Opinion Talk

By Art Hurt

April 28, 2008 11:01 AM | Link to this

So, let’s go to the Jekyll Island maritime forests and build some hotels. Let’s cut down the live oaks, drain, fill, compact, pave, and build. Good idea, right? Not so fast.

The maritime forests of a barrier island are vital as storm and tide protection for the island. By extention, the barrier islands are vital as protection of Georgia’s coastline. Removing the maritme forests from a barrier island is like a soldier removing his body armor in battle.

Additionally, within 50 years, (less than the amortization schedule of the monies proposed to be spent), the level of the Atlantic is predicted to rise a foot and a half, presenting a huge increase in the destructive potential of storms and tides. Any state treasury or finincial lender should be aware of the risk to their investment. Natural conditions could render the properties incapable of producing revenues necessary to retire the loans. Skeptical? I refer you to New Orleans.

Jekyll Island issues need to be studied in ways that transcend commercial marketing. Maybe it would be appropriate to incorporate some science. Ya think? Art Hurt

By Jane Fraser

April 28, 2008 11:55 AM | Link to this

Maritime forests are rare and the one on Jekyll is superb. Preserving Jekyll for future generations is crucial - and as we have learned recently is not easy. The Jekyll Island Authority needs input that transcends commercial marketing and politics. Also keep in mind that there are plenty of unsold condos along the coast just north of Jekyll! Thank goodness for Jeff Chapman who truly represents the people in his district.

By Angela McKinley

April 28, 2008 12:05 PM | Link to this

Keeping the maritime forests or paving paradise and putting up a parking lot is a no-brainer.

By janie Hopwood

April 28, 2008 12:11 PM | Link to this

Why can’t someone stop this train and take time to study what is best for Jekyll. I have seen enough of the beautiful live oaks cut down to be replaced by palm trees that are not natural to this island but fit with someone’s idea of a tropical getaway. Please, slow down and look at Jekyll. Find the uniqueness of this place. Don’t touch any place that has not already been “developed”. Keep this state park as carefully as you would keep your family because it belongs to them, the generations of Georgians that will follow us and praise us or curse us for how we watched over their heritage.

By sassysue

April 28, 2008 12:25 PM | Link to this

Yes, the builder does have its eye on another natural asset of the park, but not for the reasons they would like you to believe. Building condos and time shares seems to be the most important issue to them than just redeveloping the existing hotels and retail area. Jekyll Island does not need additional development such as a luxury hotel or a new town square. Keep Jekyll the way it is now because that is why the people visit! They don’t want a resort area like everyone would like to think. We want it to remain the beautiful island it is.

By J D Black

April 28, 2008 12:31 PM | Link to this

As a life-long resident of Georgia and annual vacationer to Jekyll, I am adamantly opposed to the development proposals I’ve seen for this coastal jewel. First, developing right on the beach and now the inland woods and wetlands? I am in favor of renovation and re-development in the existing footprint, but everything I’ve seen from LLC is very agressive and intrusive. Time shares, shopping, and upscale condos go against the very grain of what Jekyll is about. Nature, serenity, and affordability are what drove my family’s love affair with the island that now spans 3 generations. I know it may be too much to ask of a developer, but could we not meet a happy medium and renovate/rebuild rather than develop another Hilton Head? Could a minor project not draw interest from a developer? Does it have to be a 10-figure project? I am not an environmentalist, as many in the movement to protect Jekyll have been labeled. I am a conservative Independant who is concerned that the decision makers that hold the future of Jekyll in their hands have lost sight of what the island is all about, or who never cared about the island at all. To Governor Purdue, JIA, and LLC, stand up and do the right thing, not the most profitable thing. It will do your conscience a world of good. With regards from Ringgold, GA.

By Karen Brown

April 28, 2008 12:47 PM | Link to this

The JIA and proposed developers appear to be behind the curve as far as tourism. The people who come to Jekyll come because the island is NOT developed. We have plenty of choices to go elsewhere to find condos and shopping that are easier to get to. The birding, kayaking at St. Mary’s, and seeing the ocean are what attracts me. I believe that out-of-staters such as myself would gladly pay a much higher fee to enter Jekyll Island State Park if money is an issue. If development is needed, Brunswick could use it.

This year, in search of a similar paradise, we went to Hunting Island State Park in South Carolina. A lot of Georgia’s tourism dollars will go to nearby states.

By Martin McConaughy

April 28, 2008 12:50 PM | Link to this

The educational potential and unique recreational aspects of what Jekyll Island is should always take precedence over any economic engine resort type development that is the current direction we are having to respond to. Sustainability is a key here. I want my grandchildren to experience Jekyll as an island that was allowed to take care of itself. Let’s wait a few years to see how the new and refurbished hotels impact the island before pour any other new concrete.

By Theresa Matt

April 28, 2008 1:11 PM | Link to this

It was probably predictable that the developers, thwarted at the beachfront, would turn their sights to the maritime forest. Hold on! The forest is an essential part of Jekyll Island. The attraction of Jekyll Island is the natural environment, and that includes the forest as well as the beach.

Nowhere in all of this discussion is an examination of the basic issue: Is the state park supposed to be a moneymaker, or is it for the average Georgian?

The people who should be listened to are those who have visited Jekyll for decades (three-plus, in the case of my family —- Georgians all). We want the forest left as is. We want to be able to see the beach and walk on it. We want to explain nature and the environment to our children and grandchildren, using real examples. We don’t want to have to say, “There used to be some unusual trees here. Let me tell you what it was like.” Why are some people trying to make Jekyll just like every overbuilt, tacky “upscale” place on the ocean?

Yes, the run-down hotels should be refurbished. Yes, shops and facilities can be upgraded. But that doesn’t mean extending the footprint. Jekyll Island is one of the last places you can go without being assaulted by commercialism. Let’s keep it that way.

By Frank Mirasola

April 28, 2008 1:15 PM | Link to this

It goes without saying that the Maritime Forest along with the contiguous wetland and marsh must be preserved. Simply because, once it is gone it will never return and it is vital to the environmental protection and well being of Jekyll Island and the salt marsh which it defends from oceanic ravages. The issue is how can this be accomplished? With one exception on the Jekyll Authority Board (Ed Boshears) no one has shown any inclination to make development and revitalization subordinate to protection of the environment and wildlife. Despite numerous requests from citizens and some legislators, there have been no environmental effects studies preformed, the Island does not have an approved Conservation Plan, there has been no attempt to measure how much development is necessary and how much the Island can support. The Governor and his administration have entered into an unholy alliance with developers to take away what rightfully belongs to all of us and put it in the hands of the anointed few to enrich their purses.

