AJC > Sports > Thrashers > Blog > Archives > 2007 > April > 13 > Entry

Hedberg in goal for game two

I’ll blog more later, but Bob Hartley said today that Johan Hedberg would get the nod in goal for game two over Kari Lehtonen. Hedberg is excited to go, but Lehtonen is obviously disappointed by the decision. I asked him if he was surprised, and he said he was. Actually, his answer was “You were too.” And I was.

But the move makes sense, considering Hedberg’s history of playoff success as well as his standout game against the Rangers late in the regular season. What do you guys think?

Permalink | Comments (116) | Post your comment |

Comments

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 12:55 PM | Link to this

On March 16, 2007, Hedberg won a game at Philips Arena over the Rangers. I kinda thought Moose would play when the series featured those “back-to-back” games. But, if it results in wins, it’s hard to question.

By BG33Brown

April 13, 2007 1:02 PM | Link to this

WOW. I have to say I surprised but not necessarily disappointed. I think Kari could of bounced back and played a solid game 2.

What I love about this move is that Hartley is not willing to sacrifice this season in buliding Kari’s confidence for future years. CC Do you think his decision would of been different if he had a contract for next year?

Can’t wait to hear 19k people yelling MOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSE at the top of their lungs.

GO THRASHERS

By Bryan

April 13, 2007 1:04 PM | Link to this

Surprised, but not. Thought Hartley would stick with KL no matter what. But 4 goals is a bit much. My guess is this is a bit like sitting Kovy for that 3rd period against Wash. However, it would be nice if on D, we wouldn’t let Jagr skate freely in circles. Him and Nylander I think 2-4 times did it last night. And I think at least 1 or 2 goals were the result. Finally in the 3rd Jagr tried it and someone simply closed the space instead of waiting to see what was going to happen and he lost control of the puck. What a novel idea. The hitting was great. 3 goals was good, I think if we passed better, it would’ve been a different game.

By Brian

April 13, 2007 1:10 PM | Link to this

My first reaction was WHOA!

I can’t believe Hartley is doing this. I didn’t want to say it on the earlier blogs, but how much pressure is BH under? DW clearly put the pieces in place right now and I won’t name names but someone isn’t under contract for next year. Could that be the short leash reasoning? If so, why not pull up McCarthy somehow and get Sutton out after last night?

This seems very surprising to me. This can also send a message to every other player on the team though that now is do or die time and we can’t be the streaky team that we have traditionally been.

By Thrashersfan33

April 13, 2007 1:11 PM | Link to this

I am surprised. I figured he would have given Kari a chance to bounce back in Game 2 but have him on a short leash. Oh well. I guess Hartley was possibly thinking ahead. By that I mean, if Kari was shaky in game 1 because of the playoff atmosphere, would he be shaky in game 3 in MSG due to the atmosphere that is going to be there? The TEAM can’t afford for that to happen even if this is a best of 7 series.

By the fish

April 13, 2007 1:12 PM | Link to this

Hope this isn’t a move of despiration, however……

By Brian

April 13, 2007 1:14 PM | Link to this

BG33Brown - not sure if my first post went through or not but my thoughts exactly…

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that Carolina will draft 11th and Florida 10th overall this Summer. Chicago will draft 1st overall in an amazing feat of luck. With the 5th worst record, and only an 8.1% chance of winning, they did it! The Blackhawks have been drafting better lately.

The bit of good luck pushed the Washington Capitals down to 5th overall, from what appeared to be a likely 4th overall pick.

Reverend Whittaker, your Bruins will draft 8th overall. I know we have Blues fans here rooting on Keith Tkachuk. St. Louis will draft 9th overall. Philly drafts 2nd overall, and Phoenix 3rd, and the L.A. Kings will go 4th.

Doug McLean, assuming he’s still the Blue Jackets GM by Draft day, will select 7th overall. McLean has got to be feeling the heat by now.

Unleash the Fury, Blueland!

By BG33Brown

April 13, 2007 1:17 PM | Link to this

Brian-I think it had to have a big impact that Hartley isn’t under contract. I just hope that in doing this (short term thinking) we don’t cut off our nose to spite our face.

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 1:21 PM | Link to this

I like surprises. For example, in 1999, how many of you thought our 1st playoff goal would be Belanger, from Havelid and Tkachuk. Put … your hand … down. Hartley’s worst ever playoff season ended with eleven (11) wins.

That was his worst. I’m gonna trust him. Let’s give Moose a warm, Blueland welcome. See ya on Saturday.

By sisu

April 13, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this

This is a clear message to the team!

By Matthew At The SLC

April 13, 2007 1:28 PM | Link to this

This is all well and good, but why isn’t anyone talking about two of the best moments from last night?

Yes, I am talking about how 19,000 people booed the Atlanta Hawks (about 14,000 more people booing them than they’re used to) and then those same people booing Shirley Franklin.

Classic!

The thing is, Shirley Franklin doesn’t have to worry much, because (and I’m guessing here) the people who went to that game were not her her constituents because none of the people at the game actually live IN Atlanta. But still… it was hilarious.

By Russ

April 13, 2007 1:29 PM | Link to this

I don’t like this move, but if Hedberg plays well they should probably stick with him. We will already have one goalie thinking he’s going to get yanked after every goal he gives up, we don’t need two.

By Thrasher_Ed

April 13, 2007 1:37 PM | Link to this

I really don’t care who is in net. They are both good goaltenders. I just want the Thrashers to continue to pound the Rangers on the Forecheck. That was an awesome forecheck last night w/ lots of great hitting. I think the Rangers are soft and the Thrashers can wear them down in the end. Thrashers in 7 games!! Let go Thrashers! Let’s go Thrashers! Let’s go Thrashers!

By Jenn

April 13, 2007 1:38 PM | Link to this

Half of me is shocked by this move - and worries that it will dash Kari’s confidence for the rest of the playoffs.

Half of me thinks it’s brilliant - that’s why we signed Moose, right? To be the steady ready back-up?

Let’s not forget - Cam Ward was the back up goalie for Carolina last season.

MOOOOOOSE!

By Brian

April 13, 2007 1:54 PM | Link to this

Brendan - I don’t think a single Thrasherfan is against the Moose. Just a question of surprise, etc. Most folks don’t care if it is Damian Rhodes in net as long as we win. I can’t wait to get there on Saturday.

