Falcons

By dEAN

December 30, 2007 5:00 PM | Link to this

better draft pic k. It is a no brainer, a chance at mcfadden or the ability to trade down for multiply picks as dallas is interested in mcfadden. Even when they win they lose.

By Ace

December 30, 2007 5:04 PM | Link to this

Leave it to the Falcons to finally actually win when they really should lose. Figures.

By WIN

December 30, 2007 5:05 PM | Link to this

Winning is all that matters.

By jedd

December 30, 2007 5:05 PM | Link to this

As Herm Edwards said, “You play to win the game!”

I hope we fall far enough down the draft order for Matt Ryan to be off the board. I would hate to use a high first round pick on him just because we need a QB.

By Deport Illegals

December 30, 2007 5:05 PM | Link to this

The Falcons just screwed up their draft pick! They don’t even know when to lose. They just dropped from drafting second to drafting seventh…how stupid can they be?

We might have caught a break in the draft and picked up Darren McFadden. Forget that thought!

By Paul

December 30, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

A team must play to win. Period. Believe me, an intentional loss would’ve carried over into next year and further solidified a “losers” mentality on this squad.

By Najeh Davenpoop

December 30, 2007 5:06 PM | Link to this

It’s ALWAYS foolish for a team to lose out on draft position. Chances are between 1/4 and 1/2 of the players on this roster won’t be returning next season. What difference does it make if they go into the offseason feeling good about themselves? Of course they should throw the game. But unfortunately players and coaches care more about looking good now so they can get paid more when they hit free agency. True team players would have tanked this game.

Some of y’all might think I’m joking, but I’m not. This applies to coaches and players in general in pro sports, not just to these Falcons. In 2004 when the Terry Stotts-led Hawks won a bunch of meaningless games in March and April, it cost the Hawks a chance at Dwight Howard, who would have radically changed the direction of the franchise. If these people were truly loyal to the organization’s future they would tank the games.

Of course if Rich McKay is picking the players, it might not matter where they draft.

By Grover

December 30, 2007 5:07 PM | Link to this

Better draft pick would have been the way to go…

By will

December 30, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

Falcons are idiots. Goodbye Darren Mcfadden, hello Matt Ryan (another first round bust)

By Hypemaster

December 30, 2007 5:08 PM | Link to this

they did the right thing, end the season on a winning note, go in the offseason with confidence in redman. We will be back next season no matter what position we draft. good win!!!

By Yeah...We Suck

December 30, 2007 5:09 PM | Link to this

We’ll I guess I can kill off all of my Darren Mcfadden dreams. I guess we’ll draft either Ryan or Brohm and enjoy another decade in the NFC cellar. Way to blow it dirt birds

By GTfan

December 30, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this

The falcon’s are idiots… They’ll miss out on a franchise RB now.

By Guy

December 30, 2007 5:11 PM | Link to this

Getting a 2nd pick overall would have been nice but to beat mora’s defense so thoroughly is so much better for the team’s spirit. Well done falcons. Here’s looking forward to next season.

By Get the Picture

December 30, 2007 5:12 PM | Link to this

This is an absolute disaster. The one consolation is that I think we will have some very high draft picks for the next few years (ala the Hawks), so we SHOULD (IF we have a good GM) be able to stock up on talent. Look out. I tell you, the 2011 Falcons are going to be something!

By Meshugenah FalClown

December 30, 2007 5:13 PM | Link to this

Falcons Always Win !!! Hey Hey Hey !!! Well not exactly, but they were 3 wins and 2 losses on Sunday Home Games this season and I know next year they won’t be playing much on Monday,Thursday or Saturday. Don’t Worry - Be Happy We Won One !

Seriously, Arthur, Bubbala, stay in the owners box and turn the team over to Football Mavens ! Oy Vey, we need a winner, I’m so tired of hearing the whinning about the FalClowns !

By leesan

December 30, 2007 5:14 PM | Link to this

A pro always goes for the win. Otherwise stay home and shut up

By gram

December 30, 2007 5:16 PM | Link to this

The issue isn’t whether or not the Falcons draft second or sixth. What matters much more in the long run is whether or not competent football men run things. How many times have Falcons fans hoped that with high draft picks, things might change? Too many to count. Here’s a suggestion- offer someone like Patriots VP Scott Pioli a small piece of ownership, pay him more than the highest GM now working, and let him straighten things out. It matters much more in the log run if you have foresight and direction rather than having a draft pick a few spots up. Just ask Aundray Bruce.

By Too Sweet

December 30, 2007 5:16 PM | Link to this

Yes, Mr Wyche, I feel the players need this win for their self confidence and what is for the Falcons will be and it will not happen over night or in a year…Many changes are going to occur…So lets be patient and see what the future holds for the Falcons!!

GO FALCONS!!

By Bill

December 30, 2007 5:16 PM | Link to this

There were about 5 games this year that could have gone the falcons ways. Jags-we lost 7-13 but there were plenty of scoring opps and our defense game to play that game Panthers- should have beaten them easily but d hall messed it up Titans- wow did not want to win this game the unbelievable happened and we still didnt want the game. great defensive game for the falcons Saints- Byron leftwich need i say more about this game? Cardinals- if your a falcons fan then you know about this upsetting defeat… yeah my fellow falcons fans we could have had 5 more wins, i did say COULD plus the defense should have gotten more rest and other games would have been closer than they the scores say but i look forward to the changes and i will always be a falcons faithful and an Atlanta sports fan as Atlanta will always be my city

By sorry falcon trash

December 30, 2007 5:16 PM | Link to this

Of course these lazy thugs win the finale and knock us out of getting the opportunity to get a sure fire impact player in next years draft. BEAUTIFUL. They can�t win any important games and when we finally need them to lose one for draft position they play the game of their lives. A lot of teams with 4 losses so the falcons will probably be drafting 7th or 8th instead of top 3. It probably won�t matter anyway since we have the dumbest owner in professional sports. I wonder what turd he will hire next that will drive this franchise further into the ground.

By It figures

December 30, 2007 5:16 PM | Link to this

This team needed a loss in the worst way but these idiots even screwed that up! We missed Adrian Peterson last year by one pick, at least this year Mcfadden will be long gone when we pick 6-8. The Falcons are so good they don’t need the 2nd pick. Give me a break.

By Bill

December 30, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

You always play to win. Otherwise, there is no integrity, and then it really doesn’t matter, does it?

By Dewitt Rehberg

December 30, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

Win the game. They needed it.

By RG

December 30, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

It was probably a huge morale boost to beat Jim Mora and Patrick Kerney’s team.

And if the Falcons really do want a signal caller, none of the top 3 QB’s are worthy of a top 5 pick in the draft (along with the heftier salary requirement). Also, none of the top 3 QB’s (Ryan, Brohm, Woodson) especially stand out. Let someone else take the risk of drafting one of them with their top 5 pick and we’ll take one of them with the 7th or 8th pick.

