AJC > Sports > Tech > Blog > Archives > 2008 > June > 19 > Entry
Who’s a better bickerer? D-Rad extends
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
OK then, moving on …
by looking back. To yesterday’s blog, which has me wondering:
Who is more defensive about the reputation of their school’s academic posterity, particularly as it relates to student-athletes? Is it the Tech fan base, or the UGA fan base? You people slay me with the way you carry on about that stuff.
Or, should I write up something about Dan Radakovich signing a five-year extension?




DEL.ICIO.US


Comments
By Buzz Belle
June 19, 2008 3:00 PM | Link to this
We don’t have to be defensive - it is well known what high academic standards Tech has. UGA is always defensive because they know where they stand against Tech on this issue. Sad but true. Write something about Radakovich! THWG!
By TechRules
June 19, 2008 3:07 PM | Link to this
In the case of Tech fans, we just like to remind people of what Tech student athletes have to work with: only a few dozen majors to chose from and they all take some form of calculus to graduate. Which is why Coach Johnson realizes that we will rarely be able out-recruit UGAG. There’s a reason it’s not called “graduating”, but instead called “getting out”.
By SiriusBlack
June 19, 2008 3:07 PM | Link to this
I do not give a rat’s butt about uga. I am glad Mr. Radakovich re-upped with Tech. He is a class act.
By Richard
June 19, 2008 3:31 PM | Link to this
Tech fans, don’t have to be defensive when face to face with a UGA grad.
We can just fire them.
By TheBigBone
June 19, 2008 3:32 PM | Link to this
The uga fan base are the better what iffers and when they lose, they are the better whiners. Kiss old rusty.
By quaildawg
June 19, 2008 4:12 PM | Link to this
They both have quality degrees to offer (if one is objective) and are well respected by businesses everywhere.
Tech does rank ahead of UGA in Sleeper Cell Programs…Tech 1 UGA 0. AlObama would be proud!!!
By cltgtfan
June 19, 2008 4:42 PM | Link to this
The academic thing is a known issue without any new stuff to discuss. I am curious to hear what you may be able to bring to light about Mr. Radokovich’s tenure at Tech.
By fred
June 19, 2008 4:48 PM | Link to this
Heck, (h—-)ask the employers who they prefer. Then, 25 years later, just ask one-and-the-same—-Tech alums/entrepreneurs.
Congrats DRad!!!
By CarolinaJacket
June 19, 2008 4:52 PM | Link to this
In my opinion, its way too early to judge Radokovich’s job performance. But based on the extension, Tech’s president must think he’s doing well.
By The Truth
June 19, 2008 4:52 PM | Link to this
I think Georgia fans would be perfectly content limiting the discussion exclusively to the 7 game win streak and the strong possibility of more wins in the future due to strong Georgia recruiting classes and the stability of Mark Richt’s coaching staff. Tech fans bring academics to the discussion because they don’t have a leg to stand on in the football discussion. Anyone who was around in ‘98-‘00 when Tech was actually beating Georgia knows this is 100% fact. Tech fans rarely had a word to say about academics back then. They only wanted to talk about football. That shoud answer your question Matt.
Truth be known, both are fine schools that this state should be proud of. If Tech fans were half as smart as they think they are they would realize that the schools have very little in common and comparing them is a waste of time. Its apples and oranges. No comparison can be made.
Its ashame that the only way Tech fans can build themselves up is to try and tear someone else down. I sometimes feel sorry for them.
By StingerSplash
June 19, 2008 4:55 PM | Link to this
Frenchy got all of that one! At least it wasn’t a pop up or a strikeout. Gotta stay out of the DP now.
By Pitbull
June 19, 2008 6:08 PM | Link to this
I do not think any school that admitted student athlete Reuban Houston can point a finger at any other school regarding academics.
I do not think any school that played 11 academically ineligible football players over a 7 year period can point a finger at any other school regarding academics.
