Gold Dome Live is moving!
Our new spot will allow us to get the news to you even faster and make commenting easier. Please bookmark the new site and sign up for our rss feed:
http://blogs.ajc.com/gold-dome-live/
AJC.com > Legislature > Blog > Archives > 2009 > March > 06 > Entry
DEL.ICIO.USBill inspired by octuplet births may morph into stem cell research restrictions
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
A bill developed in response to the octuplets recently born in California might not be on a slow-track after all.
State Sen. Preston Smith (R-Rome) says he has made some changes to Senate Bill 169 that he plans to present to a special Senate subcommittee Monday morning.
The legislation appears to be shifting from a discussion of the practices of fertility clinics towards a debate over embryonic stem cell research.
If those changes pass, the Senate Health and Humans Services Committee could reconsider the amended legislation at 10:30 a.m. in the Capitol.
Smith said he has removed from the bill everything to do with fertility clinics and how many embryos can be transferred into a woman, but he has left language that deals with cloning and embryos used for scientific research.
The bill as amended would prohibit cloning and chimera experimentation — crossing human genetic material with that of animals — which Smith called “creepy.” It would prohibit creating a human embryo for the purposes of scientific experimentation in Georgia, but would allow such research to continue using embryos created outside the state.
The bill also addresses the idea of personhood, Smith said.
“It does advance the position that an embryo has more rights than a piece of property,” he said.
Embryonic stem cell research uses newly-created human embryos discarded from fertility clinics. Because the discarded embryos are destroyed in the process, many Christian conservatives —- though not all —- equate the practice with abortion.
President Barack Obama plans to hold a public event Monday where he will announce his plan to lift restrictions on taxpayer-funded research using embryonic stem cells. Embryonic stem cells can grow and become any cell in the body, and scientists hope to use them to cure diseases such as diabetes, Parkinson’s disease or to treat spinal chord injuries.
Republicans in Georgia have predicted that changes in federal rules regarding stem cell research will prompt a state debate over the issue.
That debate could start Monday morning as the special study committee of the Senate Health and Human Services Committee meets at 9:30 a.m. to discuss the changes to the bill.
If the four senators on the subcommittee agree on the new language, they could pass it back to the larger committee, which could in turn vote in favor of it.
Monday is one of the last days for bills to pass out of committee in order to be considered for a vote in either chamber during this legislative session.
The state of Georgia is trying to use an international biotech convention that is coming to Atlanta in May to showcase the state as a good place to do business in biotechnology.
Opponents of restrictions on embryonic stem cell research say legislation prohibiting stem cell research could have a chilling effect on efforts to lure firms to establish operations in Georgia.
Staff Writer Jim Galloway and the Associated Press contributed to this story.
Permalink | Comments (3) | Post your comment | Categories: Legislature
Comments
By jeff sutter
March 9, 2009 10:03 AM | Link to this
The real purpose finally surfaces. Smith, Shafer & Hudgens were dishonest about it in the original bill. This is a terrible bill that will cost Emory, GA Tech & UGA ddearly in the Bio Science field of research. It also makes GA look like the rubes are still in control !
By politicsandpie
March 9, 2009 10:17 AM | Link to this
I’m not sure I even know where to start….
First, they gut the bill to regulate fertility clinics.
Then what part of ‘discarded’ do the “Christian conservatives” not understand? I would imagine if they had a mother with Parkinsonism or a child with a spinal cord injury they would change their position on the subject. One is a discarded piece of genetic material which can be used in order to further scientific research for the life of the second.
By Trail runner
March 9, 2009 1:47 PM | Link to this
Our tax dollars should NOT be used for “embryonic” stem cell research — nor ANY “playing god” activity with embryos. I am battling breast cancer right now, and my son-in-law has MS, but we both think that it would be wrong to destroy HUMAN LIFE for our own personal means.
I absolutely love life and live it to the fullest each day. I am thankful for the wonderful advances that have been made to treat my cancer. But a line should be drawn when treatment involves treating human life as a commodity.
I do not embrace this sick thinking that I can be happy by living pain free or living longer when a human life is destroyed on my behalf — without being given the opportunity to first live and choose to do so. At least when people choose to donate their organs (or the organs of their deceased children) a human life was not created to be destroyed for someone else. At least when our soldiers & police officers serve and possibly die on our behalf, they first have the opportunity to live and make that choice (knowing full well the possible ultimate sacrifice that they might pay).
We have no right to elevate ourselves to demand that embryonic human life should be treated this way, much less demand that citizens who oppose it be forced to help pay for this treatment. A lot of people are going to get even richer because of the federal funding (in addition to the private funding) of this research — and the Obama team will continue to get powerful & political financial support from this madness. Ditto on the abortion machine. But tax payers should not have to pay for this human sacrifice.