By Dr. Tobias Funke

December 30, 2007 5:17 PM | Link to this

Since “no one is suggesting the Falcons should have thrown the game,” allow me to be the first. This is SO typical…win a meaningless game in the final week of the season and cost ourselves 4 or 5 spots in the draft. What was gained by this win? Nothing. What was lost? Darren McFadden.

By Halsey

December 30, 2007 5:19 PM | Link to this

The #2 pick is not always a good thing. The team picking there gets to choose from every prospect in the draft besides one, but they also pay a lot to that pick. That makes it a very risky pick. It certainly isn’t a guarentee that a team will get a great player either.

Besides, this reduces the chance the Falcons will waste a top pick on this year’s overhyped RB: Darren McFadden. The fantasy footballers out there won’t like it, but the Falcons don’t need the Reggie Bush of the 2008 draft. They need to either pick a QB, Left Tackle or big D-tackle. Maybe a CB if D-Hall is traded.

By dewman

December 30, 2007 5:20 PM | Link to this

they have messed everything else up this year why not the 2008 draft….

By mikey p

December 30, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

they should have tried to win the game. you have to know how to draft to get quality layers. the falcons need someone who knows talent like the braves have. first or last pick doesn’t matter, just need to find players that fit your system.

By WTF

December 30, 2007 5:22 PM | Link to this

All you can do is laugh to keep from crying. Only the ‘Koons could so totally and completely eff things up in every possible imaginable way. Way to go, losers. See ya McFadden >:(

By Halberstram

December 30, 2007 5:23 PM | Link to this

Congrats to the Falcons players and coaches on this worthless win. I hope we remember it when we are picking later than #2 like we could have in April. It’s nice to see the team rally when it’s pointless. What a bunch of hacks!

By TOM

December 30, 2007 5:24 PM | Link to this

This team screwed us all season, so why not in the draft also!! Looks like we will be picking 6th or 7th in the draft now. NO chance at DMC for Falcons now unless they trade the farm to move up!! GOD HELP US!!

By Perry's biggest fan

December 30, 2007 5:24 PM | Link to this

I think it would have made for more off-season excitement if the Falcons had lost and received a better draft position. That being said…I have been a Falcons fan for over 30 years and I hate looking back over my teams history and seeing one dreadful record after another. Any win is better than losing. What would have been best is Seattle playing their best players for the whole game. Then we could have really felt better about the win, or lost fair and square.

By Manny

December 30, 2007 5:24 PM | Link to this

The Falcons needs help from the top down. We need help on the O-line. We need a starting QB. We need better D-back play, but that may be fixed with Chris Houston maturing.

Oh, and we need a plug up the middle on the defensive line to stop the run. And we need a larger, better linebacker to play the middle. And get Brooking a chance to play where he’s better suited.

To me, the QBs coming out of the draft doesn’t Wow me. There’s some great running backs, but Jerious Norwood is the future in that position for the Falcons.

The bottom line is that we need O-line and D-line help immediately. I would go and use my first draft picks on getting that help. And that help will be there after the first 2-4 picks.

As far as QBs are concerned, I would go and get one from free agency. I wouldn’t spend a high draft pick on someone who will help us in 2009. And I see absolutely no QB coming out of college that can help this team in 2008.

So, win the game. Have fun! Give Emmitt Thomas won a game as a head coach in the NFL. Yes!

My philosophy is that winning is good, never bad.

By bill

December 30, 2007 5:27 PM | Link to this

won & loss records don’t matter at this stage but talent does. mister blank please clean house.

By Brian F.

December 30, 2007 5:27 PM | Link to this

You always want to win whenever you play a football game. It just seems appropriate that the Falcons would pick the least opportune time to do so. You have now gone from a potential #2 pick to a potential #7 pick. In every Round. What a disaster for a jinxed franchise.They better find someone to go choose the right players with those picks or else the pain and suffering will just continue. They should go get Scott Pioli from New England and give him the world.

By BirdMahn

December 30, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

Throwing a game and playing for a draft pick is for losers. I’ll take a win!

By samuel gore

December 30, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

The need is for some talent on the OL and they can get some good choices with the draft position they have. That is only if the management the team ends up with can identify those good choices. They have found a starting quarterback, for the next couple of years in Redman. Now they need guidance and that will come with good management. Lets hope that they can identify what that is too.

By Dirty Bird

December 30, 2007 5:28 PM | Link to this

To suggest throwing the game to get a draft pick is disgusting.

By TommyP

December 30, 2007 5:33 PM | Link to this

Paul: You have to be kidding me?

Loser mentality has been with this squad for awhile. 1 more loss wasn’t going to mean a thing. The roster is going to be purged…..many won’t be back. This victory meant NOTHING.

There would’ve been nothing wrong with playing the young players, the backups. Get a read on what you have before you get rid of them.

No, we have to screw ourselves from a prime draft spot. Not that we would’ve drafted from that spot but the trade value would’ve been astronomical.

If you actually think it was good for the Falcons to win this game, with all that’s happened and is about to happen, you no NOTHING about pro football/sports.

By EataPeach

December 30, 2007 5:35 PM | Link to this

No real fan wants team to lose to improve draft position. Only uninformed, bandwagon, fantasy fans would want their team to lose. Check out how well the Lions have done by having top picks every year, or check the Colts and Patriots to see how they have done by winning games!!!Any suggestion that the Falcons are worse off for winning is lame!

By Halsey

December 30, 2007 5:37 PM | Link to this

The Falcons need a QB, LT and big DT more then some overhyped RB. Besides, the 2nd pick in the draft costs waaaay too much in salary cap space. Just say no to the Reggie Bush of the 2008 draft: Darren Mcfadden

By Lynne

December 30, 2007 5:43 PM | Link to this

Wow….the same people who had freaking seizures because Vick said he didn’t give his all in a meaningless last game in 2005, now are upset that the whole team GAVE its all in the last game of 2007…. ironic, don’t cha think?

By BCS Slave

December 30, 2007 5:44 PM | Link to this

You always play to win. The Falcons could have played their second string and still done that.

By Moe

December 30, 2007 5:45 PM | Link to this

ITS A GREAT WIN PEOPLE WE WERE NEVER GOING TO GET MCFADDEN ANYWAYS SO NOW WE CAN GET MATT RYAN WITH LESS MONEY BECAUSE OF THE WIN TODAY.

By ATLawk

December 30, 2007 5:45 PM | Link to this

What makes you all think that McFadden will play well behind this pansy offensive line?

By Richard Cory

December 30, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

They should not have ‘tanked’ the game, but rather have played 2nd or even lower roster players. You would get a look at some players who have not played much and possibly find a gem. You also, would probably lose, and secure the better draft position. Like someone said earlier, “even when they win, they lose.”

By Shawn

December 30, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

With the offensive line we have, what good is it to have McFadden.

By long time falcon

December 30, 2007 5:46 PM | Link to this

Gram, scott pioli is not coming to Atlanta but you’re thinking the right way. He would be at the top of my list as well but he would probably only leave new england to join parcells in miami. A little known fact in the NFL is that scott pioli is the son-in-law of bill parcells. The most logical canidates might be Jeff ireland in dallas or reggie mckenzie in green bay. But somehow I get the feeling that blank will screw this all up.