I do think those occurrances were not indicative of Tech academics overall anymore than that slimy sleazeball Jim Harrick Jr.’s basketball test was indicative of the academic expectations in the average UGA classroom.
But crap happens - and it has happened at both schools.
Finally, I remember an AJC article earlier this year reporting that both UGA and Tech met and exceeded the recently toughened NCAA academic standards. Failing to meet those standards now results in scholarship losses.
Perhaps the AJC should report which Div 1A schools had reduced scholarships, Matt.
And perhaps we (UGA and Tech) should both feel good about our student athletes’ performances.
However if Matt and the AJC are so concerned about academics, then they should post the average SAT score, the average GPA, and the average 5 year graduation rate for both football teams.
I would be surprised if Tech exceeded UGA in any of the above measurements. If that were so, the AJC would have already gleefully reported it after Carter Strickland finished having his orgasam.
And Techies, please do not say Tech is academically harder than UGA so your scores would be lower.
If you are not recruiting and signing HS football players that can do Tech work, then you are guilty of placing sports ahead of academics in your recruiting process, which is the very thing you say about us.
By CarolinaJacket
June 19, 2008 8:21 PM | Link to this
Pitbull, you make some good points. The fact of the matter is that both schools have some excellent programs. The advantage that UGA has over Tech is that a large university has many more options than does a special type school like Tech. This does not address the question of hard or easy programs, but rather choices of degree choice. Tech will never be able to compete with UGA year in and year out because they will never have the options available to incoming students that UGA will have. This just makes the challenge more demanding, but a good challenge is often what makes life the most interesting. Good luck to both.
By TDone
June 19, 2008 9:46 PM | Link to this
The fact that Rueben Houston messed up, is something outside of academics.
But when it comes to Muttland, let’s talk about:
Jan Kemp
Jim Harrick
Odell Thurman
Jan Kemp
Jim Harrick
Jan Kemp
und so weiter…
By gtNC
June 19, 2008 10:21 PM | Link to this
Seriously Matt, this is the best you have? Use this and take tomorrow off: Hey fans, do you think UGA fans are rednecks, or do you think GT fans are nerds?
By Matt Winkeljohn
June 19, 2008 10:54 PM | Link to this
gtNC,
That was the best I had. Dang. Sorry.
What part of the blog concept created your expectations?
Matt
By gtNC
June 19, 2008 11:03 PM | Link to this
I guess the concept where they can include interesting information, insights, etc. that may fall short of a full article. Not to be a jerk, but read Dave O’Brien’s blog sometime, then read the one you just posted. Just stirring the pot between rival fans doesn’t take a lot of effort.
By Buzz29
June 19, 2008 11:53 PM | Link to this
GO easy on matt. What sport is happenning on the flats? Only so many recruiting stories. THWG and mexican food
By Robert
June 20, 2008 9:03 AM | Link to this
When it comes to UGA lets talk about Mark Richt and the fantastic job Damon Evans is doing. That is your problem isn’t it Tdone? You look at those guys and you see the stark contrast between them and all that is Tech. It tells you what your future is and it’s killing you. Paul Johnson is a class act, but he is not your savior. Hopefully his stint at Tech will not be the career killer that it has been for the rest of your recent coaches.
By TruthBeTold
June 20, 2008 9:08 AM | Link to this
AJC > Sports > Tech > Blog > Archives > 2008 > June > 19 > Entry
Digg DEL.ICIO.US Newsvine Reddit Who’s a better bickerer? D-Rad extends By Matt Winkeljohn | Thursday, June 19, 2008, 02:38 PM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
OK then, moving on …
by looking back. To yesterday’s blog, which has me wondering:
Who is more defensive about the reputation of their school’s academic posterity, particularly as it relates to student-athletes? Is it the Tech fan base, or the UGA fan base? You people slay me with the way you carry on about that stuff.
Or, should I write up something about Dan Radakovich signing a five-year extension?
