the game that all of the first round sieres winners last year had losing home records. This may not be true someone do some research. So the Thrashers are not out of it. They also play very well at the Garden. I expect to see Hedberg in goal Tuesday and don’t be suprised if Hartly mixes up our top two lines. Lines 3 & 4 have played much better. Holik’s line has played great.

By Dave

April 15, 2007 9:39 AM | Link to this

You titled this ‘Didn’t Deserve to Lose”??? Do you know anything about hockey? One goal on HOME ice against the #6 seed?? Incredible!! You better read Shultz’s column. Learn!!

By gorangers

April 15, 2007 10:41 AM | Link to this

Dude, your clueless. For starters, you are not a fast team so spare us on the speed take. Second, you have no idea how the game would have gone without that fluke goal. Teams play differently when they have the lead. Third, you did deserve to lose. In the first two games your stars for the most part haven’t showed up. You aren’t going to win in the playoffs without your best players, playing well.

By Meat

April 15, 2007 10:57 AM | Link to this

Ice Man, please….

I was so hoping, so convinced that thse guys wouldn’t drink the loser Kool Aid of this city that the other bumbling teams do every year…..But that dopey Trash must have been slid a few pounds of birdseed and spiked the water…..

They have played like crap! Mosse did his job and the grinders are doing their’s but this is a total JOKE. I grew up in MSG with the Rangers and have totally embraced this team - but I won’t be like the rest of you Atlanta nit wits - if they roll over and don’t roll heads, this is one season ticket holder that won’t be back.

Stop with the damn excuses and PLAY HOCKEY !

By wh

April 15, 2007 11:07 AM | Link to this

I go away and RnS comes back with boastful commentary for his 60K job .. That is a Biblical Injustice. With a good buzz thats material for an hour. Oh well.

By Vegas

April 15, 2007 11:09 AM | Link to this

*The easiest money I made this year was betting the Thrashers were out in round one. They have no clue how to win a playoff game. *

By FiveHole

April 15, 2007 11:12 AM | Link to this

What Dumb-A** editor allows Steve Hummer to write a story on the difficulty of watching hockey on TV during a Thrashers playoff run? Are you idiots actually TRYING to turn fans away? As if the team’s current failures aren’t enough, you have to insult those who’ve had no problem watching televised games for years. Not to mention the piece wraps up with a nice conclusion that there is no solution to the problem. Thanks Steve, just what Thrashers fans need on the front page this morning.

If this is how the AJC plans to rally the hockey base, kiss off, and enjoy the Nextel Cup. We don’t need your absurd excuse for “coverage”.

And by the way, Steve, here’s a tip: watch the players react, not the puck, and maybe your dumb-a** will finally understand this game.

Love, A 30 year Georgia hockey fan.

By John Luciano

April 15, 2007 11:17 AM | Link to this

Play hard? Didn’t deserve to lose? You are kidding, right? Look at the stat sheet pal and find the glaring line that tallied up “giveaways.” You’ll see a big, fat ZERO. Atlanta is undisciplined and reckless. Avery and the Rangers laughed all the way home on the plane last night. It’s obvious that you’re not even a real hockey guy based on the 30,000ft views in your article. You don’t know anything about the sport. You’re like the history teacher in High School who puts on a whistle at 3:00 and coaches the football team becuase nobody else is available. Where is your team relocating next?

By Rawhide

April 15, 2007 11:36 AM | Link to this

ICE MAN - I’ll keep it clean. I’m sure even the likes of P&S understands he was called out. Until he shows his face at Philips,…and he won’t becuase he’s gutless,….he’s a non-issue with me from here on.

Let him post. Sometimes idiots like that have to be heard so the rest of us seem THAT much smarter :o)

CM - I understand how you feel. That game left me with a sick stomach. But I hope you feel better soon.

I would feel worse if we were blown out 5-1 or something like that,…so I’m still a believer. But with those gut wrenching 1 goal losses,…one tends to replay EVERY little thing,..if THIS would have gone the other wy,….If THAT would have, etc……sheeze!