We need a public outcry of Biblical proportions to reach to the four corners of the state and especially to Atlanta to stop the madness. We need to show up at every political gathering between now an the July Primary and tell the candidates what their mandate must be, “stop the madness and preserve Jekyll Island”. That will get their attention and just may stop them!

By TwinBo

April 28, 2008 1:22 PM | Link to this

This project started on the wrong foot with a development firm that came in with a supposedly impeccable reputation. They then presented an atrociously intrusive and unrealistic plan that shocked every interested person. Worse, the avenue for any constructive criticism or communication was non existent with any of the principals. Is it any wonder that there is great suspicion of future changes and accommodation?

By Carol Sue Ravenel

April 28, 2008 1:32 PM | Link to this

As the saying goes…”if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it..” Well,Jekyll isn’t broken, it just needs a gentle dusting so that it can continue to provide peace and tranqulity to both wildlife and visitors. A state park is not intended to be a profitable place, it is meant to be for the pleasure and enjoyment of the people who pay taxes for its upkeep. We don’t have much left of our American shorelines that has not been invaded by profiteers….leave MY island alone!! My grandchildren and I thank you.

By Susan DeHoff

April 28, 2008 1:44 PM | Link to this

Thanks to Mr. Chapman for making the general public aware of Linger Longer’s desire to move its Jekyll Island State Park development project into the maritime forest. It now seems plain that Linger Longer’s interest is not in improving Jekyll Island (“redeveloping” seems to be the politically correct term) but rather finding a way to use the beauty of Jekyll Island to turn a profit. They are right that Jekyll Island is prime real estate. What they do not seem to comprehend is that it is prime real estate because it has not been developed by land developers such as Linger Longer. The only way to insure that Jekyll Island State Park remains the treasure that it is would be to do as the National Park Service has done with neighboring Cumberland Island, protect it from real estate development companies.

By Ashley Chasteen

April 28, 2008 2:27 PM | Link to this

Jekyll does not need to be another concrete jungle like so many other beaches are becoming. Yes, most of its hotels need to be refurbished - but let’s keep them in the same footprints where they were originally built. Also, let’s keep them 4 stories and under like regulations originally stipulated. Jekyll’s natural beauty does not need to be tainted with high-rise gaudy structures. Development to the extent that LLC and the JIA are proposing would ruin why so many people love the island. Refurbished hotels and conference center would boost the island’s economy without ruining its pristine beauty.

By Victoria Oldham

April 28, 2008 2:55 PM | Link to this

We just moved to the Golden Isles of Georgia from Sedona, Arizona. We recently visited Jekyll Island for the first time and absolutely loved it. The place we just moved from, Sedona, refered to as Arizona’s “Red Rock country,” has more resorts and time shares than we care to count, but at least it’s the desert, and there are lots of towering red rocks to go around. However, to do the same thing to the delicate environment we observed on Jekyll Island would be unthinkable…and it would certainly change the environment forever. We run a destination marketing company in Sedona (Gateway To Sedona) and know that the bigger profit picture for the state of Georgia over time lies attracting tourists from all over the world who will only come to a place like Jekyll if it remains environmentally pristine, with its native flora and fauna intact. Otherwise, there are plenty of name-brand, palm-tree filled luxury resorts in gnat-free areas of the US that will surely out-compete anything that could be built on Jekyll.

By Bert Richmond

April 28, 2008 2:57 PM | Link to this

If it were not for Senator Chapman and Mr. Boshears, the citizens of Georgia would have had NO input into the overdevelopment of our most unique State Park. Three new hotels have already been approved for building, use of Jekyll Island has increased steadily over the last ten years despite what the current JIA Board would like us to believe.

We must have a JIA Board that represents all the citizens of Georgia and a majority of whom are trained and inexperienced in Biology, Park Management, and related areas appropriate to the protection of this most sensitive barrier island. We now have bankers, real estate developers, financiers, but no real vocal representatives for the environmental needs of Jekyll. What a tragedy that Ed Boshears term of office expires this July.

By Mae

April 28, 2008 3:24 PM | Link to this

If Governor Perude wants to do the right thing he would reappoint the board and include people with the backgrounds Bert refers to…it only makes sense. Governor Perdue has the option of reappointing Ed Boshears to another term. Mike Hodges’s term was up July 1, 2007 and he remains a sitting member of the board. Of course Mike is chair of the Conservation Committee who has done nothin to move the Conservation Plan to a vote by the board or retain strong, protective language in the plan. So maybe he remains on the board for a purposed. He supported the concept espoused by board Chair Ben Porter “defining the environmentalyy sensitive areas of the island can be done concurrent with development.” How absurd!

Eric Garvey stated in Dan Chapman’s article that “Whatever we do needs to be done in an environmentally responsible manner,” Garvey said, “Our goal is to be a model for how development takes place on the coast.” If that were the case the JIA would NEVER have approved an RFP without FIRST doing environmental and capacity studies and having the Conservation Plan in place. They would NOT have blocked legislation that would have protected a barrier island’s fragile ecology and insured that Jekyll maintains a character that reflects a state park and not a high end resort. No matter how “green” buildings are built they cannot replace what God has graced Jekyll Island with. Its natural wonders should be preserved for all generations!

By Hoyt LeCroy

April 28, 2008 3:31 PM | Link to this

The Jekyll Island Authority has failed to seriously consider the will of the people. No one doubts the need for revitalization, but no one would want to see the island ravaged by over-development. Blogs are an effective means of communication, but they are no substitute for contacting the Governor and legislators. They are the decision-makers and it is they to whom we must make our wishes known. It is an absolute travesty that a PR firm has been hired for $3500 per month to “sell” Linger Longer’s development “ideas” to the citizens of Georgia. Where are they getting the money? If you can’t figure that one out, I have a very nice bridge in Brooklyn that I’d like to sell to you. Contact the Governor and visit the website: www.savejekyllisland.org

By Pretty Patty

April 28, 2008 3:47 PM | Link to this

In 2004 the Jekyll Island Authority commissioned a study for the revitalization of Jekyll Island. Unlike todays model it was well researched and when presented enthusiastically received. It was titled the 20-20 /Vision Plan. It was to use 28 acres incoporating the present shopping center then around the corner and across the street, on the parkway entrance. The plan included stores, restaurants and condos. Neither beach, maritime forrest or wetlands were impacted. Old hotels were to be rebuilt or renovated and a new hotel added to the Convention Center. Unlike todays plan all the homework was well done before a plan was presented. So far we’ve had no capacity or conservation study completed. Three hotels and condo plans are proceeding on beach footprint areas at this time. Before Linger Longer spends a fortune on marketing and planning people, how about conducting the necessary studies! At present there is so much unsold real estate on other islands. It seems that the uniqueness of Jekyll should be its natural unspoiled settings. In todays harried world it is hard to find many places like it

