Jay Bookman

By TW

October 20, 2008 2:45 PM | Link to this

The move only further crytsalizes the detrimental rightwing turn. It’s as if the party, as a result of its blinding ego, is unkowingly setting itself up for a loss in 2012 as well.

The party of disinformation has been exposed as a loser - bolstering a failed concept only further accentuates its failure.

By AmVet

October 20, 2008 2:50 PM | Link to this

Karl Rove, Mike Huckabee, Glenn Beck and now Judith Miller.

When added onto their existing line up, it is patently ridiculous for them to assert any neutrality whatsoever.

They are THE OBVIOUS mouth piece for the Bush administration and the failed neo-con ideology…

I remember a few years ago when they sued Al Franken (Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right) for using their pet term! Three days later they slunk back into the shadows on that one.

Other than for the comedic factor, I give them little attention…

By RealityKing

October 20, 2008 2:53 PM | Link to this

It’s called a fair and balanced approach to reporting the news. Something ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN and the AJC lost a long time ago. Unless of course.., you too think a panel of ex-Clinton aides represents Americans non-partisan view of politics.

By Midori

October 20, 2008 2:59 PM | Link to this

Muslim McCain Fans Confront Intolerance At Rally (VIDEO)

By Bosch

October 20, 2008 3:02 PM | Link to this

I wish that for once, someone would sue the crap out of Fox News for their “reporting,” which borders on being libelous.

By mike hussein smith

October 20, 2008 3:06 PM | Link to this

Fixed News is a great place for Judith Miller. It’ll keep that lying media wh@re off the streets.

By mm

October 20, 2008 3:06 PM | Link to this

RealityKing,

When are you going to join the rest of us in reality land?

Yes, if you watch only Fox News, which is so obviously tilted to the right, everyone else looks liberal.

That’s why all you wingnuts are so brainwashed. You never see the MSM. You watch Fox News, listem to Rush, read Coulter.

By Midori

October 20, 2008 3:08 PM | Link to this

Bosch,

I have a hilarious video for you and Paul

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 3:10 PM | Link to this

I find it extremely hard to believe that there was any room for diminishment in your opinion of Fox News Jay B.

It’s blasphemous to tell both sides of a story after all.

Later y’all. See you upstairs at Happy Hour.

/Spare me the comments about my non word. I like it.

By Joey

October 20, 2008 3:13 PM | Link to this

Miller did not write anything about WMD that Clinton(s), Kennedy, Pelosi, Reid, Kerry, Gore, ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN and 50 others had not already said or published.

It was just that President Bush pointed to her and the NYT report as backup. But for the Dems it was to late to provide supporting data. Dims had already committed to the “Bush lied” stragedy.

And toadies like Bookman had faithfully accepted their marching orders.

By MorningStar

October 20, 2008 3:13 PM | Link to this

By Midori October 20, 2008 3:08 PM | Link

Hilarious! Midori, please don’t post only for Paul and Bosch. This one is great!

By Paul

October 20, 2008 3:14 PM | Link to this

Thanks Midori, I needed that!

Y’know, in the first part, the kid did a better job than BOR. Anyone who can get Barney Frank to stifle…

By RealityKing

October 20, 2008 3:15 PM | Link to this

“I was a Hillary supporter who has gone over to the Obama side,” Miller told Politico earlier by phone. “Lots of people think they know what I believe, but don’t.”

So according to Jay.., associating with the other party(i.e. working together), demishes both parties..

By Midori

October 20, 2008 3:19 PM | Link to this

LOL,

OK, Morningstar.

I’ll remember to “share the humor wealth” in the future :)

By Bosch

October 20, 2008 3:25 PM | Link to this

Thanks Midori! That’s a hoot!

I’ve always had trouble from laughing when I hear Barney Frank talk - it’s the middle schooler in me that comes out.

By Taxpayer

October 20, 2008 3:29 PM | Link to this

Fox News. Is that what they call that crap. Well, it is a network that uses sly like a fox methods of misrepresenting facts in order to twist something into what they want it to be. So, maybe it is Fox something. Maybe Fox Turds or Fox Farts. That works.

By ByteMe

October 20, 2008 3:30 PM | Link to this

Midori: that was hysterical!

