Weather

Mostly Cloudy

76° F

Pollen 8

| Traffic

Home > Jay Bookman > Archives > 2008 > August > 14 > Entry

No majority in America

I wrote this piece for Friday’s editorial page, and I hesitate to throw it out amongst you for fear of where some of you may take the topic.

Be adult.

NBC might be trying to convince you otherwise, but Michael Phelps is far from the only face of America at the Olympic Games in Beijing.

American Olympic sprinter Tyson Gay is of African heritage. Patricia Cardenas, an attacker on the U.S. women’s water polo team, is Hispanic and lists hip-hop and Spanish rock ’n’ roll as her favorite forms of music. Eva Lee, an American badminton star, was born in Hong Kong and partners in women’s doubles with Mesinee “May” Mangkalakiri, a Thai-American.

They and millions of others around this great country embody what you might call the changing complexion of America, a country that by 2042 will have no majority ethnic group, according to projections by the federal government. As a new report documents, immigration and higher birth rates among minority groups are rapidly altering the makeup of our classrooms, our workplaces and even our Olympic teams.

And what will that change mean to the America of 2042?

Very, very little. We are a nation and a people defined more by shared values and goals than by ethnicity. The Founding Fathers may have been almost exclusively English, but they preached ideals that they saw as universal, even if the mind-set of the time prevented them from seeing that “universal” included the tribes that were native to this continent and the slaves that had been forcibly imported from Africa.

Today’s U.S. citizens may look less like the Continental Congress and more like a general session of the United Nations, but they are no less American than Thomas Jefferson or Martha Washington were. That reality can’t be lost on the rest of the world, watching Americans of all hues and appearances proudly standing on the awards podiums in Beijing while “The Star-Spangled Banner” plays.

It shouldn’t be lost on those of us at home, either.

Permalink | Comments (70) | Post your comment |

Comments

By AJC/DNC Management

August 14, 2008 4:44 PM | Link to this

Do thee Olympics not seem awfully whiny this year?

Tearful judo king ‘empty’ after Beijing humiliation…

Swedish wrestler throws away medal in Olympic hissy fit…

As Chinese women gymnasts take gold, Americans hint of cheating…

It’s like a lib paradise, whining and moaning set to thee glorious backdrop of socialism.

It’s a whiny little world we live in, ain’t it?

By AJC/DNC Management

August 14, 2008 4:47 PM | Link to this

Well, that’s it for Ivan:

Video: Georgian TV reporter shot by Russian sniper during live broadcast carries on with her report with bleeding arm

Soon as the Pinko Media finds out that the Rooskies are shooting at the TV Babes, they’ll be calling for all out war against them.

Shall we start the bombing now?

(By the way, that girl is just what I’m looking for, hahaha, shrugging off a gunshot wound and dissing the shooter’s little “weapon.” Dude!)

Oh, and by the way, John Bandaid Kerry would be on his way stateside with his wittle Purple Heart.

By Dusty

August 14, 2008 4:53 PM | Link to this

Bravo, Bookman. Thatsa good one. Makes one proud and all that stuff. But really, I think you did a fine job explaining just what makes out country the world’s best and why we love it so much. Keep it up!!

By Bud Wiser

August 14, 2008 4:59 PM | Link to this

As long as there are the individual ethnic groups that keep pushing for more power for their group, more money, more ‘reparations’, etc., there will never be this homogeneous little blend you libs all seem to think exists somewhere, living all in harmony sipping a Coca Cola and singing songs.

Get real.

By Poste Haste

August 14, 2008 5:14 PM | Link to this

Too bad we all dont look like Cheney, eh?

I walked around northpoint mall last night and I was the only fat aging baby boomer with glasses. People were grabbing their children and changing directions or aisles. Store security was following me around. This was one time my FUBU jockstrap failed me. If only they had known what I was wearing….

By Ray

August 14, 2008 5:56 PM | Link to this

The thing that I worry about with minorities being the majority of the population is who is going to pay their bills. Who will do the working in this edenistic society that the libs embrace. Already 43M people do not pay taxes in this country and the number will no doubt go much higher when the politicians who embrace the ethnic vote pander for more votes and the non-tax paying members of our great nation look to the government for more and more of what working people EARN. We have the most outmoded and unfair tax code on the planet, preying on the working people to pay other peoples bills. How long can this last? Apparently until 2042.