By SirReal

December 30, 2007 5:49 PM | Link to this

The team definitely needed a win in the worst way. It was great to go out with a win for the team, Coach Thomas, and the fans. I think it is symbolic of things to come actually. As far as the draft goes, well let’s be honest here. There isn’t a lot of talent really coming through this year. There are plenty of scenarios where we can land some good talent. 1)trade the 1st round pick, (kind of like what we did for Abraham) 2)Trade down if we id potential in the draft (we still have a high spot) Let’s not panic here guys. We’ll be ok..!!

By nitin

December 30, 2007 5:49 PM | Link to this

you play to win.. I cant believe people justifying throwing the game to improve their draft position. The Falcons have not done a great job in the draft in the last few years. What makes you so sure they ll have a good draft this time? Better take the win and end the season on a good note.

By nitin

December 30, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

you play to win.. I cant believe people justifying throwing the game to improve their draft position. The Falcons have not done a great job in the draft in the last few years. What makes you so sure they ll have a good draft this time? Better take the win and end the season on a good note.

By EataPeach

December 30, 2007 5:50 PM | Link to this

Everyone saying that losing to gain draft position is better than winning the game are not real Falcon or football fans. They are fantasy, bandwagon, uninformed , midget league fans.
Go follow the Lions if you want to see what getting the top picks can do for your team. They have the market on that. On the other hand, see how the Colts and Patriots have been successful, even tho they win! You NEVER want your team to lose a game!

By Dave

December 30, 2007 5:53 PM | Link to this

Players play the game to win. Question is…why do we have so many FREAKINg starters in the game??? Come on…play more young guys. If McFadden turns out to be a stud, or Jake Long or Chris Long….we just lost. Now we get Brohm or maybe Ryan. We lose…..

By mini mods r idiots

December 30, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

McFadden is way beter then Done Dunn. To pass on him is stupid. This team will wallow in crap for many years. Way to go Falcons.

By drmondo

December 30, 2007 5:55 PM | Link to this

I liked going out on a high note. After the cursed season we just had lets the guys who will be left to feel that the curse may be lifted. Besides, this game allowed the Falcons to evaluate who had the heart to play in a meaningless game and still not quit. I believe they have to pursue a quality, experienced coach first. Cowher or Shottenheimer might want some or all GM control in order to be interested. Yes, Cowher said he wasn’t interested in coaching. I still think they should go after him. Offer him whatever it takes to come here. Shotty would be my second choice. He rebuilds teams. Before we think playoff contender or superbowl we’ve got to have back-to-back winning seasons. That to me is the equivalent to the Boston curse in baseball. Break that and good things happen. Shotty can do that for us. I also hope the Falcons make overtures to Cleveland about their qbs. Either Anderson or Quinn may be available. I’d rather have either of them than a rookie qb with no nfl experience. Yes sitting the bench still qualifies as experience. McNabb might be an idea too. As long as he’s not expected to come in and lead the team to the playoffs next year, he’d be a solid qb who could mentor a young qb (Shockley, draft pick?) and while not as mobile as he once was, would ease the transition for our OL.

By The Agenda

December 30, 2007 5:56 PM | Link to this

with the 7th pick in the 2008 draft the Atlanta Falcons take a Quarterback who isnt going to be any better than any vet they already have on the team, which in turn will lead to a crappy draft(i hope this isnt the case)

By l.toth

December 30, 2007 6:03 PM | Link to this

without question, the draft pick - there’s a bigger picture. half of these guys will be gone anyway. we just dropped from 2nd pick in the draft to 7th or 8th pick.

By Drew

December 30, 2007 6:05 PM | Link to this

Definitely better to end with a win. Who cares about the draft position. A win was what this team needed.

By Jay

December 30, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

Bye McFadden. Thanks Falcons. You just ruined our only chance of getting a franchise-changer. Now we’ll draft the overrated Matt Ryan. This was a critical mistake but not surprising.

Look at the Hawks. They tanked last year and it got them Al Horford. Now the Hawks are the best they’ve been in years. We could have made that same jump, but now that isnt going to happen. We’re going to draft the next Kitna in Matt Ryan.

By mike

December 30, 2007 6:07 PM | Link to this

How come this loser organization seems to win a game when it would be better for them long-term to lose? They can’t do anything right. They have the worst players in the league, and need the best draft picks they can get. Won’t get Mafadden, or Dorsey where they are picking.

By FalconFan

December 30, 2007 6:15 PM | Link to this

Top 5 draft picks cost your franchise way too much money. These players hardly ever work out. Most of these players are released or traded for lesser draft picks. Can you say Akili Smith, Ryan Leaf and Calvin Johnson! Yeah, I said Calvin Johnson. He could not catch a pass over the middle at Georgia Tech. In 16 games with the Lions, he still has not caught a pass over the middle. He is a mediocre receiver at best. Take the draft pick and trade it away. Why gamble $30 million on one player? Use the $30 million and get 11 players.

By Tommy Maddox

December 30, 2007 6:18 PM | Link to this

They are paid to play and win - not commit sepuku on the field.

Granted, a loss would have given us a better pick but oh well. Another win, another day.

Let’s just wait to see what the new administration does when they [whomever they are] shows up.

Onward!

By Ramguy

December 30, 2007 6:20 PM | Link to this

So the Falcons lost a few places in the draft. I say good! Now they can’t ruin the future of a great running back like McFadden.

By Jack Sheet

December 30, 2007 6:22 PM | Link to this

They should play to win.

The draft has NEVER been a factor for the Falcons except the year we eneded up with that mobile QB, what’s his name? Vick?

So we end on a high note and take whatever pick we get and trade DOWN, get a bunch of help on the lines, save money they won’t be selling any tickets next season(s).

By d-man

December 30, 2007 6:24 PM | Link to this

So what you clowns are really saying is that the Falcons shoul lose ALL their games for several years in a row to get all number one picks for several years and then they would automatically have a great team. Talk about losers - it is morons like you people who are really losers!

By KEN JONES

December 30, 2007 6:26 PM | Link to this

Hey nice win . The Falcons have a class quarterback in Chris Redman . The kid can throw and the players respond to him well . O

By VegasFalconFan

December 30, 2007 6:27 PM | Link to this

Let me get this right, these guys want the falcons to lie down and lose a game on purpose? Are you kidding me? The Draft is a hit or miss opportunity, and there is no guarantee that any of the picks will be the right one, but at least if your franchise has a solid foundation, everything else will fall into place. We need a stable franchise and need to build a solid reputation/attitude that can�t be achieved by losing games on purpose. It may be possible to appease all those fair-weather fans by having the NFL do a Lottery for the worst teams like the NBA does, and then maybe they won’t think about losing to get ahead, but winning to get ahead as that is the way it should be! And I guess those same “Losers” or “Quitters” were also satisfied with the way that Petrino left! Didn�t he give up too? How in the world are you supposed to lie down on purpose, and keep that mental edge or advantage? If you did that, how easy would it be to later on to lay down when other more important things are on the line and you are going through diversity? They did right in winning, and playing the best that they could. They didn�t and haven’t given up anytime this year, and that�s what�s going to change the attitude and make this a winning franchise!