Oh,..and I’ll go on the record saying that if the performance in their one start this series is the basis of decisding who starts Tuesday,…I would go with Moose.

By wh

April 15, 2007 11:57 AM | Link to this

RH - Moose is it. No way to make a change now. If he loses game 3 - you still have to roll him back in Game 4 because Kari is now officially a basket case. If he wins game 3, still have to roll him back despite back to back because he is now perceived by the team as best chance to win. Moose playede well yesterday. But the strategy was still suspect in pulling Kari after 1 game which is brought out by the fact team still did not win. There are no more decisions to make here - Though I of course hope Hartley makes another move to get inside both of their heads.

By Ken

April 15, 2007 12:18 PM | Link to this

Lifelong (40yrs+) Ranger fan here - 2 things y’all should keep in mind: 1)You’re seriously underestimating Lundquist in the nets and 2) Why is your best player (Kovalchuk) chasing Avery around?? You’re falling into the trap…………

By luckydog

April 15, 2007 12:57 PM | Link to this

My take, and worth what you paid:

—Despite our supposed veteran leadership and playoff coaching, the Rangers have been the team playing with better composure, focus and fundamentals (such as the ability to CLEANLY RECEIVE A PASS, for god’s sake.)

—Hossa has been taken out of the game, not for lack of effort or skill but by their overplaying him. The real problem is we don’t make them pay for overloading his side every time the puck comes in — even on the PP when that means there are at least 2 other Thrashers uncovered.

—Kozlov is awol and looked half asleep Saturday. In the first period he took a long clearing pass at mid-ice and just watched as it sailed under his stick for icing. That is not playoff form. I’m glad Shanahan knocked him at the end — maybe it will wake him the F up!!!

—Tkachuk MUST make clutch plays and get nasty in front of their net for us to have a chance. His assist to Kovy was a start. We need more from him.

— As far as our chippy play at the end Sat, Kovy and Tkachuk should both be woodshedded for blowing our 6-4 PP opportunity.

—On the other hand, the Sutton hit just before the final buzzer (and it WAS before) was clean. You got their guy sitting on the puck as time runs out, what do want Andy to do, go shake his hand? Screw the Ranjerks if they don’t like it.

Despite crappy fundamentals and the dismal top line play, we could have won both those games. Even marginal improvement in our game up there and we can get right back in it.

Go Blue!

By dan

April 15, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

These comments are great - good to see passion on both sides. Bottem line - rangers have played smarter, have taken the goonery from a frustrated ATL team (which never works - this isn’t the 1970’s and we aren’t in philly) and deserve to be up 2 games to none. How any atlanta fan can think they should have won shows that the southerners are still learning the game. That is OK - we are happy to have you and need you for the NHL to continue to thrive. The team that is up 2-0 has been the better team! ATL has a great team but it is no better than the rangers. The big difference is rangers have a goalie who is second to only Brodeur in the game. Defense always gets the better of offense in any sport in the end. The other thing that has been lost in this series is that for all the crap Glen Sather gets from the hockey world, you can’t ignore much longer the good things that are now going on with that organization. If you look past some of the high profile players the NYer’s have, there are 4 young kids playing key minutes and excelling for them. This series is far from over, but should the Rangers win, they won’t get past the next round. Their future however, is much brighter than Atl’s and remember, as good as Dupuis has been for them, the kid they gave up to NY for him is going to be a star on broadway and that is something NY has already won from ATL.

By Brendan

April 15, 2007 1:28 PM | Link to this

Okay, first thing’s first: Everyone needs to settle down, take a few deep breaths, and chill. This series isn’t over. I’m not saying the Rangers don’t deserve to be up, 2-0. They’ve played well. Especially for road games. Coach Renney is actually to be commended. He’s outcoaching Hartley. The Thrashers don’t stink. They’re playing a very good team.