By AJC/DNC Management

August 14, 2008 6:05 PM | Link to this

Well, well, the truth comes out, as it always does:

ANWR could become the fastest way to generate hundreds of billions of dollars of new oil. But laws need to be changed to fast track the leasing (there are 11 litigation choke points) and to create special courts to expedite environmental issues, as recently proposed by Rep. Michele Bachman (R-Minn.). Under current laws, it could indeed take 10 years to produce oil, compared to two or three years for the actual drilling and pumping. Additionally, leasing is done slowly, thanks to laws written when oil was plentiful. Such laws were designed to gain maximum upfront money for the government, not for speed. For example, BP recently paid $1.2 billion for a new offshore lease, some 400 miles East of Canada’s Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay. The cost and distance gives some idea of industry expectations as to the extent of oil reserves.

Its reserves are estimated at 10 billion barrels by the U.S. Geological Survey, compared to 32 billion nationwide, almost a 33 percent increase. At full production, ANWR would add a million barrels per day to U.S. production. At $100 per barrel, this would equal over $36 billion per year that would not need to be spent on foreign oil. It would also create some 700,000 well-paying jobs, according to a Wharton Econometrics study [pdf].

Why do the libs hate you?

By WeWereHereFirst

August 14, 2008 6:07 PM | Link to this

The founding fathers may have been almost exclusively English but that is merely a result of their refusal to acknowledge all the native tribes who were clearly here first. In fact, once a sufficient number of European immigrants arrived from England, France, Ireland, Germany, Spain, Portugal, etc., the surviving natives of now long-forgotten and noble tribes such as the Mahican, Pequot, and Creek — to name but a few — indeed became the United State’s first true minorities. Nowadays, these once proud peoples are relegated to such menial tasks as owning and operating major casinos for the benefit of a nation of conquerors with nothing better to do with their spoils than risk them all in a game of chance. For that, the minorities are grateful but they will never forgive the white man for the needless slaughter of the bison. After all, that other red meat is just a bunch of bull.

By "The Corporal"

August 14, 2008 6:42 PM | Link to this

Jay:

Your heart is in the right place on this one and I honestly wish you were correct but I am also a realist. What other countries have managed to long survive such diversity?

I fear for all of our progeny (regardless of ethnicity) because a country without a solid ethnic majority will become extremely unstable and hopelessly “Balkanized” with all of the terrible consequences thereof.

Just look at today’s headlines regarding Russia/Georgia. A tyrannical government can sometimes hold the pieces together but a democracy is set up to self-destruct.

I pray otherwise. Time will tell.

By Believer

August 14, 2008 6:50 PM | Link to this

I believe that the Olympics have lost their appeal to many in the United States due to a lack of proper advertisement. I remember getting all excited, in my younger years, at the very prospect of watching the winter Olympics every time I heard that announcer on ABC — or was it NBC or CBS — make that perplexing puzzler of a proclamation, “…the thrill of victory or the agony of de feet.” I would stay literally glued to the black and white, waiting and watching and wondering. Who’s feet will be in agony and how will it happen. It was several years later before I learned that the announcer was saying “defeat”. Needless to say, I was saddened and somehow strangely relieved at the same time.

By Tared and feathered

August 14, 2008 6:57 PM | Link to this

post haste you’ve been exposed as a troll posting under the names pigskin life, OZ, nice to fool, fruitless objections, harry willis, analcord truth watch and on and on and on. Go away you fake a* loser.

By RW-(the original)

August 14, 2008 7:11 PM | Link to this

What should be lost on us is all the hyphens.

By Frederick Douglass

August 14, 2008 7:27 PM | Link to this

If we could all be tow headed and blue of eye, this would be a wonderful country, simply flawless.

By hillbilly ragger

August 14, 2008 7:48 PM | Link to this

Yep. One of those things that makes me damn proud to be an American.

By Believer

August 14, 2008 8:10 PM | Link to this

Well, I could just as easily blame it all on the space program. If they hadn’t kept yelling “abort, abort” before just about every single attempted launch, who knows where we might be today. Some said that it was due to the process that had been in effect since its inception but a few disagreed with that view. So, here we are today still in need of immigrants just to fill all the vacant houses. That problem alone seems to be one of Olympic proportion and certainly worthy of more air time.

By AJC/DNC Management

August 14, 2008 8:24 PM | Link to this

“There are many credible members of the scientific community who have questioned the theory of global warming, and now we have some scientists actually suggesting the earth’s temperatures may be entering a period of dramatic cooling,” said Doherty, R-Warren and Hunterdon. “With this growing level of scientific uncertainty, it makes no sense to enact a new set of economically damaging regulations prompted by the global warming hysteria of recent years.”

Well, it makes no sense unless your goal is economically damaging the economy of the United States.

By "The Corporal"

August 14, 2008 8:55 PM | Link to this

To Frederick Douglass:

You miss the point. It’s not the color of the jell’o - it’s the “fruit cocktail” mix that eventually causes the problem.