By Morningstar

October 20, 2008 3:36 PM | Link to this

Bosch October 20, 2008 3:02 PM I wish that for once, someone would sue the crap out of Fox News for their “reporting,” which borders on being libelous

“ME TOO!” But don’t hold your breath. I’m so disgusted that I can’t go to a doctor’s office in Gainesville or Atlanta without being subjected to this Cr@p!

Do these people have no conception of marketing techniques? All your patients are not wingnuts? Huh?? Well, possibly many are since a good segment of the population is so opposed to a health care program. That’s “COMMUNIST!!!” Idiots.

By Paul

October 20, 2008 3:46 PM | Link to this

AmVet - Bosch

You forgot to add Howard Wolfson, Geraldine Ferraro, Jami Floyd, Jerry Brown - neocons all!

By Midori

October 20, 2008 3:48 PM | Link to this

nother hilarious one for you guys

Terry Tate — Motivational Linebacker :)

By Bosch

October 20, 2008 3:52 PM | Link to this

Paul@ 3:46,

Huh?

By "The Corporal"

October 20, 2008 4:02 PM | Link to this

Since it’s getting close to Halloween :

The mainstream media is to the truth as a clown costume was to John Wayne Gacy.

Now don’t just come back with another one. Get your own ideas !!

By AmVet

October 20, 2008 4:05 PM | Link to this

I have never once seen any of those people on that network.

Nor remarkable in and of itself, but if they have been on the air one hundredth of the time the others I mentioned have been, I’d be shocked.

Remember shock and awe? Of course you do. In the days immediately following, guess how many anti-war voices were on the unfair and unbalanced Fox News network.

Two.

Out of eighty.

97.5% of their “contributors” were in favor of King George’s deceitful, chosen and unnecessary invasion/occupation.

Sorry, my friend, I simply do not suffer fools gladly.

Speaking of lying sacks of cr@p, you Lush Scumbaugh fans have a real winner in that guy.

For that fata$$, never-served, never-will, chicken hawk to infer General Powell a liar is priceless.

And where was the bigoted turd’s righteous indignation when Powell endorsed Douglas Wilder in 1994?

GFY, dittoheads…

By Keeping It Real

October 20, 2008 4:07 PM | Link to this

I watch Fox news to balance my thought process. It is obvious that they are very conservative and anti Obama. This is a conntry of free speech no matter how hateful.

By Bosch

October 20, 2008 4:08 PM | Link to this

Morningstar,

Yeah, if I see Fox News playing on a television set in a business - I make it a point not to do business there anymore.

By Paul

October 20, 2008 4:10 PM | Link to this

Bosch

I was being sarcastic. Wolfson was Hillary’s communications director and is now one of those talking heads like Rove. Geraldine Ferraro gets pulled in a lot. Floyd’s a lower-level player but has long service going back to the Clinton Administration. Jerry Brown’s been a guest once or twice (former governor of Calif, went out with Linda Ronstadt (my kind of guy) was known as “Governor Moonbeam” and now is Calif Attorney General.

Point was, they (not all shows, I’m separating the news from the entertainment, and even within the entertainment there are gradations) bring on Democrats for the Democratic viewpoint. Or to criticize the Republican viewpoint, often with a Republican present.

I just can’t imagine an Olberman having on a Condoleeza Rice as a regular contributor on foreign policy. You get the drift.

By Bud Wiser

October 20, 2008 4:12 PM | Link to this

By your reference, I presume you feel that this also diminishes the NY Times?

How can that be possible? They have done ample to do that to themselves already.

Obama/Biden ‘08 - making it easy to be stupid

By Mrs. Godzilla

October 20, 2008 4:15 PM | Link to this

MI Republicans Admit to Illegal Foreclosure Scheme, “Surrender” to Democrats

Do you think FOX will find time between all their fake ACorn crap to print this?

By Bosch

October 20, 2008 4:18 PM | Link to this

Paul,

Okay, got cha. But everytime I watch Fox News I feel I need to take a shower afterwards.

By Paul

October 20, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this

AmVet

How many antiwar voices were heard on any of the networks? Isn’t Glenn Beck a radio guy with his own show? So he’s pulled in as a commentator? Then again, Alan Colmes has his own Fox radio show - I get it at night on satellite radio.

BTW - care to guess who’s had Nader on twice in the last little while? BOR. Who also said, not half in jest, that Nader ought to be head of the SEC and send people to jail.

Do any of the ‘lib’ networks give Nader the time of day?

