Home > Jay Bookman > Archives > 2008 > July > 21
Monday, July 21, 2008
Bush administration thinks ‘horizontal’
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
“It is precisely because we are succeeding in Iraq that we are able to have these conversations today to set aspirational goals for time horizons when we can transition our mission to overwatch, counter-terrorism and training, which is the goal that we share.”
— White House Press Secretary Dana Perino
At first, I wondered why the Bush administration was pushing this “time horizon” concept so hard. It’s not a timetable, it’s always a “time horizon.” But if you think about it, “time horizon” is so much more than a euphemism. It is the perfect, absolutely accurate, even downright poetic way to describe the Bush approach to getting out of Iraq.
Because here’s the thing about the horizon: You can never ever get there.
You can travel all day long, at any speed you want, trying to reach the horizon, and at the end of the day you will be no closer to reaching it than you were when you started out.
The horizon is out there, seemingly just out of reach, yet never to be attained.
McCain thinks Americans are stupid
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
John McCain has a new campaign commercial up, blaming Barack Obama for the runup in gasoline prices. Here’s the script:
Announcer: “Gas prices - $4, $5, no end in sight, because some in Washington are still saying no to drilling in America. No to independence from foreign oil. Who can you thank for rising prices at the pump?”
Offscreen chant: “Obama, Obama.”
Announcer: “One man knows we must now drill more in America and rescue our family budgets. Don’t hope for more energy, vote for it. McCain.”
As a policy prescription, that’s about the lamest commercial I’ve seen in a long time. It strongly implies that oil pumped from U.S. territory would be sold to Americans at a lower price than oil from elsewhere, and that is absolutely false and McCain’s people know it even if McCain does not.
This is “Straight Talk?”
No, this is cynical, manipulative nonsense.
Permalink | Comments (233) | Post your comment |
State would be broke if Richardson had his way
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
The effects of a struggling economy are beginning to hit state government, with Gov. Sonny Perdue announcing that he will be forced to dip into reserves to offset a $600 million shortfall.
Dire as that sounds, though, things could be worse. Last spring, House Speaker Glenn Richardson tried to raid Georgia’s rainy day fund to finance election-year tax cuts. Had he succeeded, the state’s reserves would have been cut in half, and today we’d be a lot closer to a budgetary crisis.
Richardson pushed that plan even though an economic slowdown already loomed on the horizon. He was more intent on getting his proposal passed — and in claiming credit for the feat — than in the impact his proposal might actually have on the people of Georgia. And when he lost, his petulant and angry reaction — striking out at Perdue and Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle — proved an embarrassment to his party if not to himself.
He is, after all, not a man easily embarrassed.
His party, though, may finally have had enough. A small group of GOP legislators has come out to oppose Richardson’s re-election as speaker, rallying behind state Rep. David Ralston of Blue Ridge as a candidate to replace him.
Ralston, an attorney and chair of the House Non-Civil Judiciary Committee, is a respected legislator, and he has taken a courageous and necessary step in agreeing to lead the rebellion against Richardson.
However, Ralston has had some embarrassing personal tax problems, and the small coalition of GOP legislators rallying around him seems motivated more by anger and disgust with Richardson than by fervent support for Ralston as speaker.
Given the way these things work, it’s possible that neither Ralston nor Richardson will be the speaker when the House reconvenes in January. Ralston is taking the early risk, but should the intraparty rebellion against Richardson gather support over the summer, a more prominent member of the House Republican leadership — say, Mark Burkhalter of Alpharetta — could step into the fray, bringing enough votes to put the effort over the top and crown himself speaker.
If that happens, Richardson would have no one to blame but himself. Some speakers see themselves as defenders of the House, wielding immense power behind the scenes but seldom using the post to push major initiatives or give themselves a high profile. That’s the type who tend to last a long time in the job, as the late Tom Murphy did.
Murphy certainly had an ego, and he liked to wield power, but he always treated the House as more important than he was, and his members appreciated it.
Richardson, by contrast, is closer to the Newt Gingrich model. He has treated the House and the Republican caucus as tools to satisfy his own ego and ambitions. He doesn’t see himself serving the needs of the House; he believes the House should serve the needs of Glenn Richardson.
That attitude was on full display last session in the tax-reform fight. Richardson proposed to abolish local property taxes and replace them with revenue from a new state sales tax, a move that would have stripped local officials of control over their own budgets.
By pushing the idea so hard, Richardson forced House members to take a stance against their mayors, county commissioners and school boards back home.
And why? For no apparent reason other than Richardson’s own glory. The idea itself was terrible policy.
At the end of the session, after it had become clear that he had lost, Richardson made a promise that he wouldn’t be giving up.
“I’m going to start again with it next year, the very first thing out of the gate,” he said.
The 2009 General Assembly convenes in less than five months. If I had to bet, I’d bet Richardson will once again be wielding the gavel in the House. But it’s far from guaranteed.
.JPG)
-1.JPG)
Services »