By Green Tea

December 30, 2007 6:28 PM | Link to this

NO NO NO. After the season these guys made us endure they go out and win the last one of the season and ruin possibly having the #2 pick??? And I don’t want to hear this “you play to win” crap. I’ve had season tickets for years and have watched them mail in games year after year in the second half of the season here lately especially. JUST LOSE THE GAME is all they had to go out and do. What does it do for moral by beating a team that has already clinched a playoff birth and doesn’t care about a win but keeping guys healthy for a game the matters. What a crock of BS, THANKS A LOT FALCONS

By tony

December 30, 2007 6:30 PM | Link to this

Belichick would have did what was necessary to get the lost to get the best player in the draft since there was no benefit in winning the game. Here’s 3 legimate reason to lose the game. (1) Winning against 2nd and 3rd stringers isn’t anything to be to feel good about (2) there will be a new coaching staff next season and (3) some of team won’t be back next season. I can run this organization better than current management and I only have a high school diploma. They better hire Ron Rivera or Mike Singlingtary as the new head coach. Both of them have a SB ring and they know how to communicate with today’s players.

By srh1955

December 30, 2007 6:31 PM | Link to this

I agree with Dirty Bird and samual gore. We’re better off seeing which players want to win, and I’m proud how the Falcons battled back these last two games. We can get good players with the draft picks we have coming up if we do a good job of scouting our needs and the college talent out there.

By Bird Fan

December 30, 2007 6:33 PM | Link to this

The Louisville Cardinals will always root for the Falcons and their players . Thanks Harris , Redman and Stanley for making us proud .

By d-man

December 30, 2007 6:34 PM | Link to this

And furthermore, if you think that adding one more playa thru the draft will make this team a winner, you are delusional. They need 10 or 12 players go be any good.

By TommyP

December 30, 2007 6:34 PM | Link to this

Paul: You have to be kidding me?

Loser mentality has been with this squad for awhile. 1 more loss wasn’t going to mean a thing. The roster is going to be purged…..many won’t be back. This victory meant NOTHING.

There would’ve been nothing wrong with playing the young players, the backups. Get a read on what you have before you get rid of them.

No, we have to screw ourselves from a prime draft spot. Not that we would’ve drafted from that spot but the trade value would’ve been astronomical.

If you actually think it was good for the Falcons to win this game, with all that’s happened and is about to happen, you no NOTHING about pro football/sports.

By Thomas

December 30, 2007 6:38 PM | Link to this

Falcons were not getting the second draft choice anyway. We may slipped from 4th to 7th, but throwing the game is so unsportsman-like even though I was little bit disappointed with the win today.

By gg

December 30, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

it is so stupid to put so much stock in one game. First of all, it’s not going to start next season on a winning note just because the Falcons won their last game. Second of all, what do you guys think they should do, lose on purpose? All year long, they have been losing, and now they win-give them some credit for fighting. These guys aren’t thinking about who is going to be a new member of the team next season. As far as the draft is concerned, one player is not going to turn this team from a losing squad into a powerhouse. They need so much more than one player. It’s foolish to gripe about your team winning-come on!

By phillip

December 30, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

I think the Falcons did a great thing by winning. This was the last game of a dreadful season. They had to win to guve a little hope for next year. I wish that they would of kept Dan Reeves

By Clayton

December 30, 2007 6:39 PM | Link to this

I can’t believe some of the whiners we have here. They played a good game and most of all showed character.

So what they fall down at worst to number 7. They need a qb or a lt as long as the Jets were ahead of us we weren’t going to get McFadden anyways

The Falcons will still get a very good player as long as he is not from Louisvile

stop whining and be happy when they win.

Go Falcons!! Please get Marty S

By Chris F.

December 30, 2007 6:40 PM | Link to this

Forget about being able to get Scott Pioli. He is already on top, so why lower himself? I doubt any other “big-name” candidates will want to come year unless Blank pays well above market value for them.

The best thing is to take your chances on a complete unknown. Maybe go with someone who isn’t involved with the NFL as of now, but would love to have an opporunity. Besides, it can’t get any worse than it is now.

By Jack Sheet

December 30, 2007 6:41 PM | Link to this

They should play to win.

The draft has NEVER been a factor for the Falcons except the year we eneded up with that mobile QB, what’s his name? Vick?

So we end on a high note and take whatever pick we get and trade DOWN, get a bunch of help on the lines, save money they won’t be selling any tickets next season(s).

By srh1955

December 30, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this

I guess I “no” nothing about pro sports then (actually the word is “know”) because the best thing the Falcons could have done here was win. This mentality that one good draft or one great player will win us games is the direct antithesis of what the Patriots have been doing for the last 6 years. We need to take what players we have that want to win and build from there.

By terrell barron

December 30, 2007 6:43 PM | Link to this

As long as we get a top left tackle in the first round, it will be o.k. by me. We can find a running back in the 2nd. Ray Rice, Mike Hart, Felix Jones. They should still be on the board. Pair either one with Jerious and we should be fine. And add another lineman with the other second rdr.

By preston

December 30, 2007 6:47 PM | Link to this

A win that gave everybody at the dome a chance to cheer for the home team and leave happy……A win that finally gave the home team something to hang their hat on, after the past two weeks loses…..A win that, for the moment gave this city a breather from the the public turmoil and ridicule that this franchise has faced this year……….nothing wrong with. p.s. for all of the talk about missing out on Mcfadden………can anyone name me a superbowl team of recent memory where the running back stole the show, or made any sort of impact on the outcome of the game?

By Miranda

December 30, 2007 6:49 PM | Link to this

Its not like a draft pick or two will matter for this dreadful franchise….at least the guys can end the season with a win…..since no doubt, the next 3 or 4 seasons will be quite similar to this one. Hello TV blackouts, hello half empty dome, hello irrelevance. how ya been?

By terrell barron

December 30, 2007 6:51 PM | Link to this

Mcfadden would be AVERAGE behind this o-line. One day I hope we realize that it starts UP FRONT. Theres plenty of excellent tackles and guards in this draft. Lets get 2 tackles, a guard and a running back with our 1st 3 picks. BLALOCK IS THE ONLY LINEMAN THAT SHOULD BE STARTING NEXT YEAR, FROM THIS YEARS TEAM. PERIOD!

By Supes

December 30, 2007 6:52 PM | Link to this

Anyone who says the Falcons are better off winning a meaningless game in 2007 instead of having the chance to draft Darren McFadden has lost their mind!

Tell me, how is this win going to help the Falcons 3 years from now when McFadden is a probowl running back for someone else, like the Jets or the Rams?

This is just like the crappy Falcons, they can’t do ANYTHING right.

Here is the rule: When your team has a “throw away” season like the Falcons did this year, you go for the highest draft pick, esp. when there is dynamic impact franchise changing player at a skill position!

My fear now is they will draft that loser from BC Matt Ryan, instead of going for someone like Colt Brennan later on in round 2.