By Taxpayer

October 20, 2008 4:24 PM | Link to this

I cannot even imagine those clowns on Fox trying to explain to their intended right wing nut audience what a credit default swap is. No. The only thing fair and balanced about the likes of a Billy Oreally is that he probably drools out of both sides of his mouth.

By "The Corporal"

October 20, 2008 4:26 PM | Link to this

How many newspapers (and their websites) are liberal vs. conservative ?

How many television news programs are liberal vs. conservative ?

How many radio talk shows are conservative vs. liberal ?

How many college & university professors are liberal vs. conservative ?

Me Thinks you liberals are still way ahead by volume so why are you so testy ?

By Bud Wiser

October 20, 2008 4:28 PM | Link to this

You foaming at the mouth left wingers are really ramping up the garbage you puke out as the election nears.

Whats the matter?

Are you afraid that Joe the Plumber is going to ramp up the white vote for McCain?

Only socialists like other socialists. Obama’s “spreading the wealth” is bringing him down. He said it, and now its off to the races.

Obama/Biden ‘08 - making it easy to be stupid

By Taxpayer

October 20, 2008 4:37 PM | Link to this

If Joe the plumber couldn’t stand the heat then maybe he should not have opened his trap with that phony scenario of being hit up for more taxes if he bought a plumbing company. He was probably trying to score some points with someone — maybe a “date” that he picked up during a night on the town — and it blew up in his face. Maybe he should take a plunger and use it to dislodge some of those feet that he, McCain and other Republicans keep getting stuck in their mouths.

By RB from Gwinnett

October 20, 2008 4:37 PM | Link to this

Bosch, From your 3:02

The sad part of that post is I really don’t think you’re smart enough to know how dangerous that line of thinking is.

Have you heard the story of boiling a frog, Bosch? You liberals are the frog and the water is slowly warming…

By Taxpayer

October 20, 2008 4:44 PM | Link to this

I’ve had frog legs before. Tastes like chicken — RiBit.

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 4:44 PM | Link to this

I don’t know, if I were kookman, I seriously doubt if I would be throwing out the phrase “widely discredited.”

Stuff like that could wind up homing back in on it’s source.

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this

By the end of this day I suspect Joe Biden will be “widely discredited.”

By Dennis

October 20, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this

Amazing! All of these people, including Bookman, who never watch FoxNews and who will walk out of a business establishment if F-N is on the TV: How do they know so much about F-N?

Answers:

A. They don’t know anything about F-N, but are damn if the will let that interfer with their hate-filled post.

B. They watch it all the time but are not honest.

C. They are gullible and swallow the words of any Dem-wit who is critical of the idea of being conserative. Then, since they cannot digest the crap they just swallowed, they re-gurgitate their version on sites like this?

By Citizen of the World

October 20, 2008 4:50 PM | Link to this

In my defense of the media in general as the “fourth estate” – every bit as important as our three branches of government in ensuring checks and balances, I always urge those who point fingers at the “liberal media” to get their news and information from as many sources as possible.

Practicing what I preach, I tune in to Fox News along with other TV sources; I take the daily paper and read both conservative and liberal columnists. I read a lot of books. I purposefully expose myself to conservative and liberal viewpoints.

I have to say, though, that the tactics I observe from media like Fox News and talk radio on the right are frightening. Name-calling. Broad characterizations. High repetition of over-simplified messages. Appeals to fears, prejudices and religious ferver. Anger and confrontation. Undermining institutions (government, education, the press). Good looking conservatives (Hannity) and homely liberals (Holmes).

And if it’s not brainwashing, then why are they using brainwashing tactics? You cannot separate the ends from the means.

Oh, I know. I know. It’s the liberal media that does all those things! Well, how do you know unless you tune in, read, etc., and analyze and compare not just the viewpoints expressed but how they are presented. The difference is there.

By Citizen of the World

October 20, 2008 4:52 PM | Link to this

Sorry, Colmes, not Holmes.

By Mrs. Godzilla

October 20, 2008 4:53 PM | Link to this

Analyst: GOP voter fraud scandal ‘really serious’

Not from Fox!

By Bosch

October 20, 2008 4:54 PM | Link to this

RB,

Um, I’m smart enough NOT to get my real estate market analysis from a billboard. How ‘bout you?

BWA!!!!!!

