Tech

By Big Ed

September 27, 2007 6:37 AM | Link to this

Oh I see so your stupid theory didn’t work with UGA so now your are going to try it on Tech. One great thing about the internet is that you can read different newspapers and compare the quality of writing. It would be interesting to see if T. Moore could make it outside of Atlanta.

By GT Lee

September 27, 2007 7:07 AM | Link to this

Umh, what does this have to do with Terrance Moore? Who do you think you are calling Mike’s column stupid? I would love to evaluate your performance at work in an anonymous public forum.

Mike, I think you are spot on with this one. This team needs some fire to get over the hump and overcome their shortcomings. It has to be up to the seniors to do this. I hope that starts this Saturday.

By Channie

September 27, 2007 7:41 AM | Link to this

The entire problem with the football team stems from the fact that the Tickle Pile investigation is still incomplete and Tickle Piles involving the football team are continuing to this day. The excuse that the fraternities will not cooperate with the investigation is unacceptable. It’s time for the administration to bring this thing to it’s conclusion.

By Big Ed

September 27, 2007 8:10 AM | Link to this

If anyone thinks that a coach is going to change his philosophy based on what a sportswriter says they are dilusional. Two weeks ago Gaily was the smartest man in town. If you want to put it in a workplace setting it would be like a casual observor trying to tell a doctor how to perform surgery.

By Male McMuffie

September 27, 2007 9:21 AM | Link to this

I will step up and high five all the athletes at YJA. That should get them fired up, coupled with Chan’s brilliant coaching and inspirational leadership.

By Joshua Barlowe

September 27, 2007 9:46 AM | Link to this

Change starts at the top, and with comments like “I was suprised at how we won at Notre Dame,” it’s no surprise Tech continues to surprise us with lousy showings.

Chan has got to go. There are plenty of guys out there who can do a better job.

By braveswin

September 27, 2007 9:57 AM | Link to this

There can be no hope for a “team” w/o a quarterback that doesn’t play scared.If Bennett can progress then so can the Jackets.If not,then this joke will only get worse and worse until the final laugh….another loss to UGA.But there is potential in this group and although I don’t have much faith in the coaching staff there is talent on the field.GO DAWGS

By Reggie Ball

September 27, 2007 11:18 AM | Link to this

Its just a game, dog.

By fred

September 27, 2007 11:34 AM | Link to this

In every business there is a “leader” who is unmistakenly “in charge”. Failure to perform is not due (in football) to the QBs arm, WRs who drop balls or cheers from fans—-even some play calling—-IT’S THE JOB THE HEAD COACH IS DOING/NOT DOING. STOP, end of b*** session.

Gailey is a good man, a great mentor but not the motivator/leader of a year-in-year-out FOOTBALL PROGRAM.

Change is past due.

By Can Chan!

September 27, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Gailey’s a joke!!

GT Atheletic Assoc: Make the decision at season’s end (i.e. this Saturday), and come December 1, bite-the-bullet and fire Gailey. Then go and hire Boise State’s coach away from them! He’s young, innovative, and though it won’t seem like a jump after you compare Tech’s record with Boise State’s, he’ll be in bigger, better conference, and possibly build Tech to a consistant winner. It’s so demoralizing for Tech fans to continue on, seeing talented player on Tech’s sideline be ‘robbed’ of great season because their coach is simply just not good. Georgia didn’t put up with it with Ray Goff. Just because your a nice guy with a great personality it doesn’t mean you’re meant to be a head football coach.
WAKE UP Atheletic Assoc.!!!

By Can Chan!

September 27, 2007 11:43 AM | Link to this

Gailey’s a joke!!

GT Atheletic Assoc: Make the decision at season’s end (i.e. this Saturday), and come December 1, bite-the-bullet and fire Gailey. Then go and hire Boise State’s coach away from them! He’s young, innovative, and though it won’t seem like a jump after you compare Tech’s record with Boise State’s, he’ll be in bigger, better conference, and possibly build Tech to a consistant winner. It’s so demoralizing for Tech fans to continue on, seeing talented player on Tech’s sideline be ‘robbed’ of great seasons because their coach is simply just not good. Georgia didn’t put up with it with Ray Goff. Just because your a nice guy with a great personality it doesn’t mean you’re meant to be a head football coach.
WAKE UP Atheletic Assoc.!!!