Matthew At The SLC - this gets confusing but we have 3 blogs going on at once here and I already brought up those points and some touchy folks got emotional…

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 1:54 PM | Link to this

Thraser_Ed, that’s the spirit! Did you see Exelby’s hit on Jagr, and the look on his face afterwards? Priceless. And “X” did it with Avery on the ice. So, this was no, “take advantage of Jagr while the GOON rides the pine” kinda hit. Way to go, “X!”

Jenn, don’t also forget that it was Jussi Markanen who backstopped the Oilers to a 3-3 record in the Finals, with 2.17 GAA, including a shutout in Game Six, when the Oilers backs were up against the wall. Having a dependable, capable backup is a great move by ANY GM.

But I’ll say this. Uhhh, we haven’t seen the last of Kari Lehtonen in this series. I’d be even more stunned if Lehtonen doesn’t play when the series shifts to MSG.

Start the countdown to Game Two!

By Buzilla Baby Blues

April 13, 2007 2:01 PM | Link to this

I don’t know what to think….

Kari will be crushed…

What do we do if Moose wins?

By smclem35

April 13, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

I’m not surprised by Hartley’s decision. Kari looked unsteady throughout the game and Moose has a lot of playoff experience. The Rangers even commented on Kari looking shaky. I think a bigger and more important decision will be which pair of defensemen lineup against Jagr’s line. Havelid and Zhitnik obviously could not handle the size and strength of Jagr. I expect to see Sutton or Exelby out with them in game two especially after all of the discussion about playing physical with Jagr.

By Bob

April 13, 2007 2:11 PM | Link to this

zilla, we keep playing Moose, that’s what. This isn’t for one game, it’s a change because Kari was not ready.

This is a great move. I called for it as soon as I got home from the game last night on all the blogs, but I did think Hartley would start Kari and then I was hoping he’d yank him the second he let in a softie tomorrow. Better to do it this way, let Hedberg have a day to prepare.

Unleash the Moose

It was obvious to me that Kari was not ready from the get go last night. He looked bad when he went behind his net early to play a puck, he had terrible rebound control all night, crap, there was this one puck he just left laying there just to his left right near the goal line last night, and never covered it up, finally some dman swept it away. The 4th goal is the softest goal I’ve seen allowed in a playoff game in years, it was absolutely inexcuseable.

Great move, Bob.

By BB

April 13, 2007 2:13 PM | Link to this

I think that sisu hit the nail on the head. I think this move is intended to further fire up the team. The team really seems to ramp up their play when Moose is in goal.

By Dave

April 13, 2007 2:14 PM | Link to this

Absolutely idiotic !!!

I have been a big fan of Hartley but this move is nuts !!!

I have a feeling that this just may be some gamesmanship and Kari will start.

You gotta go with the guy that gives you the best chance to win, and that is # 32.

By Brian

April 13, 2007 2:16 PM | Link to this

smclem35 - it’s not the size or strength of Jagr that hurt us, he didn’t play a physical game against us, it was the fact that him and a couple other Rangers skated circles in our zone without being touched. I think as the series goes on it will be our front line that pesters him more. I like the idea of X playing out there but whoever he is paired with will not keep up with Jagr & Nylander.

By Bob

April 13, 2007 2:20 PM | Link to this

Dave, our best chance to win is with Moose, Lehtonen was not ready and the Rangers obviously had the book on him (everybody was shooting top shelf). This is not gamesmanship, you don’t do that, he will start Moose and I’m pumped up again, great move!

Kari looked so shaky last night, I lost all confidence in him, and so did our Coach.

Moose played great in his last few starts. He attributed it to abandoning his change he made earlier in the year to “play like all the young guys now with the butterfly”. He’s a standup goalie and is aggressive on pucks behind the net, that’s his game and once he went back to it, his play went up.

Unleash the Moose

By Bob

April 13, 2007 2:22 PM | Link to this

Jagr’s size and strength absolutely did hurt us, big time. That’s why I also expect Coach to change it up and put Sutton out there every time Jagr takes a shift, Big Andy played Jagr pretty well this year.

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this

Craig, I don’t want to be the nit-picky sort. But I’ve heard way too many commentators and journalists alike say “The Rangers have stolen home ice advantage” in this series.

Really?

You see where I’m headed, don’t you? Game Seven will not be played in Madison Square Garden. If there is a Game Seven, it will be played at Philips Arena, giving Atlanta four (4) homes games compared to the Rangers’ three (3). Nothing can take our home ice advantage away, other than losing before the full complement of games are played.

And right now, there are potentially three (3) games left in each club’s building. By definition, when any series shifts to Game 3, there are only five (5) potential games left, and three (3) of them could be played in the lower-seeded team’s barn (3, 4, and 6 compared to 5 and 7 for the higher seed). Home ice advantage means … having the advantage of playing a game on your home ice. Teams sometimes lose while playing on their home ice. But at no point have they ever lost the advantage of having played the game on their home ice, in front of their own fans. (Unless they were invaded by the visiting team’s fans and outshouted. Which, I’m proud to say, didn’t happen at Blueland last night. And won’t happen on Saturday.)

Okayyy, someone’s gonna say, “But Brendan. The point is … that all the Rangers have to do to win this series is win their home games.” Well, that’s just gonna be “a piece of cake,” right? Let’s not dress the team. We’ll forfeit them. LOL.

It’s a lot easier said than done. I don’t think anybody should assume the Rangers, or any other team, will win all their home games. That’s the whole point of playing the games. Every game is up for grabs. Every series is up for grabs. I categorically reject the notion that the Thrashers cannot win on Madison Square Garden ice.

Allright, I’m beating the dead horse now. And P.E.T.A.’s already after me.

By raindawg722

April 13, 2007 2:23 PM | Link to this

UNLOOSE THE MOOSE!

By Daniel

April 13, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this

Darren Elliot has noted that the Moose has been more comfortable since going back to a more stand-up style of play in his past few games,instead of the butterfly. The numbers don’t lie since he has a better record in terms of wins since the change, all games that he has been clutch in, like the last game against the Rags in March. I think its a good move and sends a good message that only the guys who help the team win will play, I hope Kovy and Hossa are paying attention.

GO THRASHERS!!!

By sweetlew

April 13, 2007 2:25 PM | Link to this

It is a GREAT move by Hartley. I didnt think he would do it unless Kari struggled in game 2 but I am glad he did it nonetheless.