By AmVet

October 20, 2008 4:55 PM | Link to this

Paul, I believe BOR till secretly thinks Nader is a loon (he has said so int he past), but as is true on other topics, he is finally coming around! And to his credit, at least he gives Nader a public forum. (Unlike the supposed liberal MSM who have effectively locked him out. Including PBS.) And I did see where BOR did make that Nader heading up the SEC comment.

How many antiwar voices were heard on any of the networks?

You are 100% correct, my friend.

How many indeed?

Let’s ask our faux conservative friends here.

Just how many anti-war voices were heard in the days and weeks following Bush’s invasion on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN et al?

NEXT TO NONE.

WHY???

Bloodlust sells REALLY, REALLY well.

As you know, I have predicted that the neo-cons are going to get humiliated yet again next month.

And they are so duplicitous and so unwilling to own up to ANY of their vast number of screw ups and have so little to cling to anymore their crybaby mantra of “IT’S BECAUSE OF THE LIBERAL MSM!!!” is predictable, outdated and nonsensical.

It simply does not stand up to scrutiny.

By AmVet

October 20, 2008 5:01 PM | Link to this

BTW, I just this minute got an email saying Ralph Nader is going to be profiled on the NBC Nightly News with Brian Williams tonight.

I’m not sure what that means, hopefully the “liberals” at NBC will at least let him speak for a few minutes…

By RealityKing

October 20, 2008 5:06 PM | Link to this

Wow! Obama raised $150 million last month. No wonder he reneged on that campaign finance pledge with McCain.

And in light of all the fraudulent credit card entries sending money to his campaign…, I just double checked my statement. You might want to do the same, unless of course, you don’t mind other people giving your $2300 to a politician.

By Bud Wiser

October 20, 2008 5:07 PM | Link to this

Check ALL of the ratings services, and you idiots that trash Fox apparently are unaware that they are flattening the competition in virtually every category.

Paste that on the wall next to the plummeting subscription services to the like of the NY Times, AJC, etc, etc. Then, look at the ratings of Fox against PMSNBC, CBS, NBC, and it is no contest.

The moron left is in the minority….again.

Obama/Biden ‘08 - making it easy to be stupid, and ill informed, and a toady to the left

By RB from Gwinnett

October 20, 2008 5:07 PM | Link to this

Bosch, This is typical of you. You couldn’t answer any of my questions about the ATL real estate market 6 months ago, don’t have any facts to support your opinions, so you change the subject and call people names.

If you would just take a moment once in a while to educate yourself, you would provide a whole lot more value to these discussions and to society as a whole. As it is, you’re just plain dangerous.

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 5:13 PM | Link to this

Oblahma’s poll numbers go down, the stock market goes up, hmmmmm.

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 5:19 PM | Link to this

You are receiving this message based on your prior agreement to receive emails on topics of potential interest from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Background: About a year ago, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution (AJC) created a special, private online community of about 300 readers who serve as “consultants” to the AJC. These community members log-in at their convenience about once a week for 10 minutes to share their perspectives and opinions in surveys and discussion boards on a range of topics - from news coverage, to new products or whatever they feel is important.

Influence: The community’s access and reach into the upper levels of the AJC is unprecedented and reader’s comments have had a real impact on the AJC as it is developing and making changes for the future. (Community members have even contributed to printed articles.)

We are looking for additional readers who would like to take part in this exciting and important project. There’s no commitment at all. You participate when you can and don’t when you are too busy. If you are selected to be a part of the community, each month you will receive a $15 amazon.com gift certificate in exchange for participating once a week.

How do you like that, Jay, they are shopping your job around.

For a measly 15 dollar gift certificate.

Comforting, isn’t it?

By AmVet

October 20, 2008 5:21 PM | Link to this

Bud, I may be wrong about this, but I don’t think anyone said Faux News isn’t popular.

So is pornography.

Lonely, single, white men have a lot of pull! (Get it!)

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 5:27 PM | Link to this

“I don’t know why I did this. It’s just those signs, and this election, it has me so upset.”—B.F., a 49-year-old man charged with second-degree assault for allegedly attacking a woman carrying a McCain sign in New York City, quoted by Pajamas Media, Oct. 17, 2008

Attack the old lady and whine.

By GodHatesTrash

October 20, 2008 5:51 PM | Link to this

LOL AmVet.

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 5:54 PM | Link to this

Is anybody using Firefox 3? I just upgraded to it and can’t post anything at the AJC with it. Although this site actually looks better in Safari.