By Frederick Douglass

August 14, 2008 9:00 PM | Link to this

Corporal, in general, you’re a derelict!

By Bud Wiser

August 14, 2008 9:05 PM | Link to this

Does that mean that in 2042 white Americans will be the majority minority? Don’t think I’ll be around that long. (sigh)

By Hillbilly Deluxe

August 14, 2008 9:17 PM | Link to this

If I’m still around in 2042 I’ll be in my late 80s. Probably at that point nobody will pay attention to what I have to say anyhow… ….Kinda like now….(a little levity)

By Believer

August 14, 2008 9:27 PM | Link to this

I can relate, Hillbilly. Some of my best work just sits around, unnoticed.

By AJC/DNC Management

August 14, 2008 9:31 PM | Link to this

I can’t stand it any longer:

I wrote this piece for Friday’s editorial page, and I hesitate to throw it out amongst you for fear of where some of you may take the topic.

Be adult.

That is so Cynthia Tucker.

In their never ending quest to neuter America, the “elitists” of the Pinko Nation are willing to give anything a try, destroy the economy, pump up some tosspot dictatorship into the second coming of the Third Reich, flood our cities with low rent house slaves that they can pay a pittance to tend to their yards and deliver their “news” papers.

Correct me if I’m wrong but that is the same thing Jefferson Davis had in mind.

And check this out, there is the added bonus of crowding the taxpayers out of the schools and hospitals that the leftists get to turn right around and whine and moan about Bushie’s “failed policies.”

And use as an excuse to grow government.

Yes, Amexico, you should be concerned about your future.

Why do you think all these foreigners want to come here in the first place?

Could it be all the freebies that the dimwitocrats want to lavish on them?

I pray for you, America.

By RW-(the original)

August 14, 2008 10:55 PM | Link to this

I can’t stand it any longer:

AJC/DNC-M,

I agree, the people that see every single issue in terms of race are the very same ones that feel the need to post a ridiculous warning about what their readers might post. Maybe Jay will tell us who the race baters he’s worried about are, but I doubt it.

I just see Americans.

Would you like to man up, Jay?

Martin Luther King Jr has already weighed in.

By "The Corporal"

August 14, 2008 11:26 PM | Link to this

To Federick Douglas:

Why is it you are so touchy, can’t take a joke, won’t debate the issues, and are so into name calling.

Childish …………..

By Jake

August 15, 2008 9:57 AM | Link to this

Okay, illegal aliens are not Americans Jay. They are still Chinese or Bolivian or Mexican or whatever they were before they invaded. Secondly, it’s not the racial/ethnic composition that’s the problem, it’s the 400 million plus! It’s no coincidence that the two countries with the largest populations have millions of their people living in third world squalor. At some point, 400 or 600 million, it will become the same here.

By Paul

August 15, 2008 10:03 AM | Link to this

It’s gonna be a slowwwwww blog day if this is the only topic.

Mrs. Godzilla, ITN, AJC/DNC Management, where are you when we need you?

By DUMB AMERICANS

August 15, 2008 10:07 AM | Link to this

Who allowed the bankers to seize control of the country by allowing the federal reserve to coin money in 1913?

Who sold out the country by enacting the income tax in 1913?

Who caused the stock market crash and then ordered all the citizens to turn in their gold to the bankers?

Who created the ponzi scheme called social security and the stock market?

Who eliminated the common law judiciary system and replaced it with military courts where every case is treated as a business transaction?

Who caused the U.S. Corporation to be bankrupt in 1933 and be in a state of emergency ever since?

Who took the U.S. into wars and further debt thus forcing us to give up more of our liberty in the name of protection.

Who created public schools to miseducate and indoctrinate the masses to conform?

Who took your currency of the gold standard and made it totally worthless?

Government spending to boost GDP is not capitalism.

You live in a communist country and do not even know it.

slavery is when you work twelve months and do not have the ability to determine how the fruits of your labor are used.

You spend four months of every year slaving to pay the U.S. Corporation.

Yep.

Citizen vs citizen, which one are you?

By Mrs. Godzilla

August 15, 2008 10:12 AM | Link to this

Wasn’t it Pocahontas who said in 1610, “Look at all those white people! There goes the neighborhood”

Funny how what goes around comes around ain’t it?

I love how colorful America is.