This is a MUST WIN GAME. Moose has come up huge for us over and over again. His game against the Rangers last time was amazing. He made a ton of incredible saves.

Kari’s psyche may be a little bruised but he has years to recover from it. H e usually plays his best after a benching as well.

I am on the glass next to the Zamboni tomorrow. Go THRASHERS!!!!

By Matt H

April 13, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

Loved: The hitting game, the crowd, the enthusiasm, secondary line production

Liked: The resiliency

Disliked: Lack of starpower and goaltending

Hated: LACK OF STARPOWER AND GOALTENDING!

Hossa, Kovalchuk, Tkachuk, Kozlov, Lehtonen- stand up and sound off like you GOT A PAIR! A pair of anything- eggs, testicles, whatever. Something that shows you can produce.

Whatsamatter? Tired? Lazy? Nervous? Maybe sleeping on giant piles of cash isn’t making for a good night’s sleep?

I’m sure Pascal Dupuis has a cashless mattress, and he seemed f’in’ well-rested!

After last night’s game, I have to stand by my early gut feeling of Rangers in six. If we see a repeat of this b****** on Saturday, I say Rangers in 4.

Some people, Garnett Exelby especially, have a lot to feel good about from last night’s game. The Thrashers got two very important playoff game points right last night- 1. Hit em hard, make em pay, wear em down, make em pay. 2. Bounceback factor.

Two big points wrong- 3.Goaltending (mediocre at best, but not as bad as MA Fleury’s playoff debut, and thankfully Lundqvist did not look unstoppable). 4. Starpower- zilch-o, unless you count KT’s assist, which you really shouldn’t, cos he didn’t do crap the rest of the night.

The fifth point was team defense which was alright. The team offense was absolutely pathetic, with the exception of the 3rd and 4th lines. All perimeter shots with little if any follow-up.

Bobby Holik and Lars shined, which makes me happy.

I’m generally of the opinion that most first playoff appearances are like first girlfriends- usually not too pretty and best left forgotten.

The Thrashers have yet to make me change my stance on this. (>:( I’m p**, can ya tell?)

By Still Thirsty

April 13, 2007 2:28 PM | Link to this

Now if we can only call in the reserves for the concessions at Philips…talk about unprepared and totally overwhelmed! I’m still waiting for a pizza and a beer.

By michael

April 13, 2007 2:29 PM | Link to this

I think this is a great move. The moose has been playing better than Kari. When we clenched the division the moose was in goal! Kari showed that he is not ready for this last night. lest ye not forget that the moose led the penguins to the eastern conference finals!

By Matt H

April 13, 2007 2:34 PM | Link to this

And yeah, I’m pretty down with starting the Moose, if the idea is “Let Kari see how a pro does it.” And I’m 90% confident Hedberg can fill that role, though Moose has shown in the past he will lose his cool.

By N2Hockey

April 13, 2007 2:37 PM | Link to this

the rangers are so relaxed that they were playing soccer in the pking lot before practice this am!

moooooooossssssssseeeeee

By Ben

April 13, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

Can we bench Exelby as well? He was just as responsible for one of those goals as Kari

By ThrasherGator

April 13, 2007 2:48 PM | Link to this

Still Thirsty - I’ll cut them some slack because it was the first game at Phillips like this but if it is the same on Saturday.. We will unleash our Fury!

By johnmrog

April 13, 2007 2:48 PM | Link to this

Maybe this wouldn’t even have been an issue is Kari hadn’t decided to display all the maturity of a pre-pubescent adolescent earlier this week. I’m with ya, coach.

By bartdunwoody

April 13, 2007 2:49 PM | Link to this

It is a great move. Coach is taking the pressure off of Kari. Let him chill and get ready mentally. Don’t forget that the games in New York are back to back. Moooose in game 3 and Kari in game 4. The Rangers are no where close to winning this thing.

By 74 Dawg

April 13, 2007 2:51 PM | Link to this

why did it take 2 full periods before we raised the tempo to where the Rangers started/ We out played them in the third. In the first 2, they skated circles around us, literally. If Lehtonen gets benched for uninspired play, shouldn’t Kovy sit again too?

By Red Light

April 13, 2007 2:58 PM | Link to this

Thank you Ben. Exelby comes up to the blue line to try to lay a big hit, the puck gets chipped past him and the Rangers had an odd-man rush, albeit a short one. This isn’t the only time he has gotten trapped by doing that.

While the fourth goal was soft, were the other goals KL’s fault? Don’t think so!

The real issue is that the Rangers dominated the puck in the Thrashers zone often last night.

By bartdunwoody

April 13, 2007 2:58 PM | Link to this

Thirsty. NO slack on the concessions. It’s not like they didn’t know how many people would be there. And don’t tell that if you call the beer man at the last minute that he wouldn’t send over a truckload. Come on Spirit you say you need the money, you have people in the building with money to spend and you can’t supply them! The fans expect better tomorrow can you step up? and don’t get me started on the lines and service last night…..

By michelle

April 13, 2007 3:02 PM | Link to this

yeah my first reaction was: WHAT?!?!? one game and you’re gonna bench him??

i think hartley ought to give him a 2nd chance at home and play moose on the road. it seems to be on the road we’re not AS effective, why not use your veteran on the road?

By SW

April 13, 2007 3:10 PM | Link to this

I want to get positive for a minute.

Last night I saw our beloved Captain race for two pucks to prevent an icing call. The first one the linesman called icing anyway (although I think he got it wrong, Mel won the race and got the touch) the second one he got the call. Great hustle for a 40 year old never known for his speed, and if I may say so is there a more effective leadership style in the NHL than “Follow me”. I’ll excuse him the lack of a speech Wed night, and I’ll applaud BH for rewarding that kind of effort with minutes.

Great effort Mel - keep showing those kids how it’s done

By Mary

April 13, 2007 3:12 PM | Link to this

I am glad I am not Kari’s mother. It would crush me to see the disappointment on his face this morning. I am totally behind Moose. With his experience, he could win this one and even the series. You know what, I wouldn’t want to be Moose’s Mom either. It’s a lot of pressure on him!!!!

By tConnor

April 13, 2007 3:17 PM | Link to this

Let’s hear it for Holik. Had it not been for him, we would have fared much worse. I was so disppointed in the play of Ilya, Marian and Keith. Ilya was the best of the 3, but not by much. I sure hope they improve on Saturday.