By GT

September 27, 2007 12:09 PM | Link to this

A man that would handles himself “Big Ed” ain’t ready for prime time. I think Mike is dead on, and I think the AJC is considered one of the best college football sections if not the best in the country. When you find yourself on the opposite opinion of most intellectuals on subjects either you are a genius or just plain stupid. Talking of intelligence I believe Richt pulls off his low key act by having a perception of intelligence. Chan seems to come from the other camp where no one knows how stupid you are if you never open your mouth. I don’t think Chan is stupid, I just think he has bought into this south Georgia persona. Thank God Patton didn’t do the same, we would all be German by now.

By JustMe

September 27, 2007 12:12 PM | Link to this

To correct the ugay fans …..

When Tech was 2-0, no one (and I mean NO ONE) was saying that Chan was a great coach. Yes, Tech fans were excited about the prospect of having a good team. Yes, there were prognosticators predicting a great season. But NO ONE said Chan was a great coach.

By Pitbull

September 27, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

“Tech offensive coordinator John Bond chalks up some of Taylor Bennett’s problems to faulty footwork.”

The kid has been in the program for 5 years and he needs to correct his footwork? What do the tech coaches do all day, sit around and play cards? What a joke.

By TECH alumni

September 27, 2007 12:30 PM | Link to this

Chan Gailey is a joke. He doesn’t know how to win consistantly and can’t beat UGA.

Bennett is the problem on the field. Give Nesbitt or Booker a chance. They can both move better and create big plays. Nesbitt has a cannon and can move. Booker has some experience.

Why would you stand and let someone continue to hit you in the face. Common Sense would say to move out of the way. If what your doing is giving you the same bad results then change something. GEEEZ

By GTsophomore

September 27, 2007 12:39 PM | Link to this

That someone who needs to take charge is Dan Radakovic. Gailey seems to be a good man and I believe he really cares about his players on and off the field, but Tech will never win a game because of a gutsy call by him or by outcoaching the opponent. Gailey is too conservative and he is no motivator. That’s the reason Tech is awful in games they are supposed to win and so great as an underdog, the players are only fired up if there is the possibility of an upset. There is plenty of football left, and I’m pulling for the team to get back on the winning track, but I’m tired of seeing good athletes produce 7-win seasons, which looks like where we are headed this year (I hope I’m wrong). A coaching change IS due.

By Noyellowinthisblood

September 27, 2007 12:41 PM | Link to this

Tashard Choice “has some fire in him”! Yeah right, he wasn’t even man enough to stay at Ok. and battle for the starting job. Tech doesn’t have the talent or coaching.

By ben

September 27, 2007 1:16 PM | Link to this

All we really know is that this and the past administration endorse a mediocre coach who is not capable of coaching a championship caliber team. He can’t coach quarterbacks to improve over 4 years, much less 4 games.

By uga-ly

September 27, 2007 1:19 PM | Link to this

Why could anyone think UGA-ly dominated Alabama? In typical UGA fashion, after one game (a squeaker), Ga fans believe they’re on top of the world. They will be at the bottom of the SEC at season’s end.

By Clifton N. Amos

September 27, 2007 1:27 PM | Link to this

Pitbull, you’re as stupid as your name. Bennet is a junior, its not his fifth year. Your brain is as small as your “man”hood.

By Noyellowinthisblood

September 27, 2007 1:33 PM | Link to this

Uga-ly, You my friend are crazy. Why would a well coached team with the athletes of UGA’s calender end up at the bottom of the SEC. Tech on the other hand is poorly coached.

By Noyellowinthisblood

September 27, 2007 1:43 PM | Link to this

That was supposed to be caliber

By surfrider

September 27, 2007 1:52 PM | Link to this

Don’t fool yourself the Bulldawg Nation reads the AJC and many work for the AJC. It appears to me that Bobo and Stafford took charge in their own ways. There is something called quiet determination, meaning one does’nt have to stand up and yell to get the result eventhough that yelling may be going inside their thought processes. The Bulldawgs are either getting better or Bama is overrated or it could be like the Tech/ND thinng where it’s combination plus a combination of being overrated. The press may need to wait 5 games into a season before it really starts to judge who has the team and who does’nt in a typical season.