By AJC/DNC Management

August 15, 2008 10:14 AM | Link to this

Any normal person sees suicide bombing for what it is, a depraved act of futility, mindless evil in it’s foulest form, so why do the libs at the AJC/Jihad seem so fond of it?:

The woman blew herself up in a group of pilgrims resting on the side of the road in Iskandariyah as women were cooking dinner, men were praying and children were playing nearby, a witness said. Last month, three other female suicide bombers struck Shiite pilgrims in nearly simultaneous bombings in Baghdad, killing at least 32 people and wounding more than 100.-AJC/Jihad

They dwell on these atrocities they way a normal person would look through a photo album.

This was last week, there were two of them at once!

Why not denounce it as the degeneracy that it is AJC/Jihad?

There are two kinds of people in the world, those that speak out against suicide bombers and those who encourage them.

Guess which side the AJC is on.

~~~~~

Only Japan is slightly higher overall, though if you are silly enough to base a corporation in California, Iowa, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or other states with high corporate levies, your tax rate on business income is even higher than in Tokyo. For the first time, the U.S. statutory rate is now 50% higher than the average of our international competitors, continuing a long-term trend as the rest of the world keeps reducing corporate tax rates

The libs keep whining about lost jobs and the declining middle class but then they turn right around tax the major employers like they are some blood sucking ghouls.

And you wonder why they leave the country?

Insane, isn’t it?

~~~~~

Second, it includes an Apollo-like project to get 85 percent of our cars and trucks off petroleum-based fuels in the next 20 years. Finally, the proposal contains a robust federal commitment to conservation. The New ERA proposal addresses the fundamentals of supply and demand by increasing production here at home and making a serious investment in conservation and alternative energy sources.-AJC/DNC

Wonderful, now we have a “bipartisan” commission on mindlessness, or is that a bipolar commission?

Considering that federal regulations add 8 years on to the two year oil drilling production process, what would be the most efficient means of relieving our “addiction” to foreign oil right now?

Twenty years of new unintended environmental disasters like ethanol, or removing governmental roadblocks from the drilling process?

If the Democrats really wanted to cut the profits of Big Oil, they would vote to…increase the supply of oil! Oil company profits are so high because the price of oil is so high. The price is so high because demand is so much higher than supply. Allowing oil companies to drill for more oil will increase supply, which will lower prices, which will lower oil company profits!

Who is really in the pocket of Big Oil here — the party whose policies would reduce oil company profits, or the party whose policies are keeping huge oil reserves confined underground, thus keeping oil companies rolling in record amounts of cash?