The people who don’t want McFadden are the ones who have Warrick DONE! and J-Rock in their fantasy keeper leagues! This is madness!

All I wanted for Christmas was a Seattle, St. Loius and NY Jets wins and now it doesn’t matter!

On top of that, The Falcons did NOT beat the REAL Seattle team. They beat(barely) their second team players!

That’s all I have to say about that.

It’s going to be sick missing out on that high draft pick!

By FalconsFan

December 30, 2007 6:58 PM | Link to this

Leave it to Falcons fans to actually look at a win as a bad thing. Yes, it would have been nice to have a better chance at having the #2 pick, but come on now, we all know that high draft picks don’t always pan out. Personally, I’m glad the team was about close out the season on as high a note as they could. Now all we need is for a good GM and coach to come in and make some good picks for the draft. Mark my words;losing out on the #2 pick will not hurt us in the long run.

By tony

December 30, 2007 7:00 PM | Link to this

Belichick would have lost that game in a heartbeat because there is no proud in defeating 2nd and 3rd string athletes. They better hire Ron Rivera or Mike Singlintary to coach this team. I honestly believe I can run this franchise better than they can.

By falconsjv

December 30, 2007 7:03 PM | Link to this

way to go falcons !!!! you beat seattles 2nd string !!! cant wait till we get to draft # 12 and get a DB from VA-TECH!!!

By Norm Hecker

December 30, 2007 7:04 PM | Link to this

In 2008, the Falcons will change their name to the Clowns. The Ga Dome will be renamed the Clown Factory. Or, the McDonald’s Clown Factory. The new Falcon insignia will be Ronald McDonald’s face on the helmets.

GO CLOWNS!

By Max

December 30, 2007 7:07 PM | Link to this

You draft players to win. You don’t lose games to draft players. What a tragic state of affairs when the fanbase & media even toy with the notion. It’s no wonder the Falcons have never had back to back winning seasons with a fan base like this.

By G Force

December 30, 2007 7:10 PM | Link to this

The Falcons blew the pick. Why can’t this team ever catch a break. As for the dummy that said we beat Mora’s defense it was his second team defense we beat with our starters. Not so sweet. I hope we hand on to Redman for at least a back up next year and let him compete for the job with whoever.

18 year season ticket holder.

By Willy

December 30, 2007 7:10 PM | Link to this

Bill, nice post

By ATL

December 30, 2007 7:18 PM | Link to this

You can not ask the team to lose no matter what the circumstances. You play to win the game!!!!

By Dawgbyte

December 30, 2007 7:18 PM | Link to this

You people are so stupid it is beyond belief. With everything else that has happened this year, all the Falcons need is suspician that they “tanked” a game. Sure it would have been better to have a second round choice “guaranteed”, but these are professional athletes and they play to WIN! So grow up, smarten up and deal with it!!!

By larry

December 30, 2007 7:20 PM | Link to this

did you think the uncle tom, yes sire, mister sir, is smart enough to actually not win?

way to go mr. blank, you are on your way to losing all your season ticket holders.

do you find it ironic that the veterans like dunn, crumpler, horn actually played hard today, as they worried that the falcons, with high draft picks, would replace them

By win

December 30, 2007 7:24 PM | Link to this

To hell with a draft pick. we have had draft picks for years and not done a damn thang with them. we need to get the management fix first. Fix the management top to bottom. We have never had a very good front office. get that right first. we get that fix we win for years. we know how to lose! This is a must to get a great gm Atlanta Falcons!

By El Michael

December 30, 2007 7:25 PM | Link to this

The falcons do this almost every year. They win a game at the end of the season when there is nothing to play for except draft position. When draft day comes, they will trade up to get the player they want. In the trading process they will have to send other picks to move up. If they had simply played bench players and evaluated their worth to the team for next year, they would not have to trade up and lose other draft picks.

If they had gotten the second pick, they should have tried to trade it to get extra picks. They need help all over the field. They need all the picks they can get!

But saying all of that, the first and most important thing they need is a front office man who can evaluate talent. They have missed on so many picks in the past.

It is truly hard to be a Falcon Fan.

By win

December 30, 2007 7:38 PM | Link to this

WE DON’T NEED TO DRAFT A qb IN THE FIRST THREE ROUNDS. WE NEED LINEMEN OFFENSE AND DEFENSE.

A MIDDLE LINE BACKER AND A POUNDING RUNNING BACK. bUT BEFORE ALL OF THAT WE NEED A VERY GOOD GM WITH SKILL to pick talant THEN A COACH!

By Crown & Ginger

December 30, 2007 7:38 PM | Link to this

Man,

They should fire the whole organization. Even the Smith family was smart enough to know when it was better to lose a game. I will be glad when we no longer have to hear how good Brookings is.

By politicalcorrectgoneawry

December 30, 2007 7:42 PM | Link to this

They should have tried to win. With this win, they should keep Emmit and hire a General Manager to acquire some real talent. Then and only then, should a head coach be hired.

By Michael

December 30, 2007 7:45 PM | Link to this

I don’t think that it really matters. The Falcons need to load up in the 2nd thru 4th rounds of the draft. A franchise QB is never going to develop behind a line that’s a porous as a sponge. Work on the O-line then start auditioning QBs… This is not to say that they don’t need help at every single position (including GM and head coach). Lets draft Marty Schottenheimer!!!

By san antonio Falcon

December 30, 2007 7:47 PM | Link to this

Way to say it EataPeach! First 5 picks are usually good for one thing. High $$$ for minimal output that can cripple a franchise’s salary cap for years. MV falls into this category kinda Sorta…not a bust, but just as well be called one!

By mike

December 30, 2007 7:53 PM | Link to this

If winning is all that matters why did seattle pull their players?Hmm,big picture maybe?

By Harmon Wages

December 30, 2007 8:05 PM | Link to this

1.Trade Me-Angelo and Upsetme Krumpler to the Tuna in Miami for the Nos.1 pick!Heck throw in Mike Jenkins as well,DRAFT MCFADDEN,then draft OL with the 2 second round picks!I can dream can’t I? Keep Hue Jackson as your OC and Zimmer as Def/Co. Mr.Blank put your money in a top GM.! Happy New Year!GO DAWGS!!!!

By Scoop

December 30, 2007 8:07 PM | Link to this

Is everyone on here a moron, you don’t play for draft position you play to win. The team actually looked pretty good today(I know it was against a Seattle team that had nothing to play for) maybe the players are better than we give them credit for and it was Coach Metrino holding them down. What is a high draft pick anyway it is like a lottery ticket maybe it turns ou maybe it doesn’t does anyone remember Ryan Leaf,Jeff George, even the ole ball coach himself was a high draft pick that didn’t turn out. You draft in the top 5 you should be able to get a very good player who fills a need so the difference for a team like the falcons drafting 2 or 5 is very small because there a re a lot of holes people. One more thing about the draft how many of you thought Charley Casserly was an idiot for taking Mario Williams over Reggie Bush? Well how did that turn out?