By Marshall Murphey

April 28, 2008 4:21 PM | Link to this

This one is EASY. Increase the ground leases by another 90 years. Then let the developers only redevelop already developed hotel properties. That would keep Jekyll the same old Jekyll (nice and quiet)but with modern hotels. Jekyll is a state supported island used to serve the pleasure of ALL. I am 44 and must say the best times of my life have been spent on Jekyll. It nice to vacation where time stands still, Jekyll is not Saint Simons of Hilton Head, I thank God for that, lets do a lttle face lift but keep her just the way she is, Beautiful. Marshall Murphey

By Sandra Hamel

April 28, 2008 4:30 PM | Link to this

Jekyll Island State Park history will remember 2 names: Senator Jeff Chapman R-Brunswick and Representative Debbie Buckner D-Junction City. Both have fought lonely battles for legislation to protect the last undeveloped area near or on Jekyll’s beach. Hopefully, the Republican controlled House and Senate will understand, before it’s too late, that their support for the JIA and LLC beach village is irresponsible (especially when revitalization is already taking place with the renovations or replacement of the 10 existing hotels, and, the JIA already has plans they can return to for the convention center and shopping center to be replaced in the same areas they are now located). Allowing more hotels and condos to be built on any part of this state park, from the beach to the Historic District, will change Jekyll Island forever. It will lose, for future generations, the simplicity and uniqueness that makes it so special. History might not remember all of their names, but, if development of this undeveloped area is allowed, it will be remembered that Jekyll Island’s simplicity and uniqueness were lost to future generations under Republican Governor Sonny Perdue and his Republican controlled House and Senate. Rather than doing all in their power to protect this entire area for future generations of Georgians, they sold their State Park out to developers. Sometimes “less” really is “more”.

By big jake

April 28, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this

Here we go again ,LLC at their best!No direction,no visitation or capacity study,who’s in charge.Is the Jekyll Island Authority working for LLC or is LLC working for the Authority.Who indeed is setting the parameters on Jekyll revitilazation? Unlike the movie “Field of Dreams” where build it and they will come “was the belief ,not so on Jekyll revitilazation.I’m confident the Reynolds Group has deep pockets but this incompetence on all parties must be costing them big bucks.LLC now says in 30 days they will have a new plan, however the Authority says the Bleakley study on capacity and visitation will take 8 weeks..I rest my case and hope for the best!

By Mary Lynn Huie

April 28, 2008 5:18 PM | Link to this

I have been vacationing on Jekyll since the early 1950s. The trips were family excursions involving slow days and nights that gradually synchronized to the rhythms of the ocean, sky, and land. The plans to “upscale” (a nice way of saying getting rid of the troublesome middle class) and add to what is already on the island will only make this special place identical to the rest of the traffic-congested, over-developed islands along America’s coasts. Jekyll will no longer be a place to return to nature but just another developer’s Disneyesque interpretation of nature.

Yes, the hotels have been sadly neglected. But much of the reason for that neglect has been the knowledge that plans were afoot to replace them with resorts. I understand that this is an attractive “opportunity” for developers, but the state needs to step in to protect the island for the people of Georgia who are not being served by developers who only think in terms of the money they can make. Our political leaders should think of their legacy rather than their debts to developers who underwrote their campaigns.

By Anne Brunsgaard

April 28, 2008 5:32 PM | Link to this

I completely agree that the reason people go to Jekyll is because it is not horribly overdeveloped and touristy! I lived in FL for years and always hated the ugly beachfront developments there; when my mother-in-law first took me to Jekyll I expected just another FL beach but it was so serene and natural. I felt so refreshed and relaxed that we go back almost every year. If Jekyll changed to include large developments and less nature, we would mourn the loss, and take our vacation dollars elsewhere.

By The Oddball

April 28, 2008 6:32 PM | Link to this

The Oddball recently visited Jekyll Island, and was surprised to see that the “crumbling parking lot” which the developers and their well-paid friends in the legislature wanted to rip out was actually in fine shape. It also happens to be the only place on the island where a family can park the car to spend a day on the beach. The Oddball can afford the hotels, but many cannot.

When developers want a chunk of anything on the Georgia coast, they’ll say anything — don’t believe a word they say unless you’ve verified it yourself.

By Martha and Richard Lang

April 28, 2008 7:01 PM | Link to this

We, friends of Jekyll have said from the very beginning when Linger Longer was chosen that we only want new hotels and retail facilities to be built on the original footprints of exiting old hotels and retail establishments. Of course by doing so, Linger Longer will not be able to make the enormous profits unless they expand on the size of their development and encroach on envirnomentally sensitive land that keeps in balance Jekyll’s fragile existance. Jekyll belongs to the people of Georgia and Linger Longer with Govenor Purdue’s endorsement fail to listen to us. This is nothing but a land grab for the wealthy Mercer Reynolds family who owns Linger Longer Devleopment Company and who in return are being rewarded for their huge donations to Purdue’s last re-election.

Martha and Richard Lang

By Decatur

April 28, 2008 7:34 PM | Link to this

Georgians are really speaking out on their love for the Jekyll that is not yet commercialized or housing new condos, timeshares and a town center that would invade a maritime forest. It is amazing to watch our legislators ignore public opinion on this aside from those like Senator Chapman and Representative Buckner. I know the names do not end there, but legislators have also shown that they are not going to necessarily vote with their constituency on this issue where big money is involved and it is the desire of Governor Perdue, the JIA (excluding Mr. Boshears) and Linger Longer to take giant steps in moving forward and not listening to the wishes of the people. I adore the simplicity of our state park and hate to see anxious developers and biased JIA members ruin this incredible island.

By Barbara Driggers

April 28, 2008 7:45 PM | Link to this

First off, I must apologize to my fellow Georgians, for wasting my vote on Gov.Purdue. I will never do it again. Also, it breaks my heart that some of the people that I knew on the JIA, sold their souls to the devil.

Now that being said, when the Ocean rises and engulfs the land, which it will do in years to come, with the obvious global warming. Then I hope that LLC,JIA and all their graft grabbing money hungry friends are taken out to see, right along with the “Town Square” and all the Condo’s and Town Houses. Cause when you mess with Mother Nature and God’s Plan, it has a way of back-firing on you. My Family is now going on 4 generations that have been coming to the precious “Golden Isle”. We have walked every foot of the beach and tramped through the Wet Lands, watched the Squirrels run and play. Plus Deer crossing the roads. Feeding the birds and admiring the turtles, plus all the other things of Nature. So fix up and clean up, fresh paint, yes, Expand, NO.NO,NO.