Permalink | Comments (18) | Post your comment |
Comments By Buzz Belle
June 19, 2008 3:00 PM | Link to this
We don’t have to be defensive - it is well known what high academic standards Tech has. UGA is always defensive because they know where they stand against Tech on this issue. Sad but true. Write something about Radakovich! THWG!
By TechRules
June 19, 2008 3:07 PM | Link to this
In the case of Tech fans, we just like to remind people of what Tech student athletes have to work with: only a few dozen majors to chose from and they all take some form of calculus to graduate. Which is why Coach Johnson realizes that we will rarely be able out-recruit UGAG. There’s a reason it’s not called “graduating”, but instead called “getting out”.
By SiriusBlack
June 19, 2008 3:07 PM | Link to this
I do not give a rat’s butt about uga. I am glad Mr. Radakovich re-upped with Tech. He is a class act.
By Richard
June 19, 2008 3:31 PM | Link to this
Tech fans, don’t have to be defensive when face to face with a UGA grad.
We can just fire them.
By TheBigBone
June 19, 2008 3:32 PM | Link to this
The uga fan base are the better what iffers and when they lose, they are the better whiners. Kiss old rusty.
Maybe that’s because Tech fans have alot more experience when it comes to losing. They express themselves by their negativity and lack of support for their team. Like the guy yesterday said, their favorite form of expression is coming to the game disguised as empty seats. Wouldn’t it be better to just wear bags over your heads like the Saint fans did. At least they were at the game.
By Huh?
June 20, 2008 10:11 AM | Link to this
So that’s it? Tech players have to take “some form” of calculus and have fewer majors to choose from? This is what separates Tech from UGA? So according to Tech fans, if we remove the calculus requirment and add more majors Tech will be winning 10+ games a year, going to BCS bowls, and finishing in the top 10.
You guys better stick to building bridges and playing with your protractors. Logic is not your strong point.
By Wreck'EmTech
June 20, 2008 10:53 AM | Link to this
CarolinaJacket and others who posted regarding the academic comparison issues, in looking at other states’ university systems and their football rivalries I begin to wonder if Tech has been mismanaged. The reason I wonder is because aren’t most other in-state rivalries between a large, mostly liberal arts and medicine-related school and another usually EQUALLY LARGE AND WEALTHY science, engineering and technology-related school? Or at least in the case of a “U of..” versus “State” case one would have an engineering program and the other the less math-intensive programs? I guess I’m looking at some of the most healthy rivalries that bring in big money for their schools like UT v. TAMU, UF v. FSU, Bama v. Auburn, UVA v. VT, etc. So maybe it’s Georgia Tech’s relentless pursuit of the MIT structure (which is fundamentally different since it’s PRIVATE and TINY), but the big question for me remains why is Georgia Tech so small? We could grow our liberal arts programs and try grow the school. But I think until we get more evenly matched in size and scope with UGA I think you guys are right that the points of comparison are few. I’m not suggesting we back track on the academic rigor we’re all proud of to get to a more Auburn level of sports and size, but we’re definitely not able to take the recruiting away from UGA without some key things like a nicer campus and more generalized fields of study.
That said, I said the other day on one of these that our rivalry is not about comparison. It’s about hate. So despite smaller size, an often under-achieving team, a comatose fanbase, and the nerdy persona isn’t it still within the realm of possibility that we could just HATE Georgia? Is that so wrong?
By Matt Winkeljohn
June 20, 2008 1:14 PM | Link to this
gtNC,
Dave O’Brien’s batting average is higher than mine. He’s in the prime of his career, and a future Hall of Fame blogger, one of the very best in America.
And, he’s in-season. Tech is way outta season.
Matt
By TDone Logic
June 20, 2008 1:33 PM | Link to this
But what about:
Rueben Houston
Joe Hamilton
George O’liar
Reuben Houston
Joe Hamilton
Gearoge O’Liar
Weak crap as usual from TDone’s feeble mind.
