Jay Bookman

By TW

September 28, 2008 3:52 PM | Link to this

Anybody got the inside track on who will replace Palin and how it will go down?

By ByteMe

September 28, 2008 4:03 PM | Link to this

Anyone else think this might happen?

Times of London Article

I don’t know whether to laugh, cry, or rent a tux.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 4:05 PM | Link to this

Palin strikes again

Joe Lieberman to the rescue soon.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 4:13 PM | Link to this

al-Gitmo: Thanks for the vid, I like the way McCain ripped Stephie a new one.

By the way, where’s Hair Plugs at?

Been sequestered, huh, huh?

I see that Sarah’Cuda is still talking.

By Mrs.Godzilla

September 28, 2008 4:20 PM | Link to this

TW

It could happen, it is such a “mavericky” idea.

Can’t be Guiliani….Giuliani’s law firm seeking bailout business. I imagine the Veep’s salary pales in comparison.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 4:26 PM | Link to this

The Republican party is in complete disarray. It’s falling apart. Look at it. Bush has no choice but to trust Bernanke and Paulson and their $700 billion bailout but it slaps right in the face of the one core party principle that had not completely and publicly broken down — til now. Free market capitalism has been brought to its knees by the Republicans. In the last days of the Bush administration, Newt and some House Republicans are now turning on their own party in some last ditch effort to save a little face or more precisely, a few seats. McCain was a last-ditch effort on the part of the Republicans to get someone that could breathe a last breath into an already fractured grouping of misguided misfits and that has been a disaster. McCain’s mavericky addition of Palin to the ticket is nothing more than the icing on the deflated sponge cake. If I didn’t know better, I’d think that the Republican are trying their best to throw the election. Maybe they finally realized that they need some people in office that can actually clean up their mess.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 4:37 PM | Link to this

But the proper response in a democratic society isn’t to scream at those who give an author a podium, to call the man names or jam a radio station’s phone lines with angry callers.

If you value free speech, the proper response is to say yes, thanks, when the radio host invites your campaign to send someone to debate the enemy on the air.

Obama’s campaign declined.

The Obama campaign bullied CNN and Fox TV out of airing the Ayers commercials. -Bloomberg

Must be some truth to what the Cons say.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 4:43 PM | Link to this

He is campaigning on the road Andy.

You would know this fact if you turned off fixed noise.

I heard rove spewing that same crap.

By Mrs.Godzilla

September 28, 2008 4:46 PM | Link to this

I suspect Obama’s momentum will justify another stunt from McCain Campaign Tip Top Secret Headquarters. What will it be? Roll the dice dude…..

I am permitting myself to believe that Senator Barack Obama, a man I trust, will be America’s next President, and it gives me hope.

Now, if I could only have the level of trust with the privately held election companies being used all over this land.

Make sure all the Aunties and Grannies and Uncles check their voters registration and offer them a ride to the polls. Got Nuns? Remind them too!

By Dusty

September 28, 2008 4:55 PM | Link to this

What a joke!!

Liberals are so anxious to get rid of the lady America loves that they go around guessing and giggling over Sarah Palin.

She is a great choice. Eat your heart out, liberals. She is here to stay and enjoy. AND YOU HAVE BIDEN!!! He’s a comedian that doesn’t even need Saturday Night Live. He’s a laugh all by himself!!

By getalife

September 28, 2008 4:55 PM | Link to this

They are refusing to run the cancer ads about McCain too.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 4:56 PM | Link to this

It may be trending in Obama’s direction, if things go back to the way they were last Wednesday, before McCain suspended his efforts and went to Washington, and then Obama joined him there, and the two of them joined the President in the White House, and the bickering began between Democrats and Republicans about whether McCain was helping or hurting by his presence there. Interestingly, no one suggested that Obama’s presence made a difference one way or the other. -Susan Estrich

Hahahahaha, aahhh yes, but that won’t stop Fake Temple Pilot from creating his own fairy tale.

By CJ

September 28, 2008 5:02 PM | Link to this

Still several weeks left, giving McCain and Republicans plenty of time to attack, distract, whine, lie, disenfranchise and pull newborn rabbits out of their a*******es (like the Supreme Court did in 2000) to carry McCain to the White House. One should never take a victory for granted when competing against unabashed thieves, liars and cheaters.

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 5:06 PM | Link to this

Palin 08: Nobody doesn’t like Sarah P.

Obama 08: He’s right for what’s left of America.

By Dusty

September 28, 2008 5:09 PM | Link to this

Poor Mrs. Godzie @4:46

Already setting up excuses to wail when Obama loses.

Here she goes:If I could only have the level of trust with the privately held election companies being used all over this land. If only…if only….

Oh my, shades of hanging chads, recount, recount, etc. etc. etc.