Duh.

~~~~~

By any historical standard, Mr. West argues, the average U.S. grunt is the model of humane professionalism and, when challenged in open combat, ruthless military efficiency. It enrages him that defeatist American critics seize on isolated incidents such as the Abu Ghraib prison fiasco and civilian deaths in Haditha to portray American soldiers as war criminals. “No nation,” he writes, “ever fought a more restrained and honorable war.”

Our soldiers should be lauded as the heroes that they truly are but the left instead harps on the one or two acts of the few, trying to turn our troops into monsters and liberal boogeymen.

Why do they hate them so much?

By The Olympics? So what...

August 15, 2008 10:15 AM | Link to this

The olympics are going on? Yawn, who knew, or cares. Thankfully, I do not watch that network so i have not been subjected to the whiny “we are the world” pinkos and girlie man propaganda.

As to “mr.” bookman’s allogation that ” Today’s U.S. citizens may look less like the Continental Congress and more like a general session of the United Nations, but they are no less American than…”, I think he is dead wrong.

Today’s citizens are gutless and spineless…they have no moral courage to stand up for what is right nor the willingness to defeat evil. What is evil: Look at the fools the public elected to the Clayton County School Board, look at that idiot mayor in Lithonia, look at the Federal bailout of the mortgage crisis, look at the selfish corporate “leaders” raking in tens of millions of dollars a year while playing golf out in Augusta, look at the State of California in general.

Bookman, this country is screwed up and has been for two generations. Our forefathers tolerated the hippies instead of beating them back into line, and we are getting our just deserves. Liberalism is a cancer, if it is not emphatically adressed, and soon, via chemo and radiation in large doses, it will kill this country.

My fear is that is has already killed this country and we simply do not know to fall over…

By bh

August 15, 2008 10:16 AM | Link to this

On diversity you are 100% correct. The implied reasoning for NBC coverage, however, is a bit off. Phelps is getting coverage and becoming the face of the Games because he is on the verge of doing something that has never been done before. At the same time, as a network interested in ratings, NBC has to put the events that garner the most interest on prime time. Some of the very worthy competitors you mention simply do not participate in those types of events. Finally, Tyson Gay only started his competition today in Track and Field. Its somewhat difficult to cover an event and medal winner when the competition has not yet been run. We all should be proud of all of our competitors regardless of race, ethncity, or sex and also regardless of whether they win or not. That said, when someone, like Phelps or Edwin Moses from a few years ago in Track and Field, are on the verge of a athletically historic feat, we need to recognize it and enjoy what we are seeing. It does not happen often.

By T

August 15, 2008 10:16 AM | Link to this

RW-

That would be a great day. When the are no more whatever - Americans, just Americans. Could we be so bold to no longer see race, but unite soley based on our citizenship? Can’t wait to see.

By Bosch

August 15, 2008 10:17 AM | Link to this

Good morning Paul,

I was thinking the same thing. If this is all we’ve got this morning, might be a good day to catch up on some sleep I’ve been deprived of lately.

Do you know the answers to the questions at 10:07? I know Nixon took us off the gold standard, but that’s the only one I knew the answer to. I guess I’m a Dumb American. :-)

By Bosch

August 15, 2008 10:19 AM | Link to this

Look Paul!

You ask and whammo! They appear! It’s like magic.

Good morning Mrs. G. Give Joe a scratch behind the ear for me.

Good morning Andy.

By Tom Terrific

August 15, 2008 10:21 AM | Link to this

I think Latin American immigration to the U.S. is kind of funny actually. What are most of these folks? That’s right, Native Americans. Indians from Central and South America. The ol’ country’s starting to look more like it did before the Europeans came. What goes around …

– Tom(atillos are) Terrific

By hillbilly ragger

August 15, 2008 10:22 AM | Link to this

Paul, I think the comments doohickie was broken, earlier—I tried posting and got 404’d.

You really think this is a dull topic? Here, let’s dig a bit—I’ve got a USA Today article on the Census report that, probably, inspired Jay to write this column.

A taste follows:

Racial and ethnic minorities in the USA will become a majority in 2042, but the working-age population — those 18 to 64 — will cross that threshold three years earlier, the projections say. By 2050, minorities will make up 55% of the working-age population. The share of the population that is working-age will drop steadily, from 63% to 57% in 2050.

“Not only are we going to have a relatively small workforce, but also one that’s more diverse,” says William Frey, demographer at the Brookings Institution in Washington. “We need to become very concerned about getting the proper education track for those in the pipeline.”

In 2050, the working-age population will be 30% Hispanic, 12% non-Hispanic black and 8% non-Hispanic Asian. Today, the breakdown is 15% Hispanic, 12% black and 5% Asian.

Mark Mather, who studies U.S. demographic trends at the Population Reference Bureau, a research group, says the greatest concentration of minorities now is in the group younger than 18.

By Bosch

August 15, 2008 10:31 AM | Link to this

hillbilly ragger,

Not to speak for Paul, not a boring topic, boring posts.

Intersting that a majority of the working age population will not be of the Caucausian persuasion. I guess that answers Mr. Rascist’s comments earlier about whose going to pay for the deadbeat minorities welfare checks, huh?