I wish that you men involved in the destruction of my Island were my Son’s or my Husband. You would realize the wrath of a woman scorned. If you were able to walk or talk. I wonder how yu can sleep at night. You know this “State Park” does not belong to you, it belongs to the people of Georgia and all of our country men that would care to visit. And we Welcome them with open arms. Cause once you have put your feet in the sands of Jekyll, you are hooked. It gets in your blood. Every time I walk the Beach, I can’t help but think of the prayer, “Foot Prints in the Sand”, cause trust me the man up stairs walks that land on a daily basis. Our Wetlands are so vital, the Marshes are so vital,the Trees and Sea Oats, the animals,the sand and water are all vital to our very way of living. I am 73 years old and a mere woman. I wish I had the power to gather the people of Georgia to converge upon the Island and have a sit in, just to STOP you in your tracks. I live on Social Security, and I have literally spent almost one full month of my income, to make long distance calls, make flyer’s, write letters.What ever I thought it would take, to help save the Island. I would stand on a “Soap Box” and preach non-stop, if I could to get my point across. I get so angry every time I think about it, I come real close to losing my religion. I want to tell you off so bad, in not so nice of a way. God made so many different types of people, and I think that all you big wigs might fall under the title of being “Idiots”. I think LLC means Linger Longer, well lets change your name to “Linger Less” get Lost. Go mess up some one else’s life and leave us alone. You make me sick. I am so ashamed of all of you. You know they say the rich get richer and the poor gets poorer and the bigger they get, the harder they fall. Pride goeth before the man. Search your hearts and minds, cause you are going down the wrong path. God Pity you that are involved in destroying the Island and hurting millions of people.

By susanme

April 28, 2008 7:57 PM | Link to this

The people who love Jekyll are genuinely concerned about the island’s future. This love has fueled them during recent months as they have fought to save the open shoreline. Now it is another battle that they face. Sen. Chapman and Rep. Buckner have listened to the people of Georgia and have banded with them to try to save their island. Because they are not in agreement with LLC, the JIA, and the state politicians who surely have chosen to back LLC’s development plans whatever they may be—Chapman and Buckner have been made-out to be the “bad guys”. Well if they are the bad guys throw-out the “good guys” please. Those in elected offices need to take notice. Sen. Chapman and Rep. Buckner are doing what they were elected to do—serve the people—instead of trying to rob them blind. Like Frank Mirasola said the people of Georgia have to stand up and say stop the madness we have had enough!

By Paul Patterson

April 28, 2008 8:26 PM | Link to this

My family visits Jekyll because is not overly developed and is unlike any other costal area we have been to. We come from out of state and if Jekyll is paved over and filled with condos then Georgia will lose this vacationer’s dollars. All the island needs is some updating of the current facilities not an extreme makeover as proposed by the JIA and Linger Longer. It is time that the politicians wake up and realize what a valuable resource they are about to let be destroyed. It is an absolute shame an environmentally sensitive and increasing rare costal area like this could be bulldozed away due to the greed of a few short sighted land developers.

By Paul Patterson

April 28, 2008 8:27 PM | Link to this

My family visits Jekyll because is not overly developed and is unlike any other costal area we have been to. We come from out of state and if Jekyll is paved over and filled with condos then Georgia will lose this vacationer’s dollars. All the island needs is some updating of the current facilities not an extreme makeover as proposed by the JIA and Linger Longer. It is time that the politicians wake up and realize what a valuable resource they are about to let be destroyed. It is an absolute shame an environmentally sensitive and increasing rare costal area like this could be bulldozed away due to the greed of a few short sighted land developers.

By Charlie Busfield

April 28, 2008 8:30 PM | Link to this

There is no doubt in my mind the current development plan will be soundly denounced in this forum, or any other. The plan is clearly that bad. Still, I am concerned certain people in positions of power may not care about what we Georgians want in this case, much less about what is best for Jekyll environmentally. It is ironic the governor has called for green space preservation in the state. Is Jekyll not the epitomy of Georgia green space? No development in the maritime forest, please. All Jekyll needs is for existing lodging accomodations to be improved, fix up the convention center and modernize the golf course. If more needs to be done at that point then we can cross that bridge when we come to it. But there is no need for development of an aggressive, radical nature, and I suspect the motives of anyone who advocates such a thing.

By Save Jekyll

April 28, 2008 9:09 PM | Link to this

For those who are interested in the preservation of Jekyll Island, you may enjoy www.savejekyllisland.org.

By Joan L.

April 28, 2008 9:09 PM | Link to this

From the Official Code of Georgia Annotated:

O.C.G.A. Section 12-3-235 (14):

The Jekyll Island Authority shall have power to do any other things necessary or proper to beautify, improve, and render self-supporting the island park, to make it facilities available to people of average income, and to advertise its beauties to the world.

O.C.G.A. Section 12-3-271:

All income and revenues arising out of the operation of Jekyll Island State Park, and all gifts, grants, appropriations, or bonds or loan proceeds made specifically for Jekyll Island State Park, shall be used by the authority for the sole purpose of beautifying, improving, developing, enlarging, maintaining, administering, managing, and promoting Jekyll Island State Park at the lowest rates reasonable and possible for the benefit of the people of the State of Georgia.

Interesting language (which also happens to be state law.) Doesn’t seem to support the current state leadership’s headlong & impetuous rush to turn Jekyll into a fancified upscale resort destination.

By Charlotte Clark

April 28, 2008 9:31 PM | Link to this

We have been going to Jekyll twice a year every year since 1973. Yes, today we have trouble finding a pleasant pet-friendly place on the beach to spend our week, but without a doubt, it is the best place for quiet relaxation, family bonding and nature watching. The tidal marshes have the primordial pea soup necessary for the food web so important for all creatures – not just humans. Watching pelican fly just above the surf in late June, the rafting ducks in late November, porpoise hunting in pairs – fall or summer, and the Right Whales blowing tall streams of water is all a part of the Jekyll experience. The whales come to the coastal area off the Georgia coast for their calving.

Have you ridden your bike down the bike trail on the north part of the island? There are so many different species of birds, many types of scat, various tidal invertebrates and a myriad of other animals living in the spartina.