By GT
June 20, 2008 2:33 PM | Link to this
Georgia has actually improved their academic standing since the Hope Scholarship was introduced. If you think the degree is weak now can you imagine the “good ole days”. Not only do half the people that blog in favor of Georgia now, not know what an SAT test is, half the one’s that do and went to Georgia couldn’t qualify to go to UGA now. This explains a lot about their following.
By steponmarbury
June 20, 2008 2:45 PM | Link to this
Me did good in school.
By surfrider
June 20, 2008 3:08 PM | Link to this
Personally I like the extension of the Ad in these uncertain times. Tech has to maintain both a good product on the fields but also improve the business side ie finances. That said I like the direction of the overall program. The only question is how does Basketball adapt to the players going to the NBA that seems have been a problem going back to 90’s. Price and Sally and Ferrell and Hammonds, etc…stayed 4 years and really developed. It’s a different ballgame now. As for Georgia it’s really not comparing apples with apples so it will be different.
By Joe Hamilton - A Tech Alum
June 20, 2008 3:44 PM | Link to this
I have a date tonight and I was hoping that one of my Tech alumni brothers would let me borrow your car.
Unfortunately, my car was incarcerated as the result of an unfortunate misunderstanding with the Atlanta Police Department.
I am totally innocent of all of the accusations and will prove it when I have my day in court.
No plea deal for me.
I promise I will not rear end another vehicle and then drive off, I will not have any open containers of alchhol in your vehicle, I will leave no drug residue in your vehicle, and if the police ask me q question, I will give a complete and totally honest answer.
You can trust me.
By Vespula
June 20, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this
The good thing about ga’s size….more to hate!
By College Football Fan
June 20, 2008 5:17 PM | Link to this
Found the following web site which most college football fans will find interesting and wanted to share it with the other readers.
I was amazed by the overwhelming number of years in which multiple national championships were awarded in football by various organizations.
The site is http://www.ncaa.org/champadmin/iafootballpast_champs.html
According to the site UGA has 5 national championships and Tech has 6 national championships.
Take a look for yourself. I think it show the weirdness of focusing on winning a football national championship in a Div 1A level school when the NCAA does not recognize any champion.
I think the important thing to take away from the site is there is a history of great college teams out there and you do not have to be recognized as THE national champion in order to take pride in your chosen team’s accomplishments in any given year.
By WTH
June 20, 2008 6:10 PM | Link to this
Personally I am not particularly fond of DRad. It is good that he canned Gailey despite the financial pain, but I think DRad really screwed up on the whole Tech Fund issue. He has traded alumni loyalty for quick cash, and for the sake of the GTAA finances he’d better hope PJ produces on the football field this fall.
By Zeb
June 20, 2008 7:58 PM | Link to this
WTH, as a Dawg fan, I heard the interview with DRAD on 680 yesterday and I was very impressed with his comments. I don’t follow GT in depth but it sounds like he wants to bring you guys back to the 90’s. You guys have a great school and it sounds like he wants to renew the football program. I wish you guys the best,except in November, and I work WITH(not for) some excellent Tech people and I call them good friends.
There’s so much football banter in my building, with people from all over the south east, it gets crazy sometimes, especially in the fall.
But that’s what most of us live for…….the Fall. This is the slowest time of the year for football talk, but we all find a way to somehow keep it going. We pretty much jaw at each other at least 3 times a week about who’s gonna kick who’s butt. But it’s all in good fun,, and it makes our work day go that much faster. And no, for some of you UGA haters, we don’t all work for Mcdonalds, but you know that. And you guys aren’t always Astro-physicists. But it’s all good. We will never get along, but we should keep it……somewhat clean. Agree??
By Buzz29
June 20, 2008 11:51 PM | Link to this
I totally agree Zeb… Someone pooped on the toilet seat in the employee bathroom. Can you get that before you put your mop up and clock out for the day, Zeb? Thanks and tell Susie Mae and your 9 kids I said hey.
By halfmetaljacket
June 21, 2008 1:51 AM | Link to this
**Clean Old Fashioned Redundance
Visited this site for information or commentary on Tech sports. Found neither.