The Rangers 1st goal was a fluke. A gift. But they got it, and they made the most of it. Good for them. I want to agree with Brian, IceMan, Bob and the others who have said that Hartley is responsible for the woes of this Thrashers power play. That’s what’s killing us. It’s hardly a “new” problem.

I’ll agree that the Thrashers aren’t intense 100% of the time. The worst thing I observed at Blueland was the Unleash the Fury video segment being followed up by a Rangers’ goal. And folks, that’s just not acceptable. This was TV timeout. Hartley, having benefit of the home ice line matchup advantage, put out troops that seemed bewildered and tired. There was less than 5:00 left in regulation. They looked “lost.” To give up a goal … in these circumstances, is difficult to believe. It was as if the unleash the fury video segment fired up the WRONG TEAM.

Hartley has to got to reevaluate his line combos and work on that power play. I don’t think there was a single shot on net through the first four PP attempts. It was insufferable to watch. And the penalty kill … why do we never attack the puck?? I’ll never understand that.

And finally, what’s with this saddling of the Thrashers, in their 1st ever playoff appearance, with the failures of the Hawks, Braves, and Falcons? This team is just starting to write its postseason history. Do not lump them together with teams from other sports. They have nothing to do with each other. Nothing.

Where is your “faith?” This team isn’t playing horribly. Its power play is. But overall, this team hasn’t layed an egg. They just didn’t get the win. They play well at MSG. And if EVER there was a team capable of blowing a 2-0 series lead, coming home, it’s the Rangers!

Folks, I’ll end on this note. And hear me well. This is now the Rangers’ series to lose. And with their media boozehounds, expect them to lay it on THICK, if the Rangers should falter in Game Three. It’ll be an utter feeding frenzy if this comes back to Blueland tied, 2-2. I still think the Thrashers have a shot if they come back to Blueland down 3-1.

See ya at Game Five.

By JNY

April 15, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this

First time to your paper. Um….it’s interesting…

1) Some “fan” writes for the paper. Okaaay. Rather unique take on the game. “Perhaps this team just needs to keep playing hard, keep persevering and keep laying those rat bastards on their asses and keep putting the biscuit in the basket.” ??. ???. No substitue for class…Oh and that was ONE biscuit…

2) The Thrashers are actually a pretty good team (though hardly VASTLY superior, as another, uh, “writer” for this paper thinks). The teams are fairly evenly matched, but there’s this little problem…there are hockey games being played! Your coach’s playoff tactics are well known, but I think, at some point, the Thrashers may have to PLAY HOCKEY! You guys are not the big bad Bruins, or some reincarnation of the broad street bullies. Pathetic.

3) Finally, you do not get to say a word about Avery if your best player is ignoring the puck, running after him late in a losing playoff game. That was beyond sorry. Sending a message? To a guy who loves that stuff? Great job coach!

PS - Any of you enjoying watching that prototype loser Tkachuk?

By Matthew At The SLC

April 15, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this

I just wanted to let y’all know that the idiot who said those things under my name is my Idiot Racist Redneck Stalker, and as a redneck wouldn’t know a blueline from a crease. I love this team, have since before they began playing. I saved for 6 mos as a poor college student to buy playoff tickets and will be purchasing some kind of season ticket package for next year. I love hockey, and watching the last two games live at Philips has introduced me to a whole new world of sports - PLAYOFF HOCKEY!!! There is nothing more thrilling and exhilarating than playoff hockey. And I include in that the Florida-Georgia Game, shoot… any football game, Braves playoffs, or any other sport I’ve ever seen live.

There’s nothing like playoff hockey, and I STILL, and WILL ALWAYS believe in BlueLand. If the Sox could do it… shoot, if the 1996 Yankees could do, I say we CAN do it! I will see the rest of 19,000 crazy BlueLanders back in Philips Arena on Friday! And my Idiot Racist Redneck Stalker can suck my c@#&!!!