By CM

April 13, 2007 3:18 PM | Link to this

I’m incredibly torn about the goalie situation. Not about Moose getting the nod (because I like Moose, a lot) but it bothers me that Kari got yanked. Make sense?

On one hand how does a guy build his resume and his confidence when coach sits him for “losing” game 1? (Besides just how much of the blame can anyone put squarely on Kari’s shoulders for the loss? Not a heck of lot if you ask me.) He faces too many shots, although I’m sure many of you will disagree, we all saw (or heard about) the Dalls/Vancouver game the other night…

On the other hand how do you start Kari in game 2 when losing another one really isn’t preferred? I will say that I do prefer to see Moose start as opposed to Hartley yanking Kari at some point during the game. It’s a very tough call, one I’m glad I don’t have to make.

I agree that it will probably be a blow to Kari’s confidence BUT, he is a professional athlete and he should bounce back from it (although I think it’s vastly unlike the Kovy benching). #32 will be back in net, he is a stud you know?

LET’S GO BLUE, UNLEASH HELL!!

By Kathryn

April 13, 2007 3:19 PM | Link to this

I say unleash the moose. I am a huge fan of Kari’s but I trust BH. This is the playoff…there arent 2nd chances. There’s 4 games and you’re out.

By CM

April 13, 2007 3:23 PM | Link to this

Right on SW - Mel’s hustle was evident and I was stoked about it.

By MiddleGA

April 13, 2007 3:25 PM | Link to this

If he doesn’t already have an unannounced contract extension in his pocket, I think the outcome of this gamble might ultimately be what determines Hartley’s future.

If it works & we go on to win the series, he’s certain to be back IMO, regardless of who is between the pipes when.

But if Moose loses, and then Kari comes back for the rest of the series with his confidence shaken, I can’t see Hartley being behind the bench next year.

Right now, I’m not convinced that we win the series even if Moose shuts out NY tomorrow. But if we lose tomorrow, I feel like we’re done, probably swept.

By Chris

April 13, 2007 3:34 PM | Link to this

Great Move!

See last year’s Braves for an example of what happens to a team when they lose confidence in their last line of defense.

It is hard to imagine a storyline of The Moose coming back 6 years later to lead another long playoff run; but if Kari is going to put is in a 1-0 hole every game with a softie it’s the only shot.

By Craig Custance

April 13, 2007 3:37 PM | Link to this

Brendan — I’m kind of with you on that one, but I think you answered your own question when you point out that the Rangers just need to take care of business at home and they advance.

BG33 — I don’t think Bob makes any moves with his contract in mind. I think it’s all about winning the next game/series.

By Russ

April 13, 2007 3:37 PM | Link to this

HOLY OVER-REACTION, BATMAN!!!

A lot of people, including me, have been saying not to panic after one game. I would imagine that message isn’t exactly coming across to the players on the team when the coach panics after one game.

I didn’t think Hedberg should start the Carolina game at the end of the regular season either, but I was wrong, so hopefully I’m wrong again. I just think 9 out of 10 games Lehtonen is going to give you a better chance to win than the Moose, so Lehtonen should be in…We’ll see.

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 3:49 PM | Link to this

Craig, you do think the NY Rangers will take care of business at home? I’m shakin’ my head, “no.” The Broadway Blueshirts are going to have to win another game at Blueland to win this series. That’s just my opinion.

It is nice to know that if Game Seven is needed, that it will be here in Georgia. Not up there!

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 3:55 PM | Link to this

RUSS, you’re absolutely right. There’s no need to panic. It’s one game. If it were 3-0 in favor of the Rangers, I’d say some people might justified in expressing their frustration over the status of the series. But the truth is, we didn’t bring our best game last night, and STILL we almost forced OT, where ANYTHING could have happened.

I suspect Atlanta will win one game in New York when the series shifts there. I’m not ruling out two (2) wins by the Icebirds. The Thrashers play well there.

By Thrashers27

April 13, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

Not a bad call. There’s no room for chance now. It’s win or go home. Kari had his chance and will surely get another, but Moose has done well this year and very well against NYR.

MOOOOOOOSE!!!!

We will win tomorrow!

By yellowjax

April 13, 2007 3:57 PM | Link to this

There’s been a lot of talk about the softie the KL gave up but I think it goes deeper than that. He was never in control of his game last night. Several times he came out of the net and misplayed the puck. He put Zhitnik in tough spots a couple of times. He did make some great saves but he was never the “hot” goalie and the general thinking is to ride the hot goalie to the cup. Hedberg is a quality keeper. He would be starting on a lot of teams. No sense in risking going down 0-2 before you see if maybe he will have the hot hand. I know it caught Kari of guard but these guys have kept their egos in check all season and if Moose is the guy to carry to carry us deep then I think Kari will be content to wait in the wings. This is the playoffs. We’ll have to worry about the fallout from fragile egos next season.

By Russian

April 13, 2007 4:09 PM | Link to this

I do not know what I can say…. Change a goalie, may be it works. First game loose it is not big deal. Even if we will lost Second Game, we still have a chance to shake our heads and win a series. Critical moment become 3:0, that will done. But I hope it will not happend. We will see it at Saturday. And Please take off our Old Captian from Second Line!!!

By luckydog

April 13, 2007 4:11 PM | Link to this

brendan, Exelby’s hits were nice crowd-pleasers. But when marcel hossa sailed through the slot for his tip-in on their third goal, Ex was trailing him helplessly….. worst defensive play of the game, Kari’s bobble included.

nothing he can’t redeem with better play in front of the net saturday, tho.

I think BH is benching Kari as much for his bush-league throwback of the puck on Avery’s shot as for any of the goals.

Moose will win and Kari will come back strong. Take it to the bank.

Go Blue!

By Eileen

April 13, 2007 4:26 PM | Link to this

MOOOOOOOOSE! The loss was by no means all of Kari’s fault. Let’s hope the 3rd period is a sign of good things to come Saturday. Kari will bounce back next week. I think Moose will come through and send this series in the right direction.

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 4:30 PM | Link to this

I think you’re right, Luckydog. So let it be written! So let it be done!! Thrashers take Game Two.

By Brendan

April 13, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this

MEMO to 680THEFAN, last time I came to a Saturday afternoon game, your station had incessant March Madness tournament coverage. And literally in mid-sentence, it was interrupted to bring us the Thrashers game. No lead ins. No teasers. It was as if the station “apologized” for having to interrupt the basketball coverage to bring you some “weather update.”