Get the excuses for defeat lined up, Mrs. Godzie. You are going to need every one of them.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 5:09 PM | Link to this

We will look back on the failure of Congress to reform the government-sponsored enterprises at the heart of the mortgage meltdown as one of the most expensive derelictions of its duty ever. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac used their lobbying clout, political contributions and even charitable largesse to charm or bully anyone demanding reform in their lending practices.

Indeed, the White House’s list calls for GSE reform is a long one, stretching as far back as April 2001. At that time, the administration’s first budget declared that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s growing dominance of the mortgage market was “a potential problem,” because “financial trouble of a large GSE could cause strong repercussions in financial markets, affecting Federally insured entities and economic activity.”

The response? Rep. Barney Frank, who now vilifies Republican House members for questioning a policy of throwing another $700 billion on the bonfire, insisted to the New York Times during the 2003 accounting scandal: “These two entities — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.”-Wall Street Journal

More of the same?

By getalife

September 28, 2008 5:30 PM | Link to this

Indeed. Throwing money by bribing in Iraq and now 700 billion by bailing out Wall Street.

Throwing money at the problem is always our government solution.

Business as usual.

By Midori

September 28, 2008 5:34 PM | Link to this

What a joke!!

that, dear banshee, describes you in a nutshell.

Liberals are so anxious to get rid of the lady America loves that they go around guessing and giggling over Sarah Palin.

actually, we like laughing at you better.

She is a great choice. Eat your heart out, liberals. She is here to stay and enjoy. AND YOU HAVE BIDEN!!!

yes we do have Biden. And I wouldn’t trade him for 100 Sarah “I can see Russia from my house” Palin.

He’s a comedian that doesn’t even need Saturday Night Live. He’s a laugh all by himself!!

which is why you’re working on your stand up act, isn’t it? Jealous are you, Crusty? That “ingrate” material sure ain’t cutting it. Ever try focus groups?

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 5:36 PM | Link to this

As Congress has debated a bailout for Wall Street, there is also an urgent need for aid to working families and for state governments struggling in this weak economy.-Philly Inquirer

Or we could start a national effort to lower energy prices by increasing domestic production, killing the ethanol monstrosity thereby turning our food back into food, immediately embark on construction of 30 or so nuclear power plants that would provide jobs for worker’s instead of the green weenie lobbyists.

But first, we would have to get rid of the democrats, wormy little socialists all, that obstruct each and every initiative that would strengthen our energy sectors and stop sending our treasures to foreign lands.

What ideas do they have?

Grow the freaking government.

Who will pay for this?

Duh.

Next bailout, please.

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 5:42 PM | Link to this

Neither candidate gained any ground. This was a safe play, opening gambit, pawn to King 4, fair shot across the bow, parry and deflect, demonstrate in your opponent’s front, feel each other out debate.

Too bad the CNN pollsters didn’t hook electrodes up to Jay Bookman to see who was winning the debate. Did anybody read his play by play? He really doesn’t understand our culture at all not to know how ridiculous he appeared with his idiotic updates.

The physical appearance factor, which favored Kennedy, and the fact that Nixon was caught glancing at his watch, suggests that Sarah palin won that debate.

Didn’t Obama sound like our president, though? McCain sounded like the old bitter cantankerosity he truly is.

Once again, though, Obama and the democratic writers dont know how to reply to “the surge”. McCain left himself wide open with, “We’re winning in Iraq”.

Oh? Win? What is the mission? What part of the mission is complete? What criteria are you citing to declare a win?

I want Sarah Palin 2b our prez. I love her now. I’m going to send her a valentines day card tomorrow so that mine will arrrive first, unless Osama Bin Laden sends her one first, the dirty rat, imagine how impressed with sarah palin osama bin laden is. I’ll bet he howls at the moon when he looks at her signed, 8X10 glossy.

I know I do. Sarah, please run for pres in ‘12. You will win. All America needs is a good five cent bikini wax.

Sarah ‘12: Nobody doesn’t like Sarah P.

By @@

September 28, 2008 5:48 PM | Link to this

Next bailout, please.

I was listening to OBlahMa this morning. “We can’t just help Wall Street (a blatant admission of guilt), we’ve gotta help Main Street. ‘We’ve gotta help the auto industry………’”

OBlahMa’s linin’ em up for us.

WTH? It’s not his money.

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 5:49 PM | Link to this

This bailout is the beginning of the end of the American Experiment. it’s so over.

Every last penny now is gone to Cheney-clones.

We’ll be rounded up by Blackwater Mercenaries soon and keeled to death. Those that are fit for slave labor will be spared.

They went after the joke-writers first during the Inquisition, the Third Reich, and the Patriot Act. Somehow, My ancestors and I managed to escape.

Does that mean I’m not funny?

No, really. Does it?

BTW: the reason nobody would explain clearly this bailout is because of the fifth amendment priveledge against self incrimination. That is, the felons involved are the only ones who understand what was done.

‘muff said.

Palin 08: Nobody doesn’t like Sarah P.