By TommyP

December 30, 2007 8:11 PM | Link to this

Again, nobody is saying to tell the players to not try. You just play younger players to basically scout what you have. Activate the practice squad and put them in there. If we win with those guys, better yet.

But to win with the same bunch that quit for most of the season anyway? You gotta be kidding me.

Some of you fools are acting like it’s not important to have a higher draft pick. You think #7 is as good as #2. Clueless.

It’s not just the player that you could net at #2. It’s the trade scenarios, idiots. If you’re so enthralled with the #7 pick, trade your #2 for much more and still have the #7 pick. You’re stockpiling players. Get it????? And don’t say the Falcons don’t draft anyone worth a damn in the draft when they’re obviously going out to hire someone that CAN DRAFT.

Some of y’all’s thinking mirror the Falcons’ brass.

By Bluestreak

December 30, 2007 8:17 PM | Link to this

You should always try to win. So what we draft 6th or 7th…we have a decent QB that with a line and a every down RB, can be successful. Here is what should happen now…We keep Redman as our incumbent starter, cut the mistake signing of the year (Leftwich) and try to improve our QB stable with either a later round pick or a decent backup FA QB. If we can do neither, keep Harrington and P-R-A-Y that Redman doesn’t break a pinky or something. Then, we need to make a major push for Michael Turner from the Bolts and hand him the reigns of the running game. With our ‘Low’ pick of 7, we draft the best player that would help us out immediately on the line (either OL or DL) and build from there. Redman has been good in 2 of 3 games he’s played in this year. Every QB in the league has had a VERY bad game this year…even the “Playa” Brady. So, if we can give whomever we have taking snaps some time in the pocket, and have a go to runner behind a beefed up line, then I think we can win some games next year. I think our OC and DC are good and should remain (and likely would if Jason Garrett his hired, possibly even if Mr. Intimidating Mike Singletary is hired).

Folks McFadden hasn’t even declared yet. The Falcs probably would have secured number 2 only to see the ‘people’s choice’ decide to stay in school for one more year. Just be glad we have a high pick (and hopefully about $20 mil extra from the dog fighter) to give us a leg up on rebuilding the franchise.

I’ll say it here now, the Falcons will return to the playoffs NEXT YEAR. In fact, I’ll go one step further…they’ll continue the streak of the last place team from the previous season winning the NFC South the next year. Yes, I said it…Atlanta Falcons, NFC South champs for 2008.

By BigDawgRob

December 30, 2007 8:19 PM | Link to this

Big Whup we have four wins instead of three. All of a sudden I am overcome with Falcons pride cause my team is a winner. OK, that is a load of hooey. How stupid to even play the starters in a meaningless game. Of course we screwed up the draft choice, what else could such a hapless organization possibly do? Now to get a player like Dorsey we will have to trade up and spend more, if such an opportunity even exists. But when we see the best players going to other teams we can console ourselves with a four win season. What morons!!!!!!!

By Fatalbert

December 30, 2007 8:19 PM | Link to this

No better QB in this draft than any of the ones currently on our roster. Overhyped hacks from small wannabe programs like BC and Louisville are not worthy of a top 5 pick. Glen Dorsey would have been nice and he’ll still be available at our new position. Bye Bye Brooking, Dunn, Leftwich, Jenkins and Ookie. Team’s getting better already.

By Falconboi

December 30, 2007 8:20 PM | Link to this

You guys are never happy; They loose and you give them hell, they win and you give them hell. I am happy for the win, they needed something to go right, plus Redman played good.

Next year Falcons need to trade 1st pick for a late 1st and a 2nd round. They need to fill many holes. They can then pick up a few free agents with the extra money when they let Harrington go.

By realbirdfan

December 30, 2007 8:21 PM | Link to this

GO BIRDS Regardless of what you people say us true Atlanta Falcon fans are here and we go up and down with the ship!

By Cairo

December 30, 2007 8:25 PM | Link to this

This is typical AJC BS and typical side of neck talking ATL Falcon wannabe fans. I remember when a certain QB and others said they quit on the last game of the season and they were labeled quitters. Which one is going to be you fickle fanatics? Play to win or quit to appease your selfish motives. I am so tired of this crap. Dumb fans Dumb fans!!!

By kris

December 30, 2007 8:27 PM | Link to this

We have the #3 pick. Nice!

By samiam

December 30, 2007 8:28 PM | Link to this

U guys are idiots. We didn’t need the second pick. That pick would have forced our hands to pick a QB. We need the 4th-7th pick. This pick will allow us to have more cap room.

If we do pick the QB that late, that would be cheaper than the 2nd pick. You never play to loose.

I can tell who has played sports beyond park ball and who has really played at a higher level.

By cb

December 30, 2007 8:29 PM | Link to this

Why would the home team’s beat writer even ask such a question? You always play to win. Period. You play the string out and where you end up in the end is where you end up!!! A TRUE FAN NEVER roots for their team to lose. Until next year: GO FALCONS!!!!

By Kenny

December 30, 2007 8:29 PM | Link to this

Lol, wow. I cannot believe there are so many people saying we shouldn’t/can’t take McFadden. First of all, I read on the NFL website that the first tie-breaker between us and the other 4-12 teams (Jets, Raiders, Chiefs) is strength of schedule. If my college education allows me to add correctly, I worked it out and found that the Falcons’ cumulative opponents’ record (i.e. our strength of schedule) will be 132-124, regardless of what happens between the Titans and Colts. That is the same as the Raiders and Chiefs. The Jets had a strength of schedule of either 133-123 (if the Titans lose) or 134-122 (if the Titans win). Either way, our strength of schedule is weaker. Since weaker strength of schedule gets the higher pick, it should be between the Falcons, the Raiders, and the Chiefs for the 3rd pick. I’m assuming a coin flip would be the only way to decide that (since the Falcons aren’t in the same conference or division as the Raiders or Chiefs, so conference and division records won’t matter).

That being said, if we get the 3rd pick, why can’t we get McFadden? The Dolphins and Rams don’t really need a running back, so he should still be there. Honestly, unless the Raiders win the coin flip, McFadden should be there when we pick regardless (the Chiefs won’t take him since they have LJ).