This time around, how ‘bout you give us a FULL HOUR of lead-in coverage? And hype it up, for Cripessake!! These are playoffs!! You are the FLAGSHIP STATION of the Atlanta Thrashers. FLAAAAAGSHIP. May I say, “flagship” one more time? Good. Time to ACT like it. One hour!! Give us an HOUR of coverage to lead in to the opening faceoff.

I don’t want to hear some spiel in rebuttal about how hockey kills your ratings on 680AM. If you don’t want to carry Thrashers games, I’m sure some other station will.

By mb

April 13, 2007 4:39 PM | Link to this

Overall, I like this move. Moose brings a bit of a stabilizing factor given his recent success against the Rangers and his past playoff success, plus he’s a far better puck handler than Kari, and our D needs all the help it can get.

The real challenge is significantly reducing the number of shots either of our goalie faces. I believe the shots were 38-24, with way too many of them coming within 20 ft. On the flip side, Lundqvist didn’t seem all that sharp, either, so I’d like to see us throw more at him and see what happens.

I expect to see a more composed Thrashers team tomorrow now that they have one under their belts.

By ICE

April 13, 2007 4:44 PM | Link to this

The cause of goal #3 was the team’s inability to clear the puck and get a line change after the end of a Ranger PP. X was spent. On Ranger goal #1, Zetnik was defending without a stick for at least 15 seconds. Rangers went to jagr on Zetniks side. The forwards are responsible for giving their stick to the defenseman. They didnt do it. Kari was a nervous mess most of the night. Way too many rebounds. He is being benched for that more than his awful play on goal #4. The team plays with a lot more confidence in front of Moose. The other blue hair ought to follow him to the bench. He committed at least 3 penalties last night and was fortunate to be called for just one. He made passes without looking in his own end, made several turnovers and iced the puck for no reason a few times.

By Skydawg

April 13, 2007 4:46 PM | Link to this

I think most of you are looking to deep into this. I don’t think it has anything to do with BH looking for an extension. I think it has everything to do with BH wanting to win and putting an experienced goalie, who by the way has played lights out over his last 5-6 games. Moose has been our stopper lately. And BH is simply looking for that same result in this case. I don’t think he’s given up on Kari, he just made some nervous, youthful mistakes that you can’t make in the playoffs. He learn from it and be out there again soon.

By John

April 13, 2007 4:49 PM | Link to this

Aside from a couple of GREAT hits by X last night he played a horrible game. It’s one thing to lay a hit within the context of the game but it’s a completely different story when you abandon your positioning to do so. Two goals were directly on the man that Exelby should have had checked.

The big guns will get their names on the scoresheet, you can’t expect that Ranger defense to cover them that well over the course of a series. The bad thing is that Lundqvist was bad last night as well, we can only hope that continues. I thought the birds,while they played hard, were too focused on playing physical than were about playing their game. I’ve watched probably 15-20 Ranger games this year on center ice and I thought they were really off their game last night, so the physical play worked in that aspect. Maybe BH should play the fourth line a bit more for the physical play and have the Kovy and Hoss focus more on making plays.

By storstark

April 13, 2007 4:57 PM | Link to this

Kari has responded well to getting sat all season, no need to panic. He plays better vindictive and with a sense of indignation. As has been suggested, I also think it sends a good signal to the rest of the team regarding accountability.

I would have let him start one more, but eff it, we’ll be fine.

Moose plays the Rangers well and an early W will do a lot for the shaky nerves of every player.

By Thrashy Thrashy

April 13, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

The toss of the puck at Avery and the subsequent fourth goal got Kari benched. Hedberg better show up Saturday. If he doesn’t, we’re doomed. I just hope the Moose is solid and the boys can give better effort on D throughout the game.

By JAR

April 13, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

Speaking of goalies, remember the Lundqvist/Islander ice girl incident? Did anyone else notice Lundqvist last night with Shanahan as a “bodyguard” while the Ice Girls cleaned the crease? Hilarious! My friend got a video - will try to get it.

By Red Light

April 13, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Since the 2000-01 Stanley Cup Playoffs, there have been a total of 30 instances where the visitor won Game One of a particular series in any round.

The road winner went on to win the series just 13 times (13-17).

Of the 14 times the visitor won the first game in an opening round, the road winner won just five times (5-9).

As you might expect, visitors that have won the first two games are a more formidable 12-4.

I couldn’t find how many times there was a change in goalies between Games 1-2, though.

BTW, the Holik-Dupuis-Larsen line had nine of the Thrashers’ 24 shots and 10 of the Thrashers’ 24 hits.

By Red Light

April 13, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this

John: How was Lundqvist bad?

Before Hnidy’s goal his own player knocked him off his feet, and by the time he got up the shot was half-way there. The Belanger goal was a beautiful tip-in and the third goal was after a turnover and a goalmouth scrum that popped out to Dupuis.

By John

April 13, 2007 5:20 PM | Link to this

Red Light, he totally looked lost on the Dupuis goal, He had a chance to cover the puck when it was right by his left skate. He misread the pass from the point to Belanger as a shot and was out of position.

By Tony C.

April 13, 2007 5:30 PM | Link to this

No the worst defensive play was Mrs. Sutton’s tape-to-tape pass to Jagr as he crossed the blueline into OUR zone. But X’s escort of Lil’ Hoss is a verrrry close 2nd.

After last night’s display, who wants to b!tch about Big Bobby’s paycheck??? Seriously, that 3rd line was the only line that played on the rangers end with any consistency.

My keys for game 2 are:

1)#17 must lower his shoulder and go to the net, this will either (A) draw penalties, (B) allow Cap’n Rat & Walt to catch up. I’d really like to see hiBob put Simmer back on that line-he can almost keep up with #17

2)Weak-side forwards must provide support to break-out/clears-too many times last night the puck reached the redline, but was pushed back into our end by NYR … I’m sure that the boys were trying, but these half-speed blind clears from the half-wall with no puck support killed our game last night. Full credit to NYR for playing a smart puck-possesion game, but seriously, how many times have you seen one of our guys just whip the puck to the redline without even looking…you play with fire, you get burned.

3) continue the physical play, it will pay off, this team excels when there is a commitment to the forecheck.

LET’S GO BLUE !!!