I don’t think I’ll ever be able to retire, so I’ll be right in there with the youngin’s even in my 90s - “okay, let’s go your whipper snappers, let’s get to work!” Followed by “Oh, my back.”

By Paul

August 15, 2008 10:34 AM | Link to this

Hi Bosch!

I always knew you were depraved!

Oh, you said “deprived.” Sorry…

I don’t take the 10:07s as at all serious. Unless I’m rereading a Ludlum novel. Without Googling, I seem to recall going off the gold had something to do with moving into the 20th century.

Did you see the women’s beach volleyball last night! Belgium - the team that had to convince the IOC they should have a place - nearly broke the American’s 100+ game winning streak. The tie at the end that went on and on was great. But America won. Yes!

Off to an appointment - later

By Mrs. Godzilla

August 15, 2008 10:35 AM | Link to this

Morning Bosch….

Joe’s grinnin’! He was playing catch the bumble bee yesterday and now has a big red welt on his nose. He’ll never learn.

I know folks who are really worked up about whites losing their majority status. Really Really worked up and I just don’t get it.

My daughter married a young man of northern Italian descent….olive skinned and cute as a bug. Someday, soon I hope, I’ll have beautiful olive skinned grandbabies.

I just don’t get the furor.

By hillbilly ragger

August 15, 2008 10:39 AM | Link to this

For the record, and based on my admittedly limited viewing, I disagree with Jay’s actual lede—if anything, up to now NBC’s been trying to convince me that beach volleyball is the Most Important Sport on Earth.

I mean, I get it—brutally tough sport for the participants, probably fun to watch live, a snooze after about ten minutes on the tube. Maybe it’s just me.

I think the “gorgeous mosaic” of America’s olympic team will be more apparent as the T&F events start airing today.

By buster brown

August 15, 2008 10:55 AM | Link to this

NEWS FLASH!!!

This just in John McCain takes the OLYMPIC gold in gymnastics….

Moves that have never been tried before elevated his point total!

A TRIPLE REVERSE, FOLLOWED BY A DOUBLE TWIST FLIP-FLOP, TOPPED OFF WITH A STRADDLE-BACK AND A HEAD-TUCK UP HIS you know what.”

The man was sure dynamite!

By Bosch

August 15, 2008 10:55 AM | Link to this

Mrs. G.

Benadryl works for my dog when he goes toe to toe with the bees. He’ll never learn either. He thinks they’re fun - no pain, no gain. It’s his way of being an Olympian, I guess. Maybe a nice BBQ porkchop will make Joe feel better.

I’m like you Mrs. G - I like diversity. My neighborhood and my kids’ schools are all very diverse. It’s the way I like it.

Paul,

I read the first sentence of your post (about me being depraved) and I instantly scrolled up to see if I had typed that, and then I scrolled back down and read the second sentence, and I thought, Oh, I need some sleep.

Anywho - YES!!! I did see that volleyball match (are you kidding? I have two teenage sons - anytime the beach volleyball is on, well, let’s just say it has become they’re number one most favorite sport to watch).

I’ve never seen those two even behind in a set.

hillbilly ragger,

My family are soccer people - that is the most important sport on Earth in the Bosch household, but during the summer Olympics, when the beach volleyball is on, the soccer pendulum switches a little, and I really can’t figure out the attraction for the sport - ha, just kidding.

By Poste Haste

August 15, 2008 10:57 AM | Link to this

Venus in Beijing: Ode to Nastia

Oh, she slipped the surly bonds of earth, (turned cartwheels ‘cross the floo-or), and flung her eager task through footless falls of air. She danced on a lark, and did a hundred things we’ve never dreamed of. She wheeled, soared and swung high on bars in silent gasps. Arched and alone, she dangled dreams amidst the tumbling mirth, and, with delerious pace, struck the chord of freedom’s easy grace.

By "The Corporal"

August 15, 2008 11:00 AM | Link to this

On another subject:

“Just suppose” the Mexican Army was ten times more powerful than ours and Los Angeles Police were “abusing” Mexican nationals. It’s not a justifiable excuse, but how long do you think it would take for San Diego, Orange and Los Angeles counties to become part of Mexico ?

By getalife "whiners"

August 15, 2008 11:01 AM | Link to this

White flour!

By AJC/DNC Management

August 15, 2008 11:11 AM | Link to this

President Bush’s popularity has tanked, but boy can he still bring in the cash.

Uh, kinda contradictory, ain’t it?

He’s raked in close to a billion dollars, the political fundraiser in chief, during his White House tenure. In all, Bush has personally raised more than $968 million for the Republican Party, GOP candidates and his own re-election campaign and inauguration during his two terms in office. And he’s not finished.

And just think, none of that came from the Chinese.

Bwa.

By martinchill

August 15, 2008 11:21 AM | Link to this

*Bush embraced McCain as the party’s next standard bearer in the Rose Garden in March, saying, “I can help raise him money, and if he wants my pretty face standing by his side at one of these rallies, I’d be glad to show up.”

Since then, the only time they have been seen together in public was after a fundraiser on May 27 in Phoenix. The two men shook hands on the airport tarmac and smiled and waved at reporters before Bush boarded Air Force One. The goodbye lasted less than a minute.

These days the White House is being careful not to step on McCain’s message or schedule back-to-back events in the same city. Bush advisers aren’t saying - and might not know - whether the two will appear again together between now and Election Day.