By blake

September 27, 2007 2:02 PM | Link to this

I’m with surfrider on this one. I said yesterday and I’ll say it again. Clemson is not THAT good. Tech could easily pull the upset this weekend. As for the Dawgs, I was just as happy than anyone to see them pull of that vicory on the road with such a young bunch. But they could have played better. Hopefully Tech gets their act together and makes a decent season out of 07 after all. Best of luck Tech.

By Chris

September 27, 2007 2:03 PM | Link to this

We’re going to keep being a bewildering team that wins when we should lose and loses when we should win until this coaching staff can figure out how to motivate players when we don’t have the “disrespected underdog” position to cling to.

As soon as we see some amount of success, respect, and national attention, we seem to relax and try to rest on our laurels. One problem: WE DON’T HAVE ANY LAURELS TO REST ON! It’s not exactly like we’re some traditional power that can rely on any sort of intimidation factor (like an Ohio State, Florida, USC, Oklahoma, Texas) to help out our side. We have to figure out how to stay hungry and keep striving for bigger and better even when we’re getting some recognition.

The underdog mentality can only take you so far, and I think we’ve reached that point. Playing like an underdog gets you to the Chan Gailey Equilibrium, which is the mathematical tendency for Chan to win exactly 58.3% of the time (that’s 7-5 for the UGA grads out there).

Someone has to step up and convince this team that they can be winners, not just thorns in someone’s side. Last year, we got to 9-2 and were on the brink of a special season, but we got to that point and didn’t know how to handle it. It was almost like we got there, freaked out because we weren’t playing spoiler, and sabotaged ourselves the rest of the way. We HAVE to figure out how to break the cycle of moderate achievement and self-sabotage that we’ve been stuck in for the last 7 years.

Maybe it is the players, but attitude and outlook come from the top down. If the coaches are satisfied with the good win-bad loss cycle, how can we expect the players to be motivated to break the cycle? If the coaches have a killer instinct and gameplan aggressively, the players are going to play with a killer instinct and play aggressively.

By TECH Alumni

September 27, 2007 2:38 PM | Link to this

**Gailey Stinks!!! The only way to win now is for the coaches to put Nesbitt in the game. I saw him play in high school and know that the kid has skills. Even Booker would be a step up.

By WhiteAndGold

September 27, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this

Noyellow…my old rival…its “calibre” not “calender”. UGAy has a whole calibre of no talent a$$ clowns like yourself. Let me speak some words you might understand, “GO ON NOOOWWW, GIT!”

By john

September 27, 2007 3:13 PM | Link to this

NERDS,NERDS,NERDS

By techwood

September 27, 2007 3:37 PM | Link to this

Tech fans are getting what they deserve for crucifying Reggie Ball who gave them all he had for 4 years. I’m not saying that Reggie was your classic QB but the kid had a winning sprit and heart. It was not Reggie’s fault that Chan didn’t know how to handle a high sprited person. So the fans have ridiculed Reggie like no other Jacket instead of admitting he gave what he had and he was a leader. I’m embarrassed at the way they treat Reggie. So Tech got what it asked for; a OB who looks like a deer looking into headlights and doesn’t have the foot speed to get away from Southern defenses. And a wimp-of a Coach who couldn’t put fire in a volcano

By puppydawg

September 27, 2007 3:53 PM | Link to this

WhiteAndGold, I understand your frustation but your constant barrage of insults destroys any credibility that you may have once had. Your neverending verbal assault on UGA and its fan base is tantamount to Whoopi Goldberg telling Ashley Judd that she’s ugly. Even those of your own ilk wish that you would just shut the F… up!

By WhiteAndGold

September 27, 2007 3:56 PM | Link to this

Come on Jackets and stop moping around. Were going to kick Clemson’s teeth in this week. Clemson has nothing on us. We need to have a little confidence in ourselves. Bobby Dodd is our house! Clemson’s weak D wont be able to handle Tashard and Dwyer! Come on guys, “we got this”.

By WhiteAndGold

September 27, 2007 4:01 PM | Link to this

Puppydawg, who the hell are you? UGAy sucks as do you sir. You and your fleabag friends are not welcome here.