By candyman

April 13, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

Yellowjax is right on, besides the softie which he’s had a habit of giving all year, Kari did look unsteady last night. My guess is that Hartley saw the unsteadiness and felt that the team has so much confidence in Moose that it wasn’t that tough a call to make the switch. Kari’s a pro and still learning, he’ll bounce back. That being said, the defense need to be better in front of whoever is in goal.We can’t afford to to go 0-2 going into MSG…

By volstar

April 13, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

I’m giving up on the Thrashers. Last night was a must win and the Rangers came in and outplayed us on our home ice. The Thrashers are done, I would not be surprised if we lose on Saturday. We have better players than New York but something just is not clicking with the team chemistry.

By MASHAPlayer77

April 13, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

Anyone ever hear the phrase “a good defense is a good offense”? Yes, there was way too many breakdowns in the D-zone - Kari gift wrapped rebounds and allowed the killer soft 4th goal.

But not until 7-8 minutes left in the game, did the Thrashers establish ANY forecheck. I love the talent we have, but we have to learn to just shoot it in and win the battles on the board. I can’t count how many times we either lost the puck on the boards or we dumped the puck to an empty corner where there was no Thrashers player.

If we can do what we did those last 7-8 minutes, we’ll be okay in the series. If the Thrashers spend more time low in the Rangers D-zone, then Jagr, Nylander et. al are useless and we don’t have to worry about them circling 3-4 times.

By MASHAPlayer77

April 13, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

Oh and let me add that a solid forecheck will lead to drawn penalties. How many powerplays did we have last night? Not nearly as many as we should.

By Tom

April 13, 2007 8:33 PM | Link to this

Watching the game again today, God bless Tivo, I can see why Bob pulled the plug on Kari.

Kari was so geeked up for the game he spent most of it out of position. He was out a good 2-3 feet more than he normally is and was very loose with the puck.

I think Hartley made the right move and I am a huge Kari fan, but I do not think he was mentally prepared for the game. Not that he was not ready, but that he was too ready.

By stendec

April 14, 2007 12:13 AM | Link to this

Truly shocked by decision! Not big KL fan, as blog readers are aware, but sure he would be between pipes in Game 2. Whatever is best for team! Just want to win. Even if Bob Hartley has to don goalie equpmment!

By scott

April 14, 2007 2:05 AM | Link to this

First off, home ice is overrated in the NHL. It all comes down to hot goaltending. It might be a little rash to pull Lehtonen after game 1 but he was terrible in the game. Easy goals and WAY TOO MANY REBOUNDS. He has to learn to control the puck especially against a dangerous team like the Rangers.
We have to win game 2, although the Rangers are the type of team that would let another team win 4 in a row off of them. I’m sure we will see Lehtonen again in either game 3 or 4 since they are back to back and I hope he shows up. Because he can play in a playoff atmosphere.

By Thrasher_Ed

April 14, 2007 8:16 AM | Link to this

Brendan, You would think the FLAGSHIP STATION of the Thrashers would: A)Promote them more often B)Have a stronger signal at night(most people can’t pick it up outside 285 and suffer from listening to Carolina Hurricanes games from 680 AM in Raleigh, NC. That’s right Mr. David Dickey. You’d think the Thrashers would deserve a better more powerful Flagship Station.

By Thrashersfan33

April 14, 2007 9:16 AM | Link to this

It is only 9:15 and I am already getting excited for today’s game. Bottom line…I really don’t care who is in goal, as long as they win. Kari usually does very good when he comes back from being pulled (better than when he has a few days of rest), so I say ride Moose with a short leash and put Kari back in when he slips. If they keep winning with Moose, keep Moose in. Kari should know he is the future of the franchise and even if his the #1 goalie this season, he will be going forward. Oh…I hate the Schultz may try to say he was right about KL which really p** me off.

GO THRASHERS!!

By Thrashersfan33

April 14, 2007 10:13 AM | Link to this

Next time I won’t post until I have had my coffee. Meant to say “even if he isn’t the #1 goalie” and that “I hate that Schultz”. My bad.

By Tony H

April 14, 2007 11:31 AM | Link to this

There have been some very interesting observations about game one and the change in goalie for game two. I’ll add my two cents worth.

First, I don’t know if Hartley is under contract or not for next year. I think it is totally irrelevant here. Hartley coaches to win, period. Whatever it takes in his mind is what he is going to do. Does that mean that I, or anyone else, has to agree with him? Of course not. By that I mean that I think that he does what he thinks will win a hockey game and then let the results speak for themselves as to contract renewal.

Secondly, Kari’s benching is not just a message for Kari but for the whole team. Play sixty minutes as hard and as well as you can or you won’t play and we will all go home for the summer.

It is really easy to sit back and blog the mistakes that were made by most Thrashers on Thursday. Quite frankly, no player would be exempt. But that case could be made in most games - everybody makes mistakes. It is the team who makes the fewest mistakes that ultimately wins.

The boys will make mistakes today. However, if Hartley has gotten the players attention and everybody realizes they have to play like there is no tomorrow, well, who knows.

My gut feeling is that this will be a long series or a very short one. Therefore, any moves that are going to be made, should be made now - not after we are down two or three games. Wake up now guys, or it’s over mentality is required.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 12:59 PM | Link to this

Unleash the Moose

Let’s bring it today folks, off to the game. I feel good, I think the boys come out and score early, Moose keeps them in the game, and we go to NY tied 1-1. Split the games there and we’re good.

I see Moose starting Game 3 and then Kari starting Game 4 (it’s the 2nd of the back to back). If Kari performs in Game 4, then the net is his again.

Unleash the Fury

Let’s bring it today, folks!

By Tony C.

April 14, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

Good kill…#17 gets the call-hope he’s OK

BTW I know there’s a NYC bias in the media but damn you’d think Le Thrash never won a game.

LET’S GO BLUE !!!

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 4:25 PM | Link to this

Slutton is the Rangers b!tch.

By Tony C.

April 14, 2007 4:48 PM | Link to this

He really isn’t making a good case fr being re-signed is he Stroz? Howabiut Moose though-he is the difference right now.

By Tom

April 14, 2007 6:01 PM | Link to this

Shanahan deserves to be suspended for that hit on Kozlov

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 6:02 PM | Link to this

Tony C. - Moose was an animal. If not for some of those beakaway saves, the game would have been over alot earlier.

By jokurone

April 14, 2007 6:04 PM | Link to this

pretenders not contenders the atlanta jinx is in full effect. Atlanta’s sports team play at home is horrible.