Taylor Schoettle’s “Naturalist’s Guides to the Georgia Coast” are a wonderful way to discover additional adventures and existing creatures at our wonderful island. The books are a great family reference and an interesting way to get children’s curiosity piqued http://www.georgiabarrierislands.com/

To allow this pristine quiet family island to be bullied by acid-tongued politicians who enjoy attacking those who choose to try to make a difference in the world is beyond understanding – even so far as attacking their own within their political party with the most trite juvenile postcards depicting people with black eyes – and it is just because the person is standing up for what he thinks is right. And it is right. It’s time the silent nature lovers took a stand and helped the voices who are helping us all.

Recently, I found a reference “Treat the earth well. It was not given to you by your parents. It was loaned to you by your children.” I invite you to substitute “Jekyll Island” in the quote. Jekyll was loaned to us by our children. It’s up to us to maintain the ability for the tidal marshlands to stay in their role, to keep the wonderful beaches in the same environment that they hold now. Taking a stand now to help Jekyll is very much like a long-term smoker who has finally kicked the habit — one step at a time can only do us all good!!

The politicians who are more self absorbed in their joking acerbic attitude at the board meetings should take a lesson from Thoreau: “The question is not what you look at, but what you see.” See Jekyll. It is beautiful. Make it stay beautiful.

By Guy Lemaire

April 28, 2008 10:06 PM | Link to this

As a long time visitor to Jekyll Island, I was so appalled today when I was surfing the net and came across this story.

I have not been to Jekyll Island for several years, but I forever miss its beauty and serenity. If this condo-hotel-retail project goes through, I vow never to set foot on the island again. Obviously, I will not be the only one with such an attitude.

I cannot believe that such a disgusting project would ever be considered by lawmakers of either political party. This pandering just goes to prove that the only thing bipartisan in 2008 is the lure of the almighty dollar.

Unfortuantely, I am far away at this time and can only donate money to help preserve the beautiful Jekyll Island. I wish I could donate my time, energy and karma as well. I urge all area residents who feel strongly about not turning this beautiful piece of nature into high-priced commercial real estate to get involved in any way they can to stop this destructive and obscene.

Your activism is needed now! Please remember the movie The Godfather: Part II when Al Pacino’s character of Michael Corleone went to a pre-Castro Havana to meet with other U.S. mob bosses to discuss their interests in Cuba. While being driven through Havana, Michael witnesses a rebel going up to an Army captain and several soldiers and blowing himself up and taking them with him. At the meeting of the mob bosses, Michael voices concern that if the rebels come to powerful, all their interests in Cuba will be lost. The other mob bosses assure Michael that there is nothing to worry about with the rebels. Michael then says, “The government soldiers are being paid to fight. Nobody is paying the rebels top fight, therefore they can win.” Similarly, no one will be paying the opponents of the development project on Jekyll Island to fight it, therefore they can win!!

By Hoyt LeCroy

April 28, 2008 11:05 PM | Link to this

Ooooops! My previous note said that a PR consultant had been hired to “market” the new development on Jekyll….Now hear this…….it’s $35,000…..that ‘s thirty-five thousand smackers…per month….for a total of some $140,000 over a period of four months……… They know that the citizens don’t want over-development, so they spend $$ (whose $$) to “sell” it to us??!!

By Igor

April 29, 2008 12:01 AM | Link to this

Gimme a break! This entire Jekyll Island development scheme is nothing more than Sonny Perdue and friends carving up more real estate to make millions. We all knew Sonny was a backroom deal scheister before the last election. And you still voted this moron into office!!! What did you expect? He’s a crook and a doesn’t give a damn about Georgia’s natural resources; only the financial resources he can stuff into his own pockets.

By Tom

April 29, 2008 12:09 AM | Link to this

People, you elected this crowd, then you re-elected them. You did this even after knowing what Perdue did on his real estate deals. So what did you expect? Wonder what he is getting personally out of this??

By susanme

April 29, 2008 12:44 AM | Link to this

When I wrote my earlier post I was still fired up after reading Barbara Driggers post. She tickled me with the part about if it were her husband or her sons. Sounds like we have a lot in common because I can relate.

When I posted my last comment I meant to comment on the blog questions. This is where Linger Longer really ticks me off. All they want to do is bad mouth the condition Jekyll is in and how bad everything needs to be revitalized but they come in wanting to do everything backwards. This throws up a red flag to me. I believe they want to sink their hooks into a lot of land before they are willing to invest in the work that needs to be done first. We need to redevelop what is already there and stay within the footprints of the existing developments. Then if Jekyll is booked up and the phones are ringing off the hooks and the hotels and restaurants can’t handle the demand then new development might be consider. If such a place to safely house the new development does not exist then everyone will have to wait their turn—day trip to visit the beach and go else where for food and lodging. I have had to do this myself but that is just part of the tourist trade. Sometimes wide open sometimes slow go. So first redevelop then wait a few years to see how it goes and then consider new development. I think this is what most people want. I certainly do.

By Greg Lowery

April 29, 2008 8:35 AM | Link to this

Many of the comments already posted echo my feelings on this subject. Revitalization needs to take place, no doubt—but in the existing developed footprint. The proposals thus far have simply been overwhelmingly large. I enjoy a steak dinner occasionally, but I don’t need or want twenty pounds of steak.

Has Linger Longer considered this strategy: Why not listen to public input, and then prepare a proposal? It seems counterproductive to invest all this time and money in plans that fly in the face of prevailing public opinion. Listen first, and then plan.

By Jim

April 29, 2008 8:37 AM | Link to this

Here’s one more. I like Jekyll as it is. Just restore the structures that are there. No more development. Have you ever rode a bicycle on Jekyll? Or walked the beach around to where the Live Oaks merge with the sea? It’s beautiful just the way it is. We have had conferences there and stayed in the hotels, shopped in the shops. What’s scary is to see how St. Simons has gone from a simple two-lane entrance to a huge development that destroys the small island feel it once had. Preserve what’s left of our Ga. coast.

By Brenda Constan

April 29, 2008 8:40 AM | Link to this

Each year in early spring, I toss a stack of books, some comfortable walking shoes, and my beach bike in the car and anticipate a week of quiet self-indulgence and renewal on Jekyll Island. It is a unique place. Its salt marshes; stately live oaks; maritime forests; wetlands; beaches; and array of wildlife, some of it rare and endangered, awaken in me a need for contemplation and remind me of the power and beauty of the natural world. More significantly, the island makes me reflect on our role as human beings in this world. Because Jekyll Island is a state park, we are, as citizens of Georgia, its stewards, responsible for protecting its quiet natural beauty and its wild life population.