Getting Tech and UGA fans to repeat tired taunts and skewed opinion can be invoked at any time of the year, it seems.
While I’m a Tech fan, I’m not an alum and have overseen my company’s recruiting of grads from both schools for years. Thus bringing a little objectivity.
It’s surprising how much ‘fans’ of each school seem as eager to attack the other without being able to acknowledge truths pertaining to their own school.
Techies run SAT scores and calculus classes up the flagpole no matter what the debate is about. And it’s amazing how many Dawg fans post onto Tech blogs … and pile on with ridicule and hate filled blather. Suggests a ton of resentment. Why? It only comes across as the rantings of a disgruntled loser in life.
For the record, of late UGA SAT scores have risen to the 1250 zone and the Terry school is now turning out a lot of attractive prospective hires. Big upgrade from 20 years ago. Tech still is in the 1360 SAT zone and prospective grads generally have their pick of offers… and generally are too cocky when it comes time to accept or decline.
Rather than Dawg and Jacket fans stupidly firebombing one another here, maybe a blog topic on: Tech football recruiting to date; or Tech season tix sales past vs present and what that suggests; or Tech PR and marketing, past vs present; or Tech bball recruiting (which is a HOT topic from now through August); or how the Oline and QB are picking up the new system and how long until they can make it work; or Wommack’s D vs Tenuta’s D; or Tech athletics’ financial bind and how much fans can be expected to dig down for; or etc,etc.
hmj
By Bravesfan79
June 21, 2008 4:27 AM | Link to this
GT Hoops will be just fine. We have a good coach whos a GREAT recruiter and can assemble a hell of a team. I do agree tho that we need some fresh blood among the assistants…to help him with game planning.
I also thought wed do better than we did with Jarvis running the PT, but he WAS only a freshman, and we ran into a pretty hot shooting UNLV team.
We will NO DOUBT be a top 6 ACC team this year, and a potential top 10 team in fall 09.
All you fools on here that dont know anything about basketball should quit posting your negativity on the blog.
Focus on what you know about (football) Althought GT HOOPS is 10 TIMES closer to a National Championship than football will ever be as long as the BCS is around!
You really think thed pick a 1 loss ACC champion team NOT named Miami or FSU…. OVER a 1 or 2 loss USC, Ohio State, Texas, or the SEC champ??
KEEP DREAMING!!
College Football is a joke of a sport. I will be proven right after another wasted joke of a season.
By KC Kid
June 21, 2008 8:04 AM | Link to this
halfmetaljacket,
Great points. I’m not a Tech alum either (Mizzou), but I follow the Jackets because I’ve got a kid in school there and I live in Atlanta. I’ve gotta admit, SEC football is a lot more interesting than ACC football. But since I’m from Mizzou, I’m used to rooting for underdogs, so I can empathize with Tech fans. I looked through some of the other blogs on the AJC this morning. Wow, what a bunch of trash! Anyone know of blogs where you can actually talk sports and avoid the juvenile semi porn stuff?
By quaildawg
June 21, 2008 9:05 AM | Link to this
Halfmetal, No current blogs on UGA site. Besides coming over to the Bug site is sooooooo much fun. Kinda of like picking on your lil’ brother (you know the one that still wets his bed). Mom and Dad (see-Winkie) don’t like it but darn it’s fun to watch him get mad and cry!!!
By oldgold
June 21, 2008 1:30 PM | Link to this
Wink, I think you should write about DRAD. How does this guy get a 5 yr extension and why do 70% of your readers think he’s done a good job? I don’t get it. Regarding the stuff between Tech and UGA academics, I’m a Tech grad and I don’t see the point. UGA entrance requirements have increased dramatically over the past 10-15 years and is now a tough school to enter. I think most of the noise we hear is from the UGA non-grad fan base which is huge. Tech dosen’t have that degree of “sidewalk” support. I live in South Carolina and see almost as many UGA caps and bumper stickers as Clemson. We attach everything to football success because in the south our NFL interest is slim. When UGA has the team quality they have had in the past 5 years, they will automatically receive huge support. Tech has got to step up and get to the next level on the field and all this will take care of itself.