By Chris

September 27, 2007 4:06 PM | Link to this

As far as replacing Taylor at QB, I think he’s the QB for the duration unless he has a major meltdown against Clemson. So far, he hasn’t won any games for us (Tashard+Dwyer/O-Line won the first two) but (until the fluke pick-6 against UVA) he hasn’t lost us any games. He’s just kinda…meh. Not good, not bad, but just there. Like AJ Suggs without the “throwing to the wrong team” issue. We need Reggie’s fighting spirit and Taylor’s even keel. Taylor might get flustered and screw up his footwork or overthrow his man, but he won’t force throws that aren’t there and turn the ball over (fluke INT last week excepted).

Basically what I’m saying is that we need Joe Hamilton. If Josh Nesbitt is as good as all you people who want to give Taylor the boot after two mediocre performances say he is, he could rise to the bar of QB performance that Hamilton and Godsey set.

By Pitbull

September 27, 2007 4:11 PM | Link to this

Clifton N. Amos: I can easily ignor your insults since you have provided me with the good news that Taylor Bennett has both this year AND next year to play qb for Tech.

That means I get to watch an awful Tech offense for at least 2 years rather than 1. Now if you can just keep Chan in place, this is really going to be a great time to be a Bulldog.

By Kay

September 27, 2007 4:14 PM | Link to this

It is so disappointing. Year after year we think we have a good team, good athletes and what do we get? Another let down; year after year. There are good coaches out there with Tech connections; Go get one!!! Is it that hard??

By puppydawg

September 27, 2007 4:16 PM | Link to this

WhiteAndGold, who am I? I’m your lord and master, b!+ch!!! I will stay away if you stay off the Georgia board. Deal or no deal? Didn’t think so, therefore I’m staying and I’m bringing hell with me.

By Pitbull

September 27, 2007 4:17 PM | Link to this

Yes Kay, it is that hard at Tech.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

By Daddy Bowden

September 27, 2007 4:18 PM | Link to this

Daggumit folks, don’t be so hard on my old buddy Chan. He helped save my boys job last year and me and mama didn’t have to clean out the basement. After all I had a couple of 7-win seasons myself before reeling off 11 straight finishes in the top four, including two NC’s. Ole Chan has only been there for seven years and he needs at least one more. After I play him next year, I will re-evaluate his progress. Be nice to little Tommy tomorrow, I don’t have an extra room. That’s the reason I let him whup me every now and again.

By The GT Football Team

September 27, 2007 4:24 PM | Link to this

We know we suck but you guys don’t have to rub it in.

By scooter11

September 27, 2007 4:38 PM | Link to this

Is there a Reggie Bennett or a Taylor Ball out there? Please apply for QB job at N. Ave.

By AlabamaRamblinwreck

September 27, 2007 5:19 PM | Link to this

I cannot say this enough. Chan must go. He seems to be a nice, honorable man, and that is important, but he does not know how to develop quarterbacks. He also does not know how to be innovative with a team that is undersized at o-line. He must go, or GT will continue to be mediocre at best!!

If I am a recruit, Why would I pick Tech, especially if I am an explosive offensive player?? Chan has been there through 3 offensive coordinators, and the offense looks the same basically. These are the reasons Chan must go.

By 1276jacket

September 27, 2007 5:36 PM | Link to this

Yep, this team strikes me as leaderless. You can see it and feel it. Somebody or somebodies better step up real fast or it’s a mediocre season.

By Big Man

September 27, 2007 5:36 PM | Link to this

Noooooo not the great Taylor Bennett. No he can’t be performing poorly. Everything was all Reggie Ball’s fault. Taylor is the saviour. All hail Taylor!!!!!. If I had twins I would name them Taylor and Bennett. G-Tech is going to win the National Championship!!!! Taylor Bennett for President!!!

By Bigger Man

September 27, 2007 6:25 PM | Link to this

Noooooo, not the great Channy. Nooooo, he can’t be an absolute waste of space as a coach. All hail Droopy Dog Gomer Chan!!!!!. If I had twins I would name them Channy and Gayley. G-Tech is going to win the National Championship!!!! And, we already have Chan as president!!! Yea!!!

By I-DOG

September 27, 2007 7:49 PM | Link to this

If tech can win against Clemson, then all this anger will turn into joy for tech fans. A loss, gives tech a 3 game winning streak and likely only a 6 win season (Duke, North Carolina, Maryland, and Army as good opportunities for a win)and that can’t be good for Chan’s job security.

How long is Chan’s current contract and who would tech fans want as a coach assuming Gailey is fired at season’s end?

Would six wins save his job? I believe a win over Clemson or UGA would stop the talk about firing Gailey, but six wins will not be enough.