Linger-Longer’s decision to move their proposed development off the beach may appear to be a magnanimous and environmentally sound gesture. However, the gesture merely veneers the real issues concerning development on the island. The new plan will still negatively impact the maritime forest and its flora and fauna, it will still impact the island’s infrastructure, it will still bring excessive traffic and noise to the island, it will still violate the original intent to keep the island affordable for ordinary Georgians. It will still be inappropriate in a state park.

By Amy Schwartz-Bradberry

April 29, 2008 8:58 AM | Link to this

The project to develop Jekyll Island should be stopped by a grassroots efforts if we want to pass on some of Georgia’s beauty to furture generations.

Interested people should visit www.savejekyllisland.org

Those who wish to prevent this travesty of nature should keep in mind the famous quote by Edmund Burke: “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men to do nothing.”

By Brandy

April 29, 2008 9:10 AM | Link to this

It’s a STATE PARK, not a resort. It should be treated as such.

By Brenda Constan

April 29, 2008 9:25 AM | Link to this

Each year in early spring, I toss a stack of books, some comfortable walking shoes, and my beach bike in the car and anticipate a week of quiet self-indulgence and renewal on Jekyll Island. It is a unique place. Its salt marshes; stately live oaks; maritime forests; wetlands; beaches; and array of wildlife, some of it rare and endangered, awaken in me a need for contemplation and remind me of the power and beauty of the natural world. More significantly, the island makes me reflect on our role as human beings in this world. Because Jekyll Island is a state park, we are, as citizens of Georgia, its stewards, responsible for protecting its quiet natural beauty and its wild life population.

Linger-Longer’s decision to move their proposed development off the beach may appear to be a magnanimous and environmentally sound gesture. However, the gesture merely veneers the real issues concerning development on the island. The new plan will still negatively impact the maritime forest and its flora and fauna, it will still impact the island’s infrastructure, it will still bring excessive traffic and noise to the island, it will still violate the original intent to keep the island affordable for ordinary Georgians. It will still be inappropriate in a state park.

By Diane Shearer

April 29, 2008 9:34 AM | Link to this

Blogs are good, and it’s wonderful that the AJC has given people this opportunity to keep our concerns about Jekyll alive, but we have to do more than blog “to the choir.” Write the governor about the composition of the JIA board. At least two memembers’ terms are up this summer, and one is Boshears. I’m sure Porter and Croy are lobbying the governer to put someone else in that spot! Be sure to vote and when people come campaigning,talk aboutJekyll with them. Politicians need to understand that this is an issue that isn’t going away. Thank the people such as Chapman and Buckner and others who fought for legislation to protect Jekyll and contribute to their campaigns if you can. And finally, visit the web site the Egans work so tirelessly on to keep us up to date on issues and what happened at meetings, but go beyond that and donate some money to the cause if you are able. In the end, if we don’t want to see Jekyll as some gated community run entirely by Linger Longer and their ilk, it’s going to involve lawyers. If you’ve been following the news, you may have noticed that the whole concept of public land in America is under attack.

By Robert Banks

April 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

The difficulties that emerge with each new proposal for land development simply underline the extremely delicate balance between people and environment that exists on Jekyll Island. Jekyll is a unique resource that presntly serves its local community and draws many of us from thousands of miles away. We know of no other place like it.

By Robert Banks

April 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

The difficulties that emerge with each new proposal for land development simply underline the extremely delicate balance between people and environment that exists on Jekyll Island. Jekyll is a unique resource that presntly serves its local community and draws many of us from thousands of miles away. We know of no other place like it.

By Robert Banks

April 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

The difficulties that emerge with each new proposal for land development simply underline the extremely delicate balance between people and environment that exists on Jekyll Island. Jekyll is a unique resource that presntly serves its local community and draws many of us from thousands of miles away. We know of no other place like it.

By Robert Banks

April 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

The difficulties that emerge with each new proposal for land development simply underline the extremely delicate balance between people and environment that exists on Jekyll Island. Jekyll is a unique resource that presntly serves its local community and draws many of us from thousands of miles away. We know of no other place like it.

By Robert Banks

April 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

The difficulties that emerge with each new proposal for land development simply underline the extremely delicate balance between people and environment that exists on Jekyll Island. Jekyll is a unique resource that presntly serves its local community and draws many of us from thousands of miles away. We know of no other place like it.

By Robert Banks

April 29, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

The difficulties that emerge with each new proposal for land development simply underline the extremely delicate balance between people and environment that exists on Jekyll Island. Jekyll is a unique resource that presntly serves its local community and draws many of us from thousands of miles away. We know of no other place like it.

By Lu Ann

April 29, 2008 10:09 AM | Link to this

Once more I want to stand up and plead for Jekyll Island to remain untouched. Now the forest! Everything on Jekyll is precious to those of us who “escape” there. Riding my bike through the forest is just as renewing and soothing as sitting on the beach. Please let God’s original design be the guiding plan for the future of Jekyll.

By rdhood

April 29, 2008 10:18 AM | Link to this

I don’t see why our lawmakers don’t get it….

Georgia has only one island where a family can go and have a relatively inexpensive vacation. There isn’t much on Tybee (thought the beach is good), and St. Simons is sky high. Jekyll is Georgia’s island for the “common man”. They are trying like h* to price it out of reach and turn it into St. Simons. I know our lawmakers would love a Hilton Head or Amelia, but the average citizen of Georgia just can’t afford that. In “renovating” Jekyll, they will destroy the island as it is today and price it out of the range of many of us. What a shame.

By Tracy

April 29, 2008 10:36 AM | Link to this

Jekyll is the Fox Theatre all over again. We saved the Fox. We must save Jekyll. It is without compare. It is irreplacable. Not so much the man-made as the Fox but the God Given. My next visit to Jekyll will be via this suggested website. www.savejekyllisland.org

By Nellie Buckhout

April 29, 2008 10:47 AM | Link to this

As a person who has vacationed on the island since 1975 I remain deeply concerned about the proposed development by Linger-Longer. I feel that their primary purpose along with that of most of the JIA members is to turn Jekyll Island from a quiet beautiful state park which is a haven for wildlife, a place where history abounds and a tranquil vacation spot that is affordable to most to a St.Simons look alike where only the wealthy can do more than make a day trip. I think that the comment wait until you see the plan we have before you get concerned is idoitic. Once the plan is in place, it will be harder to stop the powers that be. It is true that there needs to be updates on the island, but not to the extent that they infringe on the whole atmosphere of the island. Island residents have been threatened or at least the threat has been implied that most of the people do not want any houses on the island. Although I am from Michigan I have never heard anyone of the numerous people that I have talked to even imply that foolish. Get real GIA board most of the people don’t want to give Linger-Longer any more money at the expense of their own enjoyment. Take a sensible approach, improve the shopping center, put in a new convention center, build new hotels that are accessable to the convention center, but don’t get greedy and ruin Jekyll Island, Georgia’s Jewel! Save it for the future use of us all.