By Zeb
June 21, 2008 1:53 PM | Link to this
Hey Buzz29, it’s tech people like you that make us hate you. I try and give you guys a complement and you come back with some drivel. You’re an idiot and a disgrace to the good tech people. And if the 29 is your age, then you are REALLY pathetic. Come back here when you have something intelligent to say ,dill hole.
By Zeb
June 21, 2008 2:20 PM | Link to this
Quail, it’s pointless. Carolina is one of the VERY few tech people on here that can accept a compliment without coming back with some dimwit backlash. I usually call out my stupid bulldawg brethren when they lash out for no reason, but I guess you multi-millionaire, CEO’s of the world are too busy counting you’re money and bossing stupid UGA grads around to call out your own. (Dam that was a long sentence).
And Quail, what’s up with the no new blogs on our side? I b!tched about this yesterday and as projected, these AJC people are continually pi$$ing me off. They let 10 year olds get on here and say anything they want, and they leave us hanging for about 6 or 7 days with nothing. I’m sick of these dam people. It must be nice to do nothing for a week or so and still get paid. Hey, if all you guys are on freakin vacation, at least let us know. Dam.
By old gold
June 21, 2008 4:06 PM | Link to this
College Football Fan: I could not link to the site you mentioned above. When I go to Wikipedia Tech is listed as nat champs in 1917,1928 and 1990. UGA is listed in 1980. Another point. When I read the UGA blogs I really enjoy the knowledge and the banter that goes on among some of the serious regulars such as Altamaha Dawg and CUZ (also known as the director of the now defunct “Fans Of Chan”). Some of the stuff comes from buffoons but a lot of it is from obviously serious fans who know their team very well.
By gtNC
June 21, 2008 5:38 PM | Link to this
Halfmetal - well said.
By gtNC
June 21, 2008 5:48 PM | Link to this
Zeb - mature Dawg posts are welcome by most of us. Wouldn’t be as interesting without you. Both sides have plenty of jacka$$es that you just have to ignore.
By Zeb
June 21, 2008 6:25 PM | Link to this
Maybe I didnt make myself clear, crystal clear…I root root root for Dem Dawgs firstest, Cheer Cheer Cheer for the Pound, Fight Fight Fight for America and WHATS RIGHT. Sissy city GT boys NEED NOT APPLY. Now sit down, soldier, and get that “Pecker Wrecker” in Order.
By Cuz- D Rad
June 21, 2008 6:28 PM | Link to this
Well, guess it didnt take Jeb long to go after “these youngins too”. Beware boys, BEWARE.
By Zit McKorkle
June 21, 2008 6:50 PM | Link to this
Wow. I guess the reason there are no new blogs is because those 12 year olds would just fill them up with trash. I wish the AJC would take out the garbage, and take my $$!
I love you techsters, but have a stronger fondness for UGA football. Gt you’re cool, but UGA rules! Hi, Shane #1 and Cuz. How’s it going in South Georgia? Is the General working on a new batch of sippin’ solvent from the great state of Tennessee? I hope so.
Where is Chip Towers when I need his help?
Bulldog brethren there’s no need for you to come to this blog with a bad attitude. Play nice…PLEASE!
By CarolinaJacket
June 21, 2008 7:06 PM | Link to this
Well, the idiots and imposters can keep up their crap, but we all, regardless of our allegiances, must give credit to the DAWG baseball team. They are having a remarkable run. Lets try to keep the blog on sports gang.
By Who's Carolina?
June 21, 2008 7:17 PM | Link to this
CarolinaJacket is your other name Casey?
Way to go dogs.
By CarolinaJacket
June 21, 2008 7:56 PM | Link to this
Nope. I’m just a Jacket fan who loves sports and enjoy the blogs, when they stay out of the gutter.