Obama 08: He’s right for what’s left of America.

By Dusty

September 28, 2008 5:57 PM | Link to this

Weak, Midori, very weak. Are you losing your touch? @5:34

I am going to roast a chicken for dinner. For some reason, I will think of you, Midori.

Then I shall take a poll on Cranberry Sauce so I will be sure my menu is correct, just like Bookman does.

For dessert, we will most surely have Sarah’s Favorite Apple Patriotic Pie. It is very popular here.

When my good dinner is laid out I shall say, just like McCain: EVERYTHING IS IN ORDER. LET’S GET STARTED. And then we say a “blessing” for our good fortune.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 6:00 PM | Link to this

Obama said Sarah is a good debater.

I doubt the gambler will roll the dice and allow her to debate.

Anyhoo, now they call it a buy in. So what do we get besides the bill.

Its all just so depressing.

Thank Goodness we have gone green.

By TW

September 28, 2008 6:01 PM | Link to this

Anybody notice that the bombings in Iraq are starting to pick back up now that the Sunni no longer get their ‘Surge allowance?’

By Midori

September 28, 2008 6:04 PM | Link to this

Weak, Midori, very weak. Are you losing your touch? @5:34

considering I was using your words, well, um, er………..

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 6:11 PM | Link to this

You wanna see some idiocy in action?:

“If after five years … the CBO decides that the American taxpayer has lost money in this, then there would be a fee on financial institutions,” Pelosi said, adding that she hoped the provision could be part of a final bailout deal.-Reuters

This person, this Pelosi, is the most wretched, intellectually crippled hack to ever represent the awesome power of the United States.

We look like a nation of thumb sucking diaper fillers, thanks to this dimwit.

If the financial institutions don’t make money, thereby not passing any along to the tax payers, what, do tell us, will there be left to tax?

I pray for you America.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 6:12 PM | Link to this

Ah, crusty is making witch’s stew.

By @@

September 28, 2008 6:15 PM | Link to this

Since the site kicked my link, I’ll have to spam.

Boiling it down to simple syrup. The sweet stuff rises to the top. The taxpayer gets gooey with the ifs and shoulds.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The proposal to bail out U.S. financial markets to the tune of up to $700 billion creates a lot of potential short-term winners, as well as some losers.

Wall Street and the banking industry are perhaps the biggest winners. Scores of banks and other financial institutions faced with going under stand to gain a lifeline that should allow them to start making loans again.

There are other winners, too, if the bailout works as intended: anyone soon trying to borrow money — for cars, student loans, even to open new credit card accounts.

Top executives at troubled financial institutions, on the other hand, are in the losing column because the proposal would limit their compensation and rules out “golden parachutes.”

Of course, these executives may take solace in knowing their jobs still exist.

Investors, including the millions of people who hold stock in their 401(k) and pension plans, should benefit.

Homeowners faced with foreclosure or those who have lost their homes get little help from the agreement. Nor will it help people whose houses are worth less than what they owe get refinancing or take out equity loans.

It would do little to halt the slide in home values that are one of the root causes of the current economic slowdown.

“It doesn’t deal with the fundamental problems that gave rise to the problem — or alleviate the credit crisis,” said Peter Morici, an economist and business professor at the University of Maryland

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke are potential winners.

In just a few months, they have remade Wall Street. If the plan helps to get the economy moving again, they may be remembered for having kept the financial crisis from spreading throughout the economy.

Bartlett said the plan is flawed, yet the alternative of doing nothing could be catastrophic.

After the heavy dose of new regulation in the agreement, New York will have a hard time claiming it is the center of the financial universe. That title may have shifted to Washington.

And they’ve done such a good job obscuring what should have been made obvious.

It looks like we, the taxpayers, should consider ourselves fortunate if we can be scraped from the pot.

Heck! I’m feeling the brittle.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 6:16 PM | Link to this

And you should have started praying eight years ago Andy. But you and your ilk cheered it on. She is trying to clean up your party’s mess.

Why do you hate your country?

By Dusty

September 28, 2008 6:19 PM | Link to this

No, getal, ya ol’ cajun coot,

I’m stirring the pot just like you.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 6:21 PM | Link to this

Weird how they fired AIG execs but keeping these. Wonder what the total lobbying spending bill was for this bailout.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 6:23 PM | Link to this

Take the spell off crusty.

You are killing our country.

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 6:26 PM | Link to this

At least Bookman isn’t trying to explain how this crisis became so unmanageable. I’ve yet to hear more than a third grade level narrative about the who what when and where. Of course that’s because anyone who was involved and could explain it is taking the fifth.

A trillion dollars, eh? The bailout is a trill. Iraq’s a trill. With a trill here, and a trill there, pretty soon you’re talkin’

A. Serious money.

B. A cuckoo clock

C. A marital aid

D. The terrorists win

E All of the above.

Question number 2: How many Gods do you see in your life?