By Rick Flanagan

April 15, 2007 2:02 PM | Link to this

Unfortunately, I didn’t get to see the game. But from the tone of your column, I should have. I’m really happy to see Atlanta in the playoffs this year. It’s about time. I remember well the fine run they made leading up to the end of the season last year and the fabulous contribution that Sutton made in the last 4 or 5 games.

The time to perfect the PP is during the season, not in the playoffs. Your right about specialty teams, the coaching staff is supposed to make sure the lads are well prepared for the playoffs.

Hopefully, the bounces and breaks will turn around in New York. I’d love to see this expansion team make the second round or better.

By luckydog

April 15, 2007 2:07 PM | Link to this

JNY, as a Thrashers fan I’m right there with you on Kovy going after Avery — inexcusable given the game situation at the time. Down a goal with a minute to go, he needs to be putting said biscuit in basket, not chasing some no-name meathead around the ice. Otherwise I have no problem with our physical play, especially since we don’t have the most skilled defense.

As for Tkachuk, he was our big playoff “rental” move. The jury is still out on him. Way out.

That said, I think the Rangers have played about as well as they can while the Thrashers have not. And as Brendan pointed out, now the Rangers play under the pressure of being favorites in their own building while the Thrashers come in as loose underdogs.

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 2:12 PM | Link to this

Let me get this right, Brett Hull thinks Avery has maturity beyond his years, according to his interview on NBC. This is the same guy how yells F—- U on national television to the crowd yesterday. Yes, Brett that is maturity. What a moron!

Second, did anyone know that Brett Hull and Avery were sleeping buddies for 24 months. Yes, Brett, said he and Avery lived with each other for 24 months. Well isn’t that special! Clement, Hull, and Ferraro, or should I say Larry, Moe and Curly really showed their bias today.

Mute button on!

By Bud

April 15, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this

“I would denounce God…”

What a crock! Do you actually think the same God that let Hitler kill 6 million Jews cares a rat’s @$$ wether or not your hockey team wins a game??? It amazes me…that one people actually believe in this old man with a flowing beard sitting on a throne tallying the fall of every sparrow and two that He would take a day-to-day interest in something as trivial as a sporting event. Maybe He can pitch in at Darfur or Baghdad and let the Stanley Cup winner be determined by human action alone.

Are the NY Ranger fans any less worthy of divine intervention? I guess if He’s All-Powerful He can be on both sides at the same time.

Most of you will think I’m just splitting hairs here, but from Ice Man’s description, its seems clear to me that he really believes this stuff. Hopefully he’s just joking.

By joe719

April 15, 2007 2:52 PM | Link to this

Do any of you so-called hockey fans in Atlanta have a clue?!! Your boys were outplayed on their own ice for two straight games, in the 2 most important games of the year! Face it!!You’re just not good enough. By the way, the reason you are out-hitting the Rangers thru the first 2 games is because they have had the puck most of the game!!! Get a clue. By the way, if Tom Renney sees the light, and finally dresses Ryan Hollweg for the games at the Garden, your pretty boy russian and old man Tkachuk, might have to be sent back to Georgia in body bags. LETS GO RANGERS!!!!! DEAL WITH IT!!!!!

By Bob

April 15, 2007 3:05 PM | Link to this

Don’t give up on ‘em, Bob. They need you.

Not a chance, not giving up. Demoralized last night, but it’s done, new day.

IceMan, sorry for the Princess comment. That was out of line and I apologize.

To explain, it was a reaction to what I felt was an accusation from you that we were newbies and didn’t know what we’re watching. I’ve watched Stanley Cup games for over 30 years, live and die it, can’t get enough of every game.

We’re all in that foxhole together. We stay there until the final tick is gone from the deciding game.

Carolina lost the 1st 2 at home last year, went up to Montreal, threw Cam Ward in net, and skated a Cup. Believe

My problem yesterday with your take was that I looked up at the scoreboard with 10 minutes to go in the 2nd period, and we had 9 shots on goal. 9 Then, the boys kicked it up a notch and I was fully confident they’d win that game, and feel the only reason they didn’t was because the effort wasn’t there for all 60 minutes.