By Who's Carolina?
June 21, 2008 8:07 PM | Link to this
Amen.
By Howdy
June 22, 2008 4:35 AM | Link to this
How’s GT recruiting going?
By CarolinaJacket
June 22, 2008 8:07 AM | Link to this
Too early to tell. In fact, it will be hard to make anything out of it for a while since Tech will be recruiting a “different animal” than most of the other programs will. It will go after players that fit into the system more than just players with 4/5 stars. We will have to wait and see if this approach works — on the field.
By old gold
June 22, 2008 11:20 AM | Link to this
Yea, the UGA baseball team is really special. The way they rebound when behind is mega-impressive. I think they will be the nat champs and you will see many of these kids in MLB.
By Zit McKorkie
June 22, 2008 11:23 AM | Link to this
Gonna listen to a story about a man named Zeb….A poor Atlanta boy, barely kept his family fed….then one day, he was shooting at some Deer…and up from the ground, come a bubbly Queer…Oiled that is…Cuz gold, Texas Tee. Now ole Zeb, says he,s a Millionaire…Atlants is the place, we gots to gits from here…So he packed on up, and moved to Beverly…Queers that is, Movie Stars, Homo Bars.
By Carolina Jacket
June 22, 2008 11:32 AM | Link to this
Fergits to mentions that there was a special on the History channel, during the Civil War…which we fought and died fer “them folk”. supposedley, on cold winters nights..in betweens battles, some generals had there way with OUR youngin soldiers. Thats why the phrase BUCK PRIVATES come about.
By College Football Fan
June 22, 2008 3:17 PM | Link to this
If the link won’t work, copy the link below, go to File then Open on your web browser and paste it to get to the web site:
www.ncaa.org/champadmin/iafootballpast_champs.html
It gives a list of all the Div 1A national champions named by all of the organizations going back to the 1860’s.
UGA has 5 and Tech has 6.
By Casey-Tiffany
June 22, 2008 6:08 PM | Link to this
Guess who, yes, its me, Casey…well, you know, before the snip snip…Tiffany now. Just got back early from Hawaii and Florida…lots of Gay tors there at SouthBeach..tee. Really wanted to see our boyswin that College World Series…its ALL Atlanta has going for itself. At least its something (yawn). Will need new outfits this week as by man Brunowants his THANG all spiffy. Hope to see ya,ll on Peachtree..blond witha bod to die for..and you just might.
By Coach Polk
June 22, 2008 7:16 PM | Link to this
of Rhodes Scholars in 2008:UGA 2 TECH 0
Last time I checked no one gets into UGA with just a GED and a checkbook.
Tech’s and UGA’s academic schools/curric. are so different so why bother comparing?
Same thing goes for: Clemson/USC Va Tech/UVA Auburn/Alabama (wait…nevermind that one, it’s not fair to compare JUCO’s).
By Coach Polk
June 23, 2008 2:48 PM | Link to this
When I coach a young man, there are several baromiters we look at here. Does he shower with the other fellas, oris he hiding “something”?? I have a “peep hole” wheres I can get a gander at the quality of meat being offered. Nice young Irish boys tend to be a favorite of mines, and lately, a dark Mandingo all wet and oily wets my whistle. Gotta run, boys, really HOT in here right now. “SHOWERS MEN”.
By Typical UGA alum.
June 23, 2008 2:52 PM | Link to this
Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh, Where Da Field, Coach……Bookz, I Dont Likes a Book Lernin MuCH…..mY jOK iTCHES..dUUUHHH.
By The Big Bug
June 23, 2008 6:28 PM | Link to this
Coach Polk, do a little research before you pretend to know what a Rhodes Scholar is. I’ll make it easy for you. Scholarships are granted with preference to schools THAT HAVE NEVER HAD ONE.
By The Thrill is Gone
June 23, 2008 10:24 PM | Link to this
gt football: The Thrill is Gone.