Finally, I’m hearing lots of reasons why we shouldn’t take McFadden: he’s another Reggie Bush, a running back won’t be as impactful as other positions, etc. I think those arguments are ridiculous. First of all, me and my friend both watched Bush in college and neither one of us thought that he would make a good everydown back in the NFL. He doesn’t run through tacklers like most running backs do. Most of his yards came from juking and out-running defenders, i.e. him being a better athlete than the defenses he was facing. In the NFL, every defender is a great athlete so it’s much harder for a guy like Bush to excel as a running back. He has to run sweeps and screen passes because he’s not tough enough to run up the middle. I don’t think that’s the case with McFadden. I think he can run up the middle as well as to the outside. In my opinion, Adrian Peterson from Minnesota is a much better comparison. Speaking of Peterson, he proves that drafting a running back can have a tremendous immediate impact on a team. Minnesota had a worse record than us last year, then they added Peterson to pretty much the same offense. Look at them now: one game away from the playoffs with Tavaris Jackson at QB (Tavaris Jackson!!!). Does that mean McFadden would definitely have the same effect? No, but I think there’s a good chance he would. If you draft a QB or lineman, chances are (as we’ve seen with Jamaal Anderson) it will take at least a year (if not more) for him to impact our team in a meaningful way. In my opinion, there’s not a player out there who would impact next year’s record more than McFadden. So why not take a chance on him? This city needs some good news for a change. Falcons fans aren’t going to like sitting through another horrible year next year. If we don’t draft a marketable star who can help us win games immediately, next season will be worse than this one was. No one in the Falcons’ organization can afford two years in a row like this one. Therefore, we need to do what it takes to win as soon as possible. The chances of a rookie QB or a rookie lineman having any kind of impact on the Falcons’ record next year is minimal. The chances of McFadden having an impact on our record is much greater. Personally, I don’t even see the debate. But maybe that’s just me…

By Jack G

December 30, 2007 8:29 PM | Link to this

Who cares—-they will screw up the draft no matter where they pick

By Miranda

December 30, 2007 8:29 PM | Link to this

Redman had a great game! he should be the starter!!!!!!

Oh wait…..didn’t every backup QB playing today have a great game? Half the league played backup QBs who put up good numbers…and a lot of those QBs were playing starters on defense for 4 quarters…not 1.

Put the Redman kool-aid back people.

By Sarah

December 30, 2007 8:34 PM | Link to this

Hey - this comment is for Nejeh - I’m dissapointed! You are usually one of the best posters on this pathetic site, and I don’t usually bother to say anything on here but you bothered me tonight. You are obvisously a fan but not a ticket holder. It was freaking great to be able to stand up in he dome today and cheer and hear those fireworks. So we fell a few places, whaa whaa whaa - remember Ryan Leaf??? We need OL bad!!! It’s easy to whine from your living room - at the dome it was sweet!!!!

Sarah

By Navigator

December 30, 2007 8:39 PM | Link to this

I have a different perspective. Now that the Falcons can’t draft a QB with 2nd round, maybe they will go after linemen. It’s obvious that they have a serviceable quarterback, that can hold the fort until they can develop one. When you draft one 1st or 2nd, then you’re forced to use them too quickly. Remember Brady was a 6th round draft pick, and the Falcons need to be looking lower for a QB they can develop, while they’re rebuilding the offensive line.

By Dee

December 30, 2007 8:42 PM | Link to this

So we don’t pick second, WE STILL PICK THIRD! Good God, our fanbase has got to the absolute worst! Wanting your team to lose? For frickin’ better draft picks? And some of you have the nerve to say how bad Eagles fans are. At least, they don’t whine when their team actually wins! Pathetic.

By falcon retards

December 30, 2007 8:42 PM | Link to this

Falcons pick third according to this source! Even had the falcons lost they still would have picked third because the rams lost and they held the tiebreaker. The tiebreaker is whichever team has the weakest strength of schedule. Apparently, the usually unlucky falcons won the tiebreakers against all of the 4-12 teams!

Current Draft Order

[edit] First Round Teams are listed with won-loss record, followed by composite strength of schedule. Among teams with the same record, the team with the weakest schedule picks first.

Miami (1-15, 138-118) St. Louis (3-13, 131-125) Atlanta (4-12, 129-127) Oakland (4-12, 132-124)* Kansas City (4-12, 132-124)* New York Jets (4-12, 133-122)* New England [from San Francisco (5-11, 119-137)] Baltimore (5-11, 132-123) Cincinnati (7-9, 117-138) New Orleans (7-9, 123-133) Buffalo (7-9, 132-124)* Denver (7-9, 132-124)* Carolina (7-9, 134-122) Detroit (7-9, 139-117)* Chicago (7-9, 139-117)* Arizona (8-8, 111-145) Minnesota (8-8, 129-127) Houston (8-8, 132-124) Philadelphia (8-8, 144-112) Tampa Bay (9-7, 119-137) Washington (9-7, 142-114) Tennessee (9-6) Dallas [from Cleveland (10-6, 110-146)] Seattle (10-6, 106-150) Pittsburgh (10-6, 116-140) New York Giants (10-6, 132-124) San Diego (11-5, 128-128) Jacksonville (11-5, 132-124) Green Bay (13-3, 106-150) Dallas (13-3, 127-129) San Francisco (from Indianapolis) (13-2) New England (pick forfeited) (16-0, 120-135)* Notes:

*-Oakland picks before Kansas City on common games tiebreaker. Buffalo picks before Denver on head-to-head. Detroit picks before Chicago on head-to-head. -Does not count Tennessee’s last game. *-Does not count Indianapolis’s last game. Picks 20-32 are pending NFL playoff results. NOTE: The team with the lowest winning percentage at the end of the previous season drafts first in the NFL Draft. The Super Bowl winner drafts last, even if they do not have the highest winning percentage. The Super Bowl loser drafts next to last. Strength of schedule for the previous season is the first tie-breaker for teams with the same winning percentage (i.e. the team who has the lowest opponent winning percentage will select before a team who has a higher opponent winning percentage). Divisional and conference records are the next step in the tie-breaking procedure. As a last resort, a coin toss is used to determine the order of selection for teams with the same winning percentage. If a playoff and non-playoff team end the season with the same winning percentage, the non-playoff team selects before the playoff team regardless of strength of schedule.

[edit] Trades

By Cairo

December 30, 2007 8:48 PM | Link to this

Since the Falcons are now picking 3rd you all just proved once again how stupid you are. LOL. It is so simple. So of you so called Falcon fans are embarrassing.

By shawn

December 30, 2007 8:50 PM | Link to this

where do we pick now what spot

By Chris

December 30, 2007 9:17 PM | Link to this

You play to win, period. You play for pride. Many of these guys won’t be back next year; why do they give a damn about a draft pick? If you don’t play to win, you have no business being out there. Those who wished for a loss have never been involved in anything competitive, and if they were, they were not successful.

Many of these guys are auditioning for jobs not only with the Falcons but also with other teams. You go balls deep, each and every game, each and every snap. Anything less and you shouldn’t get your paycheck.

By NCBravesFan

December 30, 2007 9:19 PM | Link to this

I agree with Clayton - they played hard and eeked out a win. Good for them!

Picking #2 would have been nice, but in a week when so many teams played backups and kinda mailed it in (which is insulting to fans), it was nice to see the Falcons play hard.

By tj

December 30, 2007 9:34 PM | Link to this

O.K. all you GM experts, the Falcons get the third pick according to AJC article. You may want to start over with your draft.

By TommyP

December 30, 2007 9:45 PM | Link to this

SRH1955: One typo….wow, you showed me. I figured that wasn’t too bad with about 8 beers in me. Oh well.

We’re not talking ONE PLAYER HERE when talking about the draft. Luckily, the Falcons fortunes turned tonight because they “won” the tiebreaker and only fell to #3 in the draft. This is huge.