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 5:57 PM | Link to this

Another liberal shibboleth bites the dust:

Dr. Hackbart also pointed out that periods of solar inactivity known as “solar minimums” magnify cold spells on his continent. So, given that August was the first month since 1913 in which no sunspot activity was recorded — none — and during which solar winds were at a 50-year low, he was not surprised that Brazilians were suffering (for them) a brutal cold snap. “This is no coincidence,” he said as he scoffed at the notion that manmade carbon emissions had more impact than the sun and oceans on global climate.

Don Easterbrook, a geologist at Western Washington University, says, “It’s practically a slam dunk that we are in for about 30 years of global cooling,” as the sun enters a particularly inactive phase. His examination of warming and cooling trends over the past four centuries shows an “almost exact correlation” between climate fluctuations and solar energy received on Earth, while showing almost “no correlation at all with CO2.”

An analytical chemist who works in spectroscopy and atmospheric sensing, Michael J. Myers of Hilton Head, S. C., declared, “Man-made global warming is junk science,” explaining that worldwide manmade CO2 emission each year “equals about 0.0168% of the atmosphere’s CO2 concentration … This results in a 0.00064% increase in the absorption of the sun’s radiation. This is an insignificantly small number.”

You think that will stop the environmental terrorists from taxing us into oblivion?

I mean it’s not like they hate the United States or anything.

By AmVet

October 20, 2008 6:03 PM | Link to this

RW, I have been using FF 3.0.3 for a few weeks now. No problems. But, sometimes the No Script add on gives me some fits. But I sure wouldn’t NOTuse it…

By AJC/DNC Management

October 20, 2008 6:08 PM | Link to this

RW: Check out the “add ons” to Firefox to see which program they didn’t give you with the upgrade.

I’ve been using it for a couple of weeks, no problem.

By Ackmed

October 20, 2008 6:31 PM | Link to this

Today thee Iman has us conducting a poll for ABC News/ Wash Post, I am so excited and proud to be doing my duty for thee democrat party!

This is good work in thee Pakistani frontier, I hope we don’t mess it up. We even get to use thee al Qaeda #2 man’s cave, he hasn’t been back for a few days, what nice digs he has though.

Listen in to my first phone call-

Hello, Mrs. Myers?

Mrs. Myers- Yes, how are you?

Hi, Mrs. Myers, my name is George and I’m conducting a presidential poll for ABC/ Wapo, my first question to you is, are you a Repug or a democrat?

Mrs. Myers- I am a lifelong Republi

Click.

Let’s see, what is thee second number on my list?

Hello, Mr. Mcbozo?

Mr. Mcbozo- What do you want?

My name is George and I am conducting thee presidential poll for thee ABC/ Wapo, may ask if you hate thee George Bushie?

Mr. Mcbozo- With a purple passion.

Wonderful, that is one vote for thee Oblahma. Thank you for your time.

Mr. Mcbozo-But

Click

Thee McCain and thee Bushie are the same person, that’s what Oblahma says, right?

Hello Mr. Nasty?

Yes, this is Nasty.

Hi Nasty, my name is Ack, I mean George, and I am conducting thee presidential poll for thee ABC/Wapo, would you like to participate?

Mr. Nasty- Why not.

Great, who do you find to be more inexperienced, thee infidel Palin or thee infidel McCain?

Mr. Nasty- You mean Palin or Oblahma, right?

No I don’t, apostate, answer thee question.

Mr. Nasty- Say, what the f

Click

Aahhh, yes, another vote for thee Oblahma.

This is too easy!

Allah Akbar!

Yes we can!

By Paul

October 20, 2008 6:35 PM | Link to this

test post

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 7:06 PM | Link to this

Let’s try IE since Firefox noe Safari want to work anymore.

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 7:14 PM | Link to this

Safari test 3

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 7:18 PM | Link to this

Firefox take 7.

By David

October 20, 2008 7:23 PM | Link to this

RW,

I’ve been using Firefox 3 (3.0.3) for a while, but I’ve never noticed a problem with it. What’s happening with your Firefox?

David

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 7:31 PM | Link to this

David,

I’m just going to a network timeout in both Firefox and Safari after about 10 seconds. It seemed to be working once I clicked no for remember me, but I tried to let Jay B know that through a Safari post and I got the same timeout even with no checked.