Hossa, Kozlov, Tkachuk have got to wake up and get it rolling, if they do, we can get right back in this series.

Here’s what Hartley and the boys need to do to get back in it and take Game 3, then go after a Game 4 24 hours later.

1)Start Hedberg Game 3 2)Quit looking for the hits, let Exelby and Holik’s line do that work when the opportunity avails itself, but everyone else is going to the net from the drop of the puck, no more headhunting. 3)Switch up the PP, go with just one dman on the point, but someone with wheels like Dupuis or Kovy on the point and sit Havelid, he’s useless on the PP 4)Put Sutton on Jagr. Zhitnik and Havelid are overmatched and we’re lucky that line hasn’t killed us more than what they’ve done so far.
5)We can outwork them in a Game 3, then in the next game 24 hours later, start Kari in Game 4. I watched him yesterday. He was intent on watching everything Moose did, I think he’ll come back refocused, see if he can steal you Game 4.

By Lee

April 15, 2007 3:21 PM | Link to this

POWER PLAYS WERE PATHETIC!!!!

By Rawhide

April 15, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this

I saw Hull call Avery “mature” on NC today???? PUH-leeze! He’s a punk.

However, I will totally agree with the post earlier that Kovy chasing him around is playing into his game. That’s obvious. Being young and emotional, Kovy is getting caught up with personal battles. He needs to keep his head and stay focused on the team effort. BH needs to see that that happens,….TK, Mellanby, etc have roles to play in that regards as well. A lot of this game is played upstairs.

The Rangers have NOT been THAT much better then us,….but, as I’ve stated before,….they’ve been just good enough to be up 2-0,…..just gotta put it aside and deal with game 3.

Win Tuesday and the series is wide open again,……however, I will restate my feelings that we really do have to take both games next week in NY.

GO THRASHERS - RIP RANGERS!!

By d

April 15, 2007 3:31 PM | Link to this

Brendan Hartley had no choice in who he put out after the tv timeout. Sutton had just inexplicably iced the puck with no pressure on him (for about the 5th time in 2 games). Cant make line changes after an icing.

By JNY

April 15, 2007 3:58 PM | Link to this

Guys, the problem with your Thrashers was NOT that they weren’t playing hard for the full 60 minutes of those games. In fact, they were playing at 110%. However, 109% of said effort was focused on running Ranger players. And THAT is on your coach. As a coach, one thing you drum into players head’s is do not run around LOOKING for hits; opportunities for hits come along naturally during the course of a game. You take them as they appear. When you FOCUS on running the other guys a number of things happen: positional play tends to break down or is needlessly challenged; your own players suffer from fatigue and bumps and bruises almost as much (sometimes more) as the team you’re running; your special teams are impacted negatively (ok, this one depends on competent ref’s and that’s another story!).

Again, the Thrashers are a pretty good team. However, the Rangers are also, and also happen to sport some world class talent of their own, and also want to win. The idea that it’s simply a matter “trying harder” is foolish, and if they crank it up to 150% but most of that is concerned with how many Rangers they can injur, it will be a short series…

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 4:00 PM | Link to this

The cost of three tickets to the Thrashers game $180.00 dollars. Food at the game $25.00 dollars. Watching the Hanson Brothers storm onto the NBC hockey set and beat the crap out of that moron Brett Hull - PRICELESS!

By Brian

April 15, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

JNY - nice point you bring up how Vecsey says in the beginning of his column that we need to “keep laying those rat bastards on their asses”. Yet amazingly later in the blog he says that he “had to remove latest PnS comment on grounds of lewd language” because after all “we need to remember that kids can access these things, as can mothers, grandmothers, sisters, etc …. so let’s not be degenerates.”

Brendan - thank you for reminding me of another point. I am so sick of these jumbotron things in between breaks. I can’t stand the fact that a goal is scored on us and they play some comedy clip as to make a joke out of it. So a playoff team and its fans are just supposed to laugh at the fact that we are getting eliminated?!?!?!