A. One

B. Infinity

C. Zero

D. Allah the above.

If you get more than two right on this test, you’re qualified to figure the math for the bailout.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 6:29 PM | Link to this

al-Gitmo: She is a hack and a two time World Champion Moron.

She should get the top of her head hinged so that the moonbats could save themselves the time of having to program her, they could just drop their mindless ideas right into that empty skull.

This is the same mental midget that has no idea that you drill for natural gas, but yet natters on like a lunatic about the environment.

Egads, man, put down the pipe.

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 6:36 PM | Link to this

Palin 08: Nobody doesn’t like Sarah P.

Obama 08: He’s right for what’s left of America.

Anyone notice that duhng has gone mad posting comments 24/7 365? There’s nothing left of this guy. I have to apologize for spinning his head off like that. I’m sorry andy. You deserve better than this, I thought you could take it. I was wrong.

He’s even infected Dusty with his madness. That part’s not my fault. Dusty, get as far away from your pc as possible. Take a cruise. Anything. Get away. You’re not too far gone. There’s still hope for you.

Stay tuned for another episode of the SnowWitch.

Obama/Biden 08: It’s true that Politics makes for strange bedfellows, but wouldn’t it be nice to have a chocolate on the pillows?

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 6:39 PM | Link to this

Dallas and the Redskins are playing one for the ages, folks. Get over to Fox and witness this game. the season is officially on.

By Midori

September 28, 2008 6:40 PM | Link to this

Hey Andy,

watching the Redskins/Dallas game?

By Political Foreskin

September 28, 2008 6:43 PM | Link to this

The SnowWitch. episode plenty.

The Black Knight knelt before the SnowWitch and pleaded for her support on the bailout.

The SnowWitch spat as she barely acknowleged his chivalrous stoop. As she stepped past the supplicant, she paused, and spat again, this time striking the Black Knight squarely in his left eye as he steeled his gaze. He cried out and fell backwards. His aides rushed to prevent his collapse, for he was in full armor, but they were late, and with a clang he struck the ground. The SnowWitch was on him in a second, her 6 inch hair pin at the ready, poised directly beneath the exposes underarm of the helpless knight. She jabbed quickly, and pierced the Knight’s skin where he applied his Right Guard everyday. He yelped meekly. “You’re going down on Saturday. Believe it.” The SnowWitch was so clever with her hairpin that nobody noticed her felony.

“He’s okay,” exclaimed the SnowWitch as she offered her own hand to help the Black Knight onto his feet. She disengaged as his entourage finally massed together and hoisted the knight upwards.

Saturday was the night for the nest debate. And now the Black Knight had one less useful arm.

SnowWitch 08: Pins and needles, needles and pins, it’s a happy Knight who grins.

By Borat Obama

September 28, 2008 6:46 PM | Link to this

We’re in deep doo-doo as a country if some of you on this board are actually old enough and allowed to vote.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 6:48 PM | Link to this

Obama: McCain Gets No Credit for Wall Street Bailout-Fox News

1) Most mature adults would let the American people research the facts and make their own decisions on matters such as these, but the Pompous Little Aristocrat feels as though you are too stupid to figure this out on your own, apparently.

2) Should this whole enterprise fail, guess who just freed McBushie from any blame, will not the words of this moron be given their own spotlight and marquee?

3) The American public is about, oh, 90% against this bailout, they look upon it as a handout to Wall Street, so of course, send your little wind up socialist out to claim all the credit for it, if I were you, I’d have him hand out blank checks the the capitalists live on TV.

Money shot: Take the economy off the table and restore national security to it’s rightful place as the number 1 concern of the voters, thank you very much.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 6:57 PM | Link to this

Prediction with 10:33 left in the fourth quarter.

Tony Romo, geez.

By Midori

September 28, 2008 6:59 PM | Link to this

Clinton Portis might have something to say about that, Andy.

By Rocco Pedestrian

September 28, 2008 7:01 PM | Link to this

Every time McCain or Palin gets a tough question, the response is either: Support our Troops, Pray for Guidance, or something about Hanoi. Obama needs to point this out and encourage us to chant U-S-A, U-S-A! every time they respond with empty patriotism to intelligent questions. It’ll sound like the RNC delegates trying to drown out the protesting veterans at the RNC!

By Midori

September 28, 2008 7:12 PM | Link to this

where ya at, Andy???

9 pt game!!!!

By RW-(the original)

September 28, 2008 7:14 PM | Link to this

That includes just one day of post-debate polling, suggesting that Obama could move up still farther in the next couple of days.

Yes, Jay B, I’m sure Obambi will be up 40 by Tuesday. In fact why don’t we just call off the elections and that that little Hugo Chavez wannabe get started with his rewrite of the Constitution.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 7:26 PM | Link to this

He almost did it.