IE seems to work either way, but no way am I going to go through the hell that is IE.

By RW-(the original)

October 20, 2008 7:42 PM | Link to this

That 7:31 was using Firefox with no checked on remember me. It timed out the first time, but worked on the try again option in the network timeout box.

By David

October 20, 2008 8:00 PM | Link to this

RW,

Sorry for the delay, I think it’s the AJC website. It was acting weird when I was trying to post, but then I got hijacked from my pc to plan a shopping list for Thanksgiving.

I’m calling it a night-

David

By "The Corporal"

October 20, 2008 8:08 PM | Link to this

Hey AmVet

What branch, unit, assignments were you in, etc.

By Copyleft

October 21, 2008 12:12 PM | Link to this

Disgraced criminals and shills for the Right seem to get lots of rewards and cushy job offers from the right-wing media, don’t they?

But then, Oliver North and G. Gordon Liddy and Bill Bennett all got radio shows, so I guess it’s nothing new…

By Darren

October 21, 2008 2:10 PM | Link to this

Somebody has to take on the liberal media. 1 against 20+ and you’re complaining? Grow Up.

By Copyleft

October 21, 2008 3:21 PM | Link to this

“Liberal media”? You’re the one who’s complaining, and Faux News is an extended tantrum because reality wasn’t slanting in your favor.

By Darren

October 21, 2008 5:47 PM | Link to this

Hey Copyleft,

Get a clue. Even CNN’s Lou Dobb’s admits the news media is left along with most major newspapers. Obviously, you can’t see the forest for the trees. Don’t worry, once the left get full control, the Fairness Doctrine will be enacted and the liberals might be able to compete again. Of course our tax dollars will have to support them because they cannot compete in the real market.

By Copyleft

October 22, 2008 8:03 AM | Link to this

If the so-called “liberal media” couldn’t compete, how could we have a liberal media?

Come on, at least try to stay consistent from one falsehood to the next. The irrationality of the fascist mind continues to amaze and amuse me.

By Darren

October 22, 2008 10:32 AM | Link to this

You still do not get it and probably never will. FOX News ratings crush anyone else’s out there for cable news. That’s competing.

I admit FOX leans right but most of the others lean left. FOX created a place for conservative listeners that are tired of all the liberal agendas on the other broadcast. FOX always has both sides represented on the issues. Even Howard Wolfson, Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Manager stated that Hillary got more fair treatment on FOX than anywhere else.

MSNBC ratings are in the cellar. They are not competing. CNN’s are on the rise but were in the tank previously. Thank GOD, CNN is starting to get a clue and change their programming to be more balanced. I tend to watch CNN more and more now.

The rest of the Liberal Media are in the tank for Obama. Again CNN’s Lou Dobbs stated this along with many others. Name one conservative host on ABC, NBC, or CBS news programs. I bet you can’t. I can name 3 on FOX (Alan Combs, Greta Van Susteren, Morton Kondracke) off the top of my head.

You should read the book BIAS by Bernie Goldberg a Democrat that worked in the Liberal Media for years. He list several examples of liberal bias in the main stream media.

Newspaper subscriptions are down everywhere and I do realize the Internet plays a big role. I’m sure the Huffington Post, Move On, and the Daily KOS will replace newspapers in time. That’s where the hate mongers on the left like to spew their poison.

Yes, conservatives dominate talk radio but that’s because DEMs are not able to capture their potential audiences’ attention. Air America bombed even with all of George Soros’ money.

By Copyleft

October 22, 2008 10:49 AM | Link to this

You’re missing the contradiction, Darren… you say that the “liberal media can’t compete,” but you also say we have an incredibly liberal media.

How does that work? If they couldn’t compete, they wouldn’t exist!

By Darren

October 22, 2008 11:00 AM | Link to this

Ratings Man. There not getting the ratings. Coming in last and near last is not competing. Kind of like being in the NCAA but never getting to a bowl game. Maybe we define competing differently. My belief is if you are competive then you have a chance of finishing first. These guys don’t have a prayer unless they make competive programming changes like CNN is doing. The liberal media ratings are going down consistantly and FOX is still going up. Before long FOX will exceed major networks and they’re a cable news network. If the Fairness Doctrine is enacted, they may have a chance. Liberal Government will try to get involved. Just wait and see. By the way, I’m no Bush fan either. I try to be an independent thinker.