Still, McCain knows he needs the cash Bush can provide to keep pace with Obama, who is setting fundraising records. Bush can raise money directly for McCain only until the Republican National Convention, which starts Sept. 1 in Minneapolis. After that, McCain’s decision to accept $84 million in public funds in the fall will leave him reliant for additional cash on money raised and donated by the GOP. But Bush can help there, too.*

and now you know the rest of the story.

bush’s buddies will pay big bucks for an intimate circle jerk. it’s a crusade, after all.

By T

August 15, 2008 11:23 AM | Link to this

If you want to see what a beatiful form of legal immigration and what it can do for this nation read this

By martinchill

August 15, 2008 11:26 AM | Link to this

~~

“I can help raise him money”

……

By ron

August 15, 2008 11:42 AM | Link to this

Jay,Phelps isn’t the only Olympian just as Woods isn’t the only golfer.

I forget the name of the non-white majority country that is the equeal of the U.S, in matters of freedom,opportunity.and things like that there.What was it ,Jay?

In a country where the minorities are so down trodden,how do so many individuals slip through the cracks and become prominent citizens.Luck or hard work?Did Tiger Woods whine his way to greatness or did actually work hard at his sport?

In 2042,whites will not be a majority,nor will they be a minority.

How long will we have to wait to see this year’s crop of Olympians stripped of their medals because of doping?Years again,I suppose.After they are allowed to make their millions.

Dog fighting has turned out to be one of the worlds most expensive sports.Who would have thought it?

By retured

August 15, 2008 11:44 AM | Link to this

Sounds like Mr. Bookman is apologizing for being white.

By SaveOurRepublic

August 15, 2008 11:47 AM | Link to this

“Today’s U.S. citizens….are no less American than Thomas Jefferson or Martha Washington were”??!! Surely you jest!! Our population is becoming deluded with illegal invaders (upwards to 20030 million) and a endless flow of H-1B visa workers taking American jobs. This is certainly not what America should look/be like!

We can thank the Globalist Elite’s puppets on “Crapitol sHill” for this. Thanks to open borders, unmitigated visa issuance (especially H-1B workers…taking American jobs), allowance of the illegal invasion, the incessant drive for Marxist spawned “multiculturalism”/”political correctness”, the push for the North American Union, NAFTA & CAFTA, etc…our Constitutional Republic is becoming the socialist dystopia/”Brave New World” long hoped & strived for by the Globalist Elite & their innumerous shills (like “Bacrock Obummer” & “Juan McAmnasty” the Manchurian candidate)!

http://www.numbersusa.com

By Wheat Williams

August 15, 2008 11:54 AM | Link to this

I agree. I’m an Anglo-American and I don’t feel threatened by any of this.

What I really dislike is the current wave of hatred towards immigrants to America, particularly immigrants from Mexico, Central America and South America.

All through our history, we’ve had various waves immigration, and a backlash of hatred and xenophobia, and this is just the latest one. But, Americans, America works no matter who moves here and puts down roots.

The current generation of unwanted immigrant underclass will give rise to future generations of loyal and patriotic American citizens. This is as it has always been.

I love the ideal of America, and I welcome those from outside who want to participate in what makes this country great.

By Midori

August 15, 2008 11:56 AM | Link to this

Andy,

I like the way you grasp on something, ANYTHING, to further your political view(s).

You sure work hard. Real hard.

By "The Corporal"

August 15, 2008 11:59 AM | Link to this

To Wheat Williams:

I know your comments are sincere but name me other countries who have managed to long survive such immense diversity “as a democracy”?

I fear for all of our progeny (regardless of ethnicity) because a country without a solid ethnic majority will become extremely unstable and hopelessly “Balkanized” with all of the terrible consequences thereof.

Just look at today’s headlines regarding Russia/Georgia. A tyrannical government can sometimes hold the pieces together but a democracy is set up to self-destruct.

I pray otherwise. Time will tell.

By ron

August 15, 2008 12:02 PM | Link to this

Illegals coming in from south of the border are doing so because their countries are so screwed up they can’t live there.How is this group going to enhance the American way of life?It isn’t.It’s going to bring it’s way of life here and deteriorate America.

Legal immigration.Legal.Is that so hard to understand?

By Copyleft

August 15, 2008 12:37 PM | Link to this

Wow, Corporal… it’s seldom that a conservative is willing to so openly state their distrust (and dislike) of democracy the way you have.

I salute your courage, if not your intelligence.

By T

August 15, 2008 12:47 PM | Link to this

I thought we would have a solid ethnic majority. It just wouldn’t be white. HHMM.

By "The Corporal"

August 15, 2008 1:00 PM | Link to this

To Copyleft:

I know this may be hard for you to understand but our country started out as a “Constitutional Republic” but has unfortunately evolved these past 200+ years into a weird combination of a “voting masses pure democracy/judicial oligarchy”. Neither of those two forms of government bode well for our future. A “pure democracy” is set up to eventually self-destruct. Once the masses realize they have the power to “vote in” their monetary support from the government it has passed the point of no return. Our grandchildren and great-grandchildren will be the real ones to suffer.

P.S. I enjoy honest debate but let’s be civil.

By SaveOurRepublic

August 15, 2008 1:46 PM | Link to this