By RW-(the original)

September 28, 2008 7:33 PM | Link to this

Four attorneys have told the Tribune in recent days that federal prosecutors have telephoned them and other attorneys either with news Rezko is talking, or armed with details only Rezko could know. The lawyers speculated prosecutors are using the preliminary talks with Rezko to shake loose more cooperation from other witnesses.

Guess who the prosecutor is? Patrick Fitzgerald.

Maybe you’ll get to celebrate Fitzmas after all. You were after corruption regardless of the party affiliation weren’t you?

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 7:36 PM | Link to this

Watching the Republican party self-destruct is really a sight. History in the making. The Republicans are now behaving like ravenous little animals in the wood. When food is in short supply, they don’t abort their young, they cook them over an open pit — well, at least some of them still cook their meat. When the hunt doesn’t yield enough pork, they don’t live with the hunger pains, they turn cannibal. You do Hannibal proud, little Republicans, with your calls of the wild. Awooooo. @@. Awoooo.

By Midori

September 28, 2008 7:38 PM | Link to this

who are you talking to, RW?

you should know that I am not speaking to you, as you stood me up Friday night.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 7:44 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer: Have you ever considered branching out, you know, finding something new to post instead of the same tired paragraph, over and over and over again?

Or have you reached your intellectual limit?

By getalife

September 28, 2008 7:46 PM | Link to this

I believe the Constitution has already been rewritten.

Fitz let rove off the hook so I would not get my hopes up RW.

By Borat Obama

September 28, 2008 7:50 PM | Link to this

AJC/DNC Management, I reiterate my last point. Kinda scary knowing some in here…”Taxpayer”…are old enough and able to vote.

By RW-(the original)

September 28, 2008 7:57 PM | Link to this

getalife,

I wouldn’t be too sure, Fitz wants the Governor and the Mayor pretty badly. Obama shouldn’t really be involved other than more proof of his lousy judgment.

Midori,

That wasn’t you Friday? No wonder I was enjoying it.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 8:05 PM | Link to this

Oh look, the Head Urinal, Andy, opens his trap and speaks again. Andy, one of the few remaining believers in trickle down economics. How’s that warm yellow rain working for you, Andy. As for intellect, that is something well beyond your grasp given that you still have not even mastered Fiskars and Elmers, little person. Now, you have my permission to go back to your Sarah doll.

As for Borat, speak your peace and let me see if you have the brain functions needed for an intellectually stimulating conversation.

By Midori

September 28, 2008 8:05 PM | Link to this

touche, RW.

she told me you’re a bad tipper.

By ron

September 28, 2008 8:08 PM | Link to this

It isn’t a bailout anymore folks,It’s being called a buyin.It’s the old change the name to something more palatable trick.

Like when we went from suicide bombers to homicide bombers.Who decided this?I didn’t get to vote.

By AmVet

September 28, 2008 8:11 PM | Link to this

OK, you doom and gloomers.

Don’t get your panties all in a wad and quit being so thin-skinned. For gawds sakes, Dusty called me a low brow, flat head, no chin neanderthal earlier!

It was kind of a reverse Scopes monkey trial sort of thing over at Wootens.

VERY clever…

But now for a much more important topic than mulattoes and albinos, theocrats and non-theists:

The regular season pennant races are over, save one.

The Pale Hose stave off elimination and the Chitown Series is still a possibility. (As is an all LA Series). But either the Tigers (who played more like tabby cats) or Twinkies will have something to say about the White Sox moving on.

The Mets close out Shea in typical Mets fashion. El foldo redux. Those poor schmuck Mets fans have got to be a pretty miserable bunch tonight even with 44 years of memories.

And the Yanks play out the final season at Yankee Stadium with a 9-1 heads high finish.

I know, I know - buck the Fosox.

And the UGA Perennial Pretenders, er contenders, get it out of their system early this year…

By @@

September 28, 2008 8:15 PM | Link to this

Uhmmmm Taxpayer? May I once again direct you to RW’s video exposing the dems fighting against regulation of Fannie and Freddie, the lending house that was at the root of this whole pile of sheep chit. Or should I say cheep sh*t?

Awoooooo indeed.

Say baaa b-b-b-baaaa Dolly girl.

By getalife

September 28, 2008 8:21 PM | Link to this

RW,

Yeah, Chicago corruption is historic like Louisiana.

You should see all the heat Jindal took for passing ethics reform. I have to give him credit. He is trying and not bad for a wingnut. So far.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 8:27 PM | Link to this

Ummmmm, @@. Quit trying to emulate you talking Sarah doll. Further, you may direct yourself in any direction you choose but that’s as far as it goes. Now, please feel free to go back and learn some real history and when you can tell me what impact those 263 pages of under the radar legislation from Gramm had on our economic mess, we can converse. Don’t worry about my well being though — I won’t be holding my breath waiting on a response. Now off with you. You obviously have sheep on the brain so you might want to get back to your Sarah doll imitating.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 8:31 PM | Link to this

That’s the spirit Taxpayer!