If you’re at the #2 position in the draft, a lot of teams covet a player at that spot that they feel could be THE guy to change their fortunes. (i.e. Adrian Peterson)

If you have the #2 spot, you can trade down to, say, the #9 spot and pick up additional picks along the way. If you’ve been paying attention, THIS IS WHAT NEW ENGLAND HAS BEEN DOING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

New England has traded higher picks for lower picks to accumulate more draft choices.

However, if Darren McFadden is there at #3, it will be VERY hard for the Falcons to pass him up.

Look at what the Chargers did with the Vick trade. Off the top of my head, they got Drew Brees, Ladanian Tomlinson, Tim Dwight and something else, I believe.

But some of you look backward instead of looking forward. Don’t worry about the drafts that the Falcons have screwed up in the past. We’re going to have a new front office calling the shots!

By Kenny

December 30, 2007 9:57 PM | Link to this

I’m hearing several reasons why we shouldn’t get McFadden: (1) he’s just another Reggie Bush; (2) a RB won’t have a big impact on the team next year; and, finally, my personal favorite, (3) no RB has had a huge impact on a Super Bowl winning team. [Sigh] Alright, let’s attack these in order, shall we? First of all, McFadden is not (repeat: is NOT) another Reggie Bush. My friend and I watched him in college and neither one of us thought Bush would be a successful every-down running back in the NFL. In college, he got most of his yards by either out-juking or out-running everyone, i.e. by being a better athlete than the defenses he was facing. In the NFL, where every defender is a tremendous athlete, you cannot rely on athleticism to get yards: you have to be able to get tough yards up the middle, running through tackles. If you take a look at Reggie Bush�s highlight reel career at USC, you see that he made a career off outside pitches, screen passes and other runs OUTSIDE the tackles. Most of the times that he got any yards up the middle, it was because the USC offensive line opened up a huge hole. Very few times did Bush actually run through would-be tacklers. McFadden, on the other hand, is a very tough runner. Yes, he has speed, acceleration, and juking ability (jukability, perhaps?), but he�s also tough to bring down. That said, I think a much better comparison for McFadden is Adrian Peterson up in Minnesota. This brings me to the second argument: a RB won�t have a huge impact on the team next year. Um�did anyone watch the Vikings this year? They added Peterson to essentially the same offense and went from having a worse record than the Falcons last season to one game away from the playoffs! With Tarvaris Jackson at quarterback! Tarvaris Jackson! Was that all Peterson? Probably not. Did Peterson have a heck of a lot to do with it? Absolutely. And, before anyone starts, yes, I realize that the Vikings� offensive line is much, much, MUCH better than the Falcons. Still, Norwood was able to average 6.3 yards a carry behind our offensive line. Obviously, someone had to open up those holes for Norwood to run through: you know he�s not breaking any tackles with those Kung-Pao-Chicken-chopstick legs he�s got. And that average was over 93 carries�a decent sample. Yes, our offensive line needs improvement but if Norwood (who�s maybe run through 10 tackles in his life�and that�s being generous) can average 6.3 yards per carry behind it, then I think McFadden could do alright. At any rate, it wasn�t like his offensive line at Arkansas was dominating the defensive lines in the SEC all year. Finally, as far as the Super Bowl comment goes, I agree that no Super Bowl winner has featured a RB in quite some time. But some Super Bowl losers have (see the Bears with Rex Grossman last year). Either way, the point isn�t to make us the favorite to win the Super Bowl next year, the point is to become relevant again. The point is to get a player that will make Atlanta forget the debacle that was this year. The point is to get someone who can have the greatest impact on our record NEXT YEAR. Let�s face it: the Falcons cannot afford another season like this year. They cannot afford to lose 11+ games next year: fan morale is already at an all-time low. They need to draft someone that will have an immediate impact (or someone that will have the greatest chance of making an immediate impact). History has shown us that rookie quarterbacks (think basically every QB ever drafted) and linemen (think Jamaal Anderson) do not have great impacts in their rookie year. There are a few exceptions (Ben Roethlisberger and Joe Thomas) but, for the most part, it doesn�t happen. Running backs, on the other hand, have a much greater track record for immediate impacts: all you have to do is look at Adrian Peterson this year. Would McFadden have that great of an impact on our team. I honestly don�t know. But did it make me furious every time I saw Peterson tear up an opposing team this year? Absolutely. We were one pick away from having him!! One pick!!! Do we really want to go through the same thing this year, watching ANOTHER rookie running back tear up the league (putting his new team in the playoff hunt) and knowing that the Falcons were oh-so-close to getting him? I say no. If we need an immediate impact (and anyone who sat through this year knows we do) then running back is absolutely the way to go.

By kreedham

December 30, 2007 10:08 PM | Link to this

I know proudly laugh at all of the bloggers who were upset that the Falcons won and messed up the draft.

THIS JUST IN!

Had the Falcons lost they would be picking third.

The Falcons won and they are picking Third.

Had they lost the Rams would have won the tiebreaker for #2.

I’ll take the win and the third pick instead of the loss and the third pick.

You guys should have waited until the 4 o’clock games were over. Now you look silly!

By Dur!

December 30, 2007 10:08 PM | Link to this

All this crying and the Falcons still end up with the #3 pick. They might have had the same pick if they lost….lol

By Joeman

December 30, 2007 10:11 PM | Link to this

Umm … didn’t the AJC just report that we get the THIRD pick. Isn’t this the same pick we would have received if we lost? I think the Rams ALWAYS had the tie breaker based on their ridiculously bad strength of schedule. So we win for pride and wind up just as well as if we’d listed to the tankers and blown the game. Let’s build a team through pride and hard work. The winners in this league operate that way.

By kreedham

December 30, 2007 10:13 PM | Link to this

Falconboi, you beat me to the punch. Like you said, trade down in the first round (not too far) to get the other teams first and second. Then trade Meangelo, if someone will take him, for another 1st.

I’d rather have two 1st round picks in the middle then only 1 early and a couple of 2nd rounders. We need plenty and the more draft picks we can get, the better.

By Smackie

December 30, 2007 10:20 PM | Link to this

Falcons don’t yet have #3 pick locked up…..its going to come down to cointoss at combine in February. We can be 3rd, 4th or 5th still

By Dan

December 30, 2007 10:26 PM | Link to this

McFADDEN in 2008 OFFENSIVE LINE both picks in Round 2…BIG 330 HUGE TALL GUYS

MATTHEW STAFFORD 2009

By TommyP

December 30, 2007 10:35 PM | Link to this

To all of the people saying that it was great that the Falcons won:

Tell me how George Cooper, Earl Everett, CJ Gaddis, Kevin Huntley, Cameron Vaughn and Todd Watkins did yesterday? Did they show anything?

Tell me Jerrious Norwood got 25 carries……..he didn’t? What?

At this point of a lost season, you find out what you have. It’s an early audition for next year.

By AJC is Wrong

December 30, 2007 10:35 PM | Link to this

Smackie is correct. WE WILL FLIP A COIN AT THE COMBINE TO DETERMINE IF WE PICK 3RD!!!!

AJC report is 100% inaccurate. They are using tiebreakers for teams that are in the same conference. Last I checked, ATL was in a different conference than OAK/KC.