The bigger problem I see for tech is that they aren’t following up last year’s recruiting class with another big infusion of talent. Other than McRae and Chris Jackson, I see solid but not spectacular players for the 07 class. This would need to change if tech hopes to be consistantly ranked in the top 25 at the end of each season.

By Youthful Vigor

September 27, 2007 7:52 PM | Link to this

Get that armless guy from Gwinett to teach the team how to fight, that guy never give up.

By StingerSplash

September 27, 2007 8:13 PM | Link to this

yeah, someone needs to take charge alright, take charge of the program, someone other than Gailey as soon as possible.

By 3 Rivers jacket

September 27, 2007 8:15 PM | Link to this

I would like to think that we aregoing to beat Clemson on Saturday and i do thin it can be done and would not be that big of a surprise. But i am worried that the team does not have asense of urgency about winning. I am not a fire the coach guy but no one can close their eyes to the fact that we still have problems. But let,s let the season play out and see what happens but l I hope there is a list in the desk of the Ad of young coachs ready to move to a program that can bring enthusiasm and get us a little crazy. The program is solid under Gailey- we have not been going 3-8 but i do think we have another gear and I would like to see us get in it and I think it may take new blood to do it.

By curtrob2000

September 27, 2007 9:48 PM | Link to this

not to jump on the bench Taylor banfd wagon, but i recall a game last season when Taylor entered the game for some clean up duty against Duke or Samford or some no body team and he got a standing ovation when he ran onto the field. i took that as a shot in the bak to Reggie. we werent losing and the game was pretty much over and the fans were cheering for Taylor like he was coming in to save the day. lets look at this thing realistically. Taylor didnt play last year of the year before because he wasnt ready. and it doesnt look like he’s ready this year either. i think he’s making the right reads but is just a step or two slow when getting rid of the ball. pass protection hasnt been great and a consistent running attack would help, but we cant live with a QB who isnt going to step up.

with that said this issue goed back to coaching, Chan and company hasnt been able to purely develop a QB during his tenure. he was a QB coach in the pro’s and hasnt been able to develop a college QB. i hope Nesbitt or Booker get a chance if things get out of hand, but what has led us to believe that Gailey would ever consider a QB change. he sure hasnt addressed the idea in the past.

let come to the game saturday, Clemson has some pay back coming. where your gold proudly and cheer loud for your team tech fans

GO JACKETS!!!

By Taylor Bennett Family

September 27, 2007 11:22 PM | Link to this

Enough of the insults about our Boy. We have donated lots of money so that he can get his chance to play. Thats the way the system works, so why try to change it now!

By Enough

September 27, 2007 11:27 PM | Link to this

Nesbitt and Booker had better get out while they can. Remember what they did to Bilbo, who is now once again a QB on an NFL practice squad. A NFL practice squad QB should clearly have been a starter at Georgia Tech who has never produced any NFL caliber QB’s except Joe, who was too short to really be a factor in the NFL.

By Poetic Justice

September 27, 2007 11:47 PM | Link to this

That leader needs to be Gailey and we all know that won’t happen. He manages and doesn’t lead. These kids need to be led. Problem identified but not solved. At least Ball tried to lead until the fans and the media broke him down into a low confidence, mentally unstable liability to the program. We are as much to blame for Ball than Gailey. But I agree that we need to get a coach that can lead w/ passion and innovation. Bowden and Joe Pa are prime examples. The game has changed and new blood is in order.

By GWJ

September 28, 2007 8:03 AM | Link to this

Where is Reggie Ball when you need him?

By dylan

September 28, 2007 8:58 AM | Link to this

hahahahahahahahahaha tech sucks balls. go dawgs!!

By jabster

September 28, 2007 10:22 AM | Link to this

I just love all of these Dog fans who always want to share with us their infinite wisdom about how much Tech’s football program stinks and how we should just hang it up, how no recruit worth a darn should come to The Flats, how we should drop down to D1-AA or DII, etc.

Obviously, year in and year out, we have not been as good as Ugag. But Ugag usually finishes in the top 20 (unless they get outsized in a bowl game). Do the math—that makes them better than over 80% of the 110+ teams in D1-A, not just Tech. Hats off to ‘em. We usually finish just out of the top 25. That makes us better than about 70-75% of D1-A. Again, not as good but hardly a poor performance.