Double down on the Sarah doll nonsense.

Now we’re getting somewhere….

By getalife

September 28, 2008 8:36 PM | Link to this

Tipper?

Are we talking stripper?

They say it is for school but I am no fool.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 8:42 PM | Link to this

Come on Andy. You can do better than that. Why don’t you revert to that format you were stuck in a few weeks ago. Do you remember? The rants and the [expletive deleted] pieces. You were certainly at your finest back then or at least the finest I’ve ever experienced first-hand from you. Let’s see, how did that reaction from you to me go…it included one of those rants…it included “…you lying [expletive deleted]…” or something like that, didn’t it Andy. Let’s see, are we getting somewhere yet, Andy? You tell me, little person.

By Felix

September 28, 2008 8:49 PM | Link to this

Very encouraging, but it’s the Electoral College that matters.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 8:57 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer: You know, I sense a slight case of dementia in your last little rant, most afflicted like you only remember bits and pieces of highly traumatic episodes that had a major effect on them.

I sincerely apologize if I frightened you earlier with my wit and sarcasm and I truly hope that you don’t dwell over it too much longer.

These things never turn out well.

Get well soon, dude.

By @@

September 28, 2008 9:12 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer, what are you b-b-baaaaaing about?

Gramm-Leach-Bliley was essential to our ability to compete. The banks were finding ways to circumvent the restrictions anyway. We needed the freedoms to compete with European banks who had already granted their banks the freedom to offer customers insurance, investment or commercial banking services.

Heck, if it was such bad legislation, then why did Joe Biden vote for it? Why did Larry Summers (OBlahMa adviser) support it? along with Robert Rubin (another OBlahMa adviser)? He supported it too. Why in a democrat’s name did Bill Clinton sign it?

Right back-at-cha Dolly girl.

Now I’ve gotta get some work done before having to go to work tomorrow. I’ll be working hard to b-b-bail your sheepish blogging behind out. The credit will be flowing freely so liberals, like you can do what they do……..and do…….and do.

They blog for government benefits.

No need to feel guilty ‘cause I LOVE MY JOB.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 9:28 PM | Link to this

Andy, you could not offer a sincere apology for your rantings because that would require a change in your basic character and belief system and that is well beyond your mental capacity. So, I’ll just look forward to more of your typical outlays of cut and paste dribble — complete with your signature “urinal” rantings — tomorrow to scroll past. Further, if you wish to receive effective treatment yourself, feel free to seek out your local veterinarian although given your advanced stage of illness I don’t have high expectations and you shouldn’t either. So, enjoy your end of times with your Sarah doll, little person.

Good night and don’t forget that night light.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 9:33 PM | Link to this

@@,

Really! Can’t you even locate the correct documentation. Good gosh, girl. I give you a simple task…back to your doll. Now off with you.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 9:37 PM | Link to this

The truth is that many of these Republican politicians have sold a bill of goods to their constituency and now they can’t live up to it. The [Republican] Bush administration has already succumbed to the bailout as the only hope for saving our country from a severe recession or likely worse scenario. This splinter group of house Republicans along with Newt and a few others are making waves in an attempt to save face but only the most hard-core extremist members of the Republican base are even willing to hear it any more.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 9:40 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer: It is obvious that you are obsessed with me, why deny it?

You “scroll past,” yeah, sure thing, funny how you remember every single post that I have made the last few years and can recite them word for word every time I trick you into doing it.

You know what I am talking about and I would really like to play along with your denial charade, but then I would feel guilty for needlessly delaying your recovery.

Do make an attempt though, you will be enormously grateful to me, I can only imagine the suffering you must endure.

Try it one time, I am not obsessed with Andy anymore.

It’s better than being locked up in the looney bin, sweetheart.

I know, play with your Sarah doll, yawn.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 9:58 PM | Link to this

Andy, your memory has really burned out hasn’t it. Look back through the posts, little person, and see first-hand where the obsession lies — your lap, little person of little mental capacity. So why don’t you go back to your Sarah doll, obsessed one. What will you try next, Andy. Amuse me, won’t you. Will you resort to falsely calling me a liar again (by the way, that actually makes you the liar) or continue with your more common approach. You are so predictable, given your consistent “methodology” so change it up a little bit for me, obsessed one.

P.S. You might try looking at your post that I’ve pasted below for this particular thread just in case you are having difficulty figuring out where you started with the obsessive behavior this time, Andy:

“By AJC/DNC Management September 28, 2008 7:44 PM | Link to this Taxpayer: Have you ever considered branching out, you know, finding something new to post instead of the same tired paragraph, over and over and over again? Or have you reached your intellectual limit?”

By Dusty

September 28, 2008 10:00 PM | Link to this

Well, I stopped by to post a goodnight endearment and …lo and behold…..AmVet has MISQUOTED ME.