By russian

April 14, 2007 6:10 PM | Link to this

Team played not Great, but it was not too bad. Head Coach is F* Idiot. He kept Scotty all game with Tkach and Kovy. It is big, f*** mistake. 27 sec left on the game wegot 6 on 4 and Bob put Captian on the ice. I wanted to cry, scream on TV. I hope that our Idiotic Head Coach got my message. After 2 games down, I am very worry about series. Moose was Great.

By South Side Freddy

April 14, 2007 6:13 PM | Link to this

okay 2 games left. hope you fans enjoyed your season

By South Side Freddy

April 14, 2007 6:14 PM | Link to this

okay 2 games left. I hoped you enjoyed your season.

By westcoastbird

April 14, 2007 6:26 PM | Link to this

Why the F* are they so scared to shoot the puck? 1 shot in 3 power plays, painfull!! New Yorks first goal should have shown this team that “pretty” does not matter. Hopefully that was not the last game at phillips this season, but it is not looking good.

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 6:31 PM | Link to this

South Side Freddy must be a Hawks fan!

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 6:35 PM | Link to this

Russian - I like Rat(Scotty), but he isn’t fast enough to keep up with either chuk. Sim is a better fit for that line. Rat’s heart is in the right place but his wheels are nearly flat.

By R. Stroz

April 14, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

Where is Hossa? Absolutely, no production and I don’t see much effort either.

By alan

April 14, 2007 6:50 PM | Link to this

wow, i heard somewhere that your coach used to throw pennies on the ice to get a play stoppage. he’s so much smarter now. he just throws a team out there with no cents whatsoever. in case you guys are as dumb as your coach and team, that’s “cents” for “sense.” not only does the team suck, they are the dirtiest team i have seen this year. i am so happy i will be at msg to see the sweep tues. and wed. and i have to also comment about the rink, with the worst boards south of washington. is that how you won your games this year, having the worst rink in the nhl? i have never seen such fluky bounces over the course of a game. but you didn’t even deserve to be in the po’s anyway, giving up more goals than you scored. what a pathetic bunch. enjoy the golf. and watch the braves lose to the mets too while you’re at it!!!!! chop. chop. chop.

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:10 PM | Link to this

Alright, I am very concerned. I called in an APB for Hossa and Tkachuk.

Please respond immediately to Haveyouseen@ourvetswhoshitthebed.com if you see these former hockey players

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:34 PM | Link to this

Alright, this is serious folks. We have Game 3 in MSG on 4/17, if anyone finds Hoss, Kozlov, Tkachuk, Belanger before then, please immediately direct them to return to their team post haste.

that is all

By Bob

April 14, 2007 9:53 PM | Link to this

So, Moose starts again Tuesday, right?

Geez, I hope you guys can find Hoss, Kozzy, K-Chuk, and Be-lan-Jay fore then, we could use those guys in Game 3, we damn near won twice without them.

By Brendan

April 14, 2007 9:56 PM | Link to this

I saw effort out of Hossa, just not results. Same can be said of Mellanby. Sometimes, I feel like Brad Larsen has been our best weapon of these playoffs. And uhh, that isn’t good.

Folks, what did I tell you about your “faith” being tested? This series isn’t over. Not at 2-0. Not at 3-1. When Game Five arrives, we very well could have our backs against the wall. We’ll need to keep it loud and rockin.

A pretty good effort from the fans of Blueland. I sensed a little bit of that “afternoon syndrome” going on, but generally speaking, Blueland was an effective 7th man. I’m watching the tape of the game now. Man, some of our chances were much better than they appeared in person.

A great game from Moose. He’s got my vote for starting goalie for Game Three.

By Brendan

April 14, 2007 10:18 PM | Link to this

Without that fluke goal back in the 1st period, this game goes to OT.

The Lightning have evened their series with NJ. And so has the Pens, with Ottawa. And believe it or not, the Islanders and Sabres are knotted at 1-1.

Radulov (Nashville) has been suspended for his hit on Steve Bernier, of the San Jose Sharks. It’s a one-game suspension. Nashville vs. San Jose was nasty. First the Preds go after Cheechoo, now this.

Speaking of nasty, the Thrashers sent a message to the Rangers for what to expect in Game Three.

By Brian

April 14, 2007 10:22 PM | Link to this

Bob - I did think that Kovvy is making an effort but the rest of the line isn’t (unless I am reading you wrong when you say K-Chuk and you mean KT). I also thought that Zhitnik came to play.

Brendan - I was happy again with the arena and I will go with you on the faith test.

Bob & Brendan - not sure what to do about goaltending, but Moose gets the start based alone on the breakaway save. I sat in a different section this afternoon and was behind the net (the other zone though) but the replay looked phenomenal as he made the initial stop then reached back with the stick and swatted away the rebound that looked as if it was going to be poked in. Kari comes in G4 no matter what happens in G3 though. No comment about the boards…

By Bob

April 14, 2007 10:30 PM | Link to this

you’re reading me wrong, I was going for the phoentic K-Chuk for Keith “hey look, Darren Pang is interviewing me” Tkachuk.

Kovy played fine, in both games.

APD for Tkachuk, Belanger, Kozlov, and Hoss, please return them to their NHL club if you find them, should we organize a search party for these guys?

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 1:26 AM | Link to this

Hey everybody, we finally suckered P&S out of the closet on Ice Man’s blog. But then, Ice Man pulled P&S’s coming out of the closed blog entry. I have tried to relay as much on Ice Man’s blog as I can remember about P&S entry. Ice Man pulled P&S’s entry after only five minutes. Anyway, he does live in Lavonia, Michigan. After all this time we have been putting up with P&S’s entries, and now, Ice Man pulls the coming out of the closet entry after letting all the others stay. Boooooo!

By R. Stroz

April 15, 2007 1:41 AM | Link to this

APB Alert - Hossa eating with other Hossas. Marcel Hossa allegedly arrested for spiking his brother’s drink with tranquilizers. Marion Hossa found lying on ground asking where’s the beef.

By Dave

April 15, 2007 9:59 AM | Link to this

You know what is incredible? Ice Man saying the Thrashers deserved to win, and calling people on that blog ‘new’ to hockey. This is from a guy that had no interest in the club while in first place and didn’t blog for weeks on end, making excuse after excuse. Then he feels that scoring one goal on home ice against a #6 seed is deserving of a win. Unreal! At least the Lightning held up the Southeast divsion honor with a nice effort in the Swamp. Hey Hossa, see Vinny and Marty play against Brodeur in a ROAD game?? This isn’t Ottawa again is it?? Superstars score goals even in the playoffs.