By Linder Snider

April 29, 2008 11:13 AM | Link to this

Our family has been visiting Jekyll since the early 1970s once or twice a year. The best part of Jekyll is because it is undeveloped, quiet, and peaceful. Jekyll is a true paradise that Georgia should be protecting not developing. If it is developed, this family’s vacation dollars will go elsewhere. Georgia does not need a Hilton Head.

By Reds Raider

April 29, 2008 11:30 AM | Link to this

Linger Longer cannot afford to continue with their pursuit of Jekeyll Island much longer. They are in such financial straights from this situtation already and they are laying off workers and cutting back the hours of the workers they keep at their other resorts now. So keep up the good fight!

By Charmarie Blaisdell

April 29, 2008 12:42 PM | Link to this

Our family has benn coming to Jekyll from out of state for over 30 years.We come for the peace and quiet, the natural beauty, the unusual flora and fauna. We were shocked when we saw Linger Longer’s plans on display at Villa Ospo in March. How can this be? How can anyone in his/her right mind let it happen. Why not build where the Holiday Inn, and Buccaneer once stood, see if people come, and then assess need for more accomodations? Is anyone paying attention to the vacant condos in Florida? Hello? Spruce up the shopping center and the convention center, of course. But leave the precious environment alone. Why? Why? hasn’t some investigative journalist dug into which politician’s and JIA pockets are being lined by Linger Longer? Maybe it is time to clean house at the Capital? yes, we are “from away” so no-one much cares what we think. But we do bring and spend money each year at Jekyll. The Linger Longer plan is a total turn-off. if it happens, we are gone! Keep up the struggle here Georgia citizens. Right does eventually prevail.

By Shazaam

April 29, 2008 12:51 PM | Link to this

My class had a field trip to the 4-H center on Jekyll Island when I was in middle school. That was arguably one of the most memorable experiences in my life. Converting it into another real estate/condo development would be robbing future generations of a fantastic learning experience. Let’s make sure they don’t pave this paradise and put up another parking lot.

By Terry

April 29, 2008 2:18 PM | Link to this

I want to commend the AJC for providing a forum for its readers to comment on the Jekyll Island development issue. The comments that have been posted in response to this initiative make it clear that there is deep public concern over the Jekyll Island Authority’s endorsement of what it chooses to call “comprehensive revitalization” but what, in fact, is new development that goes far beyond what Jekyll needs. One only has to read JIA board chairman Ben Porter’s late March letter to Georgia’s legislators, stating that the only critics of the Authority’s plan are Jekyll residents, to see that the JIA is not being honest in dealing with public input on how best to improve JI State Park. The fact that the JIA, which has a marketing staff of it own, is paying $35,000 a month to an outside PR firm (GCI) to push the idea that Jekyll needs what its private partner, Linger Longer Communities, is offering speaks volumes about the Authority’s inability sell its own development plan, and its heartfelt need to put lipstick on that pig to make it look cute to the general public.
Linger Longer says Georgians need to “rediscover Jekyll” – what really needs to be rediscovered is a JIA board that understands what a State Park is all about; that realizes that a natural asset as precious as Jekyll should not be treated like a “product;” that does its environmental homework before picking development sites; and that truly listens to public opinion and responds accordingly. Gov. Perdue needs to be informed that a number of his JIA board appointees have disqualified themselves as park stewards. He needs to act on that information before it’s too late; before Jekyll takes a giant step toward looking like those upscale condo communities that dot the eastern seaboard.

By Niall Horan

April 29, 2008 2:32 PM | Link to this

I concur with the previous post that quoted Edmund Burke’s famous saying”The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” Nothing applies more to the proposed commercial real estate development on Jekyll Island than this quote.

I urge all opponents of this proposed ugly development to contact the assignment desks at the news departments of Georgia television and radio stations to tell them the obscene facts and urge them to do a news story.

Also, this proposed development srikes me as the kind of assault on the environment that a national news program would love to cover. Opponents of the plan should call the news departments at CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN and others and ask for the e-mail address of the assignment editor; then, send a succint, and to-the-point factual description of the proposal and its impact on the environment. Tell them that the story will resonate with their viewers nationally, and that their film crew will have compelling visuals to shoot with the stunning beauty of this gorgeous island. Jekyll Island should be a rallying point that will serve to bring to attention other similar greedy and predatory assaults on the environment throughout this nation. Opponents of the proposed development of Jekyll Island can turn this into a nationally covered issue if they respond to their own activist inclinations.

Let’s heed Edmund Burke and not do nothing!!!!!!

By Bob

April 29, 2008 2:53 PM | Link to this

Isn’t it terrible when the very people we put into office sell out to corporate profits at the blink of an eye? It seems there’s no end in site for this country until every natural wonder is commercialized. Are politicians for the people or the bottom line at wall street, I forget. How about LLC building a high rise in Sonny Perdue’s backyard without his consent and see how well he enjoys it.

By E. Vil Developer

April 29, 2008 3:01 PM | Link to this

Look, we need something like Myrtle Beach or Daytona Beach in Georgia. There aren’t enough places to stay on Jekyll during peak seasons, so what if we put more hotels up on the island? There’s plenty of land to be developed and if you don’t like it, go somewhere else. It’s state property and if the state wants to use the property to increase its tax revenue, it should be free to do so.

By bob

April 29, 2008 3:45 PM | Link to this

What a wonderful socialistic viewpoint. Maybe the developers should put there development on the mainland for all the reasons stated above. Why? Because greedy developers can maximize profits by building on pristine land which drives up the price per unit ultimately putting more money in there pockets. Mr. developer we know the drill.

I’ve been dealing with a developer in a new subdivision about purchasing a home. From the get go they tried to employ the same pompous attitude they used in the bubble. In a weeks time they dropped price 10k. Week later, received an email dropping another 5k and 2.5k towards closing. Terrible, it’s almost like there begging. Old saying, what comes around goes around.

By Melissa Green

April 29, 2008 3:56 PM | Link to this

There is a saying that goes: “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it!” So why are they trying to “fix” Jekyll Island. My family has been vacationing on Jekyll every year for a long time. We go there because it is NOT over-developed. Yes, someof the buildings coudl use a little work, but leave the forest, leave the beach and it’s parking lot, and let the deer and birds and alligators have some space of their own. I had a nightmare not too long ago that we were visiting Jekyll and all it contained was a huge mall with apts in between stores. The beach was not even visible because of all the buildings. No, that was not a dream, that was a nightmare. And I woke up knowing that we cannot let this happen. To all who want to ruin Jekyll - it ain’t broke, go ruin your own back yards!!