I did NOT say he looked like a Neanderthal, i.e. flat head, low brow and no chin. I DON’T KNOW WHAT AMVET LOOKS LIKE. That is why I asked What do you look like, AmVet?

Now, I admit, I HAD IMAGINED the looks of AmVet. Something like: a cone head, hairy nose and two protruding incissors. But that was a mere guess. He MAY not be that good looking.

So..with that correction I say…..

Bon nuit, mon amis. XXXXX

By AmVet

September 28, 2008 10:07 PM | Link to this

Like I said, that Dusty is VERY clever.

For a nine year old…

Actually it is quite weird that she would imagine what I look like, isn’t it? If Mr. Dusty only knew, he’d cut off her burgeoning blogging addiction!

(I think she’s been skipping out on Bible study).

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 10:11 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer: In the midst of your foamy little reply, you forgot that someone else agreed with my post.

Let’s call it a group encounter, shall we?

Try it one time, kook, I am not obsessed with Andy anymore.

By Dusty

September 28, 2008 10:17 PM | Link to this

Yep, cone head, hairy nose, and two protruding incissors!!!!!!!!!!ooooweeee mama mia….

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 10:32 PM | Link to this

Andy, please go back to my 9:58 post and read it until you understand it or have someone else read it to you and explain it to you. Might I suggest Jay Bookman, you obsessed little person. I think your paranoia is surfacing a little early, it’s not even midnight, little person. Now please concentrate on your Sarah doll. It’s in need of all of your attention.

By Borat Obama

September 28, 2008 10:36 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer, you calling someone obsessed! God what a hypocrite.

By GaLiberal

September 28, 2008 10:41 PM | Link to this

While I will vote FOR Obama (I will never again vote FOR a Rethuglicon), he was not impressive during the debate. He was so busy choosing his words carefully that he looked hesitant and unsure. Not qualities you want in a President. Obama also let McCain repeat lies that the Rethuglicons have made the centerpiece of their campaign (they have nothing else). Again, Obama should have been more firm instead of just moving on to the next topic. Obama needs to hit the Rethuglicons head on with these lies they keep repeating. There are too many people already that believe Obama is some closet Muslim terrorist supporter.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 10:42 PM | Link to this

Little person! Little person!

Sarah doll!

Let’s not get hysterical Nancy.

Geez.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 10:43 PM | Link to this

Those Republicans are sure trying hard to get some brownie points built up with the voters before the election. They’re just doing all kinds of stupid little things like going public with their “I didn’t like it before I did like it” and “I held my nose and voted for it”. What a load of crap. Where have I heard that word before…

In a closed-door session with House Republicans, Minority Leader John A. Boehner just called the financial rescue deal a “crap sandwich” – then said he’ll vote for it when it comes to the floor Monday. House Republicans are the key to the bill’s passage – Speaker Nancy Pelosi said earlier today that it’s a “bipartisan” bill and will need “bipartisanship” to pass – and it now appears that a substantial number of them will put cast their votes in favor of it. According to a source in the room, the plan has so far won endorsements from Minority Whip Roy Blunt, who negotiated it on behalf of the House Republicans; Eric Cantor, the chief deputy whip; and Paul Ryan, a hard-core conservative from Wisconsin who may hold more sway with conservatives on this issue than any other member of the House. But like Boehner, Ryan wasn’t exactly happy about how things have unfolded. Referring to the situation facing the country – and not the bill itself – Ryan said, “This sucks.”

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 10:49 PM | Link to this

Borat,

Please refer to my earlier reply to you if you wish to prove yourself less than obsessive. If you recall, you, just like little Andy, initiated the contact. So, show me what you’ve got, hypocrite.

By Hellinahandbasket

September 28, 2008 10:52 PM | Link to this

Instead of writing ‘Obama gaining momentum’ write the truth…which is the media and extremist liberals are pushing him forward in the polls by using the Saul Alinsky rules of ‘war’. And this is a war to the extremist liberals. Although they like to say they are compassionate, inclusive, caring and accepting of all lifestyles and ideas they in reality are liars…they will only accept those who believe the same as they do. And Obama is just a means to an end for them, so they wage war against Sarah Palin’s minor chilcren using the 20 yr old brainwashed Kernell’s son to do their bidding, they lie, insinuate and dance around but never answer any questions posed to them. And unfortunately the extremist liberals have a choke hold on the media and control the wire services…just ask why the AP pulls stories like the one about the hacker and Palin’s emails or the one about Sandy Burger stuffing secret documents down his shorts. The bias of the extremist liberals and the measures to which they will win is incredible and dishonest and that is how Obama is gaining momentum…by lies, deceit, deflection and insinuations.

By RW-(the original)

September 28, 2008 10:56 PM | Link to this

I wonder how things are going in the Monroe/Athens corridor? Oh well.