For what it’s worth, the last time UGA had a losing season and didn’t go to a bowl was 1996. Coincidentally, that was the last time Tech had a losing season, too.

Now, this season could easily go in the toilet. Happens to the best of them—just ask Michigan, Notre Dame, or even Auburn or Tennessee or FSU or Miami.

And this is not to be taken as an endorsement of Chan Gailey, who in my opinion has issues.

Glass half full? No, about 3/4 full. No excuse for not filling the darn glass all the way up, but it’s not like we’re down with the dregs, either.

So next time some Puga fan denies us our props, tell them to STFU. Now does the Bulldog Neighborhood Association know why we always deny Puga their props?

By WhiteAndGold

September 28, 2007 10:44 AM | Link to this

Wow puppydawg, lord and master…are you serious? That you are not sir, but you are a douchebag. Run along sport.

By CW

September 28, 2007 12:29 PM | Link to this

Jeez-enough of the 12-year-old name-calling posts. How about some posts about football?

I think everyone is focused waaaaay too much on our QB here. His performance is NOT why this team is currently underperforming. Our O line has not played very well the last two games. Folks, if your guys up front aren’t blocking anybody, not much good is going to happen to your offense.

Next in line would be our receivers. Sure, Thomas had a long catch last week, but he also dropped one that hit him right in the chest on a CRITICAL 3rd and long play when we needed it most in the 4th qtr. JJ has been a non-factor, Smith dropped a handful against BC.

I’m not saying that Bennett is playing great, because clearly he has to take some blame for not keeping the offensive unit running smoothly, but his completion percentage is not that bad and his only pick so far was a fluke. I expect he’ll show some improvement as the season progresses, but the line has got to do a better job and our receivers also need to step up.

By Barry

September 28, 2007 12:31 PM | Link to this

We are making too many mistakes. Having a leader is fine but if you eliminate the offensive penalties, an interception for a touchdown and a fumbled punt return, Tech wins against VA.

By Barry

September 28, 2007 12:44 PM | Link to this

To the person or person’s who commented under “The Taylor Bennett Family”.

First, get some thick skin. If your going to be a QB in Division 1 NCAA Football, the comments about your son come with the territory.

Next, just becuase you donate money to Tech does not provide your son with the right to play QB.

Finally, tell your kid to play better or sit on the bench.

It’s about performance not his right to play. I supported switched to Taylor last year and sent email to the athletic dept. stating that. However, it’s time Taylor perform better or someone else deserves the chance.

By doubtful

September 28, 2007 12:56 PM | Link to this

leadership doesn’t do any good when the QB can’t complete half of his passes. Not to mention TC is really not back up to 100%. My prediction… TC plays a few downs and either he wises up and pulls himself off the field or he furthers the injury. Gailey needs to man up and bench him for his own good.

By JimmyG

September 28, 2007 3:27 PM | Link to this

Hey Tech fans I didn’t go to South Florida or West Virginia so does that mean I’m not allowed to watch that game tonight? Idiots - Tech has no talent, your best player is a Big 12 reject. You have the second hardest school to get into in the state behind UGA,and your football team plays in a mid major conference. Just thought I would give y’all the daily reality check. Oh, and for the guy that said I didn’t get into tech if you want a copy of a recruitment letter from the Tech athletic department just drop me your email and I will forward you a copy of it. I think Tech needs a P.E. department, it would help you non-athletes at least look like you know what you are doing.

By JimmyG is an Idiot

September 28, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

JimmyG

You made a statement about the second hardest school to get into that you can’t back up with facts. I have proof within my house. My son was immediately accepted to UGA when he applied but was on the waiting list for the school he really wanted to attend - Tech. If they don’t come out of UGA any smarter than you appear to be in your posts, I am glad he made the right choice and held out until he was accepted to Tech.

Idiot - Keep trying and some day you might actually look like you know what you are doing. You are struggling at this point.

Run along now little doggie and go sniff at your dog pile.

By puppydawg

September 29, 2007 8:56 AM | Link to this

WhiteAndGold, I hope you refer back to this blog so you can read this. Your insults mean nothing to anyone who reads them because in the overall scheme of things, you are meaningless. In the GT world of all things white and baby poop yellow, you are but a popcorn fart. Tell the truth, does ANYONE like you? I think not, not even you.