By Casey-Tiffany
June 24, 2008 12:17 AM | Link to this
Mr Thrill is Gone, sorry to hear that…may I ask what you are wearing right now?? Well, its very hot, atleast get that T Shirt off. Now get some oil, and get down to your skivvys…bare foot and wet. Lie down on your tummy, and let me grease that crease. Niiiice, SHHH, No talking. Dim that light..let me groove them off, total commando. Now, all lights off, and here cums the snake, mmm, slurp.
By HomeDawg
June 24, 2008 8:22 AM | Link to this
Bug: UGA has had 20 Rhodes Scholars (unless I missed one between 2000 and 2007). Please provide your research.
By Navigator
June 24, 2008 9:17 AM | Link to this
What a dumb section!! This paper has got to get some better writers.
By GT66
June 24, 2008 10:26 AM | Link to this
I am astounded about Radacovich getting a 70% positive vote for doing a good job. The overall program, particularly basketball and baseball, is not as good as it was before he came. What are my fellow alums looking at? Bill Curry would do a much better job and portray a much better image. Hewitt should have been fired already. He has a much worse ACC record than Gailey. Please alums be more demanding.
By GT66
June 24, 2008 10:27 AM | Link to this
I am astounded about Radacovich getting a 70% positive vote for doing a good job. The overall program, particularly basketball and baseball, is not as good as it was before he came. What are my fellow alums looking at? Bill Curry would do a much better job and portray a much better image. Hewitt should have been fired already. He has a much worse ACC record than Gailey. Please alums be more demanding.
By HomeDawg
June 24, 2008 10:30 AM | Link to this
Couldnt agree with you more..NaviGATOR, BTW…What are U wearing??
By techf@n
June 24, 2008 11:22 AM | Link to this
Wow, you pretty much just made a blog for people to come in and call each other rednecks, white trash, and nerds. Well played. I took part in this earlier, mainly b/c I was getting sick of reading all of the uga posts on the tech blog, but this is just ridiculous. When it comes to schools, Tech has better degree programs in terms of getting a job right out of school. They do not have the many “fluff” majors that UGA does, that may require a phd to even be considered for hire (pysch, sociology). But UGA has great business and journalism schools. This topic is stupid. Both are great schools, I think tech is better, but not by much. And in all reality, UGA might be a little tougher to get accepted in b/c of the influx in applicants. This is a terrible blog, holy crap. Bicker bicker bicker. I would almost rather have these comment sections blocked off, b/c only about 1 in 10 posts is relevant AND intelligent.
By Shirley Your Not Serious
June 24, 2008 2:08 PM | Link to this
Techf@n,
Weren’t you the guy who wrote about Mark Richt molesting young boys? Give us a break. You fit right in with the other retards on this blog, so don’t act like you don’t.
By techf@n
June 24, 2008 2:26 PM | Link to this
Yep, and I thought it was pretty funny. I just don’t think that Winkel should be blatently encouraging everyone to write redneck and nerd over and over again. The least he could do is give us a legitimate topic to read, and THEN start bickering below it. Did you even read what I wrote, or just see my name and go from there Shirley? I never said that I wrote intelligent comments. Idiot
By Shirley Your Not Serious
June 24, 2008 3:04 PM | Link to this
Yeah, I read what you wrote. First of all, you show how low class you are to think that’s funny. And you agree that you fall in with the other 9 out of 10 posts that are irrelevant and unintelligent by saying you didn’t write anything intelligent. Jeez, how stupid are you? Do yourself a favor, next time you catch yourself typing just stop. Better not to say anything and be thought a fool than say something stupid and remove all doubt. It will be great if this sports blog ever gets back to sports.
By russ
June 24, 2008 5:24 PM | Link to this
Matt - how ‘bout blogging about something intelligent? The 5% of losers who post back and forth on these blogs don’t need any encouragement…..
By it's a thursday afternoon
June 26, 2008 3:49 PM | Link to this
don’t you people have jobs??