The BoSox just put the kibosh on the Yanks thoughts of a 90 win season. Good bye New York, and this goes for both of your teams, good riddance. Why don’t you celebrate your futility by blowing up both your stadiums.

Phillies/Angels is my prediction. Maybe that Las Vegas odds obsessed moron that posts here can run the numbers.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 11:07 PM | Link to this

I believe Obama is the better of the two main presidential candidates and I’m with you, GaLiberal, regarding these so-called Republicans. I want nothing to do with them and I sure won’t be voting for any of them. I don’t know enough about the Constitution party to make a call there but I don’t care for any of the other third party candidates. As it stands now, I’ll most likely vote for Obama also.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 11:15 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer: Thanks for the pro McCain message at 11:07.

By @@

September 28, 2008 11:20 PM | Link to this

Taxpayer:

I’m done with the laundry, and off to bed. Why in the name of democrats would I be willing to read a 263 page document when the gist of it’s intended purpose serves just fine?

You seem to have a lot of idle time on your hands. Feel free to read it yourself giving me your brief synopsis.

Really!……is hanging around here projecting your inadequacies on everyone else the only constructive thing in your life? In my wildest imagination, I couldn’t settle for such a pathetic existence.

Ask the government to up your benefits. Get out. Make friends. Volunteer. Do something that’ll make you feel better about yourself.

Fino ad un altro giorno in cui you’ re sensibilita piu bassa di uno snake’ pancia di s.

Buona notte.

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 11:21 PM | Link to this

Hey, you retiring GOPers take the heat on this bailout. After all, you don’t have to construct a facade to appease your voters any more. Come one, what do you say. Take one for your party. Come on. You guys are going down anyway. So, how ‘bout it.

Blunt lobbies 10 retiring GOPers From the freedom-is-just-another-word-for-nothin’-left-to-lose file: Minority Whip Roy Blunt, top negotiator for the House Republicans, is huddling right now with about 10 retiring Republican reps get their votes, Patrick O’Connor reports, citing GOP staffers. Illinois Rep. Ray LaHood reportedly encouraged the lawmakers in the room to back the proposal, telling them, “We’re not going to face repudiation from the voters.”

By Taxpayer

September 28, 2008 11:34 PM | Link to this

@@,

I see you have once again resorted to your usual game in your vain attempt to save face, Republican style. Now run off to bed and try not to bother me unless you have something to report on your progress with that document. You do realize that this approach of yours is really old and just plain boring. Why do you think you get the replies that you get from everyone that your pester. Study them and learn.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 28, 2008 11:41 PM | Link to this

Duh Bears.

By GodHatesTrash

September 29, 2008 6:35 AM | Link to this

L-o-l-a’s gonna “win” the next debate.

Because you red staters love morons.

By AJC/DNC Management

September 29, 2008 6:53 AM | Link to this

Blessed Hallelujah!

Thee Urinal/Jihad has finally come to the rescue of thee Christians:

Hundreds of Iraqi Christians rallied in northern Iraq on Sunday to protest a new election law they say denies them their rights because it doesn’t guarantee their minority any seats on provincial councils.-Urinal/Jihad

We have finally revoked separation of Church and state!

Onward Christian soldiers!

By Ted Striker

September 29, 2008 8:06 AM | Link to this

This AJC/DNC Management dude hasn’t offered up anything sensible since he learned to type ASDFJKL:

By Cal

September 29, 2008 12:26 PM | Link to this

OBAMA TRUTH SQUAD

This is the latest attempt of the Obama campaign to target ads that Obama, well, doesn’t like. The Obama campaign is asking law enforcement in Missouri to target anyone who “lies or runs a misleading TV ad” during the campaign. Prosecutors and sheriffs, at the request of the Obama campaign, are jumping on board to “keep the truth” and remind people that Obama is a Christian who wants to cut taxes for everyone making under $250,000 a year. But they will also “respond” to any statements that violate Missouri ethics laws.

Missouri Governor Matt Blunt has responded to Barack Obama’s “abusive use of Missouri law enforcement.” Here’s a quote from the governor:

“This abuse of the law for intimidation insults the most sacred principles and ideals of Jefferson. I can think of nothing more offensive to Jefferson’s thinking than using the power of the state to deprive Americans of their civil rights. The only conceivable purpose of Messrs. McCulloch, Obama and the others is to frighten people away from expressing themselves, to chill free and open debate, to suppress support and donations to conservative organizations targeted by this anti-civil rights, to strangle criticism of Mr. Obama, to suppress ads about his support of higher taxes, and to choke out criticism on television, radio, the Internet, blogs, e-mail and daily conversation about the election.”

Appealing to the Justice Department? Sending threatening letters to station managers who air controversial ads? And now getting law enforcement to “respond” to statements on behalf of the campaign. Just stop and think for a moment what things will be like when this menace occupies the White House.

Yes, I thought this would be interesting to all you Obama supporters who thinks he follows the constitution. Freedom of speech?