By ED T

April 29, 2008 3:56 PM | Link to this

If you want to truly “develop” Jeykll Island, then TEAR DOWN ALL THE EXISTING BUILDINGS that are already there. Redevelop downtown Brunswick with condos, apartment buildings and shops. Then let the people commute over to the island for day use or camping.

By Barbara

April 29, 2008 4:01 PM | Link to this

Jekyll does NOT need any NEW development. Renovations of existing structures would be preferred, OR maybe a “town center” type of development where the small shopping area is now. However, there could be one change made: Please, do away with the fee charged to get onto the island!

By Glenn

April 29, 2008 4:09 PM | Link to this

The motels at the beach are typical of anything run by the government,in terrible shpe, run down, and overpriced for there condition. I say make Jekyl a gambling island so the rest of Georgia will not have to see the gambling if they prefer not to. This will lower our taxes. If you want to commune with nature go to Cumberland Island or Okeefeenokee Swamp.

By Michael Jaski

April 29, 2008 4:15 PM | Link to this

Renovate and redevelop existing properties - YES; Add new luxury condos and hotels - NO. The island has a wonderful character with nothing except the Club higher than 2 stories. This is a state park that is supposed to be affordable to the average Georgian, not a millionaires’ retreat like it once was. The people who can afford the proposed condos and hotels can afford to go to Cumberland.

By Glenn

April 29, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this

My wife’s grandfather was a senator in the GA legislature when the state acquired Jekyl Island. The legislature took a boat over to look at what they had bought. The boat had to make extra trips to carry all the furnature the members of he legislature stole from the mansions on this visit. My wife’s grandmother cried in shame of how the GA legislature stole from the state of GA as she told this story. Our heritage has been stolen from us for a long time by the ones we elect.

By Holmes Family

April 29, 2008 4:22 PM | Link to this

We have vacationed on Jekyll Island each summer for the past 4 years and will continue as long as the natural areas are preserved. We choose this beach over all others for the peacefullness, family atmosphere and the natural preserves. I do agree that there is need to improve the shopping area and upgrade the existing hotels. However, I don’t see the need to add new additional hotels. I don’t think the current ones have full capacity and it doesn’t make sense to destroy the wildlife for profit and something that will sit half vacant. As a family we enjoy the uncrowded beach and no loud music, etc that you find in the over commercialized Beach resorts. And if we wish to venture out, we cross over to St Simons for the day. We would be terribly disappointed if the dynamics of Jekyll Island changed. The bike trails and wildlife are the highlights of our vacation and we return year after year. Please save jekyll Island from commercializaton.

By cj

April 29, 2008 4:37 PM | Link to this

Surveys show that over 50% of first time visitors to Jekyll never come back! There is a reason for that, it’s called substandard accomodations that were fine in 1972, but do not compare well today to Hilton Head, Amelia Island, Seaside/Destin, etc. I like the place, but my wife refuses to go back. So, GA continues to loose tourism dollars from Georgians who drive out of state to better beaches. If I were in charge, the state would retain and preserve all undeveloped areas, but sell the developed parts to the highest bidders.

By Robert

April 29, 2008 4:38 PM | Link to this

There is no reason to further develop Jekyl Island, other than to line the pockets of a few condo builders. The region does not need the “economic boost” that further development would provide.

Jekyl is one of the few places in America where you can stroll on a beach that hasn’t been lined with hotels and condos. Don’t we have enough beachfront condos and hotels? Why must every linear inch of our shores be developed? Why can’t we leave this tiny, tiny piece alone?

Jekyl is a public treasure. It would be a horrible shame to turn it into a private island and playplace for the extremely wealthy to spend 1 or 2 weeks of the year at.

It’s not like there aren’t any other places in America to own a beach house. If you have the money and want such a thing, what’s wrong with the thousands of other beaches where you can buy one?

Jekyl needs to be left alone.

By crass realist

April 29, 2008 4:40 PM | Link to this

Oh, NO. You big bad developers are going to come in and just RUIN our beautiful little island where the best accomodations are a tent and porta-jon. This is what being in nature is supposed to be! Creature comforts? Those are for wussies!

By Karyn

April 29, 2008 4:42 PM | Link to this

Jekyl is a state treasure! Yes, it does need renovation of the existing hotels. They’re all in sad condition. Several have already been torn down. We go there every year and for the past few years there have been far fewer hotel options. Jekyl does NOT need luxury condos, timeshares, etc. The Jekyl Authority/Linger Longer folks say fewer people have been visiting/staying on Jekyl because of the rundown hotels. I feel it’s instead due to the fact that many of the hotels have been eliminated by demolition, so fewer people even have the option of staying on the island. Re-build the torn down hotels and renovate the remaining hotels.

I can’t believe building in the pristine maritime forest is even being considered! That would be a travesty. The Jekyl Island Authority needs to start listening to the folks who actually go year after year and know what a gem this is for all of Georgia. Want the high priced luxury condo/timeshare? Go to Hilton Head or St Simons Island. Want peace, tranquility and unspoiled beauty not marred by commercialism? Keep Jekyl largely as is and only build in existing footprints.

By R Arthur

April 29, 2008 4:44 PM | Link to this

Rebuild or remodel jekyll’s present hotels,motels and buildings only. Not one inch of beach or forest should be given to any greedy person or developer. no one has the right to change jekyll. Only we, the citizens of this great state,should have that right.

By sally horan

April 29, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this

I feel that Jekyl’s existing hotels and convention center could certainly use some updating. But, overall no extensive development should be allowed eithr on the beach side or definitely not in the maritime forest. Georgia’s major achievement has been in preserving the coastline (with the exception of St. Simon’s) and that is the State’s major attraction. Let the resort needy folks go to Florida or to South Carolina….we don’t need them here. We have precious few naturally beautiful areas left in this country. Save Georgia from the developers please!

By LA English

April 29, 2008 4:50 PM | Link to this

28 Apr. 2008 I and my family have been going to Jekyll Is. since 1960. I have seen the various motels in varying stages of disrepair/repair (the late great Buccaneer). There was never the attendance to keep them in suitable repair, what with the sparse attendance in the winter. And yet the maritime forest trees have always fascinated me. The way the prevailing winds carved them, awesome! You better thank God for them or the island would have disappeared long ago. So the north end is losing beach, so the south end is gaining. That is the nature of the ‘beast’. Just don’t let greedy man come in and ruin what we have there. Strings of hotels, condos, sh