Jay Bookman

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 4:40 PM | Link to this

I know I said Steelers 3 weeks ago but that was my way of trying to jinx them.

Cardinals 27-13.

It’s too late for the new jinx.

bwa

By TN Gelding

February 1, 2009 4:49 PM | Link to this

At least we can stop criticizing Obama for a few hours.

Steelers 24-17.

By RW-(the original)

February 1, 2009 5:31 PM | Link to this

Zona 34-20

By getalife

February 1, 2009 5:41 PM | Link to this

Funny interview with our President.

Steelers by 3.

By Taxpayer

February 1, 2009 5:48 PM | Link to this

I’m thinking 25 - 21, Jay. That will give the Steelers 54% of the total points — a clear mandate.

By Hillbilly Deluxe

February 1, 2009 5:49 PM | Link to this

Arizona in a mild upset.

By T

February 1, 2009 6:14 PM | Link to this

Maybe, Ill see some of you down the road. Times are hard. Put your money or Income where your mouth is. For the freedom of our children, right?

I welcome You.

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 6:19 PM | Link to this

Funniest commercial: Budweiser, of course.

By Midori

February 1, 2009 6:36 PM | Link to this

Steelers about to go in……..

By Midori

February 1, 2009 6:43 PM | Link to this

got to give it to Arizona — that was great defense.

7 points became 3.

By JAY BOOKMAN

February 1, 2009 7:16 PM | Link to this

So far, Arizona looks like Atlanta did in the Super Bowl a few years ago … startled to be there.

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 7:22 PM | Link to this

Nice catch.

By Bosch

February 1, 2009 7:46 PM | Link to this

BRRRRUUUUUCCCCCEEEEE will be up soon!

I love Springsteen.

That teleflora.com commercial was really damn funny, and I like the Doritos commercial with the crystal ball.

By Bosch

February 1, 2009 7:49 PM | Link to this

And kudos to Jennifer Hudson.

That pre-game show was pretty awesome - Faith Hill singing America the Beautiful, Jennifer Hudson, the plane crash crew, AND General Petraeus.

Wow.

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 7:53 PM | Link to this

Overturned, I think.

By Midori

February 1, 2009 7:55 PM | Link to this

hey Boschie :)

great game, huh? :)

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 7:57 PM | Link to this

Maybe not, good call.

By Bosch

February 1, 2009 8:36 PM | Link to this

Hey Midori!

Yeah, it’s a good game - I like it when it’s not a blow out - at least not yet.

The boss rocks! :-)

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 9:26 PM | Link to this

We got a game.

By Midori

February 1, 2009 9:36 PM | Link to this

what a stupid foul, Taylor!!!

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 9:46 PM | Link to this

Oh man, do we got a game.

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 9:48 PM | Link to this

OMG

By Mrs.Godzilla

February 1, 2009 9:51 PM | Link to this

Foozball?

By getalife

February 1, 2009 9:53 PM | Link to this

Wow, what a game.

Awesome.

By Midori

February 1, 2009 10:01 PM | Link to this

what a touchdown!!!

By Midori

February 1, 2009 10:10 PM | Link to this

Hi Mrs. G :)

this is a great game!!

I’m on pins and needles here!!!

Warner just fumbled; turned ball over to Pittsburgh.

That’s 6 for P Burgh!!

By AJC/DNC Management

February 1, 2009 10:10 PM | Link to this

Congratulations, Bookman.

Super Bowls don’t come any better than that one.

By JAY BOOKMAN

February 1, 2009 10:18 PM | Link to this

No they don’t.

Whoa.

By getalife

February 1, 2009 10:19 PM | Link to this

We were close.

Pittsburgh by 4 .

Great game.

By RW-(the original)

February 1, 2009 10:23 PM | Link to this

Good call Jay B. and in case you missed it Penn State won up in East Lansing today too.

By J$

February 1, 2009 10:30 PM | Link to this

go Cards!

millions lost in vegas

By Chad Harris

February 1, 2009 11:07 PM | Link to this

Great game. Like the lottery bufoons a lot of people made big bets hoping the Steelers would cover the spread they dindn’t.

From the Muck on Rolly Polly Butterball:

The Obama administration is scheduled to file a brief on February 18 in the ongoing court case over the House’s subpoena of two other senior Bush White House aides, Harriet Miers and Josh Bolten. At that time, it will likely indicate whether it intends to back President Bush’s claim of retroactive executive privilege on behalf of his aides. So the committee’s decision to agree to Luskin’s request means the Obama administration has until then to formulate its position.

By TN Gelding

February 2, 2009 1:26 AM | Link to this

J$

February 1, 2009 10:30 PM

And millions won!

Plus the hotels were full and everyone, but the big losers, had a good time. AirTran and Delta had full flights in and out as well.

By ByteMe

February 2, 2009 6:14 AM | Link to this

You know what they say: AFC wins the Super Bowl, the stock market goes down for the year.

Of course, turns out that’s false… but likely not false this year.

By Andy the Welcher

February 2, 2009 6:58 AM | Link to this

It’s a good thing Andy wasn’t in Vegas, because I thinking welching is a crime in Nevada.

By chuck

February 2, 2009 7:14 AM | Link to this

taxpayer, in case I don’t get to post again this morning, thank you so much for providing the “reference material”. Of course the guy writing it was a non-partisan economist right? NO?

Actually, it was some Bush-hating, democrat guy in his basement writing delusional garbage. Hey, maybe he’s an electrician. Then we can call him Steve the electrician and pay more attention to what he says than he could possibly ever deserve. I don’t know what you thought that drivel proved, but you have a rather short sighted view of history if you believe any of his “spin” on the statistics.

First, his misrepresentation of the Reagan years was laughable. Reagan had to rebuild the military after the Carter debacle and he had to do it with a democrat congress. It is an absolute FACT that democrats will not increase military spending without corresponding increases in social(ist) programs. He then credits Clinton with surpluses, even though those did not happen until there was a REPUBLICAN CONGRESS. It sure didn’t happen in the first 2 years when the dems were in control of both branches.

Finally, if you read the piece, EVEN WITH HIS PARTISAN SLANT, you will see that just as I said, REVENUES INCREASED AFTER THE TAX CUTS. EVERY TIME!!!

You should also note that most of the deficit spending under Bush occurred…WHEN? That’s right ladies and gentlemen, during his LAST 2 YEARS in office when there was a…wait for it…a DEMOCRAT CONGRESS.

So thank you that EVEN IN A BIASED PARTISAN NUTJOB’S piece, the truth still shines through.

By AJC/DNC Management

February 2, 2009 7:42 AM | Link to this

{{{{By Andy the Welcher February 2, 2009 6:58 AM It’s a good thing Andy wasn’t in Vegas, because I thinking welching is a crime in Nevada.}}}}

I had 6 and half points, moron.

By Taxpayer

February 2, 2009 7:56 AM | Link to this

chuck,

I instructed you to provide me with a rebuttal — not your typical Republican whining. Now, work on that proper rebuttal along with source material to support your claims. I’ll be here to help steer your work and I’m truly looking forward to your learning a little from this experience.

By Copyleft

February 2, 2009 9:21 AM | Link to this

Chuck, revenues increase over the years anyway. Tax cuts, however, do not drive that increase, and in fact SLOW it—as has been demonstrated repeatedly.