“The Corporal” @ 13:00 - Outstanding overview and points good sir! It’s refreshing to see other Americans with the facts on our Nation’s history. We have long need to return to the roots of Constitutional Republic roots, but we’re constantly undermined (at every turn) by the Globalist Elite/”shadow government”/kingmakers who’ve steadily taken the reigns over the past several decades. You are all too correct that our children/grandchildren will greatly suffer greatly from this continued push for a quasi-socialist dystopia (marching towards a One World government). The Founding Fathers would be turning in their graves to see the treachery allowed by the traitors on “Crapitol sHill”!

http://www.jbs.org

By "The Corporal"

August 15, 2008 1:58 PM | Link to this

To SaveOurRepublic:

Ooo Rah!

By Citizen of the World

August 15, 2008 2:43 PM | Link to this

If our minorities, who (often as products of their environment) are born out of wedlock in disproportionate numbers and statistically more likely to be poor and less likely to be educated, become the majority, what will this mean for America? What does it mean for any country where the majority of citizens are poor and uneducated — regardless of ethnic origin or skin color? ‘Cause, hey, our population in general — skin color aside — is slacking off. We’re just sitting around watching TV, reading celebrity trash instead of thoughtful books, listening to pundits and talk radio hosts call names and yell at each other in what’s supposed to pass as political discourse, eating fast food and getting fat, cussing at our spouse and kids, and blaming schools because our kids (products of their environment) aren’t excelling in school and instilled with lifelong love of learning. If this is you, and you want America, regardless of its racial makeup, to survive with our freedoms and ideals intact, maybe you should clean up your act. A country is only as strong as its people, and we get the government we deserve.

By Wheat Williams

August 15, 2008 3:17 PM | Link to this

“The Corporal” wrote: “name me other countries who have managed to long survive such immense diversity ‘as a democracy’”.

I don’t think there are any others. The United States of America is unique. Wonderfully unique. We’ve been the best example of democracy in the world since our founding in the late 1700s. There have always been injustices and problems with our country, but I still wouldn’t want to live anywhere else, and I’ve seen much of the rest of the world.

My high school American history teacher (circa 1981) told us, “Throughout history, America consists of whoever happens to be living here at the time.”

It has worked, and it will continue to work. But the America of a generation or two in the future will no doubt be quite different from the one of today.

My parents, who are deceased, grew up in the Great Depression and World War II eras, and life in America was certainly much different then than it is now. I’m sure there’s a lot about life in America today that they would not appreciate.

Change is inevitable, and it’s uncomfortable, but the United States of America has weathered all these changes. I’m cautiously optimistic.

By "The Corporal"

August 15, 2008 3:43 PM | Link to this

To Wheat Williams:

I hope you are right but nothing lasts forever. We have world history to prove that.

By funnyBone

August 15, 2008 3:52 PM | Link to this

In most countries the minority race runs things….so I’m guessing the white male will remain in charge of gov’t…YES..

By funnyBone

August 15, 2008 3:53 PM | Link to this

In most countries the minority race runs things….so I’m guessing the white male will remain in charge of the gov’t…YES..

By dbm

August 15, 2008 10:20 PM | Link to this

Racist answer to Ray at August 14, 2008 5:56 PM: Thank God for Asians!

Rational answer: Every ethnic or racial group has a lot of people that want to work for their living and some that don’t. If we go under, it won’t be diversity that does us in. It will be statism, which messes up the economy, pits people against each other, and encourages parasites.

By Wheat Williams

August 16, 2008 12:41 AM | Link to this

Ron wrote: “Illegals coming in from south of the border are doing so because their countries are so screwed up they can’t live there.”

I agree! So maybe the proactive thing would be for the United States to provide critical foreign aid to the peoples of Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador, so the people would not be so desperate to try to cross over into our country. We could build infrastructure for clean water, sanitation, health care, irrigation, seed for crops, and fertilizer.

“An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.”

I bet we could afford to do this if we weren’t pouring all our economic might into that other country—what’s it called—Iraq?

I’m not saying this would be easy, but it might be more effective than building border walls and running ICE deportations.

By Wheat Williams

August 16, 2008 12:47 AM | Link to this

I would encourage everybody on this thread to rent the 90-minute documentary Wetback presented by National Geographic. You can get it at Blockbuster or other rental outlets or through NetFlix.

You will see a side of this issue that you have not seen presented before.

By ERVIN

August 18, 2008 3:38 PM | Link to this

too all you rightwingers the only way MCcain can win a debate with obama is like last nite when he knows all questions before hand this guy does have a clue!!!!dont forget this is the same guy who voted to not give those soliders a new G i bill but he loves them???

Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F

Post a comment



Remember me?

You may use the following formatting:
Bold: **this text will be bolded** = this text will be bolded
Italic: *this text will be italic* = this text will be italic
Link: [text to be linked](http://www.ajc.com) = text to be linked



There will be a delay of up to 5 minutes before your comment appears.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 

Kudzu Services » Find the right people for the job