By Tony C.

April 15, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Sim should be on the Chuk-Ching line…Cap’n Rat just doesn’t have the jump to keep up with #17 all game long.

Lundqvist deserves a raise for the phenomenal play he’s authored since February. Also, I think it’s essential that we play the Holik line against the Jagr line 5-on-5. The Hoss line just can’t keep those boys under control reliably…oh wait, we dont get the match-up on the road. Ugh anyway, that is a priority. PP needs to have a new rule: no more than 4 passes before a shot. Remember the words of The Great One ” 100% of the shots you don’t take, don’t go in “

LET’S GO BLUE !!!

P.S. It’s really tough watching sportscenter and listening to Linda Cohn drool over NYR success….I hate her right now.

By russian

April 15, 2007 6:17 PM | Link to this

I know we are going to loose this serious and Rangers will go next round. Well, Thrasher is very young team on PO. They are old of age, but in PO nobody has expirience at all. Scotty played sometimes and somewhere, Tkach played long time ago. Slava and Hossa was out PO couple seasons. Any way it was nice expirience for Team to feel PO energy. I hope they come back to Atlanta with 5-th game and it will be OVER. Well it was nice 82 games. I said we done for this year. I do not believe on God or Miracle. S** happens, not Miracle. :-)

By russian

April 15, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

I want to Pittsburg kick Heatly SOB a*. They are 1:1 and playing now.

By Hubie

April 15, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

Wow. What a bunch of whiny fans. To say the Thrashers dominated the game is just silly. I think that was the Rangers with 2 or 3 breakaways and numerous odd man rushes. Shots on goal was 39-28 Rangers. Last 10 minutes of the game, dominated by the Rangers. Your Thrashers could not even geenrate a scoring chance on the 6-4 late in the game and then resorted to goon tactics. I agree it was a game the Thrashers easily could have won, espeially given the fluky 1st goal, but overall the game was competitive and I would not say the Rangers stole 1 here. I expect a hard fought Game 3, but the Tharsh better be ready for an early on slaught on Tuesday night b/c we will be ready to play. The rangers hvae been a fgreat first period team at home this year, although we’ve lost numerous 2 goal leads.

Go Rangers!

By Brendan

April 15, 2007 11:33 PM | Link to this

d, I stand corrected then. I had forgotten it was an icing. But with benefit of a TV timeout, the guys should have (1) caught their breath, (2) refocused, and (3) consulted with their coach over strategy. The possibility of winning the faceoff, clearing the zone, and making a line change … was available within the realm of possibilities.

Again, I give credit to the Rangers. Why not? They are playing good positional hockey. They are playing angles well. And they appear to be getting the better of the line matchups. Plus, they’re winning a lot of puck battles along on the boards. They’re handling crisp passes. Can we say the same? Sometimes, I think we’re playing scared, or not to lose, like Brian pointed out. And you can’t play like that and expect to win in the playoffs. This is not the regular season, where you hope to ensure yourself of a “point” in the standings by reaching overtime. You get NOTHING if you go to overtime and lose. (If the NHL just had the intestinal fortitude, they’d institute this concept for the regular season as well.)

At this point, I have to believe the Thrashers know what’s at stake. The margin for error has been removed. In terms of adjustments and strategy, Coach Hartley will not have the benefit of the final change. So this will be an uphill battle. That means each and every Thrasher will be that much more accountable.

Folks, the Thrashers are a good road team. And they play well at Madison Square Garden. I don’t know that the Thrashers will be “relaxed” in the role of underdog. In terms of pressure, it’s squarely on the Thrashers. The Rangers can lose both games and still be right where a lower seeded team should be after four games, tied at 2-2. Even a split still puts the Rangers in a commanding position, in terms of taking the series. But I’ll remind everyone of the God’s honest truth: The NHL gives you NOTHING for three wins. Three (3) playoff wins and $1.50 buys you a cup of coffee. It’s four (4) wins that propels you to the next round. Go Thrashers!