By Sage of Bluesland

April 15, 2007 10:19 AM | Link to this

The AJC headline says it ALL: “Do You Believe in Debacles?”

Maybe we can finally stop the Waddell-Worshipping for his deadline trades (as he finally got off of his well-paid, blustering, rear-end)? It’s past time to recognize all of that for what it really was: it was a desperation move made by a desperate man who cannot draft past the consensus top three picks in the first round. He has FAILED to build through the draft, as he promised.

And for those who think this is a team built to win for the long-term—well, I sure hope you’re sitting down as this is one of the oldest teams in the league—and it’s made up of too many soft, overpaid, overrated Euros.

We’re real close to being merely an embarrassment. You may not like it, but the truth indeed hurts at times…

Oh, and one final note: Hossa worth $6-7 million dollars per year? You’ve got to be kidding me! The bigger the game is, the more he disappears. Trade him before it’s too late (although I believe the book is well-known on him by the real professionals in the league)…I’d rather have three $2 million dollar players contributing 15 goals per year…

By Menelaos

April 15, 2007 11:08 AM | Link to this

Sage you are the kind of fan who boo’s their own team, and I tell people like you exactly what I think of them when I catch them doing it anywhere around me.

Say what you want about Waddell, but the guys on the ice are TRYING. If you disagree then I find it hard to believe that you’re watching the same games that I am.

I love checking this site because I get to see the true “Atlanta fans” that somehow get drowned out by the real hockey fans we’ve created when I’m actually at the games. But don’t worry “Atlanta fans,” I see you leaving early even in closely fought games. You also stand up at the end of a break in play after watching the cutesy skits on the big TV just in time to obstruct everyone’s view behind you once the puck drops.

Everyone is entitled to their opinions, and here’s mine: We don’t look like a playoff hockey team yet, but I feel that we’re getting very close. When it happens you’ll see a cascade of goals from all these guys people are so easily saying ‘haven’t showed up’ as they sit at their office or home having not been on the ice. I appreciate that these guys are working on getting to the point where they can own the front of the crease and make better passes out of our own zone. Sure they have work to do, but don’t tell me any of you think they aren’t trying…

Last, although I do like CC’s blogs that get all these hyperintelligent remarks started, I’m beyond disgusted at the AJC sports headline. How are two closely fought games a debacle? We’re playing a good team, and last night faced incredible goaltending and a fluke goal. This is sensationalism and it breeds the disrespect and lack of fanaticism that the previously mentioned “Atlanta fans” show so shamelessly. Make your criticisms, because there are plenty to be made, but headlines like the Debacle one are just one more reason why the AJC is a laughable source of information and just perpetuates the poor state of affairs that the so-called fans in this town are known for.

See the rest of you at game 5, I’ll be there rooting for my Thrashers.

By michael

April 15, 2007 11:32 AM | Link to this

I said before the playoffs started that the pp and defense would have to be better if we are going to win. The defense has been the same allowing more than 30 shots a game. The pp is pathetic, still!

I still think we can get back in this series but we have to play completely different.

By Brian

April 15, 2007 12:52 PM | Link to this

Dave - I called Vecsey out on that and he made it out like he is this lifelong fan that can’t watch because he has 5 jobs and a dog with nightschool. Someone else called him out and said he knows nothing, just look at the 30,000 ft views he writes his articles with.

Sage - All the GM could do was put the pieces in place. We have the pieces, I am glad we have DW.

Menelaos - glad you said something about some of the new fans, because we had these idiots in front of us and every 5 minutes one of the 4 would have to get up and make the others stand up so he could get out. It was always right at the peak moments too. I wanted to ask them if they knew there was a hockey game going on in the arena.

By michael

April 15, 2007 2:18 PM | Link to this

Yes DW did put this team together. A team that is horrible defensively, allowing 35 or more shots on goal all the time. We are a plus 1 on the season. pp is 23rd in the league and pk is 26th. Not to mention he had to aqquire 4 players at the deadline because he failed to bring the right players in at the beginning of the season. His 5 yr plan of building through the draft, what a joke!

By Bob

April 15, 2007 2:21 PM | Link to this

Sage, Waddell made the right moves, in my opinion, we wouldn’t even have been in the playoffs if he didn’t, we were fading fast at the time.

The problem is that Zhitnik is completely overmatched against Jagr, Tkachuk is coasting (where’s his grit?), Belanger is invisible, he couldn’t even win draws. Kozlov and Hossa both decided to go MIA.

But the GM does have to take the heat for the moves, if we’re out in this 1st round, then he blew it giving away Coburn, Bourret and all those picks for nothing (everyone’s a UFA except for Zhitnik, and his contract is big). I still think Waddell did a good job at the deadline, but he will have questions to answers if this doesn’t turn around.

I have faith still, but reality is that taking 4 out of 5 against Lundqvist is going to be a tall order.

By SW

April 15, 2007 3:04 PM | Link to this

Went to the morning practice today in Duluth - only 7 Thrashers there (Lehtonen, Exelby, Sim, McCarthy, Boulton, Slater, and MacKenzie) so I guess it was optional. Weeks was the only coach on the ice. BH cam out and looked in from outside the glass for about 3 minutes.

You know what - these guys are good. Unbelievable skill, power, speed, and finesse.

I feel like a parent with this team. I love to see them win, I’m ecstatic when they do. But even when they lose, as long as they played hard (and I think that they have in games 1 & 2) I’m proud of them.

Have they been perfect? Absolutely not. Definitely room for improvement. But they certainly have not been outclassed or embarrassed.

I am optimistic that they will win at least one in the Garden a G3 victory could turn the whole thing around.

If Kovvy can score early, he did so a few times at the end of the season and almost did it last night, and add another goal in the 1st, I think we can minimize the impact of the NYC crowd.

All hope is not lost - I hope the boys can see what it’s like to play Playoff Hockey with a lead (I do mean play, not sit back on our heals and allow the opposition to hold our zone with only weak desperation clearing attempts to interrupt their offensive flow)

By Tony C.

April 15, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

It’s not unheard of to come back from 2 down.

LET’S GO BLUE !!!

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.ajc.com) = text to be linked



There will be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Kudzu Services » Find the right people for the job